Chuttumalle Rangi Tarangi User talk Page

Intro

edit

Welcome to my Talk Page

Welcome!

edit
 
Welcome!

Hello, Chuttumalle Rangi Tarangi, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! —Alalch E. 14:53, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you Chuttumalle Rangi Tarangi (talk) 14:55, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

September 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm 456legend. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of Telugu film actresses have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. 456legendtalk 12:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Can you please explain the reason for the changes below? see: [1] and [2] You have reverted link fixtures and other notable works additions. Please refrain from doing such. 456legendtalk 12:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Not unconstructive...but why multiple images, if so we must provide all listed heroines images...why u favouring exceptional ones by rejecting all other talented actresses Chuttumalle Rangi Tarangi (talk) 12:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
What do you mean by exceptional? What basis and criteria are you referring to for deciding the status of being exceptional? Ideally the national award winner in the particular language and more works including the primary work industry should be considered. Please participate in the discussion for a common concensus before further edits. Thank you 456legendtalk 12:11, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Chuttumalle Rangi Tarangi, Can you please stop adding images to the article without further discussion either here or on the article talk page? It would be approproate to discuss before adding them again. 456legendtalk 12:21, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload files. However, it appears that one or more of the files you have uploaded or added to a page, specifically List of Telugu film actresses, may fail our non-free policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted file of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 456legendtalk 12:17, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
I made a new row for image.but don't interrupt me by undoing my good faith edits providing images of all with equality for all actresses..please do co-operate .REMOVE IMAGES WITH COPYRIGHT ISSUES ONLY Chuttumalle Rangi Tarangi (talk) 12:21, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
FILTER OUT THE IMAGES WITH COPY RIGHT ISSUES ONLY..PLEASE ....DONOT MAKE IT ACCORDING TO YOUR WISHES.... Chuttumalle Rangi Tarangi (talk) 12:23, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. 456legendtalk 12:28, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Not every image can be added to the article as this is a Wikipedia article and not a image gallary. There should be a specific criteria to add the images to the article as specified in the article talk page. Further your request to {tq|REMOVE IMAGES WITH COPYRIGHT ISSUES ONLY}}, that is not my job to keep on checking after you place all the non-free images on to the article but a responsibilty of every wikipedian to ensure they aren't constributing non-free images/content to the article. Please make yourself aware of the Wikipedia policy before starting to contribute. Wikipedia:Non-free content 456legendtalk 12:25, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
IT WOULD BE GOOD IF YOU REMOVE OR FILTER OUT SUCH IMAGES ONLY..WE CAN MAKE THE PAGE GOOD LOOKING WITH A IMAGE FOR EACH ACTRESS AS A PART OF EQUALITY , LIKE, DIGNITY & RESPECT TOWARDS THEM. Chuttumalle Rangi Tarangi (talk) 12:32, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Chuttumalle Rangi Tarangi As I said, Wikipedia is not a image gallery and kindly stop making further disruptions without any discussion. You are getting into edit warring. 456legendtalk 12:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
lOOK AT THE PAGE LIST OF INDIAN ACTRESS PAGE Chuttumalle Rangi Tarangi (talk) 12:36, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Is that set of standard for the Wikipedia? Even the said article do not have any gallery as part of the article. Only contains limited images. And yet you haven't stopped making further edits on the article when the discussion is ongoing.
Hi @Anachronist, can you please take appropriate action on the user, as they are continuing to make edits when the discussion is ongoing here and at the same time adding non free images to the article. 456legendtalk 12:39, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
@@Anachronist, List of Hindi film actresses, they provided an image column...came to notice 456legend editing and undoing several good faith edits List of Telugu film actresses page according to their wish..even after i tried co-operate to have a good faith edits in that page providing equality , right, love and respect for each actresses..but 456legend is so adamant in having his way of edits only, even i suggested a good faith edits and filtering out of non-free content images..still he needs his styling of editing and his favorite artists images only... Chuttumalle Rangi Tarangi (talk) 12:51, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
I don't understand what you mean by equality, right, love, and respect for each actress. Wikipedia is not a platform for personal admiration. My point is that there should be a set of standards or criteria for including images of subjects in an article which is of a dynamic nature. Moreover, you deliberately reverted my edits without providing any explanation. These edits were not related to the images but involved fixing links and adding notable works, as you can see here: [3] and [4].
Additionally, you've repeatedly added non-free images and continued editing during the discussion, disregarding the need for consensus. This clearly constitutes edit warring and involves multiple violations. 456legendtalk 16:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
and the comment you made here i tried co-operate to have a good faith edits does not stand good after what all you have done, you didn't participate in the discussion rather provided me a set of order/guidlines as you can see your statements above, FILTER OUT THE IMAGES WITH COPY RIGHT ISSUES ONLY..PLEASE ....DONOT MAKE IT ACCORDING TO YOUR WISHES.... and IT WOULD BE GOOD IF YOU REMOVE OR FILTER OUT SUCH IMAGES ONLY..WE CAN MAKE THE PAGE GOOD LOOKING WITH A IMAGE FOR EACH ACTRESS AS A PART OF EQUALITY , LIKE, DIGNITY & RESPECT TOWARDS THEM.
I don't think you acted in good faith, simply shouting on me during the discussion and guiding me to perform something in your favour. 456legendtalk 16:07, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I am not sure what this dispute is about. An image column in a table is pretty standard for lists of people. However, Chuttumalle Rangi Tarangi, I must say that if you persist in adding any non-free image to the article, you will be blocked. We take copyright seriously, and other people shouldn't be cleaning up after you, especially if you are making deliberate errors as seems to be the case.

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Shivam Thiruppathi per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Eswaran Naveen. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 21:59, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply