Welcome

edit

Hello, Cancersign, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KyloRen3 (talk) 14:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Hello KyloRen3,

I will certainly contribute to improve Wikipedia. Cancersign (talk) 14:31, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your help! Cancersign (talk) 14:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sunil Shukre (March 10)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:35, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Cancersign! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:35, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sunil Shukre (March 10)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
GoingBatty (talk) 15:11, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Rishikesh Shukre has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rishikesh Shukre. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:19, 11 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ansuman Bhagat (March 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:29, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ansuman Bhagat

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Ansuman Bhagat, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:30, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi Cancersign! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Draft:Sunil Shukre, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi Cancersign! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, About Google books Citation (references), has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 14 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi Cancersign! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Draft:Rishikesh Shukre, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 14 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kritika Bharadwaj (March 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 15:46, 20 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Rishikesh Shukre moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Rishikesh Shukre, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Chirota (talk) 23:03, 19 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank you Chirota for your guidance, I will follow your valuable information and try to make an article accordingly. Cancersign (talk) 10:59, 20 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nashik oxygen tanker leak incident (April 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:03, 21 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Physician

edit

Hello, Cancersign,

Please do not blank category redirect pages. They serve a purpose. Actually, do not ever blank any page on Wikipedia unless it is your own user page and you are requesting that it be deleted. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:12, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Dear Madam, I would like to apologize. I will always take care that such a mistake does not happen to me in future.Thank you for your help and information! Good day :)

Cancersign (talk) 14:08, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kalium Sulphurium (April 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 08:12, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

respected, I have written this article about homeopathic remedies. One of the valuable remedy is the name of that Kalium Sulphurium ( Kali Sulph)

Cancersign (talk) 08:14, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rishikesh Shukre (April 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 09:33, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bianca Gomes (April 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CommanderWaterford (talk) 14:52, 26 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bianca Gomes (April 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:42, 26 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rishikesh Shukre (April 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CommanderWaterford were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:16, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply