User talk:Christina geo/sandbox
Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
editName of student reviewer: Paige Williams
Date of review: 5/14/13
Name of editor: User:Christina_geo
URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User.Christina_geo/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 5/15/13
Date review submitted to instructor: 5/16/13
Length of edit (too long/too short): Great length
Image (needed/appropriate): No image
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): yes
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): yes
Wikiformatting: yes
Grammar & composition: great
Other comments
— Preceding unsigned comment added by PAGETURNER22 (talk • contribs) 00:57, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Name of student reviewer: Sandra Jean-Baptiste
Date of review: 5/15/2013
Name of editor: User.Christina_geo
URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User.Christina_geo/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 5/14/2013
Date review submitted to instructor: 5/15/2013
Length of edit (too long/too short): It was ok
Image (needed/appropriate)Image not needed
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Accurate
Wikiformatting: Correct Format
Grammar & composition: Good
Other comments — Preceding unsigned comment added by User:Smjeanbaptiste (User:Smjeanbaptiste • Special:Contributions/User:Smjeanbaptiste) 18:40, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
| Name of student reviewer | Wikipedia User:Joselv83 |
|---|---|
| Date of review | 5/16/2013 |
| Name of editor | Wikipedia User: Christina_geo |
| URL of editor’s Userpage | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Christina_geo |
| Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 05/16/13 |
| Date review submitted to instructor | 05/16/13 |
| Length of edit (too long/too short) | Good Length. |
| Image (needed/appropriate) | N/A |
| Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | Accurate |
| Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | N/A |
| Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | N/A (Textbook article edit) |
| Wikiformatting | Good Formatting. |
| Grammar & composition | Good grammar. |
| Other comments | Looks pretty good, good job! (Review for article edit) |
Joselv83 (talk) 18:23, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
| Name of student reviewer | Wikipedia User:Joselv83 |
|---|---|
| Date of review | 5/15/2013 |
| Name of editor | Wikipedia User: Christina_geo |
| URL of editor’s Userpage | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Christina_geo |
| Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 05/15/13 |
| Date review submitted to instructor | 05/15/13 |
| Length of edit (too long/too short) | Good Length. |
| Image (needed/appropriate) | N/A |
| Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | Accurate |
| Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | N/A |
| Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | Accurate to I/O Psych |
| Wikiformatting | Good Formatting. |
| Grammar & composition | Good grammar. Try switching "in which the leader is," with just "who." In the fourth line, maybe use "identifiable" instead of "identified." |
| Other comments | Looks pretty good, good job! |
Joselv83 (talk) 03:51, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
| Name of student | Wikipedia User: Neffateriet |
|---|---|
| Date of review | 5/15/2013 |
| Name of editor | Wikipedia User: Christina Geo |
| URL of editor’s Userpage | Sandbox pre-edit URL http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Christina_geo |
| Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 5/15/2013 |
| Date review submitted to instructor | 5/15/2013 |
| Length of edit (too long/too short) | Good length |
| Image (needed/appropriate) | Not needed |
| Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | The information provided was accurate from the text book |
| Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | Yes |
| Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | The article information was relevant to I/O Psych and was accurate from the textbook. |
| Wikiformatting | Good overall job |
| Grammar & composition | None that I find |
| Other comments | Great job!! |
Neffateriet (talk) 02:18, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
| Name of Student Reviewer | Sandra Jean-Baptiste | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date of Review | 5/15/13 | ||
| Name of editor | Christina GeoHaghan | ||
| URL of editor’s Userpage | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/user:christina_geo/sandbox | ||
| URL of Wikipedia article | |||
| Reference page number in Schultz & Schultz | 201-202 | ||
| Permanent URL on PsycInfo of article | |||
| Item | Points | Points Earned | |
| Evidence of posting ahead of the edit on the talk page | 1 point | 1 | |
| Signed post on talk page | 1 point | ||
| Each response to questions on talk page | 1 point | ||
| Sandbox with intended edit | 1 point | 1 | |
| Number of sentences in edit | 1 point | 1 | |
| Appropriate image in edit | 1 point | ||
| Appropriate link to another Wikipedia page or external page | 1 point | 1 | |
| Textbook based reference information correct | 1 point | 1 | |
| Research article based reference information correct | 1 point | 1 | |
| Research article is empirical | 1 point | 1 | |
| Research article is peer-reviewed | 1 point | 1 | |
| Research article is primary | 1 point | 1 | |
| Reference and footnote formatted correctly | 1 point | 1 | |
| Each response on talk page after edit | 1 point | ||
| Student made changes to article in response to editor comment | 1 point | ||
| Each editor change to student’s edit | minus 1 point | ||
| Fancy formatting | (1 point for each up to 3 points for each: new section w/ heading; bulleted list; numbered list etc) | 3 points | 1 |
| Total ------- 11 |
talk) 02:54, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
| Name of student | Wikipedia User: Nae0408 |
|---|---|
| Date of review | 5/15/2013 |
| Name of editor | Wikipedia User: Christina Geo |
| URL of editor’s Userpage | Sandbox pre-edit URL http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Christina_geo |
| Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 5/15/2013 |
| Date review submitted to instructor | 5/15/2013 |
| Length of edit (too long/too short) | Good length |
| Image (needed/appropriate) | N/A |
| Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | The information was accurate |
| Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | Yes |
| Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | The article information was accurate to I/O Psych and from the textbook. |
| Wikiformatting | Good job |
| Grammar & composition | great grammar |
| Other comments | Great job |
Nae0408 (talk) 03:48, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
| Name of student | Wikipedia User: Nikicia |
|---|---|
| Date of review | May 16, 2013 |
| Name of editor | Wikipedia User: Christina Geo |
| URL of editor’s Userpage | Sandbox pre-edit URL http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Christina_geo |
| Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | May 16, 2013 |
| Date review submitted to instructor | May 16, 2013 |
| Length of edit (too long/too short) | length is good |
| Image (needed/appropriate) | |
| Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | Accurate Information |
| Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | |
| Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | It is accurate |
| Wikiformatting | Good |
| Grammar & composition | One very minor grammatical error |
| Other comments | Good jobNikicia (talk) 04:48, 16 May 2013 (UTC) |
| Name of student | Wikipedia User: Mtrowers |
|---|---|
| Date of review | 5/15/2013 |
| Name of editor | Wikipedia User: Christina Geo |
| URL of editor’s Userpage | Sandbox pre-edit URL http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Christina_geo |
| Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 5/15/2013 |
| Date review submitted to instructor | 5/15/2013 |
| Length of edit (too long/too short) | Good length |
| Image (needed/appropriate) | N/A |
| Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | The information was precise |
| Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | Yes |
| Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | The article information was accurate to I/O Psych and from the textbook. |
| Wikiformatting | Nice work |
| Grammar & composition | I liked the grammar |
| Other comments | Good job |