This is an archive of past discussions with User:Cameron11598. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello Cameron11598, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!
Backlog update:
The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!
Outreach and Invitations:
If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: {{subst:NPR invite}}. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.
New Year New Page Review Drive
A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.
General project update:
ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.
Hello, Cameron11598. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Cameron11598. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello Cameron11598, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!
Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!
We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!
The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.
Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:
The total number of reviews completed for the month.
The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.
NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.
Latest comment: 6 years ago8 comments6 people in discussion
Sorry that it didn't turn out well (and for my mistake in the nom, which I should have caught). I think you would have made a fine sysop, and was proud to nominate you. If you decide to run for RfA again in the future, I am sure that there are many people who would support you. That Kudpung supported is a very good sign for the future, and I also encourage you to look at the advice Ad Orientem gave you. Both of them are editors I trust implicitly, and would be good people to reach out to for advice if you decide to run again in the future. Thank you for all that you do for the project. :) TonyBallioni (talk) 04:30, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Just to add onto what TonyBallioni has already said, even though I opposed I think you're on your way to becoming an admin. Heed the advice from many people that said to become a bit more rounded in a few admin areas over the next 6-12 months and rerun. I ran into similar issues in my first RfA, too, so don't let it get you down! Cheers, Anarchyte (work | talk)04:37, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
As per Anarchyte, who I am sure will vividly recall my votes on both his RfAs. Take consolation in the fact that actually several others of our very best admins also took two shots to get the mop. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:34, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
I came here for the same reason (and realised that I nominated Kudpung and co-nominated Anarchyte, so I guess I'm obliged to agree with them!). Please don't be disheartened. I think you're well on your way and could make an excellent admin given a little more time and experience. There's no shame in not making it on your first attempt. Feel free to drop me a note (publicly or privately) if you need anything or you want to talk about anything. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts?23:00, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Tony, mistakes happen this one was relatively minor and to be honest only one person took issue with it so don't sweat it. I'd like to thank you for your support and putting up with my case of nerves. As for Ad Orientem's advice I'll be sure to heed it. I'd like to thank both you and There'sNoTime for the nomination and support.
Anarchyte, Thanks for the kind words and I'll be sure to keep that advice in mind over the next year or so. \
Kudpung, Two shots isn't bad hopefully next time I'll have a resume that will be more impressive to the community, however in the mean time I think I'm going to try to channel my efforts into the WikiCup. I haven't had the time to do much content creation the last few months and kind of miss it, with what looks to be a relatively light semester (fingers crossed) at university I'm hoping to be able to crank out some solid GA's and a few Good Topics.
HJ Mitchell I do have to say your oppose appeared to be the nicest of the bunch, as for reaching out to you, I definitely will particularly when I finally decide to try to bring something up to FA status. I'll be honest the whole FA process seems a bit overwhelming to say the least.
Davey, while it may be a bit disheartening, I knew what I was getting into and won't let the RFA experience chase me away. I intend to use the feedback provided to be a more constructive member of the community. In the mean time like I said I think I'm going to go on a content creation grind, and try to do better in the WikiCup this year.
By all means. Hit me up for advice on featured articles or RfA or anything else. And yes the FA process is daunting (to some extent, it's supposed to be) but I find navigating it to be about the most rewarding thing you can do on Wikipedia. All the best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts?22:27, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Oxford Reference access
Latest comment: 6 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion
Hi Cameron, I hope you're having a great vacation! When you're back, could you please check, if my account or password to Oxford Reference has expired? I can no longer log on. Thanks! — Kpalion(talk)09:41, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Hey Kpalion I'll check the spreadsheet on my laptop tonight and see when your access was set to expire. Just a heads up I might end up asking you to fill out a new request for access on the Library Card platform. --(Cameron11598's Alt Acct)(Converse)00:19, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Some cookies to welcome you!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Cameron11598! Thank you for your contributions. I am Drewmutt and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
I recently applied for newspapers.com access, however, just noticed the profiler information page has an incorrect email address listed for me. I'm not really sure what the email address is as I don't have access to it (when I activated email on my Wikipedia account I must have had it saved in my clipboard for something else and pasted it in). Anyway, I've updated my email address through WP but I can't seem to do so through the platform page. Should I start a new application? Thanks and sorry for the hassle. Chetsford (talk) 22:28, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
I don't believe so - would I have received a notification if it was? (If so, it might have been sent to the erroneous address?) Chetsford (talk) 22:57, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Your account was Approved and sent yesterday. It was to the e-mail address you have associated with your Wikipedia account (or had associated at the time of application) can you send me an e-mail using Special:EmailUser/Cameron11598 with a good contact email listed in the body so I can have your account created properly. Thanks! --Cameron11598(Talk)16:16, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello Cameron11598, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!The NPP backlog at the end of the drive with the number of unreviewed articles by creation date. Red is older than 90 days, orange is between 90 and 30 days old, and green is younger than 30 days.
Backlog update:
The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!
New Year Backlog Drive results:
We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!
General project update:
ACTRIAL will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Newspapers.com application
Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Hi Cameron, on February 17th I applied again for access to Newspapers.com. I'm just wondering about the status of this application, since it doesn't appear in the Latest Activity timeline on the Wikipedia Library Card Platform. Did I miss a step? Thanks, HazelAB (talk) 13:47, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi there - thanks for your message, and sorry about my delay. I have now verified my Newspapers.com account. Best wishes, Tacyarg (talk) 19:53, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Answer for Cameron11598
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hello - I applied for the newspaper.com, but haven't understood the question you sent. I thought it was an announcement asking me to acknowledge by deleting part of the code - so sorry. Please clarify. Hannah Silverman (talk) 20:02, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
@Hannah Silverman:, I need you to verify that you have created a non-subscriber account (the link I sent you via email) and that you used the email address I sent that email to, on your Newspapers.com account. Please respond to the email I sent thanks! --Cameron11598(Talk)20:10, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
OUP
Latest comment: 6 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
I tried to sign into my Oxford Reference account today and am receiving the message "This account has no valid subscription for this site." It worked yesterday, but not today. Is there something I need to do to extend my access, as it is a critical resource for me? SusunW (talk) 16:04, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Sent it. 2 screen shots. One where I tried to access OUP directly and another where I linked through an article I wrote 2 days ago. Either way, it says my access doesn't exist??? SusunW (talk) 17:04, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Yay! Thank you so much! I am back on line with OUP. I cannot express enough how important this reference is for my creation of articles and how much I appreciate your help in renewing my access. SusunW (talk) 14:10, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Note
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hey Cameron. I just attempted to apply for OUP access. I'm not super tech savvy and there's probably a good chance I somehow did it wrongly. Also, as I noted in my application, my email is currently wonky and no one has so far figured out how to fix it. So feel free to drop me a line on wiki if I've screwed something up and I'll try to fix it. Much appreciated. GMGtalk14:13, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
WikiCup 2018 March newsletter
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. With 53 contestants qualifying, the groups for round 2 are slightly smaller than usual, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining users.
Our top scorers in round 1 were:
Aoba47 led the field with a featured article, 8 good articles and 42 GARs, giving a total of 666 points.
FrB.TG , a WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points, gained from a featured article and masses of bonus points.
Ssven2, another WikiCup newcomer, was in third place with 403 points, garnered from a featured article, a featured list, a good article and twelve GARs.
Ceranthor, Numerounovedant, Carbrera, Farang Rak Tham and Cartoon network freak all had over 200 points, but like all the other contestants, now have to start again from scratch. A good achievement was the 193 GARs performed by WikiCup contestants, comparing very favourably with the 54 GAs they achieved.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Dear Cameron,
I hope you feel better. I am Library coordinator in Persian Wiki. my OUP access will be finished on March 24, 2018. Could you please let me know how to get it renewed. Kind Regards Déjà vu(Talk)21:26, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Latest comment: 6 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
I appears my OUP and JSTOR have expired, how do I renew? I tried through the library card and it says renewals are not available. Ealdgyth - Talk13:47, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
@Ealdgyth: Renewals on the platform definitely aren't as clear as they should be - we're working on some improvements to that at the moment. For JSTOR, all accounts should be automatically renewing, but if it seems as though your account has expired I'll drop them an email to check this. For OUP, I just need to clarify how we were renewing accounts and I'll get back to you! Samwalton9 (WMF) (talk) 14:47, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
If you could push it through kinda quick, I'd appreciate it. lol....just kidding. :D Hope you're havin' a good week. (talk page stalker)CrashUnderride00:54, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
ACTRIAL's six month experiment restricting new page creation to (auto)confirmed users ended on 14 March. As expected, a greatly increased number of unsuitable articles and candidates for deletion are showing up in the feed again, and the backlog has since increased already by ~30%. Please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day.
Paid editing
Now that ACTRIAL is inoperative pending discussion, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary.
Subject-specific notability guidelines
The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
While patrolling articles, if you find an editor that is particularly competent at creating quality new articles, and that user has created more than 25 articles (rather than stubs), consider nominating them for the 'Autopatrolled' user right HERE.
News
The next issue Wikipedia's newspaper The Signpost has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it, including ACTRIAL wrap-up that will be of special interest to New Page Reviewers. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. The Signpost is one of the best ways to stay up date with news and new developments - please consider subscribing to it. All editors of Wikipedia and associated projects are welcome to submit articles on any topic for consideration by the The Signpost's editorial team for the next issue.
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Cameron11598. Please check your email; you've got mail! Message added 17:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
How can I renew my access to Oxford Scholarship and Oxford Law? Just received an email that it would be expiring in a few days... Seraphim System(talk)01:49, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
Latest comment: 6 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion
My newspapers.com subscription expired several months ago (I never received any notification). I tried to renew it about a week ago and although I saw one message that said "new subscriptions not available", my renewal request seemed to have been accepted (I saw it in "recent activity"). But I can't find it there anymore and want to know if I did it correctly and/or I can renew? Thanks. MB15:54, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
@MB: That message was just there temporarily while we clarified how many accounts were left. Your renewal request is at [1] and hopefully Cameron will take a look at it soon :) Samwalton9 (WMF) (talk) 14:37, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The second round of the 2018 WikiCup has now finished. Most contestants who advanced to the next round scored upwards of 100 points, but two with just 10 points managed to scrape through into round 3. Our top scorers in the last round were:
Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with three featured articles
Iazyges, with nine good articles and lots of bonus points
Yashthepunisher, a first time contestant, with two featured lists
SounderBruce, a finalist last year, with seventeen good topic articles
Usernameunique, a first time contestant, with fourteen DYKs
Muboshgu, a seasoned competitor, with three ITNs and
Courcelles, another first time contestant, with twenty-seven GARs
So far contestants have achieved twelve featured articles between them and a splendid 124 good articles. Commendably, 326 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2018 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met; most of the GARs are fine, but a few have been a bit skimpy.
Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Hey Cameron, you approved my request on April 16th and I received an email saying that I should hear back soon. I still haven't gotten access . Is there anything else I could do? Could you look into it? I appreciate your help! Thsmi002 (talk) 21:55, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
[2] says "Newspapers.com requires that you sign up for an account before applying for access." Does this mean I need to sign up for a free trial on their site? If so, do I need to use the same email address as the one tied to my Wikipedia Library Card? Thanks. —howcheng {chat}16:45, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Can news press be deemed as proper references for a Wikipedia page? Because I have provided news press as references, and WP:GNG states that proper secondary references are those which has been reviewed by editors, and I suppose that news press has been reviewed by editors before they are being published. Jamesreadings (talk) 15:01, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
WP:ACREQ has been implemented. The flow at the feed has dropped back to the levels during the trial. However, the backlog is on the rise again so please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day; a backlog approaching 5,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.
Deletion tags
Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders. They require your further verification.
Backlog drive:
A backlog drive will take place from 10 through 20 June. Check out our talk page at WT:NPR for more details. NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.
Editathons
There will be a large increase in the number of editathons in June. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.
Paid editing - new policy
Now that ACTRIAL is ACREQ, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. There is a new global WMF policy that requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.
Subject-specific notability guidelines
The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
Not English
A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, tag as required, then move to draft if they do have potential.
News
Development is underway by the WMF on upgrades to the New Pages Feed, in particular ORES features that will help to identify COPYVIOs, and more granular options for selecting articles to review.
The next issue of The Signpost has been published. The newspaper is one of the best ways to stay up to date with news and new developments. between our newsletters.
Hi. I was hoping to get more clarification on why the page I submitted (Matthew Proman) was rejected. I obviously read what the rejection reasons were, but I'm still confused. First, I haven't been paid. Since the entry contains citations for just about every sentence, I don't understand how I'm not being neutral. I don't really understand how it deserves the "not a resume" comment either. This is an entry for a well-known (in his field) entrepreneur, who has started several successful companies -- one of which has its own Wikipedia entry, which I think meets the qualification of "notable.". As he no longer is associated with said company, (which is made evident in the entry) this entry clearly wasn't made for "advertisement purposes" either. Simply for informational purposes. I'd really appreciate some more in-depth feedback if you have the time. Thank You
@Navysalorgirl: thanks for reaching out to me. The article appear to come from a promotional tone. Articles about business men should be more than, they held this position they gave money to this person etc... take a look at O. D. Kobo for an article that stays relatively close to a NPOV and NOTRESUME tone. Additionally some of the sources you provide are from a PR website. That pretty much would fail our Reliable Source Policy. Let me know if you have further questions. I'm currently traveling and may have limited internet but will do my best to follow up with you. --Cameron11598(Talk)03:42, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello Cameron11598, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.
Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive!
As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar: . Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: , , , .
Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.
Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
The arbitration clerks are pleased to welcome Cameron11598 (talk·contribs) to the clerk team as a trainee!
The arbitration clerk team is often in need of new members, and any editor who would like to join the clerk team is welcome to apply by email to clerks-llists.wikimedia.org.
Hi Cameron11598. We have added you to the list of clerks and subscribed you to the mailing list (info: WP:AC/C#clerks-l). Welcome, and I look forward to working with you! To adjust your subscription options for the mailing list, see the link at mail:clerks-l. The mailing list works in the usual way, and the address to which new mailing list threads can be sent is clerks-llists.wikimedia.org. Useful reading for new clerks is the procedures page, WP:AC/C/P, but you will learn all the basic components of clerking on-the-job.
New clerks begin as a trainee, are listed as such at WP:AC/C#Personnel, and will remain so until they have learned all the aspects of the job. When you've finished training, which usually takes a couple of/a few months, then we'll propose to the Committee that you be made a full clerk. As a clerk, you'll need to check your e-mail regularly, as the mailing list is where the clerks co-ordinate (on-wiki co-ordination page also exists but is not used nearly as much). If you've any questions at any point of your traineeship, simply post to the mailing list.
Lastly, it might be useful if you enter your timezone into WP:AC/C#Personnel (in the same format as the other members have), so that we can estimate when we will have clerks available each day; this is, of course, at your discretion. Again, welcome! Regards, Kevin (aka L235·t·c) 01:23, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
As long as I am not dropped from the program before you get back, I am content to wait. I remember you asking me for the email address I used to sign up, but I don't remember how I gave that to you.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:40, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
I figured it out. There is a search function with the email address used to send your response to me. Unfortunately, I have three choices for folders with that address. I chose to use the address for one other purpose and I get lots of emails related to that other purpose. They pile up and I don't want to put them in the folder until I read them, and I don't go to this email address every day. I clicked on "New folder" when I found my email to you containing the email address. That did me a lot of good, as it has numerous emails in it already and it won't let me change the name of it. But I should remember next time I get time to go to newspapers.com.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:03, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Question
Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Hi, Cameron - will there be a permanent link or diff to the case you just hatted: American politics 2#Amendment request: American Politics 2 (June 2018)?? If so, will you provide it to me? Thx in advance Atsme📞📧20:28, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The third round of the 2018 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round had at least 227 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:
Courcelles, a first time contestant, with 1756 points, a tally built largely on 27 GAs related to the Olympics
Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with two featured articles and three GAs on natural history and astronomy topics
SounderBruce, a finalist last year, with a variety of submissions related to transport in the state of Washington
Contestants managed 7 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 120 good articles, 1 good topic, 124 DYK entries, 15 ITN entries, and 132 good article reviews. Over the course of the competition, contestants have completed 458 GA reviews, in comparison to 244 good articles submitted for review and promoted. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process; several submissions, particularly in abstruse or technical areas, have needed additional work to make them completely verifiable.
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Editor of the Week
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your thoughtful and careful edits. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)
It's hard to categorize Cameron11598 – he kind of does it all. Ranging from patiently helping new users on Wikipedia's live IRC support chat, to vandalism reversion work, to answering OTRS tickets, to managing accounts for The Wikipedia Library, to good old-fashioned article writing about the Olympics, Cameron11598's contributions to Wikipedia have been vast and varied. The thoughtfulness and care he puts into his edits should inspire us all, and it is my great pleasure to nominate him to be Editor of the Week.
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
All-purpose editor. A ten year veteran that does it all. Aside from his quality editing, he helps new users on Wikipedia's live IRC support chat, assists @ vandalism reversion work, answers OTRS tickets, manages accounts for The Wikipedia Library, and writes articles about the Olympics. Vast and varied, thoughtful and caring.
BLP issues on British politics - Off-wiki evidence
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Thanks for your courtesy in letting me know about this Cameron. Please accept my apologies for any protocol violations; they are not intentional. A Wikipedia editor posted the link earlier too as I recall, on the request page for the case, so it might need redacting from there as well.
I posted the link for the convenience of workshop participants, two of whom had expressed scepticism about the claims I made based on evidence within it. I could post the document contents, because its contents are not untoward, but I feel that this would be unconstructive on account of its length.
Can I take it from the fact that you were directed by an arbitrator to redact the link that the document itself is securely in the hands of the Arbitration Committee? I understand that it was sent by email (not by me) but it might have been a victim of the committee's recent email outage. 121.72.182.187 (talk) 10:09, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.
Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months. (Purge)
Hello Cameron11598, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
June backlog drive
Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers. Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.
New technology, new rules
New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.
Editathons
Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.
The Signpost
The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.
On a side note, I'll go through the ticket and reevaluate any action I took regaurding this ticket (intentionally keeping it vauge as to avoid violating OTRS confidentiality) and ask for a second opinion from another agent (which I did at the time this ticket firts started and then my actions seemed okay from the other observer). But I'll leave it at, at the time the ticket seemed compelling. --Cameron11598(Talk)13:04, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
I need your help
Latest comment: 6 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion
I'm trying to appeal a t-ban for a case that originated at ARCA but was intercepted before the case closed. Please contact me via email. Atsme📞📧22:51, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi, you've activated my access to newspapers.com, I'm not sure do I need to subscribe for their free 7-day trial to actually be able to use the site? Thanks. Crook1 (talk) 14:47, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The fourth round of the 2018 WikiCup has now come to an end. The eight users who made it to the final round had to score a minimum of 422 points to qualify, with the top score in the round being 4869 points. The leaders in round 4 were:
Courcelles scored a magnificent 4869 points, with 92 good articles on Olympics-related themes. Courcelles' bonus points alone exceeded the total score of any of the other contestants!
Kees08 was second with 1155 points, including a high-scoring featured article for Neil Armstrong, two good topics and some Olympics-related good articles.
Cas Liber, with 1066 points, was in third place this round, with two featured articles and a good article, all on natural history topics.
During round four, 6 featured articles and 164 good articles were promoted by WikiCup contestants, 13 articles were included in good topics and 143 good article reviews were performed. There were also 10 "in the news" contributions on the main page and 53 "did you knows". Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best editor win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:31, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.13 18 September 2018
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello Cameron11598, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.
Project news
The New Page Feed now has a new "Articles for Creation" option which will show drafts instead of articles in the feed, this shouldn't impact NPP activities and is part of the WMF's AfC Improvement Project.
As part of this project, the feed will have some larger updates to functionality next month. Specifically, ORES predictions will be built in, which will automatically flag articles for potential issues such as vandalism or spam. Copyright violation detection will also be added to the new page feed. See the projects's talk page for more info.
Some unsuitable new articles can be best reviewed by moving them to the draft space, but reviewers need to do this carefully and sparingly. It is most useful for topics that look like they might have promise, but where the article as written would be unlikely to survive AfD. If the article can be easily fixed, or if the only issue is a lack of sourcing that is easily accessible, tagging or adding sources yourself is preferable. If sources do not appear to be available and the topic does not appear to be notable, tagging for deletion is preferable (PROD/AfD/CSD as appropriate). See additional guidance at WP:DRAFTIFY.
If the user moves the draft back to mainspace, or recreates it in mainspace, please do not re-draftify the article (although swapping it to maintain the page history may be advisable in the case of copy-paste moves). AfC is optional except for editors with a clear conflict of interest.
Articles that have been created in contravention of our paid-editing-requirements or written from a blatant NPOV perspective, or by authors with a clear COI might also be draftified at discretion.
The best tool for draftification is User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js(info). Kindly adapt the text in the dialogue-pop-up as necessary (the default can also be changed like this). Note that if you do not have the Page Mover userright, the redirect from main will be automatically tagged as CSD R2, but in some cases it might be better to make this a redirect to a different page instead.
The Page Mover userright can be useful for New Page Reviewers; occasionally page swapping is needed during NPR activities, and it helps avoid excessive R2 nominations which must be processed by admins. Note that the Page Mover userright has higher requirements than the NPR userright, and is generally given to users active at Requested Moves. Only reviewers who are very experienced and are also very active reviewers are likely to be granted it solely for NPP activities.
List of other useful scripts for New Page Reviewing
Twinkle provides a lot of the same functionality as the page curation tools, and some reviewers prefer to use the Twinkle tools for some/all tasks. It can be activated simply in the gadgets section of 'preferences'. There are also a lot of options available at the Twinkle preferences panel after you install the gadget.
In terms of other gadgets for NPR, HotCat is worth turning on. It allows you to easily add, remove, and change categories on a page, with name suggestions.
MoreMenu also adds a bunch of very useful links for diagnosing and fixing page issues.
User:Equazcion/ScriptInstaller.js(info): Installing scripts doesn't have to be complicated. Go to your common.js and copy importScript( 'User:Equazcion/ScriptInstaller.js' ); into an empty line, now you can install all other scripts with the click of a button from the script page! (Note you need to be at the ".js" page for the script for the install button to appear, not the information page)
User:TheJosh/Scripts/NewPagePatrol.js(info): Creates a scrolling new pages list at the left side of the page. You can change the number of pages shown by adding the following to the next line on your common.js page (immediately after the line importing this script): npp_num_pages=20; (Recommended 20, but you can use any number from 1 to 50).
User:Primefac/revdel.js(info): Is requesting revdel complicated and time consuming? This script helps simplify the process. Just have the Copyvio source URL and go to the history page and collect your diff IDs and you can drop them into the script Popups and it will create a revdel request for you.
User:Evad37/rater.js(info): A fantastic tool for adding WikiProject templates to article talk pages. If you add: rater_autostartNamespaces = 0; to the next line on your common.js, the prompt will pop up automatically if a page has no Wikiproject templates on the talk page (note: this can be a bit annoying if you review redirects or dab pages commonly).
You left - [3] in. The filer wrote Palestine-Israel articles by mistake - but the whole thread is Pakistan-India. (whomever made the decision to name these PIA and IPA..... argh). Icewhiz (talk) 08:02, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Latest comment: 6 years ago7 comments3 people in discussion
Hi Samuel,
I would like some participation with a current work that is ready for community involvement.
I am sure importance can be placed on final approval and specific word placement and phrasing to be arbitrated to my discretion, to ensure that all liability and responsibility in consequence solely rests with my Self.
Please get in touch. I have a Dropbox link to a folder which is intended as read-only access, and I do expect my intent to be treated as such.
I should also add Cameron11598 that I can do this, and the world can be anew. I just need tools; my skill in language and et al is aural (pronounced oral). Everything I can offer is the result of only everything I have been given, and a triangle. I squirrel away in my room in my free time putting together in words, what I understand of others and myself between - when honesty, being a wagger is the source. I am the most responsible person and as the most responsible person, it's all my fault. No one else is to Blame.
Thewolfde (talk) 13:25, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
I'd like to discuss a deployment strategy. If something changes the way people think, it's called discovery. Wikipedia is not a place for original research; my interpretation of OR is 'experimental results or observation'. Discovery, however can be innate requiring only slight illumination. I am compiling existing information in the world, for which there is only a single source. When structured appropriately, existing information does have renewed meaning and relevance (aka notoriety). The structure needs only point to a single source for ratification, the reader.
Consider everything you know, and allow for the possibility that a fundamental construct is absent.... I am slightly frustrated and I am using the English language, which is objectively agreed upon. Read closely from afar.
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.
Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months.
Hello Cameron11598, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
Backlog
As of 21 October 2018[update], there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.
Community Wishlist Proposal
There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding the drafting of a Community Wishlist Proposal for the purpose of requesting bug fixes and missing/useful features to be added to the New Page Feed and Curation Toolbar.
Please join the conversation as we only have until 29 October to draft this proposal!
Project updates
ORES predictions are now built-in to the feed. These automatically predict the class of an article as well as whether it may be spam, vandalism, or an attack page, and can be filtered by these criteria now allowing reviewers to better target articles that they prefer to review.
There are now tools being tested to automatically detect copyright violations in the feed. This detector may not be accurate all the time, though, so it shouldn't be relied on 100% and will only start working on new revisions to pages, not older pages in the backlog.
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.
Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months.
Hello Cameron11598,
Community Wishlist Survey – NPP needs you – Vote NOW
Community Wishlist Voting takes place 16 to 30 November for the Page Curation and New Pages Feed improvements, and other software requests. The NPP community is hoping for a good turnout in support of the requests to Santa for the tools we need. This is very important as we have been asking the Foundation for these upgrades for 4 years.
If this proposal does not make it into the top ten, it is likely that the tools will be given no support at all for the foreseeable future. So please put in a vote today.
We are counting on significant support not only from our own ranks, but from everyone who is concerned with maintaining a Wikipedia that is free of vandalism, promotion, flagrant financial exploitation and other pollution.
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Cameron11598. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
left a note over the Worskshop talk-page requesting the attention of arbitrators/you into a particular incident (and behaviour) of a party. I do hope that it is the right venue to solicit attention. If, otherwise, please do the needful.Thanks, ∯WBGconverse17:56, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks I'm talking with a committee member and I'm trying to figure out what to do or if there is anything to be done. Thanks for your patience. --Cameron11598(Talk)02:27, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
WikiCup 2018 November newsletter
The WikiCup is over for another year! Our Champion this year is Courcelles (submissions), who over the course of the competition has amassed 147 GAs, 111 GARs, 9 DYKs, 4 FLs and 1 ITN. Our finalists were as follows:
Zanhe (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 17 in the news articles overall.
Aoba47 (submissions) wins the GAR prize, for 43 good article reviews in round 1.
Awards will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!
Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved much this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition.
@Bbb23: Poked into my work computer; between turkey deliveries; I've been delivering Turkeys to families in need as a work thing off and on today. But no problem its what I'm here for. --Cameron11598(Talk)19:51, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Latest comment: 6 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
Hello, I have an account with Newspapers.com for a while now. It hasn't been expired ever and the renewal of my account doesn't seem to be a problem. I got access to Publisher Extra last year and have access to it consistently through my Wikipedia account. Now I still have access to the Newspapers.com site but not to newspapers which are Publisher Extra. Do you have any idea why this happened? A lot of my research requires me to look at newspaper articles that are beyond the 1920s and I need Publisher Extra to do that. Thanks. KAVEBEAR (talk) 02:20, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
I don't know if that is the issue because I still access to the account but the extra stuff. But just in case it is, I just clicked renewed on the platform. Maybe that can fixed it. KAVEBEAR (talk) 02:40, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Thank you, Cameron - I think it's extremely important considering the discussion was still live, and it involves clarification of an "out of process" action, rather than a dismissal of it. It's also during election time and this is information the community needs to know. Atsme✍🏻📧18:19, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Cameron - can I make a simple correction to a gaffe I made? I need to strike indemnity and put jeopardy, which is the correct word. I had just reviewed an insurance policy so it was fresh on my mind when I commented there; thus came indemnity instead of jeopardy. It just looks foolish...embarassing, in fact. Atsme✍🏻📧19:16, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
@Atsme: I know but I'm the new guy and still a trainee; generally I ask before doing something new ;) don't want to get in trouble for putting my hand in the cookie jar. --Cameron11598(Talk)19:36, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
Would you be comfortable using the table format for the voting summary? I find it very much easier to read and get a sense of where the case is currently at.
Thanks for considering it, even if in the end you prefer not to use it.
Ya know what I did @Qwirkle:, I copy pasted the actual web address instead of the page link and followed with double brackets instead of single brackets. A silly mistake but hopefully people understand or are able to make the connection but I'll post a null edit to do a new archive link. Regards, --Cameron11598(Talk)19:08, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks. Given some of the cloak-n-daggerism surrounding this motion, “able to find it” will look a bit suspicious; there already seem to be enough dubious lumps under the rug as it is. Qwirkle (talk) 19:18, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
The logs are in a pastebin.com link. I'd rather not do it myself. If you don't think you should, that's OK, but I would rather have them taken down. Thanks.
@Seahawk01: Well your post had two issues which made it okay to redact the link; 1) you didn't have the consent of everyone involved to post the logs; 2)the post was technically a copyright violation as you didn't have a proper release for the statements made (this has been discussed by myself with an administrator in the past, tldr: Copyright law is confusing) --Cameron11598(Talk)02:38, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.16 15 December 2018
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello Cameron11598,
Reviewer of the Year
This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to Onel5969. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.
Thanks are also extended for their work to JTtheOG (15,059 reviews), Boleyn (12,760reviews), Cwmhiraeth (9,001reviews), Semmendinger (8,440reviews), PRehse (8,092reviews), Arthistorian1977 (5,306reviews), Abishe (4,153 reviews), Barkeep49 (4,016reviews), and Elmidae (3,615reviews). Cwmhiraeth, Semmendinger, Barkeep49, and Elmidae have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only sevenmonths, while Boleyn, with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.
The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.
Really good news - NPR wins the Community Wishlist Survey 2019
At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.
Training video
Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minutevideo was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Do you really want me to spend all my time defending myself like this? Why don't we just seek a consensus over the next week. I personally think it would be much better. Thanks Seahawk01 (talk) 03:08, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
OK, but I feel just as attacked here. I can outline all the ways I feel attacked if you wish. Do you really want me to do that? Why not just have a civil discussion. Make a proposal in a new post on Wikipedia talk:IRC and let's leave the old thread behind. Seahawk01 (talk) 03:16, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
@Seahawk01: so you are refusing to redact your statements or provide diffs? Nothing in Jeske's statement was an attack. You however have accused him and others of bad faith without any evidence. --Cameron11598(Talk)03:19, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
I am not refusing to provide justification for what I said. If you require justification I posted under your post on Wikipedia talk:IRC that it will take me time. I do not have a lot of time to spend on Wikipedia and next week is very busy, so what you are requesting will take some effort on my part. Seahawk01 (talk) 03:22, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
@Seahawk01:, you had time to make the accusations. What I'm requesting takes approximately 5 minutes to verify your claims. Every statement made has been on that page. I see nothing that justifies your claims. --Cameron11598(Talk)03:25, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Cameron11598 I would like to ask you not to question me about my time. First of all, talking to you here is taking up a lot of time. Second, it is very taxing for me to deal with all of this to begin with. Third, I am only on another hour tonight and have things to do next week. In fact, I really shouldn't be spending my time on this right now. Seahawk01 (talk) 03:29, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Books & Bytes, Issue 31
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello and Happy New Year!
Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup, the competition begins today. If you have already joined, your submission page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and we will set up your submissions page. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2019, and which you have nominated this year, is eligible for points in the competition, the judges will be checking! Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are Sturmvogel 66 (talk·contribs·email), Godot13 (talk·contribs·email), Vanamonde93 (talk·contribs·email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk·contribs·email). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
Hi Cameron11598, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy and Prosperous New Year, Thanks for all your help and thanks for all your contributions to the 'pedia,
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!
Hello Cameron11598, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing, Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 07:18, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!
Hello Cameron11598, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing, TheSandDoctorTalk07:31, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. I'm DannyS712 (talk), and I just wanted to remind you that you have signed up to compete in this year's WikiCup! There are about 2 weeks left before the first round ends – if you haven't yet made your first submission, there is still time to start; if you have already started, keep up the good work. See your submissions page: here. Good luck!
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Sorry to revert you, but myself, Joe, PMC, OR and MKDW all were a decline on this, so the count's 5, not 4. (GoldenRing and I discussed that earlier too with OR's comment.) RickinBaltimore (talk) 21:31, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello Cameron11598,
News
The WMF has announced that Google Translate is now available for translating articles through the content translation tool. This may result in an increase in machine translated articles in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to use the {{rough translation}} tag and gently remind (or inform) editors that translations from other language Wikipedia pages still require attribution per WP:TFOLWP.
Discussions of interest
Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (Discussion).
NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.
NPP Tools Report
Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828 Looking for inspiration? There are approximately 1000 female biographies to review.
Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I asked at Wikipedia talk:The Wikipedia Library, probably the wrong place, how to contact a Wikipedian with access to Grove's Dictionary? I think asking you might be a better approach! I am trying to find a date of death for pianist August Frederick Ferdinand Hyllested, born 1858. There was an article on him in Grove's Dictionary of Music and Musicians (Supplement, 1922, vol VI), when he was apparently still living. I would like to locate an article in subsequent editions of Grove's that gives a death date? - Nunh-huh20:39, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The second round of the 2019 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to scored 32 points to advance into round 3. Our top four scorers in round 2 all scored over 400 points and were:
Cas Liber (1210), our winner in 2016, with two featured articles and three DYKs. He also made good use of the bonus points available, more than doubling his score by choosing appropriate articles to work on.
Kosack (750), last year's runner up, with an FA, a GA, two FLs, and five DYKs.
Adam Cuerden (480), a WikiCup veteran, with 16 featured pictures, mostly restorations.
Zwerg Nase (461), a seasoned competitor, with a FA, a GA and an ITN item.
So far contestants have achieved nine featured articles between them and a splendid 80 good articles. Commendably, 227 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2019 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. The judges are pleased with the thorough GARs that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Regarding the recent ArbComm messages related to my adminship, what exactly do I need to do now? JIP | Talk22:36, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
@JIP: just make sure you are following best practices to keep your account secure. Enabling 2FA is optional, but having unique strong passwords is something that should be practiced. I hope this clarifies any questions you may have had. Feel free to let me know if you have any more questions. --Cameron11598(Talk)22:42, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
Newspapers.com
Latest comment: 5 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Hi. I have been applying for a renewal of my Newspapers.com account for the last two months, but I keep receiving an email that my application is incomplete because I did not sign up for a Newspaper.com account (which of course I have, since it is a renewal). I have sent two emails before with my account information, and just sent a third one in response to your email. I know you say email you above, but I am not sure that my emails are getting through. Perhaps they are going to your spam filter? Thanks. CanadianPaul20:48, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi Paul, look like you did indeed get eaten by my mail service's spam filtering. Not sure why... I'll send your account for renewal in the next hour or so. --Cameron11598(Talk)20:53, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi @Canadian Paul: I've forwarded your account info onto newspapers.com they should have it active sometime today or tomorrow depending on their workload. I'll shoot you an email when I hear from them. --Cameron11598(Talk)21:00, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library
_(cropped).jpg)
,
.jpg)
.jpg)
,_cropped.jpg)
Anarchyte (work | talk) 02:53, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Aoba47 led the field with a featured article, 8 good articles and 42 GARs, giving a total of 666 points.
FrB.TG , a WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points, gained from a featured article and masses of bonus points.
Ssven2, another WikiCup newcomer, was in third place with 403 points, garnered from a featured article, a featured list, a good article and twelve GARs.
Carbrera, 
Farang Rak Tham and 
Cartoon network freak all had over 200 points, but like all the other contestants, now have to start again from scratch. A good achievement was the 193 GARs performed by WikiCup contestants, comparing very favourably with the 54 GAs they achieved.
Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with three featured articles
Iazyges, with nine good articles and lots of bonus points
SounderBruce, a finalist last year, with seventeen good topic articles
Muboshgu, a seasoned competitor, with three ITNs and
Courcelles, another first time contestant, with twenty-seven GARs
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nova Crystallis -- Nova Crystallis (talk) 01:20, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
; see Talk:Marshall Islands at the Olympics for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nova Crystallis -- Nova Crystallis (talk) 05:01, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
. Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: 
, 
, 
, 
.
lists.wikimedia.org.
.jpg)
Kees08 was second with 1155 points, including a high-scoring featured article for Neil Armstrong, two good topics and some Olympics-related good articles.
Nova Crystallis, 
Kosack and 
Fixed @Icewhiz: Yeah the acronyms for these two are now the bane of my existance 
--Cameron11598 (Talk) 22:14, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User wikipedia/Arbitration clerk. Hhkohh (talk) 10:22, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
Courcelles (submissions), who over the course of the competition has amassed 147 GAs, 111 GARs, 9 DYKs, 4 FLs and 1 ITN. Our finalists were as follows:
SounderBruce (submissions)
Zanhe (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 17 in the news articles overall.
Aoba47 (submissions) wins the GAR prize, for 43 good article reviews in round 1.
_(14586469407).jpg)
Adam Cuerden (480), a WikiCup veteran, with 16 featured pictures, mostly restorations.
Zwerg Nase (461), a seasoned competitor, with a FA, a GA and an ITN item.
Barkeep49 with six GAs, 
Ceranthor, 
Lee Vilenski, and 
Canada Hky, each with seven GARs, and 
MPJ-DK with a seven item GT.