Welcome

edit

Hello, Cheick-Didier, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Creektiming (talk) 05:16, 25 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

July 2016

edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Despicable Me (franchise), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 15:15, 26 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

August 2016

edit

  Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Zootopia. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. WP:SEAOFBLUE discourages wikilinking several words in a row, as the reader won't be sure what they're clicking on. McGeddon (talk) 09:07, 23 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

December 2016

edit

  Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Zootopia. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. McDoobAU93 18:33, 21 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Zootopia, you may be blocked from editing. McDoobAU93 18:12, 22 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Original research

edit

Please do not add your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Shrek Forever After. You've been warned for this before. If you don't understand policy, please ask at WP:TEAHOUSE or WP:HELPDESK. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:37, 22 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

November 2017

edit

I'm not sure what you were trying to do in this edit to Shrek Forever After, but you broke the link to the director of the film and completely changed the meaning of one sentence. In the future, I strongly suggest that you provide edit summaries for your edits. Otherwise, we're left to guess at your intent—and with an edit like the one I linked above, it's just as easy to view it as disruptive as to view it as an attempt to improve the article. —C.Fred (talk) 13:36, 4 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Cheick-Didier. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

January 2018

edit

  Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Shrek 2.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not blank citations or restore synthesis, such as saying that a film received positive reviews without a source that explicitly says this. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:45, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

April 2018

edit

  Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Star (TV series). There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. --IJBall (contribstalk) 03:03, 6 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

July 2018

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:04, 11 July 2018 (UTC)Reply