Wikipedia

User talk:Carolina2k22/Archive 1

< User talk:Carolina2k22
Latest comment: 11 months ago by Schwede66 in topic Invitation to an in-person meetup in Mohua / Golden Bay
Archive 1

March 2020

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 
Hello, Carolina2k22! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:26, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
@Carolina2k22 and Cassiopeia: I must admit I that initially surprised that this draft had not been accepted, until I looked up WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Up until the 2017 "Request for comment" (RFC), any secondary schools that were at upper secondary level "were assumed notable unless sources could not be found to prove existence". In this Stuff (website) article a former principal of the school describes it as
one of 68 full te reo schools in New Zealand, but only one of five in the South Island
Stuff identifies that article as "paid content"
Carolina2k22m - could you possibly find and add other references from reliable sources that are independent of the subject to that draft?
Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 11:49, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

July 2020

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your submission at Articles for creation: Te Wharekura o Arowhenua has been accepted

 
Te Wharekura o Arowhenua, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MurielMary (talk) 12:45, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Merger discussion for Matthew Dennis Hunt

  An article that you have been involved in editing—Matthew Dennis Hunt—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Muzilon (talk) 16:54, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

  Resolved Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (contribs) 05:35, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020

Latest comment: 4 years ago11 comments6 people in discussion

inquisitr edit

as the owner of inquisitr i made the edit again and gave a reason thanks Daniel Treisman — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.154.180.66 (talk) 05:19, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Alright, please next time declare your WP:COI and instead mention the issue on the talk page. Carolina2k22 (talk) 07:29, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

List of Hart to Hart episodes

my edit was not vandalism it was a fact the show moved to Tuesday at that point just because one person think it is "trivial" is not my fault — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.127.91.117 (talk) 01:24, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Your edit was unsourced and was already removed, if you have a problem, you do not ignore it and revert, you go on the person's talk page or the article's talk page and discuss it. Carolina2k22 (talk) 01:27, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

She-Venom

Maybe if you stop and pause for a moment or notice that put FREAKING SOMETHING in the edit summary instead of instantly assuming disruptive editing or that I "continue" to vandalize Wikipedia that I was gonna add Patricia Robertson (comics) to She-Venom along with Anne Weying. 69.121.181.163 10:42, 4 September 2020

My apologies, you already had multiple warnings on your talk page and your edit summary was "[...] sounds cooler", that alongside the page blanking seemed like vandalism. Carolina2k22 (talk) 12:49, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Batman (serial), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Super 8. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

  Resolved Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (contribs) 07:14, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

 

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

TonyBallioni (talk) 14:59, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Original Dixieland Jass Band

"However, many historians and average Americans, who know the very accurate history of jazz, know that ODJB were not the first musicians to create jazz. There were other jazz musicians (Buddy Bolden and his band being among the very first) to create and perform jazz music in the 19th century (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddy_Bolden#Musical_career) before its' first initial recordings were released to the public later throughout the 20th century".:

Your message that you sent to me was very understandable. And since I had no knowledge that you were and still are the owner of this page, I will not make any changes. However, you might want to be careful about telling half of the truth about jazz music in the near future in which you tell both sides. Buddy Bolden was among one of the first to do jazz music and the ODJB band, who came out of Papa Jack Laines' mixed-race marching band, were influenced by both African and European roots of music. I have serious issue about wikipedia,org, in which they are known to tell some accurate truths but also spread untruths for there own satisfaction — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackhistorianoftruthtelling (talk • contribs) 13:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

I am not the article creator, I just reverted your changes because you did not provide a secondary source and it seemed a less than neutral statement. If you fix the issues you'll be fine. Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (contribs) 13:32, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for the response. Just show me how to fix the issue and I will provide a secondary source next time. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackhistorianoftruthtelling (talk • contribs) 14:33, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

November 2020

Latest comment: 3 years ago10 comments6 people in discussion

Assistance Request

Hello Carolina2k22. Thank you for your review of the article on Hans Albert Hohnfeldt. I appreciate your input and suggestions. However, I note that the title of the article is mistakenly spelled as Honfeldt, not Hohnfeldt (though it is spelled correctly throughout the article). I don't know how to correct this, as the "edit source" button does not seem to bring up the title. Can you get this corrected? The article will not link to any other articles that have his name spelled correctly. Thank you for any assistance you can provide. Historybuff0105 (talk) 01:42, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Renamed (moved) it. Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (contribs) 05:53, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your prompt action to remedy this. Sorry for any trouble. Much obliged. Historybuff0105 (talk) 14:41, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Dmitry Borisovich Volkov

Hello. Please see the article. I cleaned the advertising style as much as possible and brought the criteria of significance. Thank you very much! 95.153.130.99 (talk) 07:54, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

  Accepted Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (contribs) 08:57, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Page Marked for Speedy Deletion, Streetsound

Hi there you approved my entry for Streetsound yesterday - thank you for doing that! Unfortunately it seems i woke this morning to find the page marked for speedy deletion- and it appears to be gone, i was not event able to appeal the decision. The issues stems from me also posting the wiki article on the streetsound magazine archive site -which I am also the publisher of. I had posted the article on my site since it looked like my wiki article was never going to be approved. I have now updated the streetsound magazine site to point to the wiki history. I'm hopeful for a speedy restoration of my entry. I've included a link to the streetsound website which now will hopefully point back to the wiki https://streetsoundmagzine.com/history. I guess I'm just asking for some advice on what i can do ? thanks in advance ..Chris Chris Torella Ctorella 19:41, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

It appears to be fixed now. Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (contribs) 21:29, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
yes seems like it was brought back and flagged with copyright warning, trying to work through that now!.. thanks for taking a look...02:30, 23 November 2020 (UTC)Chris Torella Ctorella 02:31, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Alright, good luck!

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Known Argentinians of Croatian roots

Hi, 

I want to add another famous Argentinian of Croatian roots. that is Tomas Felipe Carlovich,nickname " El Trinche "-Football player.

Thank you very much, I am Damir Granić from Split,Croatia, my address is: genistine@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.188.147.107 (talk) 11:27, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

Latest comment: 3 years ago27 comments11 people in discussion

Hypocrisy example

Hi my addition to the hypocrisy article was rejected. I believe there is no reason to reject it, given that there is no subjectivity about my addition to the article being an example of hypocrisy. The MW definition is "behavior that contradicts what one claims to believe or feel." If anything this can be interpreted as censorship. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.231.180.187 (talk) 04:52, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

There was already an example there, it was unnecessary and it just seemed to be worded in a less than neutral way. Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (contribs) 05:17, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
That article seems to be a high risk for becoming a WP:COATRACK especially for WP:RECENT events. Partisan agendas should be unwelcome at that page, per WP:NPOV. Elizium23 (talk) 05:21, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for the additional information. Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (contribs) 08:16, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Understood, thanks for your service. I will admit that while my addition was objectively correct, it does distract from the main point of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Garrison1988 (talk • contribs) 07:16, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

you are from new zealand

and, from what you have demonstrated, you know nothing about the topic you are reverting. mind your own business. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.198.28.70 (talk) 01:16, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I apologise if I have upset you in any way, I followed standard Wikipedia procedures and a change you made that was unsourced and had WP:NPOV issues. Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (contribs) 01:56, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Improper

You shall, remove this message at one and apologize. You placed "rapist" in the shortdesc of an article, and then slap a final warning on my talk page? This is highly irregular. Pikavoom (talk) 08:28, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

I made a mistake with RedWarn when reverting the original edit, it reverted yours. Apologies, I clearly already reverted that comment with the message "Accident". Again I apologise, but, I don't appreciate your demanding and disrespectful tone. WP:CIVILITY Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (contribs) 08:31, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Withdrew part of my comment as it was unnecessary. Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (contribs) 08:34, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
You slapped a level 4 only and final warning on my page, you bet I am demanding. Redwarn is a dangerous tool, you shouldn't use it, and if you do you are responsible for the results. Did Redwarn default to level 4, or did you set that level yourself? Pikavoom (talk) 08:37, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
I used 4im as the original vandalism was severely defamatory. Also, RedWarn isn't dangerous, I just made a mistake in it saying the page had updated and warned you. I immediately removed the warning I gave to you unintentionally and you had already reverted my revert. Simple misunderstanding. Think before you leave a message like this on peoples talk pages. Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (contribs) 08:44, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
(also I thanked you for your for reverting my accidental revert before you left a message on my talk page). Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (contribs) 08:45, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
RedWarn is a dangerous tool. Reverting through it error prone, and what is even more error prone is that you are sending user warnings without even looking at the user you are warning. When I send a warning, after I revert with Twinkle, I do so after I study the user talk page and the user itself. I would not sent a level-4 final warning without even looking at the user (but just at the diff). My two cents, if you continue using RedWarn, you'll probably end up with similar edits. Anyone, I said m piece. Pikavoom (talk) 08:48, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
I understand your concerns, I made a mistake and I am unlikely to make it again. It wasn't the fact that RedWarn is a dangerous tool, it's that I did not look to see that you had already reverted. Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (contribs) 08:50, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Have a nice day/night/evening. Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (contribs) 08:51, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Beric Page

Hi, sorry if I made an incorrect edit. I have the source here, [1]. Im going to try again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hattrick4 (talk • contribs) 05:34, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (contribs) 05:37, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

JoyfulSlate

There's a Neo-Nazi named JoyfulSlate going around vandalizing pages and adding pro-Trump statements. I've tried to revert some of his edits, but got hit by warning messages myself. He won't stop. 2001:8003:AD66:D400:4D5D:D4C5:AC24:4E32 (talk) 06:36, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

He's not a neo-nazi, he never said he was, don't automatically assume, while I do support his views, I do not support the way he is expressing it, this is an encyclopaedia. Don't worry I reverted it all and he has been banned by an administrator. Thank you for helping out on Wikipedia! Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (contribs) 06:38, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Doris Day Page

Here's your proof - NOW PLEASE RESTORE SAME - THANX.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:610b:4600:345a:afe7:d880:95bd (talk • contribs) 11:40, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

NEXT TIME - LOOK BEFORE YOU DELETE - THANX.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:610b:4600:345a:afe7:d880:95bd (talk • contribs) 11:41, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

There were no sources on the page that backed up the content you inserted into the article, and you still have not provided any sources. Feel free to re-add your edit with a reliable source. Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (contribs) 11:49, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Rollback granted

 

Hi Carolina2k22. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account until 2020-12-05. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Anarchyte (talk • work) 11:22, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Userbox request

An ancestor of this user was a Girl Scout.

This user owns a Boomerang. Catfurball (talk) 19:45, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Sure! Sorry for my late response. Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (contribs) 05:53, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
This is slightly embarrassing, should've actually gotten around to this far earlier - had a rough few months. But here you go!
 This user owns a
Boomerang.
An ancestor of this user was a member of the
Girl Scouts.
You can use them by copying and pasting these: {{User:Carolina2k22/Userboxes/Boomerang}} {{User:Carolina2k22/Userboxes/Ancestor_GirlScout}} Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (contribs) 23:49, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Latest comment: 3 years ago13 comments6 people in discussion

Clive Thomas Draft

Thanks for reviewing this draft. I've put a citation for the award list and the book list. The listings come from news articles and his profile on the Uni website- so I'm not terribly invested in their importance... it's more of a "all the other econ articles have it" thing, haha. If it would be better to fit them in the article prose I can give that a shot too, since I've found another good biographical source for Thompson. I'll be fussing with the article soon, I just wanted to acknowledge your note. Cheers, Estheim (talk) 06:55, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Kindly looking forward to any feedback, thanks Estheim (talk) 15:46, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the accept and copy-edit spit shine. If you're interested, I also have an AFC draft called Draft:Banking in Guyana which is very much in the same topic of interest. I know it sounds SUPER boring, but it's not a highly complex industry, and I approached it from a more consumer-interest standpoint than macroeconomic one. If there's any conflict for AFC (since begging for AFC accepts is like, the most distasteful thing) I'd still highly appreciate any advice for improvement/copy-editing. Cheers, Estheim (talk) 19:36, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

NPR request follow up

Since you asked for examples of AfC decisions that I disagreed with, here are a few that stood out:

  • Black Dreams, which is almost certainly about to be deleted, either due to the WP:A9 tag that was added to it or as a result of the ongoing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Dreams (2nd nomination)
  • Streetsound, which has both copyvio issues and a very clear COI for the primary editor
  • Caroline Winnett, which has some egregiously promotional language towards the end. The subject may indeed be notable, but we should err on the side of strictness for BLPs, particularly BLPs of business executives, because the ratio of submissions from paid or COI editors to good-faith contributions is very high for these subjects.

signed, Rosguill talk 02:02, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (contribs) 07:17, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Userbox Request

Can you please make a Userbox saying "This user's pronouns are He/Him/His" CX Zoom (talk) 16:59, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Alright Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (contribs) 22:57, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
HEThis user's pronouns are
He/Him/His.
Done. You can use it by copying and pasting this: {{User:Carolina2k22/Userboxes/Pronouns/He}} Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (contribs) 23:52, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
@Carolina2k22: Thanks a lot. CX Zoom (talk) 16:56, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Manny Greenhill rejection questions

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mendel_Greenberg


Submission declined on 7 November 2020 by Carolina2k22

Article does not meet WP:MOS. There are lots of issues - from the name being `Manny' to multiple links to disambiguation pages. 

Comment: Forgot to specify in my decline reason: The issue with the lack of inline citations does also still exist.

The following is a response to the above.

Mendel Greenberg legally changed his name to Manuel Greenhill but was known throughout his adult life, both professionally and personally, by the first name Manny. He is remembered as such by his family, friends and associates. This is confirmed by the recollection of The Weavers manager (and Greenhill’s contemporary) Harold Leventhal, quoted in my entry: “And our sources were guys like Manny Greenhill…” Wikipedia does not appear to have a policy of rejecting entries for individuals who were best known by unconventional first names or nicknames, as witnessed by entries for Babe Ruth, Muddy Waters, Lucky Luciano, Snoop Dogg, etc. Why the exception here?

Wikipedia: `Disambiguation in Wikipedia is the process of resolving the conflicts that occur when articles about two or more different topics could have the same "natural" page title. This category contains disambiguation pages: non-article pages containing links to other Wikipedia articles and disambiguation pages.’ My entry’s rejection on account of `multiple links to disambiguation pages’ is confusing on a couple of counts. If I understand a `disambiguation page’ to be an online source linked from the body of an entry, I had the impression such links were encouraged to both establish the subject’s credibility and to help readers gain a fuller understanding of the subject’s milieu. The entry as I submitted it did have `multiple links to disambiguation pages,’ if I understand what they are, but so does the Wikipedia entry for Greenhill’s star client Joan Baez and hundreds of others. However, the iteration of what I submitted that appears in Wikitia has all the links removed (not by me).

I fail to see the point in that, just as I fail to understand the links as submitted being grounds for the entry’s rejection. (But I also never submitted an entry for Mendel Greenberg, a name by which no one would be seeking information on Manny Greenhill.) Kindly help me understand why `multiple links to disambiguation pages’ are grounds for rejection. Wikipedia: `On Wikipedia, an inline citation refers to a citation in a page's text placed by any method that allows the reader to associate a given bit of material with specific reliable source(s) that support it. The most common methods are numbered footnotes and parenthetical citations within the text, but other forms are also used on occasion.’ There are a dozen inline citations in my entry. By comparison the Wikipedia entry for the arguably better-known impresario George Wein offers only 10 inline citations. Is there a new minimum requirement? What is it?

Carolina2k22 cites `lots of issues’ before noting two and later adding a third. `Lots of issues’ is vague and potentially capricious, inviting rejection for any reason or no reason at all. Are there other specific grounds on which this entry may be rejected in future? If so, please clearly specify what they are. Thank you. Vexton (talk) 18:30, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

I stated that `Manny' was a problem, as in the ` you used for the opening quotation. Also, I explained the issues, you have links to disambiguation pages and there is not enough inline citations either. You can re-use inline citations, on the article the first paragraph in the Biography section is completely uncited. Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (contribs) 22:52, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2020).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  • By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes). The effectiveness of the discretionary sanctions can be evaluated on the request by any editor after March 1, 2021 (or sooner if for a good reason).
  • Following the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Barkeep49, BDD, Bradv, CaptainEek, L235, Maxim, Primefac.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Userbox Request

Hello, first of all I would to wish you a Wonderful Happy New Year.

Actually I came across this Userbox a few days back:

  This user has been on Wikipedia for 6 years and 26 days.

After seeing this, I thought to get Userboxes saying "This user's Wikipedia Contributions can be found here" which automatically links to the user's Wikipedia contributions list (in my case Special:Contributions/CX_Zoom). But I can't find any such Userboxes, is it possible to make one? CX Zoom (talk) 10:11, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

February 2021

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Administrators' newsletter

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2021).

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:09, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

March 2021

Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Your GA nomination of Jacinda Ardern

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jacinda Ardern you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 21:21, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Carolina2k22         GA on hold -- There is one issue to attend to, noted in the review. Thank you. --Whiteguru (talk) 00:51, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jacinda Ardern

The article Jacinda Ardern you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Jacinda Ardern for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 01:01, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2021).

 

  Administrator changes

  TJMSmith
  Boing! said Zebedee • Hiberniantears • Lear's Fool • Only • WGFinley

  Interface administrator changes

  AmandaNP

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • When blocking an IPv6 address with Twinkle, there is now a checkbox with the option to just block the /64 range. When doing so, you can still leave a block template on the initial, single IP address' talkpage.
  • When protecting a page with Twinkle, you can now add a note if doing so was in response to a request at WP:RfPP, and even link to the specific revision.
  • There have been a number of reported issues with Pending Changes. Most problems setting protection appear to have been resolved (phab:T273317) but other issues with autoaccepting edits persist (phab:T275322).

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:13, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jacinda Ardern

The article Jacinda Ardern you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Jacinda Ardern for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 19:42, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2021

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2021).

 

  Administrator changes

  Alexandria • Happyme22 • RexxS

  Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a has been deprecated; it covered immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
  • Following a request for comment, page movers were granted the delete-redirect userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target.

  Technical news

  • When you move a page that many editors have on their watchlist the history can be split and it might also not be possible to move it again for a while. This is because of a job queue problem. (T278350)
  • Code to support some very old web browsers is being removed. This could cause issues in those browsers. (T277803)

  Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:20, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2021

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2021).

 

  Administrator changes

  Enchanter • Carlossuarez46

  Interface administrator changes

  Ragesoss

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • The user group oversight will be renamed to suppress. This is for technical reasons. You can comment at T112147 if you have objections.

  Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:51, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi there, I saw you made a userbox that has "This user is powered by Ubuntu"; would you be able to make one that says "This user is powered by Arch Linux"? It'd be appreciated. Thanks. Dellwood546 (talk) 20:28, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2021

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2021).

 

  Administrator changes

  Ashleyyoursmile • Less Unless
  Husond • MattWade • MJCdetroit • Carioca • Vague Rant • Kingboyk • Thunderboltz • Gwen Gale • AniMate • SlimVirgin (deceased)

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • Wikimedia previously used the IRC network Freenode. However, due to changes over who controlled the network with reports of a forceful takeover by several ex-staff members, the Wikimedia IRC Group Contacts decided to move to the new Libera Chat network. It has been reported that Wikimedia related channels on Freenode have been forcibly taken over if they pointed members to Libera. There is a migration guide and Wikimedia discussions about this.

  Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:45, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2021

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2021).

  Guideline and policy news

  • Consensus has been reached to delete all books in the book namespace. There was rough consensus that the deleted books should still be available on request at WP:REFUND even after the namespace is removed.
  • An RfC is open to discuss the next steps following a trial which automatically applied pending changes to TFAs.

  Technical news

  • IP addresses of unregistered users are to be hidden from everyone. There is a rough draft of how IP addresses may be shown to users who need to see them. This currently details allowing administrators, checkusers, stewards and those with a new usergroup to view the full IP address of unregistered users. Editors with at least 500 edits and an account over a year old will be able to see all but the end of the IP address in the proposal. The ability to see the IP addresses hidden behind the mask would be dependent on agreeing to not share the parts of the IP address they can see with those who do not have access to the same information. Accessing part of or the full IP address of a masked editor would also be logged. Comments on the draft are being welcomed at the talk page.

  Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:26, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Hello Carolina2k22:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 900 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.

Manny Greenhill entry

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I was looking for a Wikipedia entry about Manny Greenhill, whom I wrote about in my biography of Josh White, my book "Dylan Goes Electric," and elsewhere -- he was a very significant figure in the US folk revival, sponsoring concerts by Pete Seeger during the blacklist, shepherding Joan Baez's career from the beginning, and working as a manager for many important artists on the Boston/Cambridge folk scene.

I noticed that there is a rejected entry for him under his birth name, Mendel Greenberg" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mendel_Greenberg) and that you were the most recent editor to reject it, in part because it referred to him as "Manny". There may be other good reasons to decline this draft article, but that is not one of them. Manny Greenhill was his professional name throughout his career, is the way he is consistently named in dozens of books about the US folk revival, and is how anyone who wants to learn about him would look for him.

All the best, Elijah Wald— Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.245.193.135 (talk • contribs) 22:19, 11 July 2021 (UTC)


Administrators' newsletter – July 2021

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2021).

  Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC is open to add a delay of one week from nomination to deletion for G13 speedy deletions.

  Technical news

  • Last week all wikis were very slow or not accessible for 30 minutes. This was due to server lag caused by regenerating dynamic lists on the Russian Wikinews after a large bulk import. (T287380)

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:17, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2021

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2021).

 

  Administrator changes

  Jake Wartenberg
  Emperor • Viridian Bovary
  Ashleyyoursmile → Viridian Bovary

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • The Score extension has been re-enabled on public wikis. It has been updated, but has been placed in safe mode to address unresolved security issues. Further information on the security issues can be found on the mediawiki page.

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:44, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

About Quevedos

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hello, today I've seen a message in my talk page about edits I supposedly made to the page Quevedos (currently still vandalized) in the 20th of September, 2020. I didn't do it and would like to understand what this is about and was hoping that maybe you could help me.

1) Was the edit really made on the 20th of September, 2020 ? If so, why did this message only show up now ?

2) The page says 'mobile edit': Does this imply that a phone using this IP has been hacked or perhaps that someone with access to the local network did it maliciously (as a joke, I suppose) ?

Thanks in advance, 2804:14D:4CA4:8781:BC54:1930:D57D:7726 (talk) 09:46, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Addendum: The comments were made in the following link, it seems my IP might have changed ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:189.6.242.39 2804:14D:4CA4:8781:BC54:1930:D57D:7726 (talk) 09:49, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – October 2021

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2021).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  • A motion has standardised the 500/30 (extended confirmed) restrictions placed by the Arbitration Committee. The standardised restriction is now listed in the Arbitration Committee's procedures.
  • Following the closure of the Iranian politics case, standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, post-1978 Iranian politics, broadly construed.
  • The Arbitration Committee encourages uninvolved administrators to use the discretionary sanctions procedure in topic areas where it is authorised to facilitate consensus in RfCs. This includes, but is not limited to, enforcing sectioned comments, word/diff limits and moratoriums on a particular topic from being brought in an RfC for up to a year.

  Miscellaneous

  • Editors have approved expanding the trial of Growth Features from 2% of new accounts to 25%, and the share of newcomers getting mentorship from 2% to 5%. Experienced editors are invited to add themselves to the mentor list.
  • The community consultation phase of the 2021 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process is open for editors to provide comments and ask questions to candidates.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2021

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2021).

  Guideline and policy news

  • Phase 2 of the 2021 RfA review has commenced which will discuss potential solutions to address the 8 issues found in Phase 1. Proposed solutions that achieve consensus will be implemented and you may propose solutions till 07 November 2021.

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:43, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

New (better) userbox?

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm among those who have put the existing "Carpenter" userbox on their user page. This is the box:

 This user is a carpenter.

As a concept, it's not so bad. But it shifts through several images, a couple of which are not apt. It shows a hammer, but it's a ball-peen hammer (typically a mechanic's tool, not one used so frequently by a carpenter). The better image would be a claw hammer. It also features an image of wood mallets, and another of what appear to be carving tools, which are probably carried by a small minority of carpenters, being only used for artistic work or decorative touches. The tools shown that are most relatable to a carpenter's day are the chalk line, in the red casing, and the pencil.

I wonder if you'd be willing to make a better userbox for this hobby or profession? Appropriate image(s) could be the claw hammer, a hand-held electric circular saw, a tape measure, a builder's square... etc. These would be in frequent use by either a professional or amateur carpenter.

Thanks for considering this.Joel Russ (talk) 14:04, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2021

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2021).

 

  Administrator changes

  A Train • Berean Hunter • Epbr123 • GermanJoe • Sanchom • Mysid

  Technical news

  • Unregistered editors using the mobile website are now able to receive notices to indicate they have talk page messages. The notice looks similar to what is already present on desktop, and will be displayed on when viewing any page except mainspace and when editing any page. (T284642)
  • The limit on the number of emails a user can send per day has been made global instead of per-wiki to help prevent abuse. (T293866)

  Arbitration


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:24, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

You have been pruned from a list

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Carolina2k22! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed on the AFC's participants list, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 6 months. Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to regain access to the AFCH script, you can do so at any time by visiting WT:AFCP. Thank you for your work at AFC, and if you start editing Wikipedia again we hope you will rejoin us. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:01, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2022

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2021).

  Guideline and policy news

  • Following consensus at the 2021 RfA review, the autopatrolled user right has been removed from the administrators user group; admins can grant themselves the autopatrolled permission if they wish to remain autopatrolled.

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • The functionaries email list (functionaries-en lists.wikimedia.org) will no longer accept incoming emails apart from those sent by list members and WMF staff. Private concerns, apart from those requiring oversight, should be directly sent to the Arbitration Committee.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2022

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2022).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • The user group oversight will be renamed suppress in around 3 weeks. This will not affect the name shown to users and is simply a change in the technical name of the user group. The change is being made for technical reasons. You can comment in Phabricator if you have objections.
  • The Reply Tool feature, which is a part of Discussion Tools, will be opt-out for everyone logged in or logged out starting 7 February 2022. Editors wishing to comment on this can do so in the relevant Village Pump discussion.

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2022

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2022).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:46, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2022

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2022).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • Access to Special:RevisionDelete has been expanded to include users who have the deletelogentry and deletedhistory rights. This means that those in the Researcher user group and Checkusers who are not administrators can now access Special:RevisionDelete. The users able to view the special page after this change are the 3 users in the Researcher group, as there are currently no checkusers who are not already administrators. (T301928)
  • When viewing deleted revisions or diffs on Special:Undelete a back link to the undelete page for the associated page is now present. (T284114)

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:12, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Robert Falcon Scott

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I have only just realised that I shouldn't have reverted the pending change on the article. I've been reading up on pending changes and realised only those with PC rights and admins are supposed to accept/undo them. Sorry about that! Now I know, Knitsey (talk) 16:40, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

No problem! Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (edits) 03:55, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Robert Kasun

Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Because Ethamn's talk page happened to still be on my watchlist, I saw your decision to decline their 22 November submission of Draft:Robert Kasun for a move to the main space. While the version you reviewed was sparse and exclusively cited sources immediately associated with Kasun or of a quality not high enough to contribute to WP:GNG and WP:RS standards, I have expanded and modified the article. My intention is to move the article to the main space with my additions, but wanted to ensure that you could give the draft a quick once-over before doing so. I stand by the current article and believe it presently meets WP:GNG, WP:BLP, and WP:RS standards despite the obvious but not exclusive reliance on Catholic-focused and non-independent media. ~ Pbritti (talk) 17:57, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Awesome, I'll have a look over it within the next couple of hours. Thanks! Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (edits) 05:00, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
I would ask that you resubmit it for review and then I'll be able to go over it—I'm inclined to accept it at this stage. Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (edits) 07:48, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
Excellent, expect that resubmission in the next few minutes. Kinda a heat of the moment "I could try fixing this" thing, so thanks for indulging me. ~ Pbritti (talk) 17:35, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Draft: Alan Barnard

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi @Carolina2k22 I've been editing back and forth for about 5 months now, and I've made a lot of changes. Can you please give me specific guidance on which resources is the problem? I removed sources from Medium and PR newswire as well as all sources from TOCICO, Goldratt and any resources that may not be independent as requested. The resources worth keeping according to @TipsyElephant are the awards and interviews on issuu. Please help. Karini.goosen (talk) 08:42, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

I'm really sorry about this. The main issue is more so around notability (which also direct connects with the citations). I'm not entirely convinced he has had significant coverage in reliable secondary sources independent of himself. A lot of the sources are also still not particularly independent of him either, which is why I ended up declining per the same reason since, while the content had been changed a little, the core issues still remained. Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (edits) 08:51, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank You For The Tank

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
  A picture of the Real Miss Honey
Thank you for thanking me, this is my dog. I LIKE TO EAT SKITTLES LOTS OF SKITTLES (talk) 21:34, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Haha, thank you! :) Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (edits) 21:38, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

User talk:Th ebo tis v erym uchb ack‎

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Please WP:DENY. If they get out of hand, we can request that talk page access be revoked, but I suspect they're enjoying the attention you're giving them. General Ization Talk 05:39, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Alright I appreciate it, thank you! Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (edits) 05:40, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Make It 16 Incorporated v Attorney-General

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article Make It 16 Incorporated v Attorney-General you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Make It 16 Incorporated v Attorney-General and Talk:Make It 16 Incorporated v Attorney-General/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 02:41, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Make It 16 Incorporated v Attorney-General

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article Make It 16 Incorporated v Attorney-General you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Make It 16 Incorporated v Attorney-General for comments about the article, and Talk:Make It 16 Incorporated v Attorney-General/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 18:01, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Invitation

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments1 person in discussion
 

Hello Carolina2k22:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a two week long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 14 January 2023.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 900 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help! ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 10:22, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 10:22, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia page denied 2x

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

My wikipedia page has been denied twice. The main reason I'm given is that the subject, Dr. Ralph Dacey, does not qualify because of the guidelines for notability. Yet, when I look up those guidelines "academics" is a guideline. I'm truly baffled by this. In the neurosurgery world, Dr. Dacey is an international presence and I believe the articles I cite in his bio reflect that. Any help you can provide would be great, but please don't point me back to the notatbility guidelines. Courtneykchazen (talk) 18:01, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

@Courtneykchazen The WP:ACADEMIC guideline isn't purely that the person is an academic, it entails a broader amount of requirements within it. It is its own requirement. When searching online I don't find too much independent sources of Dr. Ralph Dacey. This could be because of my region which is partly why we rely on the draft article as well.
The article in its current form lacks a substantial number of citations so verifiability cannot be established. An example is his birth year, there are no citations for that. If you're willing to correct errors, I'm sure another editor will be able to review the draft in more depth. But as it is currently, it cannot be accepted. Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (edits) 15:17, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
  The Invisible Barnstar
Thank you for participating in Articles for Creation's January 2023 Backlog Drive! You reviewed 21 drafts, for a total of 30.5 points. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 00:38, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Thank you! :) Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (edits) 01:21, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Reject of Montreal declaration on animal exploitation

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello, My draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Clkluigi#Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation%3A_Montreal_declaration_on_animal_exploitation_%28January_5%29 has been refused. The reasons for the refusal are clear in themselves, but I don't see how to apply them. I felt I had sourced everything correctly and the peacock terms are quotes in sections dedicated to feedback, which seem balanced to me. Could you help me correct this article ? Should I delete the "reactions" section? Thanks in advance for sharing your expertise. I asked here but received no answer. Clkluigi (talk) 18:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

@Clkluigi I'll have a better look at it, and I'll help improve the article myself over the next few days; then we can resubmit it. Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (edits) 01:23, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Make It 16 Incorporated v Attorney-General

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

On 22 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Make It 16 Incorporated v Attorney-General, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in November 2022 the Supreme Court of New Zealand ruled that the voting age of 18 was unjustified age discrimination in Make It 16 Incorporated v Attorney-General? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Make It 16 Incorporated v Attorney-General. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Make It 16 Incorporated v Attorney-General), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Your contributions

Latest comment: 1 year ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Just a quick note that you’ll probably see me on your watchlist as I’ve just checked your contributions. I see very solid work; well done! I had a look because whilst the Make it 16 is a solid piece of work written by a fellow Kiwi, your user name has only recently appeared on my radar. Hence my interest. I checked contributions with a view of possibly assigning autopatrolled but you are too far from the numerical threshold of 25 new articles. Are you aware of WP:DYK? I suggest that you nominate the Make it 16 article. Schwede66 19:57, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Kia ora and thank you, I appreciate it! I have heard of WP:DYK but hadn't looked much into it. I've nominated it now at Template:Did you know nominations/Make It 16 Incorporated v Attorney-General. I'm definitely quite a bit away from needing/being suitable for autopatrolled, but I am looking to do a lot more work wrt law in NZ (and encourage others interested to do so as well, hence my recent discussion on WT:NZ).
Thank you again! Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (edits) 02:31, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Are you coming to the Wellington WikiCon? If that's not on your agenda yet, can I encourage you to give this some consideration? Attendees of the two previous WikiCons got a lot of of them. Schwede66 03:12, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for mentioning this, I've thought about it a little bit and I'm not entirely sure. I'll definitely keep it under consideration for the next couple weeks. Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (edits) 03:56, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
It's really worthwhile. If dollars is an issue, I think there are scholarships available. Schwede66 06:31, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

You are receiving this message because you were a Good article reviewer on at least one article that is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 or you signed up for messages. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of Good articles for copyright and other problems, unless a reviewer opens an independent Good article reassessment and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information. A list of the GA reviewers can be found here. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. You can opt in or out of further messages at this page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Adult Adoption Information Act 1985

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

  Hello, Carolina2k22. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Adult Adoption Information Act 1985, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Adult Adoption Information Act 1985

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Hello, Carolina2k22. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Adult Adoption Information Act 1985".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:30, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Lists of Acts of the New Zealand Parliament

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

  Hello, Carolina2k22. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lists of Acts of the New Zealand Parliament, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of Acts of the 53rd New Zealand Parliament

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

  Hello, Carolina2k22. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Acts of the 53rd New Zealand Parliament, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:04, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of Acts of the 52nd New Zealand Parliament

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

  Hello, Carolina2k22. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Acts of the 52nd New Zealand Parliament, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:05, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

List of Acts of the 53rd New Zealand Parliament

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I hope you don't mind me editing in your user space - I finished off List of Acts of the 53rd New Zealand Parliament and moved it to main space. Matt (Talk) 08:37, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Acts of the 53rd New Zealand Parliament for deletion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Acts of the 53rd New Zealand Parliament is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Acts of the 53rd New Zealand Parliament until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 09:54, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Charles III requested move discussion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 05:39, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Request for applications for position of Wikipedian-at-Large, Aotearoa New Zealand

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Kia ora! The Wikimedia Aotearoa New Zealand User Group invites you to read about the call for applications for a Wikipedian-at-Large for Aotearoa New Zealand in 2024. Group members are happy to explain the process and discuss ideas with interested editors.

Sent by Zippybonzo on behalf of MurielMary using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 06:36, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
 
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Other British monarch requested move discussions currently taking place

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Since you recently participated in the Charles III requested move discussion, I thought you might like to know that there are two other discussions currently going on about other British monarch article titles here and here. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 22:21, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:36, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Userboxes

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Can u make a userbox that says:"This user is a kid. Treat him or her nicely." With kid image? And any color u want please! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anotaomo (talk • contribs) 12:18, 23 October 2023 (UTC)


Can you make a Kendrick Lamar-related userbox? I've always searched, but never found one. Thanks Flobeigor (talk) 14:31, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

November Articles for creation backlog drive

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Hello Carolina2k22:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 900 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Invitation to an in-person meetup in Mohua / Golden Bay

Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Golden Bay Air are holding some seats for us until 21 November

Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.

Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

  1. ^ http://www.madeinsaint-etienne.com/infos/article-asse-le-nouveau-look-de-robert-beric--photo--278411.html
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Carolina2k22/Archive_1&oldid=1210920403"