Carvalho1988
Welcome!
edit
|
May 2014
editWelcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Post-quantum cryptography has been reverted.
Your edit here to Post-quantum cryptography was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://christianepeters.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/20110920-ecc.pdf) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:03, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
Carvalho1988, you are invited to the Teahouse
editHi Carvalho1988! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Supersingular Isogeny Key Exchange (May 8)
editPlease read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Draft:Supersingular Isogeny Key Exchange.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .
contributions to Wikipedia!
- Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Supersingular Isogeny Key Exchange has been accepted
editThe article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Chris Troutman (talk) 16:27, 31 May 2014 (UTC)AfC notification: Draft:Ring Learning with Errors Key Exchange has a new comment
editJoseph2302, Thank you for your comment. If you look at the Ring Learning with Errors Key Exchange now you will see that Jinbolin has added an excellent lead section that should provide more of what you are looking for. I have added some more references and added a section on other approaches to solving the same problem that the article presents. Thanks.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Ring learning with errors key exchange has been accepted
editThe article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Joseph2302 (talk) 15:46, 12 June 2015 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Ring Learning with Errors Signature (June 23)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ring Learning with Errors Signature and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your draft article, Draft:Provably Secure Ring-LWE Signature (PSRS)
editHello, Carvalho1988. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Provably Secure Ring-LWE Signature".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 02:02, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Multivariate quadratic random number generator has a new comment
editMfD nomination of Draft:Multivariate quadratic random number generator
editDraft:Multivariate quadratic random number generator, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Multivariate quadratic random number generator and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Multivariate quadratic random number generator during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 10:26, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:SM9 Identity Based Cryptography Standard
editHello, Carvalho1988. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "SM9 Identity Based Cryptography Standard".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (Talk) 02:31, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
The article Supersingular isogeny key exchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
SIDH was completely broken in 2022, yet this article is the first hit on Google for the phrase "isogeny-based cryptography". In addition to being poorly written, it is unclear how to salvage the article given that SIKE is now practically irrelevant. Eventually it should be superseded by a more general article on isogeny-based cryptography, with a focus on constructions that are currently believed to be secure. For the moment we could simply redirect to Post-quantum cryptography § Isogeny-based cryptography.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 25 June 2023 (UTC)