Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry Isaac Clore Lowe (March 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stevey7788 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Stevey7788 (talk) 12:16, 27 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Chester Buchanan! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Stevey7788 (talk) 12:16, 27 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry Isaac Clore Lowe has been accepted

edit
 
Henry Isaac Clore Lowe, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Stevey7788 (talk) 15:56, 5 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

comments

edit

In general, since he is really distinguished , but may not be well recognized outside Jamaca, the article should be of a quality to do him justice. I have started to fix some problems, but the main ones are:

  1. you cannot make claims to excellence of his schooling based only on his own autobiography, per WP:BLP. These may not be restored without consensus. Such claims need a third party source.
  2. Claims to therapeutic effectiveness of anything must be based on WP:MEDRS quality sources. Newspapers will not do. Only scientific journals and similar publications are acceptable.
  3. The FDA does not approve the therapeutic effectiveness of nutritional supplements and the like, just their safety. This needs to be made clear, and must be based on better sources than a newspaper.
  4. , If his business career is important, itwould help to have sources to show its success.
  5. . If his scientific career is important, see WP:PROF for the sort of evidence we use.
  6. It would be very helpful to have the dates of his holding of various position --at least the year.

If I can help you further, please let me know on my use talk page. . DGG ( talk ) 20:35, 27 April 2019 (UTC)Reply