ChrisToast1

January 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Ian McNabb and Ian Prowse. --Jonie148 (talk) 09:06, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

I entered Factual information on both artists. They are close friends of mine. I have not went against any guidelines. ChrisToast1 (talk) 21:59, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Despite it seeming odd and arbitrary, we can't take someone's word that they are a friend of an article subject and allow them to enter unsourced info. You can understand how this editing style and argument would benefit a vandal with malicious intent. Please only add info that can be sourced. Otherwise you may be blocked from editing, as a precaution from making extra work for others. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 22:41, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Understood. Thank you ChrisToast1 (talk) 00:04, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

June 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Chelcee Grimes and Larkin Poe. --Jonie148 (talk) 20:49, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

July 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Ian Prowse, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 14:57, 6 July 2020 (UTC)