Candacie

Alechetron does not meet WP:RS guidelines

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight. These sources may express views that are widely acknowledged as pushing a particular point-of-view, sometimes even extremist, being promotional in nature, or relying heavily on rumors and personal opinions. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:32, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Candacie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Best practices for editors with close associations
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style
• The Teahouse, our help forum for new editors

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:03, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

The Kemp Model

User:Jimfbleak I am puzzled about why my article was removed in its entirety. I do not have a conflict of interest. I was simply trying to complete a task. ```` Candacie (talk) 01:24, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Please wait for an answer, recreating the same totally non-compliant text will not help you, I'll reply later today Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:32, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Candacie

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Candacie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 04:02, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

October 2024

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself, your interests and goals as they relate to editing Wikipedia, as well as disclosures of conflicts of interest and paid editing. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:

• an encyclopedia article (and should not be styled to look like one)
• a workspace for a draft article
• a personal website, blog, or social media site
• a space for self-promotion or other advertising
• a CV, resumé or lengthy autobiography

The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or to create new articles. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 04:03, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because (it is not my intention to violate any of wikipedia's policies. I am not seeking recognition not am i benefitting from this post. If there are inconsistencies with the content i prefer guidance on how to improve my work) 190.108.214.135 (talk) 04:06, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Kemp Model

Your draft has been moved from your user page to Draft:Kemp Model. -- asilvering (talk) 04:09, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Reply

You said above I do not have a conflict of interest. I was simply trying to complete a task. What task? Given to you by whom? I find it difficult to believe that of all the things you could write about, you have chosen this as your first attempt at a full article completely at random, with no prior connection to the topic or the people involved. If you have any conflict of interest, you must declare it. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

Also read the following regarding writing an article:

• You created your article in a single edit with inappropriate references, not a single wikilink and non-wikipedia formatting. Your references are unformatted and some are incomplete (what appears to be a book has no page numbers or isbn). I didn't check, but note that you must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

• You must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the people involved, a related organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person, company or organisation claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls

• Some of your refs are bare urls, and many are not independent third-party sources, for example Kemp's book, an interview with him and sales pages for their books. Also, you make claims that are not supported by your supposed reference, eg that Morrison is Editor Emeritus of the research section of the Educational Technology Research and Development journal and is a member of the editorial board for four other professional journals. Your unformatted journal refs appear to be primary reviews of the theory and I'm not sure what they contribute to notability as defined above.

• You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.

• Your unsourced benefits and disadvantages sections appear to be your own views, not permitted here

• SUPPORTING RESEARCH–You couldn't find anything dissenting?

• There is a generally promotional tone, with unsource or inapproriately sourced claims used to develop education and training programs consistently and reliably... is considered one of the world’s best textbooks in instructional design [sourced to an interview with him]... a prolific career... where he was awarded special recognition... a noted lecturer... Editor Emeritus of the research section of the Educational Technology Research and Development journal and is a member of the editorial board for four other professional journals... It is a flexible model that is designed to cater to various modes of delivery.... can be used to design instruction for many different fields of learning and various subject areas... can accommodate the use of a variety of instructional methods and strategies... an excellent instructional design model just opinions, not real facts.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:35, 15 October 2024 (UTC)