Comedytheorem

John Moyer

Lighten up... There are several extensive articles on Wikipedia that reference John Moyer. The Singles Ward, The R.M. and Mobsters and Mormons. He is an individual responsible for the creation of the comedy genre in the LDS Cinema movement and is extremely noteable as a filmaker in that realm. Previously all references to John Moyer on those pages were attributed to the wrong John Moyer. Now there is a means by which the correct John Moyer (stand up comedian) can be referenced and linked to on those pages and you are still freaking out about it. There are more than two noteable John Moyers here. So everybody needs to just get along and accept that. This is a reasonable solution. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.199.4.149 (talk) 16:26, 16 May 2007 (UTC).

Repeat yourself as often as you want. He seems totally unworthy of an article to me, and as far as the last ~12 times go, other wikipedians agree. PS: You should read up on how to use wikipedia talk pages and how to sign comments. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | 16:56, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

So are the three movies that he's been involved with as well as helping to pioneer a genre among a religious group vis-a-vis LDS Cinema unworthy of articles too? Is so, then you should ask for those to be deleted as well. Bu it's OK to have those extensive articles, just not one on an indivdual involved in creating those films? comedytheorem 17:13, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

As of now, for my part, i "evaluate" (for the range of my opinion and capabilities that is) the notability of this one article. Other articles = another topic. The fact that you vandalized an article two dozen times and created 4 other articles around a total of another dozen times can, i think, only be interpeted as you having a special devotion to that guy, and personal admiration does not belong to an objective job such as editing on wikipedia. You need to let go. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | 17:17, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

The same can be said of you over your devotion to the band Disturbed and your constant tempter tantrums and your version of your own forms of vandalism. All I am doing is rightfully crediting an indivdual who has other articles written about his accomplishments. And you didn't answer my question, you only started in with ad hominem attacks. If you are so committed to objective editing on wikipedia, then why are you so not willing to have the correct information listed about the individual responsible for these films in these articles: The Singles Ward, The R.M. and Mobsters and Mormons. Or do you only want information provided that you like? I've offered a reasonable solution to this problem, yet you are the one who insists on not letting it go. comedytheorem 17:39, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Though I wasn't invited to this discussion, I'd like to offer my $.02. I think John Moyer (the stand-up comedian/screenwriter/producer) deserves an article. The one version of the article I saw on him was speedy deleted instead of brought through the normal nomination for deletion process. I understand that the article had been created before and deleted, but if was similar to the version of the article I saw, I have no idea why it was deleted the first time. The guy's written and produced at least three movies—all of which have articles. Why is this guy not notable while his productions are? Even a star of two of the movies, Kirby Heyborne, has an article. Surely, this guy deserves one too.

That being said, I don't think John Moyer (stand up comedian) is the best title for such an article. I don't have a better link in mind right now, but something better must exist. — Frecklefoot | Talk 13:28, 17 May 2007 (UTC)