Welcome!

Hello, Christiano de aryande.  Welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm Suneye1, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information:
    Introduction to Wikipedia
    The five pillars of Wikipedia
    Editing tutorial
    How to edit a page
    Simplified Manual of Style
    The basics of Wikicode
    How to develop an article
    How to create an article
    Help pages
    What Wikipedia is not
Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
    Do be bold
    Do assume good faith
    Do be civil
    Do cite reliable sources
    Do maintain a neutral point of view
    Don't spam
    Don't infringe copyright
    Don't add original research
    Don't commit vandalism
    Don't get blocked
If you need further help, you can:
    Ask a question
or you can:
    Get help at the Teahouse
or even:
    Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the   button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.


November 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Suneye1. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kannada, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - SUN EYE 1 13:37, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Ninetyone. I noticed that you recently removed content from Indian Space Research Organisation without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ninety:one 18:39, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

 
The Show preview button is right next to the Publish changes button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jklamo (talk) 18:47, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Isro

edit

Because future mission of isro is a suspense so it shouldn't be revealed. Christiano de aryande (talk) 13:03, 12 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

November 2021

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of COVID-19 vaccine authorizations, you may be blocked from editing. 2402:3A80:6E3:368E:993C:3CDB:D313:6AAB (talk) 13:38, 12 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Russian Empire. 42.105.4.178 (talk) 13:46, 12 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 14:34, 12 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at List of COVID-19 vaccine authorizations, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 2402:3A80:1A4A:38D0:646F:AE68:DBD:2687 (talk) 03:49, 22 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  SpencerT•C 04:36, 22 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Rio Apaporis caiman

edit

Hello, Christiano de aryande,

Thank you for creating Rio Apaporis caiman.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article needs more references to meet general notability. See WP:GNG

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 21:25, 6 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

I have added more reference on that topic Christiano de aryande (talk) 13:43, 7 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Regarding this edit: it simply is not true that this is "approved" and "no one can edit it" - "no editor owns an article and any contributions can and may be mercilessly edited". The particular source you have added is an open wiki and is therefore not considered a reliable source. Please don't continue to restore it. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:09, 8 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

OK i agree . Christiano de aryande (talk) 08:49, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Oversimplified

edit

Hello, Christiano de aryande, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Slatersteven, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Oversimplified, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oversimplified (2nd nomination).

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Slatersteven}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Slatersteven (talk) 10:20, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

I disagree on deleting the article because oversimplified is a YouTube channel with over 5.6 million views and most of my points are legible you can see my reference. Christiano de aryande (talk) 10:57, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

You need to make a case at the AFD, and do not alter or remove links to it.Slatersteven (talk) 12:29, 11 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
You also need to read wp:rs and wp:n.Slatersteven (talk) 12:30, 11 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ok Christiano de aryande (talk) 13:22, 11 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

United States

edit

I have reverted your additions. Excluding all the issues the paragraphs had, the information is already there at United States#Foreign relations and its thoroughly detailed at Foreign relations of the United States. (CC) Tbhotch 17:56, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

April 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm CollectiveSolidarity. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 22:24, 24 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Because of ongoing sanctions and the collapse of the Russian economy I think we should remove it from potential superpower Christiano de aryande (talk) 05:55, 25 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Don't unilaterally do this because there are still plenty of sources arguing Russia is a superpower. I personally agree with you but we do as the sources say. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 16:55, 25 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ok Christiano de aryande (talk) 15:31, 26 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of 2022 Shivamogga riots

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 2022 Shivamogga riots requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/let-down-govt-and-cops-during-riot-muslims-shivamogga-live-anxiety-161391 and https://thewire.in/communalism/shivamogga-muslim-violence-bajrang-dal. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mvqr (talk) 16:04, 1 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

How to give credit to other news outlet Christiano de aryande (talk) 16:12, 1 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

It is a direct copy paste. You can't do that. Mvqr (talk) 16:20, 1 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

May 2022

edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on United States. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 15:02, 2 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ok Christiano de aryande (talk) 15:04, 2 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

June 2022

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2022 Kanpur violence, you may be blocked from editing. >>> Extorc.talk 15:23, 10 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

The article is under deletion process and we need to improve it Christiano de aryande (talk) 18:09, 10 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply