User talk:Chris G/Archives/2012/April
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Chris G. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Please comment on Template talk:More footnotes
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:More footnotes. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 22:15, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 April 2012
- Interview: An introduction to movement roles
- Arbitration analysis: Case review: TimidGuy ban appeal
- News and notes: Berlin reforms to movement structures, Wikidata launches with fanfare, and Wikipedia's day of mischief
- WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Signpost
- Featured content: Snakes, misnamed chapels, and emptiness: featured content this week
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review in third week, one open case
Please comment on Template talk:Citation/core
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Citation/core. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 22:15, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
RfC Tags
Please be aware when someone readds a rfc after the 30 days, assume that they want to extend the rfc.Curb Chain (talk) 14:05, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
- It is not possible for the bot to detect that (ok, it is possible, but it is not feasible atm). Extended. --Chris 05:26, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Attention needed on simplewiki
Hi Chris, I'm hoping you're still around... Some recent changes I made to the markup of simple:Wikipedia:Introduction has caused some issues with your bot. Please take a look at this edit your bot makes. Note that I merged the Please leave this line alone template into the /Content subpage, and deleted the template. Could you please modify your bot's script to match these changes? Osiris (talk) 13:25, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
- Fixed. --Chris 05:48, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you! Osiris (talk) 21:18, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Curious edit
GA bot just made a very curious edit.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:41, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
- Fixed. It was caused by this. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. While it would be possible to make the bot ignore GA tags on subpages, that might also create it's own problems (e.g. pages like Talk:AC/DC). --Chris 06:46, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Dispute resolution survey
 Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Chris G/Archives/2012. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click HERE to participate. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 02:32, 6 April 2012 (UTC) |
From the help desk
Could you help with the question about the RFC bot, here? -- John of Reading (talk) 06:51, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Template talk:Very long
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Very long. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 23:15, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Bad bot-driven deletion
User:Yet Another Redirect Cleanup Bot deleted Baltimore Colts (1953–1983) because the target to which it pointed did not exist. But that target was just a fairly recent change, and the previous target does exist. In addition, the page has >50 inbound links. So the deletion was per-policy but a poor solution. Seems like the bot is highly susceptible to all sorts of false positives that lead to deletion rather than a well-considered solution. At a minimum, would be better to defer ones with inbound links for human intervention instead of blindly deleting--likely someone could figure out an intelligent place to redirect so that those links resolve to...something. DMacks (talk) 13:44, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- Wow, that's a pretty unfair statement to make. Certainly I will agree that, that deletion wasn't the best solution to that particular page, however, I actually put in quite a lot of thought into writing the bot, to make sure that only pages that should be deleted are deleted. I think this is reflected in User:Yet Another Redirect Cleanup Bot/SkippedRedirects which shows pages that the bot would have deleted in the last run, but did not quite satisfy the bot's criteria, and hence the bot skipped them. I have however made two changes:
- Firstly, the bot will ignore any pages with 10 or more inbound links. That is a good suggestion, and thank you for bringing it up.
- Secondly, the bot currently ignores pages that redirect to a page that was deleted in the last 12-hours. I'm not sure why I originally chose 12 hours, but that obviously is not long enough. I've now changed 12 hours to 72 hours.
Hopefully this addresses your concerns. --Chris 17:09, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks! Sorry if I came across harshly...this was the first time I saw this bot in action (this specific instance popped up on my watchlist), my brain wandered to what could be made to happen as I understood the underlying logic. So first, I didn't know anything about the triggering logic (and thanks again for addressing that). I think there might still be some beans in the can though...will email you today/tomorrow if I can figure out a potential situation. DMacks (talk) 19:58, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 09 April 2012
- News and notes: Projects launched in Brazil and the Middle East as advisors sought for funds committee
- WikiProject report: The Land of Steady Habits: WikiProject Connecticut
- Featured content: Assassination, genocide, internment, murder, and crucifixion: the bloodiest of the week
- Arbitration report: Arbitration evidence-limit motions, two open cases
Please comment on Template talk:Infobox film
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Infobox film. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Feedback request service issue
Hello! Please see Wikipedia talk:Feedback request service#Late requests. Thanks! —David Levy 20:22, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Dashboard/Requests for comment
Please check if RFC bot (talk · contribs) is maintaining the redlinks at Wikipedia:Dashboard/Requests for comment. Thank you in advance. – Allen4names 04:37, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on User talk:Jasper Deng/IPv6
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on User talk:Jasper Deng/IPv6. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 05:27, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 April 2012
- Arbitration analysis: Inside the Arbitration Committee Mailing List
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Facilitator: Silver seren
- Discussion report: The future of pending changes
- WikiProject report: The Butterflies and Moths of WikiProject Lepidoptera
- Featured content: A few good sports: association football, rugby league, and the Olympics vie for medals
Abuse Filter on the Article Feedback Tool
Hey there :). You're being contacted because you're an edit filter manager, At the moment, we're developing Version 5 of the Article Feedback Tool, which you may or may not have heard about. If you haven't; for the first time, this will involve a free-text box where readers can submit comments :). Obviously, there's going to be junk, and we want to minimise that junk. To do so, we're working the Abuse Filter into the tool.
For this to work, we need people to write and maintain filters. I'd be very grateful if you could take a look at the discussion here and the attached docs, and comment and contribute! Thanks :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 18:10, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 06:15, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Template talk:Non-administrator observation
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Non-administrator observation. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 07:15, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 April 2012
- Investigative report: Spin doctors spin Jimmy's "bright line"
- WikiProject report: Skeptics and Believers: WikiProject The X-Files
- Featured content: A mirror (or seventeen) on this week's featured content
- Arbitration report: Evidence submissions close in Rich Farmbrough case, vote on proposed decision in R&I Review
- Technology report: Wikimedia Labs: soon to be at the cutting edge of MediaWiki development?
Feedback request service issue
Hello! Please see Wikipedia talk:Feedback request service#Late requests. Thanks!
Note: I'm reposting this message because it was automatically archived during a period of inactivity (so I don't know whether you saw it).
—David Levy 00:07, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
- Responded there. Sorry about the long delay. --Chris 12:39, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
Any thoughts on why the RFC bot isn't picking up on this page? Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 09:13, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
- The bot had some down time due to server issues, it's now running smoothly again. --Chris 06:21, 28 April 2012 (UTC)