Christo1234

Welcome!

Hello, Christo1234, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like King Solomon (boxer), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! wj32 ^t/c 02:53, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of King Solomon (boxer)

A tag has been placed on King Solomon (boxer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. wj32 ^t/c 02:53, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ahmad kaddour.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Ahmad kaddour.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 19:56, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ahmad "babyface" Kaddour.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Ahmad "babyface" Kaddour.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 19:56, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Nordic fight night logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Nordic fight night logo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:11, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nordic Fight Night (September 30)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nordic Fight Night.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 08:24, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question on Nordic Fight Night

Hello, Christo1234! I'm Huon. I have replied to your question on the Articles for Creation Help Desk about Nordic Fight Night.
You can read it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk#Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nordic Fight Night. Huon (talk) 19:43, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree files

Some of your files may be unfree. See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 November 21#OTRS pending since September. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:46, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2015

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. Mimi C. (talk) 20:01, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Mimi C. (talk) 20:51, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

The reference being discussed on the talk page for the article is YOUR reference, and the reference is left in the article. i corrected the subjective and false information contained in your edits, like the words "conceded" and "fabricating". either this article is going to contain fact or false subjective adjectives. take it to the article talk page, as per wiki rules. don't keep reverting without explanation. the article you ref'd doesn't even support the claims in the title or the words you are using to summarize it. Christo1234

Christo1234, I see that you haven't done much editing on Wikipedia. Welcome! I hope you don't get as frustrated here as I do.

I've taken the liberty of indenting your reply to Mimi C., and adding your "signature" to the end, so that it is clear who wrote it and who the "you" refers to. I hope that's okay! If you add four "tilde" characters to the end of each of your comments, they'll be automatically "signed" and dated.

Mimi C., I caution you to assume good faith, particularly with inexperienced editors. Your tone toward Christo1234 was very, very harsh. He has been registered on Wikipedia for many years, but he's contributed few edits. This was the first time he's edited in nearly a year, and he only edited on one day in 2014, and on two days in 2013.

That could be because when he does contribute he gets "beaten up." That should not happen. Wikipedia should not be an unfriendly place. Editors who are just sticking their toes in the water should be encouraged.

I've looked at Christo1234's edits on the Ben Carson article, and I think your accusations of vandalism and distributive editing are very badly misplaced. He made changes to what you wrote, and you seem to have taken it personally. Please take a few deep breaths, and try not to take offense when someone edits what you've written. He was not "vandalizing" the article. His concerns about the poorly-sourced accusation you added to that biography of a living person seem well-founded, and his edits were reasonable. NCdave (talk) 23:42, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

FYI, Christo1234, this might interest you:

3RR violation by Mimi C. on the "Ben Carson" article. NCdave (talk) 07:34, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Well, I tried. Unfortunately, Wikipedia's rules, even the 3RR rule, are just suggestions for certain editors. Thanks, though, for trying to inject a little bit of accuracy into the Ben Carson article.

The article is still horribly slanted. It still cites the discredited Politico hit piece attacking Carson. It still claims that the fact that Carson didn't apply to West Point "challenges" Carson's narrative, even though Carson has always said he never applied anywhere except Yale. It still claims that West Point "does not award scholarships to anyone" even though West Point's own advertising contradicts that claim.

Christo1234, the futility of your effort to make this article truthful illustrates why Wikipedia is of such poor quality, and why nobody with any sense trusts Wikipedia's articles about controversial topics. NCdave (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

I am neither a supporter nor opponent of Carson, the subject of the article, despite the accusations made by the person who was removing fact and objectivity and replacing it with subjective adjectives and opinion from an editorial publication that is open about their partisan positions. If you insert an accusation into an article that someone made a certain claim that was not true, then there should be evidence of such claim being made. in this case, the reference itself did not support the accusations in the title and lead and thus was corrected by the publication several times, but the false accusations still repeated by other media. The Wikipedia format has been co-opted by organized partisans who ironically attack anyone who attempts to insert objectivity, accusing THEM of partisanship. How many references in articles come from "Media Matters"? These are not reliable reference sources and have no place in wiki articles attempting to communicate an honest narrative about people and events. Christo1234 (talk) 03:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Christo1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

hardly ever login to edit and recently started using phone for internet instead of IP 47.192.193.143 and before that 71.98.204.251 so my new cell carrier IP may be associated with blocked content

Decline reason:

Clearing an autoblock

Due to the nature of the block applied we need additional information before we can decide whether to unblock you. It is very likely that you are not personally blocked. If you are prevented from editing, it may be because you are autoblocked or blocked because of your IP address. Without further details there is nothing further we can do to review or lift your block. Please follow these instructions:

1. If you have a Wikipedia account, please ensure that you are logged in.
   Your account name will be visible in the top right of this page if you are.
   If it isn't, try bypassing your web browser's cache.
2. Try to edit the Sandbox.
3. If you are still blocked, copy the {{unblock-auto|...}} code generated for you under the "IP blocked?" section. This is usually hidden within the "What do I do now?" section. If so, just click the "[show]" link to the right hand side to show this text.
4. Paste the code at the bottom of your user talk page and click save.
5. If you cannot edit your own talk page, then use the Unblock Ticket Request System.

If you are not blocked from editing the sandbox, then the autoblock on your IP address has already expired and you can resume editing. only (talk) 13:41, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TarnishedPath^talk 09:36, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TarnishedPath^talk 09:36, 5 November 2024 (UTC)