User talk:CheeseJadenVR

Welcome!

Hi CheeseJadenVR! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!

Help me!

Please help me with... How do I go back to my draft article!

🧀VR CheeseJadenVR (talk) 23:25, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

What was the name of the draft? (Acer's userpage |what did I do now) 23:28, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

By the way, its "Harambee, Milwaukee" thanks! CheeseJadenVR (talk) 23:29, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Hmm...I did a search in draftspace and the deletion log. It appears it never existed, but more likely I entered the wrong title. Harambee, Milwaukee? (Acer's userpage |what did I do now) 23:34, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Wow you read my mind CheeseJadenVR (talk) 23:35, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Do you have any idea if the page was deleted or if it had a different title? (Acer's userpage |what did I do now) 23:43, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

i think it got stolen CheeseJadenVR (talk) 23:48, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

what... Im sayin someone already supmited the article CheeseJadenVR (talk) 23:56, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

submited CheeseJadenVR (talk) 23:56, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Please read this article. You're new, so it's not too bad of a mistake. Feel free to improve it further, however. (Acer's userpage |what did I do now) 00:02, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

oh CheeseJadenVR (talk) 00:09, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harambee, Milwaukee (April 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sophisticatedevening was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Harambee, Milwaukee and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 22:22, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, CheeseJadenVR! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sophisticatedevening🍷(talk) 22:22, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

aw man but thank you!

🧀VR CheeseJadenVR (talk) 22:28, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
161		Passive transport (talk)	Add sources
25		Ambrose of Optina (talk)	Add sources
588		Ludwig Boltzmann (talk)	Add sources
34		Cellular compartment (talk)	Add sources
1,240		2016 Summer Olympics (talk)	Add sources
150		Bacterial cell structure (talk)	Add sources
190		Doping at the Olympic Games (talk)	Cleanup
362		Autotroph (talk)	Cleanup
581		Electron transport chain (talk)	Cleanup
254		Doping in Russia (talk)	Expand
29		Russia at the 2014 Winter Olympics (talk)	Expand
208		China at the Olympics (talk)	Expand
755		Biochemistry (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
31		AN/ASQ-213 HARM targeting system (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
26		Eighteenth-century Gothic novel (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
25		Trickle-down fashion (talk)	Merge
121		Webbed foot (talk)	Merge
12		Dublin GAA honours (talk)	Merge
351		Cell signaling (talk)	Wikify
19		Constitution of Connecticut (talk)	Wikify
4		Ferdinando Ponzetti (talk)	Wikify
3		Chulhawali (talk)	Orphan
1		Buntaanga (talk)	Orphan
5		Center for Pan Asian Community Services, Inc. (talk)	Orphan
4		1887 in Iceland (talk)	Stub
4		1699 in piracy (talk)	Stub
4		1825 United States House of Representatives elections in Virginia (talk)	Stub
8		(2,4,6-Trimethylphenyl)gold (talk)	Stub
4		1137 in Ireland (talk)	Stub
4		1837 Vermont gubernatorial election (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:44, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

April 2025

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Draft talk:CaseOh, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. JFHJr (㊟) 00:46, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at City of Whyalla. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 13:34, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Interdigital webbing in mammals, you may be blocked from editing. Many of your edits across numerous pages have been disruptive, including adding and removing improper templates, making nonsensical edits and comments, and more. Please refrain from taking actions without knowing what you are doing. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 03:23, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harambee, Milwaukee (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

There are no references in this draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Harambee, Milwaukee and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 00:49, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mutiple problems

Template:Mutiple problems has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. JFHJr (㊟) 01:12, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Unspeakable (YouTuber) (April 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ktkvtsh was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Unspeakable (YouTuber) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ktkvtsh (talk) 00:37, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	nice draft YapPro (talk) 20:49, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Unspeakable (YouTuber) (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

A lot of the sources aren't reliable, with the exception of Forbes.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Unspeakable (YouTuber) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 23:00, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Harambee, Milwaukee

Hello, CheeseJadenVR. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Harambee, Milwaukee, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Harambee, Milwaukee

Hello, CheeseJadenVR. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Harambee".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:11, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

WOW J😢 JadenGotLost 22:38, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CheeseJadenVR. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Newslinger talk 09:50, 11 April 2026 (UTC)