Welcome

edit

Hello, Cleveruserofname3, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Curbon7 (talk) 13:18, 21 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

September 2021

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  BD2412 T 05:03, 18 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Editing the https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wendy_Rogers_(politician)# page to change the words baseless “audit” to just say audit was done specifically to make the page more neutral as per the articles are supposed to be. It is not vandalism to make the page more neutral by any sense of the word. This seems more like a abuse of power from BD2412 based on his partisan beliefs and less like a action from a admin who is only doing there job BD2412 should be punished for this clear abuse of power at the very least and potentially having his administrative privileges revoked. Otherwise he will continue banning people for partisan reason and undermining what Wikipedia is meant to be Cleveruserofname3 (talk) 05:22, 18 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your block is based on the fact that your edit history shows that you have had previously had similar edits reverted by other editors (User:Ser Amantio di Nicolao and User:Curbon7). At this point you should have known better, if your intent is to participate productively in this project. Neither have you made any effort to discuss these edits. It is also apparent from your editing pattern that you edited as User:2601:400:4380:8d20:f464:7e0f:315e:b2e9, and made the same edit from this account without acknowledging the connection between the accounts. BD2412 T 05:25, 18 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

I had no idea I had to acknowledge a link between accounts. Also can you please tell me how baseless “audit” is neutral and isn’t just Audit more neutral and a better fit for a wiki Cleveruserofname3 (talk) 05:35, 18 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

I don’t remember either ser amantio di nicolao nor curbon7 mainly because I didn’t check back I most likely didn’t check back on those pages and expected them to stick however I would guess I likely removed the word falsely from falsely claimed due to the fact that at the time there was no proof on the wiki article or that I could find that stated that the claim was false and as for Walter Blackman page which I also removed falsely from falsely claimed there because there is currently a audit on Arizona that will either prove or disprove that claim when it finished and having it there without waiting for said audit to finish would be disingenuous in such a regard Cleveruserofname3 (talk) 05:54, 18 September 2021 (UTC)Reply