Captain Pingu

N.O.V.A. Near Orbit Vanguard Alliance

Your recent editing history at N.O.V.A. Near Orbit Vanguard Alliance shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Frietjes (talk) 23:43, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Oct 22

Please note that posting a series of empty edit requests or edit requests that do not actually state what you want to change can be seen as wp:disruption. Please stop. Slatersteven (talk) 09:17, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Alex Jones, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. nableezy - 18:24, 27 October 2022 (UTC) 18:24, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Alex Jones shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Zero Serenity ^{(talk - contributions)} 19:28, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Alex Jones) for persistent disruptive editing.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | tålk 19:43, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Please stop posting vague edit requests at Talk:InfoWars. As Slatersteven noted above, and as you've been told at the InfoWars talk page, your edit request needs to specifically state what it is you want to change. Do not use edit requests to ask for "minor changes" without saying what those "minor changes" are. This was your third essentially meaningless edit request within the last two weeks; these repetitive requests are disruptive. If you want to make another edit request, make sure to say exactly what it is you want to change (for example, "Please edit the first sentence in the "Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection" section so it reads "xxx" instead of "yyy".) Aoi (青い) (talk) 02:38, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Alex Jones and Talk:InfoWars) for wasting other editors' time by ignoring all warnings and explanations about how to make edit requests.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | tålk 13:39, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

@Bishonen, editor is now making similarly vague edit requests at Nick Fuentes.[1] Schazjmd (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

I see. I'm starting to believe that this new user may not be aware of this page, their own talkpage, since they have never posted here nor paid any attention to the advice, warnings, or page blocks posted here. Captain Pingu, I have blocked you from editing all of Wikipedia, in the hope that the block log will help you find this page. If you answer me below, and promise to stop with the vague edit requests, I will unblock you. Bishonen | tålk 17:52, 23 November 2022 (UTC).

Hello, I understand there might be some confusion but I just wanted to tone down the extremely biased wiki articles written about these people because when I read these articles I can see an obvious bias and narrative that they're trying to push some of it is straight out wrong, I also did try and use the talk page but for some reason a lot of the messages won't send and that is why you don't see the messages, maybe I've did something wrong who knows? But I do know now that I've made a mistake not knowing that the messages I try to send won't send and now I have it all figured out now, and I hope you will understand this. Captain Pingu (talk) 03:22, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello? Are you there @Bishonen? Captain Pingu (talk) 23:50, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

That's right, you need to use the WP:PING function to get a user's attention, like you did now. I'm glad to hear you have it figured out about how to post on talkpages. Provided you undertake specifically to post only proper edit requests, per Aoi's instructions above, I will unblock you, even though I don't think your comment above is altogether promising. Please note that Wikipedia goes by reliable sources, not by your opinion or my opinion. If you continue to edit tendentiously, as you did for example at Alex Jones in October, I'm afraid you will soon find yourself blocked from Wikipedia again. Please respond below about the edit requests. Bishonen | tålk 07:44, 13 April 2023 (UTC).

OK @Bishonen, but I didn't edit The Alex Jones article "tendentiously" I only tried to remove biases like labels like (Far-Right/Alt-Right) and tried being more objective like saying that he is either a Great exposer of the truth or just another Conspiracy Theorist which I was planning on doing but couldn't due to fear of being blocked (I like covering both sides to be objective rather than covering one side of the political spectrum). Captain Pingu (talk) 18:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

I suppose I haven't been clear enough. I tried to ask you explicitly to undertake to post only proper edit requests, per Aoi's instructions above. You have posted many vague edit requests that can't be actioned, since an actionable edit request needs to specifically state what you want to change and how. For instance, something like "Please edit the first sentence in section xxx to say yyy instead of zzz". You have been told this many times, and it's obviously a source of frustration for other users that you have continued posting unactionable requests. How about it? You really need to promise to stop doing that if you want to be unblocked. If you continue to ignore my condition ("Provided you undertake specifically to post only proper edit requests, per Aoi's instructions above, I will unblock you"), I'm afraid you will remain blocked. Bishonen | tålk 19:14, 14 April 2023 (UTC).

Alright @Bishonen, I will try to post proper edit requests this time, is that a deal? Captain Pingu (talk) 19:16, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

I hope you'll do better than just "try", but all right. You have been unblocked. You'll do yourself a favor if you take what I said about tendentious editing seriously also. Bishonen | tålk 19:22, 14 April 2023 (UTC).

Thank you @Bishonen for the pings and for reiterating my comment about proper edit requests. I am OK with this unblock; however, Captain Pingu, I really, truly hope that you listen to Bishonen's advice about tendentious editing as well. Aoi (青い) (talk) 19:27, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Europa: The Last Battle. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 19:12, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

@Trilletrollet I have no clue where you got this false information from I never edited this article with the intention of advertising it but to tone down the heavy biases and lack of research and effort put into it, also, using words like "anti semetic" or "neo-nazi" is bias, lazy, loaded and not truthful. "Neo-nazi" Calling a film neo nazi propaganda is sloppy & is similar to what Ukraine did by staging an attack on Poland to justify a war on Russia just a while ago. To censor this or change this is exactly why history gets changed, facts erased, wars fought, people erased. Let's not let this happen anymore. Captain Pingu (talk) 21:16, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Europa: The Last Battle. Thank you. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 00:03, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

@Mako001 I have no clue what you are talking about or where you got this information from, also trying to insist I am far-right or a Nazi without actually knowing what I am actually trying to accomplish in this website just shows that you are unwilling to look at the other side to get a neutral point of view which is kind of ironic since you say I don't know what a neutral point of view is, also, Zionists and Jews are not the same, just a reminder, also, I have no idea who 24.109.173.122 or Remy Gambit Labeau even is, nor am I associated with them in anyway, I just agree with what they are trying to say, and if you still think I am them, look at their IP addresses, it is clearly not the same, it is also not a VPN because if you track down the IP addresses you can clearly see that they are real addresses. I wasn't involved in this edit war and hopefully you understand that, also please just don't call everything you disagree labels without putting the research into it, it is very unfair and no one is going to take you seriously except for people who think the same as you. Captain Pingu (talk) 18:23, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Not convincing. Your views are not welcome here, end of discussion. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 13:54, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Great, now you have 0 arguments to this discussion and now you just wanna leave, OK then, if you are unwilling to listen then your view points aren't valid and I will just dismiss them, you just proved my point of you not being able to listen to other view points. Captain Pingu (talk) 18:55, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  --Blablubbs (talk) 12:42, 9 July 2023 (UTC)