 | This editor is a serial sock master and IP block evader and should not be unblocked without community discussion including a check user verification. See User:Ad Orientem/LTA Cardicharts. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:01, 22 January 2019 (UTC) |
Cardicharts, you are invited to the Teahouse!
edit
|
Hi Cardicharts! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 28 December 2018 (UTC) |
Cardicharts (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #23689 was submitted on Dec 31, 2018 22:19:40. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 22:19, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Cardicharts (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Can you guys unblock me? I didn't do anything wrong, when i checked the source Sweeet but Psycho was #83 and not #87, sorry for everything i just wanted to update.
Decline reason:
You were warned numerous times to provide sources and stop edit warring. The source you kept replacing made it clear that the peak position was 83, given the latest survey. Furthermore, you made several personal attacks in edit summaries. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:23, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Cardicharts (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
First of all, I wanna excuse me for the insults that I gave to user ss12 or something, because it wasn't my intention and the source was right at the end..but you guys need to speak because I spent a lot of time doing this work, and I tried to do it RIGHT and I've never put vandalism things. I'm trying to see you guys giving me a second chance, maybe helping me in something but even explaining. But even if you decline once again, it's ok, I have other things to do in my life and Wikipedia doesn't need me :), right?
Decline reason:
Since you don't seem to care if you are unblocked or not, we will just leave you blocked. It's also hard to see how edit summaries like this were unintentional. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 17:07, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Cardicharts (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
You are declining my request just because the user:ss12 couldn't speak properly and the source I gave was also right? If BillboardBiz couldn't be used for Wikipedia, he should've said it, I'm also NEW and it's not about insult because y'all are saying I'm a vandal. I kept adding the source because no one TOLD me that Billboard Biz couldn't be USED.
Decline reason:
Given your actions here, Ad Orientem's offer to you, below, is generous. Six months starts from your last edit. Any further block evasion will, at a minimum, reset the timer and may show that you should never be unblocked. In six months, you'll need to address your abhorrent behaviour which has included death threats. It's very rare that we would unblock a user after that user has made a death threat. Yamla (talk) 17:20, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- (edit conflict) Ok, here's the deal. I'm all for second chances and your statement above is a move in the right direction. But you have a track record of block evasion that is longer than my arm. At this point that is more serious than whatever you got blocked for originally and it is a major impediment to your being unblocked because it demonstrates your disregard for the community's rules. You need to stop socking and evading your block for at least six months. After which we can talk about this. But I need to see six months of no block evasion before I would consider supporting an unblock. If you can abide by that, then we may be able to move forward. (edit conflict- Your second posting was not helpful.) -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:17, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Cardicharts (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
So I have to wait 6 months just to make an edit? You were blocking me for VANDALISM and I've never put vandalism things, I was using my mum's phone and mine and y'all keept removing the things I was updating. So if I want to send an update, where can I do so? I'm from twitter.com/CardiCharts
Decline reason:
Right, six months. And I would highly suggest this be the last unblock request you make at this point. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:30, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You have zero chance of unblocking until you take responsibility for your behaviour here. Additionally, each edit you make, like that one, resets the six month counter. --Yamla (talk) 17:27, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- You also cannot edit by proxy/third party. There is nowhere to "send an update" to. 331dot (talk) 17:27, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- (edit conflict)Yes. You have to wait six months... AT LEAST. And no, that's not negotiable. Wishing death on another editor is an instantly blockable offense. If you don't understand that, then I am not sanguine about the direction this is going in. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:29, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- "because the user:ss12 couldn't speak properly"...literally what? I think we can all tell from your grammar and spelling mistakes here and in your edit summaries, you're the one who has issues with "speaking properly". (Also, the IPs you've used geolocate to Italy, which would indicate your first language is Italian and not English. Make of that what you will.) There was never a communication issue on my side—you were adding unsourced content and there were concerns about you being a sockpuppet account. I think those concerns were well-founded considering you're continuing to use other accounts to evade your block. Just a note: I will report any accounts I think are you and continue to have you blocked. Ss112 11:12, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Your chances of ever being unblocked are dropping like a rock
edit- Note: The above post is mine. I forgot to sign it. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:15, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Two further sockpuppet accounts
editThis user has now utilised Avasavatar and FrancescoPirchio05. With the latter, this user, who truly must have nothing better to do with their time, spent over an hour manually clicking undo on each of my reverts of Avasavatar's edits. At this point, I believe this user needs to be rangeblocked. This is who you're dealing with, so if they submit any future requests for being unblocked, I would instantly deny them. Ss112 20:23, 21 January 2019 (UTC)