Hello, i am here to help Wikipedia!

Consiliul, you are invited to the Teahouse

edit
 

Hi Consiliul! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Hajatvrc (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 5 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

May 2013

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 09:42, 10 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Welcome

edit
Hello, Consiliul! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Theroadislong (talk) 09:42, 10 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Please refine your use of edit summaries to be short accurate descriptions of the purpose of the edit. "+image", "copy edit", and "added reference" are all valid examples of a good edit summary. Thank you. Technical 13 (talk) 18:20, 10 May 2013 (UTC) Technical 13 (talk) 18:20, 10 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Paula Seling

edit

Do not re-add the image of a record cover to this article. The image is only allowed under the non free content criteria and a separate rationale for each use must be given. The image does not have a rationale for this article and is unlikely to be eligible for one as free images of Seling can be found or created.

As already advised please start using meaningful edit summaries rather than 'gggg' or similar. Your edits are not being particularly helpful at the moment. NtheP (talk) 22:23, 10 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile!

edit

Congratulations! You have earned the


  Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia.

Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! ~ Anastasia (talk) 00:50, 12 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Teahouse!

edit

Hi Consiliul,

I'm JustBerry, a host at the Teahouse. I have read your guest profile; I am happy to help if you have any questions about the Teahouse or simply need help/guidance in editing. --JustBerry (talk) 02:02, 26 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello, i'm Consiliul!

Dear Biruitorul, excuse me for my contributions, i didn't know how it's work on Wikipedia. I try to answer about uploading image on Wikipedia, but nobody want to help me. It's not unffair to delete all my posts, because i am begginer, and i know a think in this world, people help eachother. If you want, you can edit this posts of mine- Luminița Gheorghiu, Dana Rogoz, Jorge, Aurelian Temișan, Christian Sabbagh. Please help me, these are our celebrities, and i want to make them known all over the world.

Thanks,

June 2013

edit

  Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Dana Rogoz. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Also, if your going to use edit summaries please write something useful instead of random gibberish or repeating characters. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:50, 13 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Teo Trandafir may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • The [[hitch]] for Teo, when she left [[[Zone Romantica|Romantica]] has been possible, because the [[television]] couldn't furnish Teo her
  • because the [[television]] couldn't furnish Teo her [[requisite]] [[resources]], probably because [[[Zone Romantica|Romantica]] was only a small [[enterprise]] in the [[scheme]] of the Romanian [[

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:00, 15 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello, Consiliul. You recently edited Teo Trandafir, adding internal links on common words and even the name of the article itself. The addition of links to common words, multiple links to the same article, or other unnecessary or excessive internal links, known as overlink, should be avoided. Please stop adding excessive internal links to this or other articles. Thank you, Cnilep (talk) 01:45, 17 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Teo Trandafir. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Cnilep (talk) 09:04, 17 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding excessive internal links, as you did on Paula Seling. Do not add internal links on years, unless the linked page includes information that is specifically related to the page from which you are linking. Do not link to numbers or units of measure. Do not link to everyday words such as "woman" or "music" that most readers can understand in context. In general, avoid linking to major geographic locations, such as Europe, or languages, such as English language. If you add a link, ensure that the link goes to the page you intend, and not to a disambiguation page or a page with a similar name that does not treat the topic you have in mind. When linking to pages that are relevant to the content of the page you are linking from, include only one such link, generally the first time the idea is mentioned. Please see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking for guidelines on what to link to and what not to link to. Cnilep (talk) 23:44, 12 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Paula Seling- 2009.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Paula Seling- 2009.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:19, 30 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:Paula Seling- 2009.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:16, 30 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Luminița Anghel in 2005.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Luminița Anghel in 2005.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:24, 30 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Mihaela Rădulescu-coperta -VIVA -mai -2013.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Mihaela Rădulescu-coperta -VIVA -mai -2013.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:26, 30 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Dana Rogoz -coperta InStyle Romania.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Dana Rogoz -coperta InStyle Romania.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:26, 30 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:Dana Rogoz -coperta InStyle Romania.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:37, 30 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Mihaela Rădulescu-coperta -VIVA -mai -2013.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Mihaela Rădulescu-coperta -VIVA -mai -2013.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:37, 30 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Paula Seling- 2009.jpg

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Paula Seling- 2009.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:38, 30 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dana Rogoz

edit

Hi, per Michael Q. Schmidt's suggestion, I have closed this AFD with a userfy result. The article is at User:Consiliul/Dana Rogoz, so that you and can start working on it in peace. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:19, 6 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Non-free use of File:Paula Seling Inedit.png

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:Paula Seling Inedit.png. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:40, 6 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Culeg Vise (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Exchange, Romanian, Background and World wide

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 11 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

  I have asked you three times to please stop adding excessive internal links. You continue to add inappropriate links, such as your recent edits to Delia Matache. Stop adding internal links on years, everyday words, major geographic locations or languages, and the like. Such links are not helpful to readers. Try to ensure that links you do add do not point to a disambiguation page or other unintended page. I assume that you are editing in good faith, but I am becoming quite frustrated by your continued actions. Cnilep (talk) 10:38, 14 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Specifically, see User Consiliul use of internal links. Cnilep (talk) 00:58, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Paula Seling

edit

Hi, Consiliul. I reverted your addition of the good article icon from this article as I could not locate the GA assessment. In the event I missed it, can you point me to that assessment? Thanks Tiderolls 01:25, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Mihaela Rădulescu-coperta -VIVA -mai -2013.jpg

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:Mihaela Rădulescu-coperta -VIVA -mai -2013.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Psychonaut (talk) 12:13, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Playing with Fire- Paula Seling &Ovi.ogv

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:Playing with Fire- Paula Seling &Ovi.ogv. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Psychonaut (talk) 12:18, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Timpul-Paula Seling.ogg

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:Timpul-Paula Seling.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Psychonaut (talk) 12:20, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please stop

edit

Consiliul, Please stop editing until you can find some help. Your templates are not functioning, your file uploads are being questioned and your content additions are grammatically lacking. All the while you are not communicating. We need your help with the project but if your edits are not constructive and require the time and effort of other editors to repair, there is no gain. If you need help finding a mentor, I will be happy to help locate someone for you. Please do not jeopardize your editing privilge by continuing your present course. Regards Tiderolls 14:34, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • Thank you for your message; I will, of course, find someone to help you. However, You must stop editing until you have received help. This will cut down on the clean-up required. Tiderolls 15:20, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • I have contactd a user to help you but you have not stopped editing. I do not want to block you while you wait on the help but the disruption cannot continue. Please, please stop until you are contacted. Thanks Tiderolls 15:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello rolls,

I discuss with ladryan user, but, yesterday, i consider the problem resolved, because someone upload a image with Delia, it was very good, i don't see the photo anywhere, so I don't understand why this photo was DELETE AGAIN!!!!

Please help me and Delia managers, to upload a good photo with her, and a BOOK:DELIA, with her songs, etc.

In case is more, i will pay this actions. More on vladmateescu@rocketmail.com

Thanks, Vlad Mateescu, Director of Shepperton International, O.R.D.A Inspector in Romania --Consiliul (talk) 07:50, 17 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Deleted template

edit

Hello,

Why did you remove this template? Do you think the issues have been fixed?

- Tournesol (talk) 14:40, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Salut

edit

Salut, Am observat ca ai adaugat multe imagini, clipuri care sunt protejate-drept de autor (copyright). Pe wikipedia, daca adaugi imagini sau orice similar trebuie sa ai grija daca imagina respectiva este protejata. De asemenea, dacă adăugați informatii pe articol trebuie să fi atent ca datele sa aiba surse de încredere.

Te rog sa folosesti "edit summary"(sa pui mesaj cand editez articol) ca sa explici ce ai schimbat in articol, de ce ai introdus sau sters informatii.

Ar fi bine sa stii macar putin engleza pentru ca este necesar sa comunici cu alti utilizatori daca apare vreo problema.

Nu stiu ce experienta ai cu wikipedia, dar daca ai nevoie de ajutor poti sa imi trimiti mesaj. Adrian (talk) 08:41, 16 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Salut, am raspuns la mine pe pagina. Adrian (talk) 22:01, 16 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits

edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (  or  ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:03, 16 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
Hello, Consiliul. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions#WIKIPEDIA_USERS_PLEASE_HELP_the_article_Delia_Matache.2C_please_help_me_and_Delia_managers_.2Cwe_need_your_help.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Delia Matache, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tabloid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 18 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Images

edit

If you can contribute images of under a free license, please read the steps (in Romanian) at commons:Commons:OTRS/ro. Someone not using his real name (talk) 16:09, 18 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Delia Matache 2013.jpg

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Delia Matache 2013.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Psychonaut (talk) 19:08, 18 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Re: Delia Matache

edit

Sorry but I can't help in the process. However you can invite someone else to help you. Cheers ! — (talk) 09:19, 20 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please stop

edit

Consiliul, I see no change in your editing. Your attempts at getting help have been insufficient. You are contiuing to add promotional material and are being challenged for using copyrighted work. Your admitted lack of knowledge regarding English shows in the grammatically incorrect content you are adding. Again, please stop editing until you have obtained the help you require to bring your editing in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tiderolls 14:11, 20 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Dear Tide

I don't edit anything, AND I WILL NEVER EDIT TO WIKIPEDIA BECAUSE I SEARCH FOR ONE THING! TO UPLOAD A IMAGE FOR DELIA, but i understand that you and this people, think I am crazy. I quite with Wikipedia, this is a big waste of time, to edit, AND NOBODY WANTS TO HELP YOU, THEY WANT ONLY TO DELETE YOUR PHOTOS, TO BE MORE SUPERIOR THAN YOU! OK, you are not superior than me, i have a beautiful job, a wife, kids, ALL I WANT! I WANT ONLY TO HELP YOU, FROM THIS POSITION I HAVE AS A DIRECTOR IN DUBBING, but IS YOUR LOSE, YOU WILL NEVER FIND A PERSON WHO WILL EDIT DELIA, OR PAULA SELING, ONLY THEIR MANAGERS.

A nice day, and thank you again for your ,,cordial welcome" guys! I am nervous and i quite NOW! --Consiliul (talk) 16:14, 20 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

The part of your response that I understand is a severe overreaction. All I am requesting is that you stop making work for others to clean up. Your contributions are welcome, but you must edit within Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. One thing that is evident is that you seem to expect immediate results; this rarely happens on Wikipedia. It is for you to decide if you do not have the patience to wait for your experience to develop. Tiderolls 17:37, 20 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Delia-Parfum de Fericire.jpg

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:Delia-Parfum de Fericire.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Psychonaut (talk) 11:29, 23 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Requested help (Tournesol's page)

edit

You ask him for help. Perhaps I could be of some use to you. Romanian matters are naturally just as important as any other non-English speaking country. I'm from Scania the southernmost peak of Sweden. What kind of troubles have you encountered ? Remember inline references are very important here, however if you can't find sources in English, then you can use Romanian sources. Boeing720 (talk) 05:19, 31 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Vino înapoi by N&D.ogg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Vino înapoi by N&D.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:47, 27 April 2018 (UTC)Reply