Chemcol

Welcome!

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Chemcol! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! —This lousy T-shirt— (talk) 15:13, 10 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello! Chemcol, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! —This lousy T-shirt— (talk) 15:14, 10 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Edit war warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Herbicide. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection.

Conflict of interest

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please read Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest#Writing_about_yourself_and_your_work. Please also read WP:EXPERT, especially the last bullet.

Hello, Chemcol. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.

Thanks Jytdog (talk) 12:56, 11 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Expert

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hey Chemcol you appear to have a lot of expertise on herbicides and many of your contributions have been great, but you need to discuss things -- WP:CONSENSUS is the foundation for everything that happens here and that means talking about things. Please also do read WP:EXPERT. Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 12:41, 12 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

You shuold ask first ...

Latest comment: 5 years ago7 comments5 people in discussion

@Edgar181 and DMacks: Before you revise the lede in many articles with reference to what I think is a questionable source, you should ask around. Anyway, these are compounds, not molecules! --Smokefoot (talk) 18:46, 24 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

The terms "bioactive molecule" and "bioactive compound" are synonymous and can be used interchangeably. --Chemcol (talk) 19:23, 24 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Please read the definition of small molecule. --Chemcol (talk) 19:31, 24 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

That might be how you see it... I buy compounds for my lab. Aldrich just will not give me a quote on molecules. I do experiments on compounds, although there are indeed some physics people who do single-molecule experiments. A fascinating area. I am concerned about the LD50 for various reagents, but invariably multiple molecules, say 10²² or so, are involved. So it may seem to someone who does not work as a chemist, that the terms are interchangeable, but the terminology gets in the way. So working chemists discuss compounds. On the other hand compounds dont have symmetry, molecules do. So for some aspects, we refer to the molecule. You might ask around. Its a good way to pick up perspectives, not that you are required to heed them.--Smokefoot (talk) 19:40, 24 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

In general, I think the first sentence of an article should describe a defining feature of the subject. For pharmaceutical drugs, describing their pharmaceutical use in the first sentence is best. The changes you’ve made to pharmaceutical articles, switching from wording such as “is an antibiotic” to wording such as “is a bioactive molecule” is not a improvement. Also, as a general rule, if you are going to make similar changes to hundreds of articles, it is best to get consesus from other editors beforehand. -- Ed (Edgar181) 08:58, 25 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Between the fact that the source has been labelled predatory and that this is not how we should start our articles on medications I am reverting. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:18, 25 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Support reverting, per Doc James on the sourcing and both Doc and Ed on the specificity/focus on the pharmaceutical nature. DMacks (talk) 10:24, 25 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Alatrofloxacin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)