CenozoicEra
|
(Re: )Your First Saudi State rvv
editMy cleanup was NOT vandalism, and I'm shocked that anyone could think so. Remember, ASSUME GOOD FAITH. This was simply an article I came across and saw that it needed to be cleaned up. The English in the article was mediocre and the information was disjointed. I added virtually nothing, and the only real change I made was to alter the slightly POV assertion regarding the aims of Wahhab. Your "reversion as vandalism" is, I believe, completely unwarranted. CenozoicEra 19:43, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
I have restored the cleanup version I prepared. If you have objections, please specify them here or on the Talk:First_Saudi_State page. Thank you. CenozoicEra 21:28, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- Hello friend , thanx for cleanup First_Saudi_State page , but don't you consider extra words like (Wahhabis , Crusades , Zionists....etc) makes your cleanup edit as vandalism ? cheers
- Ammar 16:24, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- There is a difference between vandalism and POV. At worst, adding Wahhabism would be POV, not vandalism, and that is certainly not my intention. I understand that the term has some negative connotations, but that is the name of the article that is used in the English Wikipedia. If you think Salafism is a better article to refer to, then by all means change it. You can even delete the link if you think it is not necessary to understanding the article (that's the whole point of Wikipedia). I inserted it only for the purpose of allowing readers to follow the link to understand the aims of Wahhab. As stated, my goal was strictly to improve the readability of the article for readers. Thanks for replying, and cheers to you! CenozoicEra 19:29, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- Ok you can keep it sir , as long as no one else revert it hehe :) have a nice day Ammar 07:16, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
'North America (Americas)' ... again
editThank you for weighing in on this prior AfD. Even though an apparent consensus supported the prior AfD in some way, and the article has been deleted, this has reared its head again -- please peruse and weigh in. Thanks! Corticopia 22:30, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Image:Americanacademyrome.jpg
editWhere were you standing to take that great photo? Are you on the roof of the Villa Aurelia? I'm kicking myself that I didn't take any photos from there. Thanks for the nostalga. --Myke Cuthbert 02:05, 14 May 2007 (UTC) (FAAR '05)
Non-free use disputed for Image:Brinsleyschwarzmusician2.jpg
editThis file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Brinsleyschwarzmusician2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:36, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Non-free use disputed for Image:Brinsleyschwarzeponymous.jpg
editThis file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Brinsleyschwarzeponymous.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:37, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
- It's an album cover, and (as per above) that seems to fall under fair use. What's the problem? CenozoicEra 19:18, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Non-free use disputed for Image:Despiteitall.jpg
editThis file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Despiteitall.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:49, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
- It's an album cover, and (as per above) that seems to fall under fair use. What's the problem? CenozoicEra 18:46, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Non-free use disputed for Image:Newfavouritesofbrinsleyschwarz.jpg
editThis file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Newfavouritesofbrinsleyschwarz.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:46, 4 June 2007 (UTC) Done. Wwwhatsup (talk) 01:52, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Non-free use disputed for Image:Nervousontheroad.jpg
editThis file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Nervousontheroad.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:22, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Non-free use disputed for Image:Jesusofcool.jpg
editThis file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Jesusofcool.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC) Done. Wwwhatsup (talk) 01:51, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Non-free use disputed for Image:Purepopfornowpeople.jpg
editThis file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Purepopfornowpeople.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:03, 6 June 2007 (UTC) Done. Wwwhatsup (talk) 01:51, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Non-free use disputed for Image:Pleasedonteverchange.jpg
editThis file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Pleasedonteverchange.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Brinsleyschwarzeponymous.jpg
editThanks for uploading Image:Brinsleyschwarzeponymous.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:33, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jesusofcool.jpg
editThanks for uploading Image:Jesusofcool.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:06, 2 January 2008 (UTC) Done. Wwwhatsup (talk) 01:50, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nervousontheroad.jpg
editThanks for uploading Image:Nervousontheroad.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Newfavouritesofbrinsleyschwarz.jpg
editThanks for uploading Image:Newfavouritesofbrinsleyschwarz.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC) Done Wwwhatsup (talk) 01:39, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Fair Use
editHi. All that's needed to save your images from the chop is to add the appropriate template, usually Template:Album_cover_fur, and fill out a couple of details. The main failing of these rationales is that they don't specify what article they attain to. In the case of an infobox - replacing the current rationale with {{album cover fur | Article = [ARTICLE NAME] | Use = Infobox }} is sufficient. I'll do a couple to give you the idea. I know it's a pain in the rear end. Wwwhatsup (talk) 01:31, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Jesusofcool.jpg)
editThanks for uploading Image:Jesusofcool.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:42, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Brinsleyschwarzband.jpg
editThanks for uploading Image:Brinsleyschwarzband.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Despiteitall.jpg
editThanks for uploading Image:Despiteitall.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Pleasedonteverchange.jpg
editThanks for uploading Image:Pleasedonteverchange.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:46, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
File:Purepopfornowpeople.jpg listed for deletion
editAn image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Purepopfornowpeople.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 12:22, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
editYour upload of File:Arapacis,jpg.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:06, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)