Cmspeedrunner

Your submission at Articles for creation: Two Strangers Who Meet Five Times (November 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by 97198 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Two Strangers Who Meet Five Times and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

97198 (talk) 09:01, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Caleicine has been accepted

Caleicine, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 09:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Uokram

Hello Cmspeedrunner,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Uokram for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

CoconutOctopus talk 18:04, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

I understand this one. Thats all cool. I was only adding it to strengthen the article Molecule Art but understand this. Thank you! Cmspeedrunner (talk) 18:55, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Molecule Art

Hello Cmspeedrunner, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Molecule Art, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molecule Art.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|CoconutOctopus}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

CoconutOctopus talk 18:06, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

{{Re|CoconutOctopus}}

I would like to contest this. I have added supplementary information to argue the page's place on Wikipedia.

I would understand if you want to delete it, but, it seems to me this form of art, while niche, still has a broad reach. Do see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molecule Art and the comment I left there. Thank you!

~~~~ Cmspeedrunner (talk) 18:58, 13 November 2024 (UTC)