CommonSenseEdit

April 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to 1860 civil conflict in Mount Lebanon and Damascus, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 21:02, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Kindly how i can report your behavior to wikipedia for hiding the truth even with references. I did read wikipedia rules and what i shared don't contradict with any rules wikipedia have.

Kindly if you don't stop i would like to report your behavior. CommonSenseEdit (talk) 04:55, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

I presume you are addressing me for having reverted your edits at 1860 civil conflict in Mount Lebanon and Damascus. I will respond first by noting that I have tried to communicate with you about your edits but you have thus far refused to engage in conversation other than to say "stop deleting my edits!" without actually addressing the concerns that have been raised. You are adding content that is in no way supported by the sources you have cited. You claim to be trying to fight Wikipedia's attempt to hide genocide, yet none of your content has been about anything like genocide. (The assassination of one political figure, or even that figure's entire family, does not constitute genocide.) However, if you still feel that you need to report my, or other editors', behavior, you are free to do so. You would probably want to start at the administrators' noticeboard for incidents. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:36, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

so how u see it best way to add the info i want to add to make the article more clear? CommonSenseEdit (talk) 23:18, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

The best way to add information that has been removed by other users is to open a discussion about the matter. (See WP:BRD). At Baabda, for instance, you have added material that I then removed. You re-added the information, so I opened a discussion of the matter. Since you chose not to engage in that discussion, I reverted your material, on the assumption that you chose not to defend your actions. I strongly urge you now to engage in the discussion at Talk:Baabda. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 00:14, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Edits at

In this edit to 1860 civil conflict in Mount Lebanon and Damascus, your edit summary read It's the truth and i did add facts and references, kindly stop deleting it for burying genocides happened in the past! Wikipedia should be all about honesty and truth! not lies. The content you added may or may not be facts, but it is not at all supported by the citation you provided. The content you added had nothing to do with any genocide, so I don't know what that part of your edit summary was about, but on the whole, it appears that you want to right great wrongs that you perceive have occurred in the past. That is not Wikipedia's purpose. Please remember to edit from a neutral point of view. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:43, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Allow me to educate you a bit... a genocide is the deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group

"a campaign of genocide" in 1860 more than 500 villages were genocide and more than 20000 lost their lives in a mount which counted only 100000 back in 1860

You are very wrong in your edit and you standing on the wrong side of history. CommonSenseEdit (talk) 23:06, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

So, you claim a genocide occurred in Lebanon in 1860. I don't disagree. But none of your edits at 1860 civil conflict in Mount Lebanon and Damascus talk about genocide, they only discuss the affiliations of various religious groups to the different European colonizing nations, and they do so without providing any reliable source to back up the claims. You provided a link to a reference, but it did not verify any of the content you added. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 00:14, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Neutrality

You simply cannot make a statement as bold as From this accord Lebanon as a country was lost by giving weapons to Palestinian Terrorist who were on a mission to take over Lebanon and kick out Christian to the sea., as you did in this edit, and state it as a fact; that violates Wikipedia's neutrality policy. It is, rather, an opinion. You may write that some person or another has said that bold thing, making sure to properly attribute that statement with a reliable source. But simply stating it as fact cannot be allowed.

May 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 1860 civil conflict in Mount Lebanon and Damascus. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Your edits are not helpful. Please review the guidelines as instructed. Only make constructive, neutral, coherent, and well-referenced contribution. el.ziade (talkallam) 11:03, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

@Elias Ziade wikipedia is not Lebanon and laws of Lebanon... keep Lebanon dictatorship and lebanon which is against the truth and against the free right of speech in the current Lebanon.

Wikipedia is about the free right of speech and the truth. CommonSenseEdit (talk) 01:26, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

You’re dealing with the Wikipedia community not Michel Aoun or Hassan Nasrallah. Abide by the guidelines, and learn what is Wikipedia and how to edit. el.ziade (talkallam) 06:42, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

@Elias Ziade are you telling me in other words you are defending war criminals and hiding behind wikipedia community!

Why you mentioning the head of the terrorist organization in Lebanon and the subject is about Michel Aoun.

What you did is 100% against wikipedia... wikipedia is all about the truth and references and reread wikipedia rules a second time for your brain to absorb them.

Is your goal on wikipedia to defend war criminals in Lebanon and put flowers on their crimes? CommonSenseEdit (talk) 02:46, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Oh you know me so well. I rest my case, you are right about everything you said. I heartily apologize for slowing your mission to fix Wikipedia for the rest of us. I can’t wait to see your work. el.ziade (talkallam) 07:24, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 1860 civil conflict in Mount Lebanon and Damascus, you may be blocked from editing. {{u|Bowler the Carmine}} (he/him | talk) 21:21, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Let me ask you this, Wikipedia want to say the truth about the history or cover genocides which happened in the past by putting flowers of genocides and make them pretty.

Wikipedia is it a truth teller community or not? CommonSenseEdit (talk) 23:09, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia is a community dedicated to the truth, but part of that is having a neutral point of view. We avoid words like "terrorist" unless they are commonly and widely used, and even then we use it with attribution. Do not ever insert loaded words into articles without consensus. By the way, I removed what you put on my user page; attacking other editors is never okay. {{u|Bowler the Carmine}} (he/him | talk) 03:49, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Seriously; you cannot add language like "terrorist Muslim Palestinian militias" (like you did here), and that without as much as giving a source(!) Also, copyrigh-violations is not tolerated on wikipedia; copying directly (like you did here) is big NO. If you continue like this, I expect you to be soon blocked, Huldra (talk) 21:34, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

Hello, I'm SunDawn. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Bkerké, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 22:58, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

On this link you can see all the logo list for the Maronite church and the last one was added in 1700s... kindly let me know if you need more proof that there is more than one logo and the latest was made when Bkerke was built in the early 1700s

https://ecclesiasticalheraldry.weebly.com/maronite-catholic-church.html CommonSenseEdit (talk) 23:03, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Grammar changes

I note that you have recently been making many changes like this one, where you have changed a complete sentence

Crytivo is a game publishing company based in San Diego, California.

into a sentence fragment

Crytivo, a game publishing company based in San Diego, California.

Per Wikipedia's manual of style, the opening sentence of an article should be written in plain English, and specifically, it should be a grammatically correct sentence. Please do not make these kind of changes in the future. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:36, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for sharing this point, i will make sure from now on that the sentence is grammatically correct. CommonSenseEdit (talk) 01:45, 26 October 2022 (UTC)