Welcome!

edit
Hello, Chase m88! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!  Masum Ibn Musa  Conversation 07:03, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Speedy deletion nomination of Lovelytheband

edit

Hello Chase m88,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lovelytheband for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

CASSIOPEIA (talk) 11:38, 11 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Superorganism (band) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Superorganism (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superorganism (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tacyarg (talk) 03:50, 5 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Peach Pit (band) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peach Pit (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peach Pit (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 14:29, 15 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Lava La Rue has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lava La Rue. Thanks! Oltrepier (talk) 19:36, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lava La Rue has been accepted

edit
 
Lava La Rue, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Oltrepier (talk) 17:41, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wombo (band) (November 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 21:05, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
There are currently many music-related articles that feature references with not enough significant, independent coverage.
Articles with less references/less significant sources: Tanukichan, Skirts (musician), Tracker (band), Hail (indie band), Alaska!, Juno (band), Manifesto (band), The Lapse, Kleenex Girl Wonder, Rafter (band), Merit (indie rock band), Railcars (band), The Young, White Violet (band), Vermont (band) just to name a few.
Multiple articles from the Louisville Eccentric Observer, articles by The Fader, Paste, Brooklyn Vegan, and album reviews by Uproxx and Pitchfork is/should be considered significant coverage.
Citations to Pitchfork and Uproxx articles have been added.
No sources are self-published
No sources are non-independent
This article used primary sources
Should this article be re-submitted for review, or should this article stay as a draft while we wait for more "significant coverage" about the artist. Please let me know if you have any other recommendations. Chase m88 (talk) 00:09, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Chase m88! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 21:05, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Wombo (band) has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Wombo (band). Thanks! WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 00:18, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wombo (band) has been accepted

edit
 
Wombo (band), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tails Wx 02:23, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fire Talk (November 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:39, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
This article features lesser known sources because Fire Talk is an independent record label. Fire Talk did not receive mainstream coverage early on, as they were lesser known to the mainstream.
I would argue that multiple mentions in Pitchfork and Brooklyn Vegan, as well as a significant mention in Vice is considered to be reliable and verifiable. The other sources used here are commonly used in other Wikipedia articles of indie musicians.
I have fixed the citation errors that were present in my original submission. Chase m88 (talk) 09:15, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fire Talk (November 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 13:19, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fire Talk (June 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 19:57, 25 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Fire Talk

edit

  Hello, Chase m88. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fire Talk, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:09, 25 November 2024 (UTC)Reply