Welcome!

edit

Hi Calonmenisback! I would like to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 12:12, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Socialist Republic of Calonmen (December 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hitro talk 07:25, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Calonmenisback! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 07:25, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Socialist Republic of Calonmen

edit
 

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Socialist Republic of Calonmen, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hitro talk 07:26, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

San Miguel, Lobo Batangas moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to San Miguel, Lobo Batangas. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:16, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: San Miguel, Lobo Batangas (February 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Umakant Bhalerao was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 05:38, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: San Miguel, Lobo Batangas (February 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 14:24, 25 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

San Miguel, Lobo, Batangas moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to San Miguel, Lobo, Batangas. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:25, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

San Miguel, Munisipalidad ng Lobo moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to San Miguel, Munisipalidad ng Lobo. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it is a poor translation. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk ! 18:14, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: San Miguel, Munisipalidad ng Lobo (March 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 09:31, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: San Miguel, Munisipalidad ng Lobo (March 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Synoman Barris was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Megan B.... It’s all coming to me till the end of time 10:06, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: San Miguel, Munisipalidad ng Lobo (March 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 12:20, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

San Miguel, Municipality of Lobo moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, San Miguel, Municipality of Lobo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 03:15, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Mount Lobo

edit

Hi my friend. I hope you are fine. I have removed a lot of unreferenced information. The new page review is one of the last approval stages, so when I see a page like this with a large amount of unreferenced information, and no {{In use}} tag to show that the page is undergoing a major build, I tend to err on the side of caution and remove the unreferenced information. The easiest solution is for you to add the tag to indicate the page is still under construction (if it is). This prevents me and other editors from editing the page until the process is complete and the tag is removed. Please assume good faith of me, as I do of you. By all means add all the information again when you can add the references. Best wishes, BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 09:29, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Hello Calonmenisback! Your additions to Lobo, Batangas have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:30, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Mount Lobo moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Mount Lobo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jmertel23 (talk) 00:15, 28 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Saint Michael the Archangel Parish Church moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Saint Michael the Archangel Parish Church. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:21, 1 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Lobo River

edit

Hi Calonmenisback, please don't reintroduce uncited information back to the article. As several warnings in your talk page already stated, you need to back the information with reliable and independent sources. Lenticel (talk) 11:16, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Warning for Removal of Cited content

edit

  Hello, I'm Lenticel. I noticed that you recently removed content from Lobo River without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lenticel (talk) 02:02, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

2nd warning Warning for Removal of Cited content

edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lobo River, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Lenticel (talk) 10:32, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

WP:ANI thread

edit

Hi, I made an ANI thread about your behavior.


  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Lenticel (talk) 11:10, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Lenticel Hello Lenticel. Thank you for telling me about an issue that I have may been involved.
Can you tell me what issue is it so I can fix it? Calonmenisback (talk) 11:12, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Go to the linked ANI thread. All your behaviors are there. --Lenticel (talk) 11:17, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Lenticel Thank you for telling me. I will now try my best to make articles good and not AI generated. Again, thank you. Calonmenisback (talk) 11:24, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Please stop removing cited information in the Lobo River article. You already have several warnings.--Lenticel (talk) 11:45, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Lenticel Hello Lenticel but I now don't make edits in the Lobo River article. Thank you. Calonmenisback (talk) 12:27, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Lenticel Hello Lenticel. I have visited the ANI articles and there might be a conclusion that I had been removed. Thank you for removing me. I will try my best now! Calonmenisback (talk) 12:39, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

(reset index) I didn't remove the thread, it was archived. Anyways, if you want to have a more productive experience here in Wikipedia, you can ask guideance in WP:PINOY. --Lenticel (talk) 12:42, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Lenticel Oh, okay but still thank you I will see and try to follow your instructions, again thank you. Calonmenisback (talk) 12:46, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hello Lenticel, I know it’s been a long time but the article that I made, San Miguel, Lobo’s ID has the wrong location when I experimented the image map section in Infobox settlement. Can you make it accurate? If you can’t, it’s ok. Thank you. Calonmenisback (talk) 03:17, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: San Miguel, Municipality of Lobo has been accepted

edit
 
San Miguel, Municipality of Lobo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 01:34, 5 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:San Miguel, Lobo Batangas

edit
 

Hello, Calonmenisback. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "San Miguel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 14:24, 25 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:San Miguel, Lobo, Batangas

edit
 

Hello, Calonmenisback. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "San Miguel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 04:50, 26 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:San Miguel, Munisipalidad ng Lobo

edit
 

Hello, Calonmenisback. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "San Miguel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 06:31, 6 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Mount Lobo

edit

  Hello, Calonmenisback. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mount Lobo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Calonmenisback. Thank you for your work on San Miguel, Lobo. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 03:07, 9 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Saint Michael the Archangel Parish Church

edit

  Hello, Calonmenisback. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Saint Michael the Archangel Parish Church, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 27 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Batangas II

edit

  Hello, Calonmenisback. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Batangas II, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:08, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Batangas II

edit
 

Hello, Calonmenisback. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Batangas II".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:23, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Malabrigo, Lobo, Batangas

edit

  Hello, Calonmenisback. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Malabrigo, Lobo, Batangas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:04, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Saint Michael the Archangel Parish Church

edit
 

Hello, Calonmenisback. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Saint Michael the Archangel Parish Church".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 08:13, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lobo, Batangas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Church. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:01, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply