Welcome!

edit
 
Some cookies to welcome you!  

Welcome to Wikipedia, Contributers2020! Thank you for your contributions. I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Minor edits

edit

  Hi Contributers2020! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. WikiHannibal (talk) 17:36, 2 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for you help. Thanks, Contributers2020 (talk) 14:16, 23 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Rich Smith were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- RichT|C|E-Mail 13:05, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Contributers2020! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - RichT|C|E-Mail 13:05, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Original News (August 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 07:36, 19 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Original News (August 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:31, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Original News (August 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 05:38, 25 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Semi protected edit request

edit

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Contributers2020 (talkcontribs) 08:00, 7 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

It's not clear what changes you're requesting – Thjarkur (talk) 09:16, 7 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Original News (September 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Devonian Wombat (talk) 00:05, 29 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chanesh Ram Rathiya has been accepted

edit
 
Chanesh Ram Rathiya, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Akhiljaxxn (talk) 19:24, 1 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:The Original News

edit

  Hello, Contributers2020. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Original News, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 1 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Fast.com

edit

Hi! I noticed that you wrote some content on Fast.com. However, that page is a redirect, and readers will not usually see it. I don't think Fast.com is notable enough to have a standalone article, so I have removed your text there. If you want, you could probably expand the "Products" section of the Netflix article (Netflix#Products), but the line it already has about Fast.com is probably enough. --rchard2scout (talk) 11:14, 9 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Rchard2scout:Its completely fine. I thought that maybe they will come across this empty article so instead filled it up. Moreover, I admit that the text was so bad grammatically. Let it be a redirect page only. --Contributers2020Talk to me here 11:38, 9 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

What?

edit

Any problem Holland Tok (talk) 10:57, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

January 2024

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Contributers2020", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it suggests this is a group or shared account. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 09:58, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

331dot, thank you for notifying me about the discrepancy. I have successfully put up a global username change request, but it may take time since I have filed for usurpation. Contributers2020Talk to me here 03:33, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vicky Ostwal (January 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoboCric was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RoboCric Let's chat 15:09, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Indur Ramphul moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Indur Ramphul. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and those sources should be reliable and independent of the subject. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:24, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Significa liberdade, these are my reasons to think that this action is unjust:-
-The person is having no mentions whatsoever on anywhere other than the Bank of Mauritius's website, despite being a respected Governor of the Bank Of Mauritius.
-This person is very well known, however is not documented since of the times.
-I understand your concern about one source, but many articles coexist with that tag and especially this should apply here since the source is a "department" of a government.
(P.S. - Reply is from a mobile. Apologies for any error) Contributor2020 (talk) 05:47, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi, Contributor2020-- Thank you for voicing your concerns. If you believe the article meet's Wikipedia's notability guidelines for biographies, you may move the article back to the main space. You may also submit it for further review through Articles for Creation by clicking "Submit the draft for review" on the draft page. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 13:45, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

  Hello Contributor2020! Your additions to Indur Ramphul have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. C F A 💬 00:04, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

@CFA, please do note all the content that was from bom.mu was appropriately paraphrased as suggested by your own article linked above. I request you to please revert your changes.
(P.S. - This reply is from a mobile. Apologies for any errors) Contributor2020 (talk) 12:19, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
No, it was not appropriately paraphrased. Changing or deleting a few words here in there so it doesn't look like a copyright violation is still plagiarism. Please read the policy on close paraphrasing. Regardless, large sections of text were copied-and-pasted in without changing anything. I suggest you try expanding the article again, this time using your own words. Thank you. C F A 💬 17:17, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply