Chindhakan
March 2018
edit
Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Mark Lillis, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:56, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
April 2018
edit
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Frédéric Piquionne, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 06:46, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Frédéric Piquionne, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 05:30, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
May 2018
edit Please do not add or change content, as you did at Frédéric Piquionne, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 11:58, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Frédéric Piquionne. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Egghead06 (talk) 13:24, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
July 2018
edit
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Paul Rachubka. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:17, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Blocked
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GiantSnowman 12:36, 11 July 2018 (UTC)July 2018
edit Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Wes Brown. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:29, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
August 2018
edit You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Bernard Mendy. Robby.is.on (talk) 18:49, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Welcome!
edit
|
Speedy deletion nomination of Dooram
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Dooram requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Redalert2fan (talk) 09:29, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Robin Thirumala
edit If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Robin Thirumala requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Redalert2fan (talk) 09:29, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Carles Cuadrat
edit If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Carles Cuadrat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Redalert2fan (talk) 09:30, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
August 2018
edit
Thank you for your recent contributions. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft of your article in draftspace or in your userspace first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. Redalert2fan (talk) 09:30, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Articles about living persons, which require a degree of sensitivity, must adhere strictly to Wikipedia's content policies. Be very firm about high-quality references, particularly about details of personal lives. Contentious material that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately. Articles should cite sources whenever possible. While we cannot check the accuracy of cited sources, we can check whether they have been published by a reputable publication and whether independent sources have supported them on review. Any unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Redalert2fan (talk) 09:32, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Sourcing
editHi, I have just been through your recent contributions as I am concerned about the lack of sourcing in your edits. Where I have been unable to verify, I have reverted, and I have updated others with references. Please take heed of the many warnings you have been given by other editors. Verifiability is of paramount importance to our encylopedia and it is important that you provide citations when you are adding or changing content (preferably inline, and particularly on biographies of living people). If there is something you need help with, please feel free to ask. Thanks, Nzd (talk) 10:51, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
August 2018
edit This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Wes Brown, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Unsourced content. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:40, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
September 2018
edit {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:58, 3 September 2018 (UTC) You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Bobby Mimms. Egghead06 (talk) 06:02, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Rory Grand
edit If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Rory Grand requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Csgir (talk) 15:52, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
September 2018
edit You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Avram Grant. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:41, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 23
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited FC Pune City, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roger Johnson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
October 2018
edit This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Alejandro Menéndez, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Unsourced content. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:24, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
edit
Hello, Chindhakan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
January 2019
edit This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Iñigo Calderón, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Unsourced content. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:25, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 10
editAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khalid Aucho, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jinja (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 20
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Payal Malhotra, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Director and Producer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Gonzalo Yarza
edit
Hello, Chindhakan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gonzalo Yarza".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 08:29, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
April 2019
editHi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, espcially about living people. I have found a source to support your changes at the Gregory Nelson article, but please remember to include one yourself in future. GiantSnowman 17:58, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
November 2019
edit Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you.
Both the leagues are parallel top leagues, ISL will now get playoff in Champions league instead of I-League and like ISL, I-League will get AFC Cup playoff. Lastly ISL is closed league and the parallel league system will be dissolved in 2024 (AFC statement). Only then ISL will be called the or only top league of India. Both are getting AFC Cup slots. Both are top and parallel leagues and will be existed untill and unless the parallel league system dissolved into a single league. So don't change any more. Any more disruption will elad you to loose your privilege. Dey subrata (talk) 15:05, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
edit| | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
November 2019
edit Please do not add or change content, as you did at Neil McDonald (footballer), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 07:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
December 2019
edit Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bengaluru FC. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Coderzombie (talk) 16:08, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
January 2020
edit Hello, I'm Matthew hk. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, NorthEast United FC, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The article has lots of unsourced (hoax) player transfer already. Matthew hk (talk) 10:20, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Neil McDonald (footballer), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 16:57, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Fernando Valera
edit If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Fernando Valera requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Glades12 (talk) 10:48, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
January 2020
edit Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to NorthEast United FC, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Matthew hk (talk) 07:10, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
The article Fernando Valera has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cahk (talk) 10:38, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Fernando Valera moved to draftspace
editAn article you recently created, Fernando Valera, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 08:37, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Robin Thirumala for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robin Thirumala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robin Thirumala until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vasemmistolainen (talk) 11:13, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
article is not completed and sources are correct because of some personal issue this profile is deleting all the time Chindhakan (talk) 19:44, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
January 2020
edit You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Robin Thirumala. You have received several warnings in the past for similar behavior, so consider this absolutely final. Praxidicae (talk) 14:59, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Issuing level 4 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
edit You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Robin Thirumala. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:07, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
you stupid sparm bot go to hell Chindhakan (talk) 14:11, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 7
editAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited Steve Coppell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manager of the Year (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:42, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
March 2020
edit Hello, I'm ArnabSaha. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to ATK (football club) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. ❯❯❯ S A H A 17:49, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Do what ever you want and tell the reason behind the deletion Chindhakan (talk) 04:48, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello from Portugal,
this person NEVER coached Granada CF, he could have been there on another line of work, but never as a coach. Have some respect for other people's work please!
Now you can remove this message without replying, have a nice evening --Quite A Character (talk) 19:37, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
How do you know ,tell me the source and then why did you remove valencia assistant position i have proper source on that Chindhakan (talk) 19:58, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Apologies for removing the Valencia assistant position, already put it back in the box. He did not coach Granada, please see his BDFUTBOL coach profile in the external links (Granada was in Segunda División B at that time, and this website already has information from that level from the 80s decade, nothing appears there). Are we clear (and it last edit, you thought it was OK to write stuff that was not referenced and remove EVERYTHING i added, including refs. Please leave storyline as it is)? Thanks --Quite A Character (talk) 20:21, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
ok but in granda cf wiki page it shows he was in charge that's why i just do it i will contact habas and ask him about this before that i will never make any changes Chindhakan (talk) 20:47, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
yes you are right i personally contacted him and he said that he never coached any club in granada Chindhakan (talk) 15:08, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your work and help. --Quite A Character (talk) 00:31, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Again? Storyline was fine as it was (we don't need ONE line for every club!), now i will see if any of your refs can be (re)added to the text. --Quite A Character (talk) 19:14, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- OK apologies, reinstated some wording and two of the refs (for the third one, i added an actual news article instead of a squad sheet). Please, two favours: 1 - leave storyline as it is (in proper English, without overlinking); 2 - don't re-add he won the 1985 Supercopa de España because he did not, he retired (or left club) shortly after signing OK?
Have a nice evening --Quite A Character (talk) 20:52, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Recent edit reversion
editIn this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.
I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.S Philbrick(Talk) 16:12, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
i don't take any information from hindustan times and it's just from his club offical page and his personal site Chindhakan (talk) 17:18, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Robin Thirumala for deletion
edit A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robin Thirumala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robin Thirumala (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 17:44, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
March 2020
edit You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Robin Thirumala. Praxidicae (talk) 20:12, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Robin Thirumala
edit If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Robin Thirumala requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at [[{{{value1}}}]]. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 20:13, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
March 2020
edit You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Robin Thirumala. The AfD template specifically says "the article must not be blanked". — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 10:35, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Gerard Zaragoza for deletion
edit A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gerard Zaragoza is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerard Zaragoza until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. King Onyx (talk) 10:32, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Issuing level 4 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
edit You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Gerard Zaragoza. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:48, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Gerard Zaragoza
editHello, Chindhakan
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Interstellarity and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Gerard Zaragoza, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerard Zaragoza .
You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Interstellarity}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Interstellarity (talk) 11:34, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
the zaragoza already have a spanish wiki page you can check and he is now the manager of a uae club one top league in asia why the page should deleted. Chindhakan (talk) 11:39, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 29
editAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arzoo Govitrikar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raigad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
March 2020
edit {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:56, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Deletion discussion about Sonal Devraj
editHello, Chindhakan
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Akhiljaxxn and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Sonal Devraj, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonal Devraj.
You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Akhiljaxxn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Akhiljaxxn (talk) 17:18, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
A well known youtuber needs a wiki profile ,some of the unpopular youtubers already wiki pages because of they are from certain countries and regions Chindhakan (talk) 15:09, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Eduardo Silva Lerma
edit If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Eduardo Silva Lerma requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. BlameRuiner (talk) 05:41, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
Issuing level 4 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
edit You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Sonal Devraj. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:07, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
April 2020
edit Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Chindhakan#Issuing level 4 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8)). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Matthew hk (talk) 10:14, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Chindhakan
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Amkgp and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Carlos García Cuervo, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Amkgp}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Amkgp (talk) 13:01, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
it's just started please i will addvit in one minute Chindhakan (talk) 13:02, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Toni Seligrat moved to draftspace
editAn article you recently created, Toni Seligrat, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 20:34, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
still editing wait Chindhakan (talk) 20:35, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Let's Enjoy
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Let's Enjoy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The4lines |||| (You Asked?) (What I have Done.) 15:57, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Manasutho, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. HeartGlow30797 (talk) 07:19, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
delete fast or give time Chindhakan (talk) 07:20, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
May 2020
edit Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Iñigo Calderón, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:23, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
thank you for kind words Chindhakan (talk) 14:27, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
thank you Chindhakan (talk) 12:33, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
calderon's case i added source. ok and no need to mention again that Chindhakan (talk) 12:34, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Important notice
edit
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
May 2020
edit You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Gianni Zuiverloon. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:27, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Disruptive editing and personal attacks
edit {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:18, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
ok i don't care Chindhakan (talk) 18:06, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction
edit
The following sanction now applies to you:
For one year, you are topic banned from articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles.
You have been sanctioned for persistently failing to adhere to Wikipedia's policies, such as WP:Biographies of living people, WP:Verifiability and WP:No personal attacks, when editing and discussing about such topics.
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Editing of Biographies of Living Persons#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:02, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
make sure all wikipedia belongs to yoy Chindhakan (talk) 12:17, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Overtime (2012 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable film, fails WP:NFILM.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hitro talk 06:57, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Overtime (2012 film) for deletion
edit A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Overtime (2012 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Overtime (2012 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hitro talk 07:04, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
i just stopped editing or creating anything in wikipedia. because wikipedia is not a reliable source. then why i need to contribute. Chindhakan (talk) 09:06, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
The article Emilio Larraz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MYS77 ✉ 01:28, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
- A kind advice from someone who contributes here for nearly ten years: stop replying in a childish mode, and learn to respect the guidelines instead of creating pages here and there who aren't allowed or notable enough to exist here. Wikipedia can be a very reliable source, because it is based on reliable references. For footballers/managers, please see WP:FPL and check if they ever played/managed in those professional leagues. Cheers, MYS77 ✉ 01:31, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
July 2020
edit Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Darlington F.C., you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:19, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
The article Let's Enjoy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No independent critical reviews, does not seem to meet WP:NFILM.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mcampany (talk) 22:47, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
July 2020
edit
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → 
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Your edit summary usage is one of the lowest I have ever seen, see here. Regards, 220 of ßorg 08:20, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Gayathri (Malayalam actress) for deletion
edit A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gayathri (Malayalam actress) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gayathri (Malayalam actress) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 19:47, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Dooram, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 04:47, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Fernando Valera
edit Hello, Chindhakan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fernando Valera".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:11, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
The article Manuel González Millán has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Football player and coach who fails GNG and NFOOTY. Spent his career in 3rd and 4th Spalish league levels, which aren't fully pro
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlameRuiner (talk) 09:15, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
edit| | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Your draft article, Draft:Dooram
edit Hello, Chindhakan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dooram".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:31, 3 March 2021 (UTC)