User talk:Coren/Archive Sep 2007

Trina Morissette page tagged

I am a volunteer with the Trina Morissette Campaign in Ottawa center, i wrote the original text that has been posted in several locations including the one that your bot identified but as the original author I permit its use for the purposes of providing biographical background on Trina Morissette.

I have provided this explanation on the discussion page Talk:Trina Morissette as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ottawacenter (talk • contribs)

Y Responded on the user's talk page. — Coren ^(talk) 04:14, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Frances Howard (actress)

Hello, your duplicate pages bot caught me with a tag on the Frances Howard (actress) page just as I finished restoring the Frances Howard to a disambiguation page. Its now complete, and I removed the bot tag. All reasoning explained on both article talk pages. Now I know I need to be much quicker!!...Steven Russell 08:49, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Y No further action needed. — Coren ^(talk) 12:28, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

eMarket Trading Platform

This is not copyrighted information from ohloh.net. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Snambi 75 (talk • contribs) 17:49, August 24, 2007 (UTC)

N Article submitted for deletion for an unrelated reason. — Coren ^(talk) 18:07, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Ilinx

Got a note from CorenSearchBot about copyright in the ilinx stub I added. The content in question is a direct quote from Callois's book -- what's the position in fair use of such quotations? Thanks. Cshirky 18:13, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Dimitrios Partsalidis

Hi, your bot flagged this article up as copyvio off Phantis. (http://wiki.phantis.com/index.php/Dimitrios_Partsalidis) Phantis is a wikisite itself, and does not claim copyright in the same way that Wikipedia doesn't. Either way I have rewritten much of the article and expanded it. Cheers, StephP 18:39, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Redirection of Bharathapuzha River page to a new one

Hello,

I have two reasons to do that. Its nothing to do with the capital letters. The reasons are as follows.

1. The name "Bharathapuzha River" is not correct because the term "puzha" and "river" means the same. So the "River" part is not needed.

2. In malayalam language "bharatha" + "puzha"(river) = bharathappuzha. Please notice the "pp". As this is Wikipedia and many people including me using this as a reference guide, we should give excat naming too.

I hope my arguments are correct. You can change the title "BHARATHAPPUZHA" to "Bharathappuzha".

Regards,

Rajeev madhavan 06:30, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

It's important, when renaming a page, that you move the page, and not simply copy and paste its contents to the new name because that looses edition history— which the GFDL requires be kept. — Coren ^(talk) 15:28, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Berlin Debating Union

A stub article I created earlier today on the Berlin Debating Union seems to have been speedily deleted after automated messages from CorenSearchBot appeared on the page and on my talk page.

The article contained two very generic opening sentences that were largely (but not word-for-word) similar to two sentences from http://www.debating.de/node/9. These were could hardly be considered a copyright infringement as they were just an extremely straightforwardly-worded explaination of what the Union is, and the rest of the page was not copied at all. I'm very surprised that the page has been deleted. Purple Watermelon 10:18, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

You may want to ask the deleting admin (Butseriouslyfolks (talk · contribs)), who is in a better position than me to explain the reasoning followed. — Coren ^(talk) 15:22, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Opticians Council of Canada

Coren reported that the above was a cut and paste of copyrighted material: this worries me because I created the page simply by refactoring existing stuff from the extremely overbloated section on Canadian opticians in Opticians. I think a lot of the other stuff there could be cut and paste too. Could Coren be pointed at the page to check it? Maybe there should be a way of submitting requests to Coren to check existing pages in general? Umptious 11:19, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Actually, there is.  :-) Simply add a wikilink to User:CorenSearchBot/manual and you'll get a result within a few minutes. — Coren ^(talk) 15:17, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Northern New Guinea lowland rain and freshwater swamp forests

Your overzealous bot has marked a one-sentence stub article as a copyvio; what's going on? Tom Radulovich 01:36, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Well, if that one sentence can be found elsewhere, then it wasn't overzealous; it was correct. If you wrote that sentence yourself and simply happened to match someone else's, then removing the tag is all that's needed. — Coren ^(talk) 04:51, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Yated Ne'eman (United States)

Hi Coren: I received a message about "copyrighted" material on the new Yated Ne'eman (United States) I have just created. The joke is, that this newspaper does not publish on the web. All that I quoted in the article was the ONLY two lines on http://www.yated.com/ that offers readers an alternate option and indeed the Wikipedia article explains why that is so and what's behind it. Thus the copyright issue is not relevant and I am removing it. Thank you. IZAK 11:15, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Bot error Instinct:_Decay

This is the first time I've left a message like this so I'm sorry in advance if I do this incorrectly. One of your bots thought I took a whole section of text from this article from [[1]]. I took the tracklisting (this is an album page) from a completely seperate website but the bot linked it to the CD universe website. I hope that made sense. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by YamaLlama (talk • contribs) 17:33:10, August 19, 2007 (UTC).

Y Responded on the user's talk page. — Coren ^(talk) 03:20, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Unnecessary SearchBot alert when splitting Wikipedia article

Hi, your bot left me this copyvio alert unnecessarily. I was splitting a Wikipedia page, creating a new article. The SearchBot detected similarities with another copy of the Wikipedia source page, the content of which ought not to be copyright. Fayenatic (talk) 15:07, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Unavoidable annoyance, I'm affraid. CSBot cannot know that a cut-and-paste is legitimate, and so flags all. When you know what you are doing is okay, just go ahead and remove the tag. — Coren ^(talk) 15:20, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

OK, thanks. Could you give it a fuller list of sites which copy Wikipedia, to ignore when searching? Fayenatic (talk) 16:39, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Y Moving conversation to the user's talk page. — Coren ^(talk) 03:14, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Deleting article

This bot keep deleting my article that has facts and says they are copyright because it found them on some random forum. From my understanding facts can not be copyrighted. So How do I get around this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rickler (talk • contribs) 18:30, August 25, 2007 (UTC)

If you only copy raw facts (and not prose, even single statements) then there is no violation of copyright. Simply remove the tag (preferably with a short note on the article's talk page so that patrolling admins can see why you did). — Coren ^(talk) 03:13, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Financial Services Action Plan

Hello Coren,

I just received a message from you about the Financial Services Action Plan that I have just created. You make reference to text from the FSA page.

As you may see from my entries, I am a relatively new user of Wikipedia. I am interested in improving the coverage of European Union topics, particularly with reference to financial services and financial market regulation. My sources often include material from regulatory authorities as I am not creating original material in any way.

I always try to refer to other Wikipedia pages where relevant and also cite sources wherever possible. I did use the FSA text as part of my entry and was obliged to save it to create the original entry. In the comment field I noted that more work would be required to make this Wikipedia reach an acceptable standard, in part referring to the text from the FSA,

I have the intention to substantially revise the text and incorporate material from other sources, all sources will be referenced accordingly as per all my other Wikipedia entries, and my revised text will not resemble the text from the FSA.

Please inform me of how I can ensure that my entry will conform with all Wikipedia as I have no intention of posting material from other sources and passing it off as my own,

regards Dean Armond (talk · contribs) 20:35, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Y Responded on the user's talk page. — Coren ^(talk) 03:12, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

John Baughan

Hey Coren, How can I get your searchbot off my tail? I have used information from a number of sites to make this page, not just this page. If I re-edit it with reduced content from that page, will the page survive? Macr237 00:07, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Doesn't matter, I have removed 99% of the information. Macr237 00:42, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Y No further action needed. — Coren ^(talk) 03:06, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Santosh Namby Chandran (India)

Dear Coren, I received a message that my page "Shri Sanwaliaji" contained text from another website. That is true, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Trust has given me permission to use the information. In case you feel that it is a VIOLATION of copyright, i have deleted it. Santosh Namby Chandran —The preceding signed but undated comment was added at 11:44, August 26, 2007 (UTC). Comment was actually left by Santosh namby (talk · contribs).

Y Responded on the user's talk page. — Coren ^(talk) 03:05, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

The Kakurangers

Hey um, I just created it. I am sorry. I just removed the characters section and made an article, for example the Dairanger article has The Dairangers. I am not copying it directly. I will make edits to make it more or less similar. Thank you for your bot's comment, even though I admit it is confusing. I am now going to remove the tag. Greg Jones II 14:39, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

If that article is a copyvio, I have placed Template:db-userreq there. I have now moved the Kakuranger stuff back to the main article. Greg Jones II 16:15, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Y No further action needed. — Coren ^(talk) 03:01, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Reed Martin

Reed Martins Bio is indeed copied from the www.reducedshakespeare.com, However, this is where Reed Martin works and it is the source of his official biography —Preceding unsigned comment added by Billionkid (talk • contribs) 01:50, August 27, 2007 (UTC)

Y Responded on the user's talk page. — Coren ^(talk) 03:00, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Waki-gamae

I was in the process of moving waki to waki-gamae, as it is the more standard term. Perhaps you could wait a little longer before alerting people? I will be moving a few more pages in the near future, if I get tagged during the moves I will just ignore it and carry on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ffbond (talk • contribs) 06:36, August 27, 2007 (UTC)

N Please do not rename pages by cut-and-paste, this looses edit history which must be preserved to follow the GFDL. Use the "move" function instead. — Coren ^(talk) 12:42, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

HEAR

I see that a message for the bot maintainer has been added at Talk:Puccinia psidii. Lavateraguy 08:58, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Y Responded on that talk page. — Coren ^(talk) 14:11, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Copyright free stuff tagged as copyvio

Hi! Your bot tagged Irmgard Flügge-Lotz as copyvio from PlanetMath. As you can see at [2] PlaneMath is under a free licence and can be freely copyed, wich is what Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics/PlanetMath Exchange is trying to do. Could you please put an exception from PlanetMath in the bot's page checking? AdamSmithee 12:12, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

 Fixed Planetmath added to the list of known GFDL sites. Please remember to properly attribute the source and author(s), which is easiest to do properly by linking back to the specific article. — Coren ^(talk) 14:20, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Tx. Note that the article does have a template at the bottom wich makes the necessary attribution and links back to the original article AdamSmithee 07:20, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

North Oscura Peak

Your bot said: {{csb-pageincludes}}

This is not a copyright violation; the original source at http://www.kirtland.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-070404-041.pdf is a public domain work. (sdsds - talk) 02:43, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Copy of copy. Just remove the tag, and all will be well.  :-) — Coren ^(talk) 02:52, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Untitled by User:Colinrosewell

Colinrosewell 03:01, 28 August 2007 (UTC) I have just changed a link from Sir Henry Rosewell to Sir Henry Rosewell. The Article Sir Henry Rosewell is empty and may be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Colinrosewell (talk • contribs) 03:01, August 28, 2007 (UTC)

Y No further action needed. — Coren ^(talk) 16:41, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

DumbBOT

I'm back; please see my talk page. Tizio 12:15, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Congress

I had a different message posted here before, but let me better explain myself. It's not a big deal, but I'm just wondering if you can program your bot to avoid this problem. I got some information from the U.S. Congress website, which is well established as part of the public domain. However, your bot said that I got the info from everyone's favorite Wikip rip-off, Infoplease.com. Since Infoplease apparantly uses the same public domain info, your bot seems to think i took it from a copyrighted site. Weird. Mr. Vitale 20:04, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

There's absolutely nothing that can be done about that, I'm afraid. When two places take their information from the same source, they will always look like copies of each other, and no bot could be smart enough to figure out that the copies were legitimate. All you need to do when that happens, however, is remove the tag— the humans reviewer that follow CSBot are smart enough to understand.  :-) — Coren ^(talk) 20:19, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Free Agent Crew

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Free Agent Crew, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.triplejunearthed.com/Artists/View.aspx?ArtistId=655. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 00:19, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

I have no idea what this means????

It means you blatantly cut and pasted information from a website, which is a breach of copyright. I have had this done to me once and I had to do more research and rewrite the majority of the article. You can reference it, but you cannot blatantly copy it. -- Macr237 07:37, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Ok - i created a new page for Free Agent Crew. Didnt cut and paste any info at all. And it has STILL been deleted saying it was about a band/muso ect.... im confused. So you can't put a page up about a band now? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Topcat82 (talk • contribs) 02:05, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

I was working on it

The Langtang National Park is a copy of a page existing on a Nepalese Government Website. The sentences were still to be formatted (rewritten) but its not available anymore. Please advise! --Utsav80 06:23, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Bridge Conferencing Solutions

MadDogMikey 19:36, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Hi,

I have just entered details for Bridge Conferencing Solutions.

They specialise in video conferencing and I thought it would be good if the world knew about them.

I got their info from their Company page on their website www.bridgeconference.co.za and simply changed it from 1st person to 3rd person.

The searchbot said this is in violation of copywright as it is pretty close to the info on their website.

Please tell me how to go about rectifying this so that it can be officially entered regardless of where it is being sent from.

Thank you.

Cativolcus

The text on the article is not a copyright violation. It is indeed taken from the Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology, which is available online (the text is from here). However, that book is published in 1870, which puts it in the public domain. –RHolton≡– 04:49, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

The Gazette of the United States content

Hi, replying to your bot message, it is correct. However, the duplication was only momentary because I was copying the content of the article The Gazette of the United States, and moving it under the paper's correct name Gazette of the United States (i.e., article renamed to remove the 'The'). I inserted a redirect from the old name to the new, so any links will flow properly. Thanks, and a good bot! GoldenMean 06:04, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Coren, wasn't sure about how to do that. GoldenMean 18:02, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Hedydipna

Please stop your bot tagging Hedydipna - twice in two days. http://www.economicexpert.com/a/Collared:Sunbird.html has copied the collared sunbird page from Wikipedia, not the other way round, and has acknowledged Wikipedia and the GFDL licence at the bottom of the page. If you cannot train the bot, I'll protect the page. Jimfbleak 16:28, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Congress

Hey, I'm the guy who had the problem with the bot tagging information from US Congress public domain sites. Anyway, remember how you said human editors are smart enough to understand that the info is ok? Well, I'm already running in to a problem with somebody who just won't take the 5 seconds that're required to find the info on the Congress website. Can you help me straighten this out? Thanks. Mr. Vitale 22:19, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Exclusion Additions to CorenSearchBot

Please see [3]. Can you add http://www.infoplease.com/biography/us/congress (not the whole site, just that particular section) and User:Afil to your bot's ignore list? Over the past few weeks, I have remove quite a number of false matches based upon these.

The Biographical Directory of the United States Congress is a US Government work and, therefore, public domain. Infoplease mirrors the directory and anytime someone creates an entry from the directory, your bot tags and lists it. These articles are getting created quite frequently.

User:Afil has been creating many stubs on rivers. He's using the same basic format for all of them & your bot keeps tagging and listing them. I'm surprised he's not complained to you as he keeps reverting the tags. I've removed quite a few of them from the listing.

Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks. -- JLaTondre 00:04, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Stephen Glicker

I had cut and pasted from his about page, but I cleaned it up.Blackbeard2k7 01:17, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Your recent change of MOSNUM

I don't get it. Why is scientific context at issue here?

"Outside of scientific contexts where numerical error may be significant, the number of decimal places should be consistent within a list or context". Tony 04:29, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Because significant digits and precision count. 41 is different from 41.0— the former means "some value in [40.5 41.5[" while the latter means "some value in [40.95 41.05[. In a scientific text, changing the number of significant digits changes the meaning. — Coren ^(talk) 05:32, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Goodbye Gay Meadow

Goodbye Gay Meadow - I am the author of the book and run and maintain the www.goodbyegaymeadow.com site of which I own all the copyrighted material. As a professional photograper who frequently has images stolen off the web I very much appreciate the amazing © copyright stance that wiki adopts. The book is currently being printed. If Wiki do not feature forthcoming releases then I do not mind the page being deleted and I will re-make the page when the book is available next month.

Mattsnapper 09:24, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Shekhsar

The article on Shekhsar does not violate copyrights. It has been taken from Jatland.com site. The Jatland has been Attributed that The original text of this article was taken from http://www.jatland.com/home/Godara, and http://www.jatland.com/home/Shekhsar, which is licensed under the GFDL. Hence no copyright violation. --burdak 05:16, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

re Barnett Rubin the article was edited to remove the verbatim text from the NYU web page. only public domain information is included in the article. jeremylhJeremylh 21:18, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Learned Estonian Society

RE:it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page.

• Removed the tag. The source was from a public domain and I rephrased the text on WP afterwards. Hope that would do it. If not, please let me know. I'm going to work on with the article anyway using other sources and the text is going to change further... Thanks--Termer 08:16, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Reem Riyashi

I'm going to remove the tag. This is a draft and while the sentences are quite close to the article cited now, every sentence is footnoted and is undergo changes anyway. Thanks. Tiamat 09:32, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Hashivenu

I'm learning the ropes here, so thank you for your patience! My understanding was that short quotes could be used if they were cited. I placed the information in quote and included a citation. Is there more I need to do than that? GracieRuth 06:03, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

As a rule, no. CSBot might simply have gotten a bit trigger-happy if the quotations are a significant part of the new article (something to watch out for), but if they are properly attributed it's normally not a problem. You might want to read up the copyright policies to double check, but human reviewers look after what the bot notices and tend to be much smarter than a program can be about quotations.  :-) — Coren ^(talk) 06:09, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Untitled by Jpalme

Jpalmejpalme@dsv.su.se 17:42 2 September 2007 (UTC)

I am a very inexperienced writer in Wikipedia, but if I have done things wrongly, please explain how I should do it right. I do not even know for sure how I should go about asking a question in the web page I am writing my question in now. I understand that this is a page where I can get answers to questions, but not how to do it.

I wrote a new article for Wikipedia with the title "Cognitive modules". After this, I get repeated statements that this article is not permissible, because it is based on another web page, http://web4health.info/en/answers/bio-brain-work.htm, which is substantially identical to the Wikipedia article.

However, I understand your rules to say that it is permitted to copy existing web content, if that content is available under the GFDL license. And I have included a note at the end of http://web4health.info/en/answers/bio-brain-work.htm, saying that that page is available under the GFDL license.

Question: Must the indication that a page is available under the GFDL license be in any special format, for example using some special HTML or XML encoding? If so, how should I have done it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpalme (talk • contribs) 16:44, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Well, it doesn't have to be, but it helps CSBot know about it if you use a suitable template, and avoids the notice entirely. As long as it's attributed, however, humans reviewer should notice.

Also, as a rule, the GFDL requires that edition history is preserved; this is most easily done by linking back to the page from which the material was taken. — Coren ^(talk) 06:06, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Jpalmejpalme@dsv.su.se 5 September 2007 12:59 (UTC)

I hope I have done it right now. I added the following text at the bottom of the Wikipedia article:

This article was originally based on material from [[4]], which is licensed under the GFDL.

It seems funny that information about the GFDL license should be in the Wikipedia articles, which anyone can edit, and not in the original article, which only the copyright owner can edit. It seems more secure to have the GFDL information on the original text. But now the GFDL information is in both the Wikipedia article and the original article, so I hope this will prevent the Wikipedia article from getting deleted.

Always Active Technologies

Hi There

The Bot is a bit confused as the text it found (from our home page) was pasted into the forum by an employee trying to describe to a potential job seeker what the company was about. This text has been removed from the Always Active Technologies Wiki page in any case.

thanks,

Alangsm 06:26, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

The Heart's Tremolo

Hi, your searchbot has identified similarities between this new page I have created and http://quimby.gnus.org/circus/jukebox.php?group=Tsunami&album=The%20Heart's%20Tremolo.

I think this is because both pages have a track listing of the album. May I remove tha tag?

Cheers (MuteJoe 10:20, 3 September 2007 (UTC))

Malcolm X: Make It Plain

Hi, your bot has said that I have used copyright in the above article. The only bit that is copied is the DVD cover blurb. Other article about documentaries and film copy the official blurb so I didn't think that it would be a problem. Robert C Prenic 10:34, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Homai Vyarawalla

Hi I think the your bot has a made a mistake. I have created this article with just one line saying she is the first woman photojournalist of india which off course appears in all the article able her. I don't this stating this is a copyright violation hence I am removing the notice. Anuragshekhar 10:49, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Best I Ever Had (Grey Sky Morning)

Coren, It said that this article was infringement of copyright, but actually it is just the lyrics to the song, so it is the same on every website. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Septemberpillow (talk • contribs) 16:07, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Indeed. The problem is, lyrics are copyrighted and cannot be put on Wikipedia at all unless in the public domain or explicitely licensed in a way that is compatible with the GFDL. — Coren ^(talk) 21:58, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Game Related

The track listing is the only thing on that page.

D3M0Nz 20:28, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Y No further action needed. — Coren ^(talk) 22:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

TACJ

With regards The Technium.

Just cut and pasted a load of stuff from the page - I've rewritten everything from scratch now.

TACJ 18:26, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Y No further action needed. — Coren ^(talk) 22:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Robert Goldwater

Indeed, I had cut and pasted a biography and was in the process of re-writing it when this bot snagged my drafts. It should be fine now after ample revisions.

thanks

Underbelly02 17:18, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Y No further action needed. — Coren ^(talk) 22:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Bot error regarding Juanita Bynum.

Info is not derived from said source.

Y No further action needed. — Coren ^(talk) 22:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Sangye Nyenpa Rinpoche

I removed the tag in the discussion  : "csb-pageincludes" because the article Sangye Nyenpa Rinpoche was reproduced with courtesy of www.benchen.org for wikipedia. I strongly suggest to improve the article, and will do so for wikipedia style. All the best wishes, --Rédacteur Tibet 15:06, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Y No further action needed. — Coren ^(talk) 22:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Socialismo e Barbarie

The only content in http://www.yellowpecora.net/cccp/socialismo_barbarie.html is the track listing for the album "Socialismo e Barbarie" by the Italian punk rock band CCCP

I have removed the tag from the article (Socialismo e Barbarie). (Pjoef 16:39, 27 August 2007 (UTC))

Y No further action needed. — Coren ^(talk) 22:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

L&N Depot(Milton, Florida)

No, your bot is not confused. I did copy text from Louisville and Nashville Railroad Depot, in order to transform that specific page into a list of other L&N Depots. The one that was listed had a link to a List of Registered Historic Places in Illinois. ---- DanTD 19:21, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Y No further action needed. — Coren ^(talk) 22:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Puget Custom Computers

The page that was cited as the source is actually some crawler site that actually copied verbatim an old version of the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eb1232 (talk • contribs) 21:28, August 28, 2007 (UTC)

Y No further action needed. — Coren ^(talk) 22:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Help I am new here.

I received the following: This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of New york state association of auxiliary police, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.auxiliary-police.org/. I am the President & Webmaster of NYSAAP.

Please allow this article to be started.

I will work on it more.

Thank You

NCAP 23:02, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Y No further action needed. — Coren ^(talk) 22:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Locked-In Retirement Account

I got slapped with a copyright notice on this newly created page. Yes...at the current moment it's a copy but it just an outline which I'm re-working into my own text. By the time you read this it should be corrected. My apologies, I DO know better than to press the save button before such a re-working is done. Regards... Dross82 14:32, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Y No further action needed. — Coren ^(talk) 22:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Xavier

Thanks for the automated message. I am working on reorganizing numerous related dab pages and redirects and have already removed your tag as it no longer applies to Xavier (name). SlackerMom 17:35, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Y No further action needed. — Coren ^(talk) 22:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

I LOVE your bot!

Well actually the subject line says it all. Wonderful bot. Of coure it has made a very few errors which are easily resolved, but it has really, really, been a great asset. 11:51, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Well I don't. its doing my head in on certain articles where there is no direct copywright ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 21:46, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

OK I do think the bot is a great idea but we have to compile an encylopedia using something. It wasn't a copy and paste job I rewrote it but even then it triggered the bot. I'm just trying to buuild an encyclopedia of the greatest depth this is all. But his means leaving out important info because it will be seen as copywright ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 21:59, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

NahooToo

Your bot told me most of the information for NahooToo was copied from this site, however that is not the case. Just letting you know I've removed the tag from the article. seven+one 22:18, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Y No further action required.

Sheer (textile)

See Talk:Sheer (textile). Anthony Appleyard 19:34, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Y No further action required. — Coren ^(talk) 02:13, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Fiction-writing modes

The bot is correct that I used wording from an outside source, in particular a blog: www.mikeklaassenblog.com, which is my personal blog. I wrote the the text and retain all rights, but I understand that have granted use to wikepedia under the user agreement. I will remove the notation under fiction-writing article. Please let me know if you disagree. --Mike Klaassen 19:28, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Y No further action required. — Coren ^(talk) 02:12, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

1978 in motoring

I did not copy this page from the link you posted on my discussion page. The person who created the identical article has obviously copied my work, although I have no idea who this person could be. AlexWilkes 21:58, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Y No further action required. — Coren ^(talk) 02:12, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

SHARE Operating System

CorenSearchBot tells me that SHARE Operating System is a copyvio of http://www.santiago.es/ir.php?var=SHARE_Operating_System. That's wrong, it is instead a direct copy from es:SHARE Operating System prior to translation. Sure enough, http://www.santiago.es/ir.php?var=SHARE_Operating_System says it is "De Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre". You need to get a better exclusion filter. RossPatterson 00:21, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

I'm afraid copies-of-copies matches are an unavoidable side effect. Sorry for the trouble. — Coren ^(talk) 02:09, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Security Council Resolutions

Hi

Your bot seems to be repeatedly tagging articles on United Nations Security council resolutions (e.g. United Nations Security Council Resolution 143). As far as I can see there is no copyright violation involved; the articles as (mostly) created by Schrandit are summaries of content in WikiSource. Could you let me know how best to prevent future tagging, as it's a lot of effort to remove your bot's over-enthusiasm. Cheers Chrislintott 10:13, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

 Fixed CSBot now knows about the {{wikisource}} tag and will ignore articles that attribute that source. — Coren ^(talk) 02:08, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Vernon Sankey

Accused of using copyright material I have re written the article, I was unaware that a list of jobs was in any way copyrightable. Paste 20:44, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Y No further action required. — Coren ^(talk) 02:06, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Tarilky

Hi. I'm transfering and will be entending materials on Ukrainian folk instruments from my bookand website. I am the owner of the copyright. --Bandurist 23:57, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Y Responded on the user's talk page. — Coren ^(talk) 02:05, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Chris Fleming

I'm doing a Wiki page for Chris Fleming and it keeps getting tagged. I have his personal permission to use the bio from his website http://www.unknownmagazine.com/bio.htm. I have the email to prove it. Would you please stop this and let me continue? Thank you.

Skompier 00:14, 6 September 2007 (UTC)Steve Kompier

N Please read the guide to requesting and formalizing permission to use copyrighted works on Wikipedia. Note that, in addition to copyright requirements, the article must still comply with notability guidelines, advertising prohibition and avoid conflicts of interest. — Coren ^(talk) 02:03, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Henry Bertie

Maybe not immediately, but both of them are notable as members of the British House of Commons and the other as a Lord Proprietor. There were several incoming redlinks to "Henry Bertie" before I created it, which I've now disambiguated appropriately. Choess 03:12, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

I have to sign off and sleep now, but I'll fix something up tomorrow if you like, then. Choess 03:19, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Tugon

Please restore the Tugon page I created. It was really taken from the website: www.tugon-rescue.org. I'm also the author of the contents of the said page. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kookiefreak (talk • contribs) 05:07, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

EMS Group content

I am the web editor and Marketing Coordinator of EMS Group. Does this not give me permission to use the same information from our website which I created for our Wikipedia article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jrussoems (talk • contribs) 19:21, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Y User was responded to on his talk page. — Coren ^(talk) 19:43, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Alexander Palace Faberge egg

Sorry for the text vio, I sent an email to Matt & Andrej Koymasky, a while back, and they said I could use the descriptions from their site, but it appears that I copied a bit too liberally. Gareth E Kegg 23:30, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

external links

Copy of discussion on User talk:Lolololol12345678 excised

Reply: Please take a look at the wildlife page and look at the external link list, and the tell me why the World Wildlife Fund (just to take an example) should be there and not the one I proposed???? You should also reject all those organizations that are listed in the external link of wildlife page because they contain similar information as the one I proposed. What do you think? Please answer

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lolololol12345678"

The links you have added were spamming. Whether other external links are also spam is immaterial to that (and a dubious claim to boot— the WWF is very notable). — Coren ^(talk) 14:26, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Reply:

The links I have added were not spamming at all. They contained related NOTABLE infornation. I guess you have not answer my question. The problem is that you probably lack expertise in the matter. Therefore I will do the job for you! The WWF is notable but it should be not a link as well based on your judgement. The link should be added if it is related to the subject and if it not spamming.

Hey Coren

I'm just writing to give you an update on a third-opinion you were involved in a few days ago, involving Ludovicapipa. Unfortunately, after an unsuccessful attempt at WP:WQA, we've decided to file a Request for Comment/User Conduct. You can find it here. As you provided a third-opinion, I'd appreciate if we could have your endorsement as a user who tried to solve the dispute. Let me know if you have any questions, comments or concerns.--Dali-Llama 05:54, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

I just saw your endorsement. Thank you for taking the time, Coren. I appreciate it!--Dali-Llama 15:05, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Bleeding the False Album Cover

Hey, Your CorenSearchBot found a copy of an album cover I uploaded and told me to discuss it here and such. I believe I followed the uploading rules for CD covers, but I might have fudged something up. Please let me know if this was just a bot error or if I should change the image source or something else. Safe travels! Tubeyes 06:42, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Kristogar Velo

My apologies. I added the article from the Articles for Creation page with doing a detailed enough search on the information there. I have since updated the information and hopefully resolved the problem. - Markio —Preceding unsigned comment added by Markio (talk • contribs) 08:48, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Pole Buildings

I removed the copyright content, I was using it as a reference while creating content for the page. I am the original author of the content on the shown infringement page as well. Mbrownwiki 19:31, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

The Essential Anna Vissi

The website http://www.lgr.co.uk/music/news/9020/anna-vissi-scorching-new-album/ was the source of the information and there was no copying of sentences at all. the unformation was used to fill in the blanks of the template and i used the opening of another of her albums and changed it to go with this one. the only copying was the track listing which is classified as public knowledge.Grk1011 22:46, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Not copy from someone

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ukfriancy, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://portal.tw/detail/166.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

---

The website http://portal.tw/detail/166.html was same me to post it!

Not copy from someone!!!

Should I create again about "Ukfriancy"?

Jenmin 01:01, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Nkwanta South (Ghana parliament constituency)

Hello, I used Nkwanta North as a template for Nkwanta South but a visual inspection would show that both articles are different. I have removed the tags.--Natsubee 13:07, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

CSB Down

6 hours seems like a long time between copyvios. Or am I being paranoid? -- But|seriously|folks  01:36, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

It's just not finding any matches. I agree it's dubious; I'll keep an eye on it for a bit. — Coren ^(talk) 02:54, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Working! -- But|seriously|folks  03:41, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

blinkbits.com Wikipedia mirror

Hi, you probably need to update CorenSearchBot's Wikipedia mirror list with http://www.blinkbits.com/en_wikifeeds/: the alleged copyright violation source is obviously a word-for-word copy of Wikipedia: bot's alleged copyright violation (Wikipedia revision vs mirror). A big thanks for your efforts to fight copyright violations on Wikipedia! -- intgr [talk] 13:34, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Miura-Kaigan Station

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Miura-Kaigan Station, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Misakiguchi Station (Kanagawa). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 16:42, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

The bot was in error. Miura-Kaigan Station & Misakiguchi Station (Kanagawa) are 2 distinctly separate train stations located in the same city.--Endroit 16:52, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Chōshō (長承)

The bot was not in error, not really. However, this is one of those instances in which the SearchBot was precisely correct -- and yet unhelpful. I'm in the process of creating templates for as yet "blank" Japanese era names or nengō. In other words,

• Yes, I did copy the full text of Hōen (保延), which is the Japanese term for the years spanning 1135-1141 ....
• Yes, I did paste this data in the empty text box for Chōshō (長承), which is the nengō for the years spanning 1132-1135 ....
• Yes, I do plan on using the same copy-and-paste strategy many times in the future ....

I did post an "under construction tag" at the top of the page, but I now believe that I should have posted this warning on the blank page BEFORE adding any text whatsoever. Your SearchBot recognized that something was amiss -- no error on your part. But I wonder what I could have done differently? Any suggestions? --Ooperhoofd 18:17, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

The warning on the black page before the cut-and-paste would indeed have avoided the bot triggering. An alternative, if there are a large number of articles on nengō you intend to create like this, is to place you on the list of trusted users. さようなら. — Coren ^(talk) 20:21, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback. While I do very much like the idea of being included amongst your list of "trusted users," I think I prefer to remain in jeopardy of your bot. It should be a simple matter for me to remember to put the under construction tag on a blank page -- and, if I forget, this becomes a good practice exercise. In future, my hope is that the accumulation of comparatively trivial details in the way I conventionally do things will produce a range of beneficial consequences: so -- if your bot does catch me in a silly oversight, so much the better .... Some things are perhaps best learned the hard way.

fr:Ères du Japon

À l'égard de votre « CorenSearchBot » à la version anglophone de Wikipédia: In this context, I dare to be BOLD in asking a corollary question about creating nengō in fr:Wikipédia? As it happens, I've not encountered anything like your specific bot in the francophone venue. Maybe it does not yet exist -- or maybe I've just been lucky? In any case, it makes sense for me to follow up briefly:

• Est-ce qu'on peut utilizer un truc comme « w:en:Template:Underconstruction » avec des nouvelles pages des nengō à la fr:Wikipédia?

• C'est à dire -- est-ce qu'il est vrai ou faux que « fr:Modèle:En cours » ≠ « w:en:Template:Underconstruction » ... ou bien, est-ce qu'il y a un meilleur?

--Ooperhoofd 13:38, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Your bot

Your bot should not leave messages for experienced users and admins. As an admin, I expect the community trusts my judgment not to violate copyright policy blatantly by copying unauthorized material from another website. Much more likely explanation is that I'm copying material from my own website (where I hold copyright) to Wikipedia. Please opt me out of your bot. You should also probably opt out all admins, and probably experienced users. Regards. --Aude (talk) 18:33, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

I just wasted 15 minutes fixing the mess caused by your bot. Please see Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars. Regards. --Aude (talk) 18:43, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Now it's been 30 minutes. I'm done for the day with Wikipedia. The bot is a good idea, but needs to treat regulars with more good faith. --Aude (talk) 19:04, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

This discussion was taken to the user's talk page. — Coren ^(talk) 23:05, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

bot error

Please see the bot talk page--it's marking disam pages as copyvio. DGG (talk) 01:49, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

thanks, i see the problem. Followed up on the bot page & being dealt with DGG (talk) 04:15, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Y No further problems. — Coren ^(talk) 13:56, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Terence O. Hanley

I had paraphrased it considerably since the memo was placed on my Talk Page that I was using Copyrighted Material.--IAMTHEEGGMAN 03:42, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Y No further action needed. — Coren ^(talk) 13:55, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Storm Stoppers Page

Hi, the bot caught the fact that I used portions of the website for the page on wiki. I did have permission from the owner to use their about us page to set up a page on wiki. This product is so unusual that I felt a page was necessary on wiki so that people can find out about it when they see it in news articles. There is not a place on the submission page to notate if a person has permission to use such material. And I was just to brain dead at this time of the morning to re-write the whole thing. I understand the balance between permission based cut and paste and the people who strip sites and call it their own. What's the next step? Blessings, Ddanderfluff 11:25, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

N Moot. Page has since been deleted as advertisement. — Coren ^(talk) 13:55, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Warhawk

Fixed the Warhawk (disambiguation) thing that your bot found.--Playstationdude 16:48, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Y No further action needed. — Coren ^(talk) 13:53, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Twice as green

Just responding in relation to the article "Twice As Green". I work for World Vision, so the copyright belongs to World Vision. The other listings you have found relate to other sites that have used information from our website. I hope this explains things. In the meantime, I've removed the copyright tag.

Conleyv 04:37, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

N Moot. Page has since been deleted. — Coren ^(talk) 13:53, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Order of the Golden Ark

Hi Coren. Thank you for your automated note. I have modified the article accordingly. Maias 05:17, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Y No further action required. — Coren ^(talk) 13:51, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Adding a New page

Hi I am new and not sure of the rules? I looked in Wikipedia and did not find any good content for the phrase History of Stenciling. I have a website about stenciling so I added my own article about stencil history to Wiki. Now your bot is telling me I plagerized it from my own website?? Do you not accept information that is already on a website?? I'm not sure what to do now? Thanks Leslee —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lesleer (talk • contribs) 13:19, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Please read the guide to donating your own copyrighted material to Wikipedia. Note that, in addition to copyright requirements, the article must still comply with notability guidelines, advertising prohibition and avoid conflicts of interest. — Coren ^(talk) 13:50, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Copying Copyright free information

On the National Dissemination Center for Children with Disabilities wiki page I copied some copyright free material from their own website describing what they do. I rewrote most of it so it should be okay now, but I am not sure if copyright free information like this is generally okay to post freely or not. Please let me know.Kyried 18:11, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

It is, but the only truly copyright-free material you can find, is that which lapsed into the public domain (either by virtue of having been published earlier than 1923, of having been created exclusively by the US government, or by having been explicitly given by the rights holder to the public domain).

Public information found on website default to copyrighted, and cannot be copied to Wikipedia without an explicit authorization (either by the author, or on the webpage itself). — Coren ^(talk) 13:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Captain N Episode

Regarding the The Most Dangerous Game Master article: I am new to Wikipedia. I thought the text I used was changed enough. I then deleted it all anyway, and re-typed from scratch. No problem now. Thanks. D'INC2006 01:34, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Y No further action required. — Coren ^(talk) 13:44, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

San Marco (sestiere of Venice)

I am a new wikipedian, and I fought a bit to redirect "San Marco" to that new article. Now it seems to work. Please check anyway.--Stefano Remo 01:26, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Y The move/rename/disambig mess has since been sorted out. No further action required. — Coren ^(talk) 13:38, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Jim Cumbes

I recently created a redirect page, adding the content from Jimmy Cumbes (the original name) but then changed it due to a note on my talk page. A bot (presumably belonging to you) flagged the content as copyvio, I would just like to say that the page it suggested was a mirror site. Thanks. If this doesn't make any sense reply back! Onnaghar ^{talk ! ctrb} 14:58, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Y Page rename fixed— no further action needed. — Coren ^(talk) 13:38, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Sir Nicholas Slanning

Hi there, My contribution on Sir Nicholas Slanning has fallen foul of a CorenSearchBot, claiming copyright problems. This article is almost entirely derived from material supplied by Alan Wicks, taken from 'The Crucible and the Gun', a work in progress. Alan has given full permission for the material to be used in Wikipedia. Similar material exists on the web site of Sir Nicholas Slannings regiment http://www.slannings.org/CrucibleGun01.html and parts of it also appear on Sealed Knot sites. This is because the original writer, Alan Wicks has given permissions for his work to be used there as well as in my article. Alan is a personal friend, an ex C.O. of Slannings Regiment and a long standing member of the Sealed Knot, hence the material being duplicated / triplicated.Pan narrans 17:58, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Y Responding on the user's talk page. — Coren ^(talk) 13:34, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Using Press Releases on Wiki

I have written a press that has been picked up by PRNewswire and my positing to Wiki has a lot of similar content, though much greater exposure.

Since there is no worries with legal troubles (since I am the source of original press release as well as the source for the Wiki article), I'm wondering if my created page for the Neighborhood Music Festival can be posted.

Thanks so much.

All best. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackieamp3 (talk • contribs) 18:17, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Please read the guide to requesting and formalizing permission to use copyrighted works on Wikipedia. Note that, in addition to copyright requirements, the article must still comply with notability guidelines, advertising prohibition and avoid conflicts of interest. — Coren ^(talk) 13:33, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

No copyrighted pages on Eurosif

Hi.

The page www.eurosif.org/member_affiliates/list_of_member_affiliates/ecpi

you are referring to is not protected by copyright because the content is the general description of a company that is one of the member of Eurosif organisation. The sentences and information contained are public. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Camilla b (talk • contribs) 09:44, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

N That's not how it works. The site even takes the effort to state "Copyright © 2001 - 2006 Eurosif. All rights reserved.". Public does not mean permissible to copy. — Coren ^(talk) 12:36, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

CorenSearchBot and Camerapedia

Hello !

Cool bot, but it's a bit cumbersome when we're taking material from Free sources like Camerapedia. Maybe a list of sites known to harbour Free content would be in order.

Cheers ! Rama 11:23, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

There is such a list, but it obviously can't be all-inclusive.  :-) Just tell me what the uri for the site is and I'll add it. — Coren ^(talk) 12:37, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

I suspect that the URL is http://www.camerapedia.org Genisock2 13:40, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

 Fixed camerapedia.org is indeed GFDL, and has been added to the list of know permissible sources. Please remember to attribute copies from a GFDL source (as required by the license); preferably with a link back to the camerapedia article itself. — Coren ^(talk) 13:47, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Henry H. Krusekopf

Material on this site is from our records here at Farmhouse Fraternity, Inc. I, as webmaster, posted the orignial on our website. Other chapters have copied from my site, so you may see this same text on other webpages as well. I created the originial information, and authorize its use on wikipedia as not copyrighted. For any questions or concerns, please direct them this way.

Bmmccann 13:09, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Y responded on the user's talk page. — Coren ^(talk) 13:32, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

confusion

Your bot is confused.

Cheers! Geo Swan 17:21, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Lol. This page the bot thinks I plagiarized is a mirror of the wikipedia's Sufyian Barhoumi article. The single sentence from the Sufyian Barhoumi article that I recycled in the USA v. Barhoumi article is not only released under the GFDL by the original author, but I was the original author.

Try again bot! Geo Swan 17:30, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

QStik Records

The article on QStik Records is a copy of the article I drafted in my sandbox - haven't worked out how to delte the article from my sandbox - so there isn't any copyright violation involved here ... Dan arndt 09:05, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

The easiest way to do so is simply to replace its contents with a {{db-author}} tag, which asks for deletion from an admin. But that was a bug in CSBot, which shouldn't trigger on user space articles anyways. Will fix. — Coren ^(talk) 12:40, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Flemming L. Norcott, Jr.

Removed copyright material from Flemming L. Norcott, Jr. topic as requested. CT2008 13:53, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Y No further action needed. — Coren ^(talk) 20:18, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Ladies National Association for the Repeal of the Contagious Diseases Acts

Removed copyright material from Ladies National Association for the Repeal of the Contagious Diseases Acts topic as requested. Tractorboy60 21:46, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Y Thank you. No further action needed. — Coren ^(talk) 21:49, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

bot on B.B. King in London album

Greetings Coren, Thanx for adding the bit in your message about reverting if the bot was confused - until I read that bit I was a bit nonplussed as to what my next step was to be. I was actually listening to the above-mentioned album at the time and was copying the track listing in front of me. Regards, --Technopat 22:49, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

No problem. Hence the note.  :-) — Coren ^(talk) 00:51, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Re:Dhetarwal

Attribution - The original text of this article was taken from http://www.jatland.com/home/Dhetarwal, which is licensed under the GFDL. Hence no copyright problem --burdak 03:34, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Y No further action required. — Coren ^(talk) 16:20, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Red Hill School

As noted on the entry, this text was posted with the explicit permission of the copyright owner.

I understand that this is permissible - please let me know if i am mistaken here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Philculmer (talk • contribs) 10:04, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Y Responded on the user's talk page. — Coren ^(talk) 16:19, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

CorenSearchBot and German municipalities

I have been splitting articles of German municipalities, and I keep getting notices from your bot because some webpage copied the original wikipedia article before I made my split. For example:

• Talk:Ramstein-Miesenbach (Verbandsgemeinde)
• Talk:Kandel (Verbandsgemeinde)
• Talk:Maikammer (Verbandsgemeinde)
• Talk:Börde Wanzleben
• Talk:Blankenburg (Verwaltungsgemeinschaft)

Could you add those sites to your mirror list? Markussep ^Talk 18:29, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Tagging of Biographical Directory of the United States Congress Articles

I previously asked you this, but you did not respond. Can you please fix your bot to stop tagging articles as copyvios of http://www.infoplease.com/biography/us/congress (not the whole site, just that particular section). The Biographical Directory of the United States Congress is a US Government work and, therefore, public domain. Infoplease mirrors the directory and anytime someone creates an entry from the directory, your bot tags and lists it. I removed two more cases just now[5] and there's been even more since my last request. Thanks. -- JLaTondre 23:18, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

The best way would actually to have a standard attribution tag placed on the articles, because if I just whitelist the site it'll just hit some other mirror instead. Is there a standard tag you use to attribute those? Something like {{1911}} which CSBot can recognize? — Coren ^(talk) 02:33, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

The standard attribution tag is {{bioguide}}. Thanks. -- JLaTondre 13:53, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

http://www.dadsclubdfw.mysite.com/index.html - @04:37 September 15, 2007 (CDT)

(DADS CLUB DFW 1.JPG) was taken by me, Joe Samuels. I am the founder and Non-Profit DADS CLUB DFW Organization. I created the http://www.dadsclubdfw.mysite.com/index.html website. I created all documents, files, texts and images on that Website to generate Parental Involvement in schools. Please contact me at joe.samuels@verizonwireless.com if you have any questions. Regarding Licensure to post this info on WIKIPEDIA, please send me the necessary Site Link to do so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Twok2ya (talk • contribs) 09:44, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Please read the guide to donating your own copyrighted material to Wikipedia. Note that, in addition to copyright requirements, the article must still comply with notability guidelines, advertising prohibition and avoid conflicts of interest. — Coren ^(talk) 16:40, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Perry Hall Mansion

Your bot deleted my page before it could be completed. First of all, I am one of the principal authors of the www.perryhallmansion.org where the text of this page originally appeared (so there is no infringment of rights). Second of all, I had not completed the page and referenced the source of the text. I would greatly appreciate it if your bot would allow me to finish, prior to unilaterally opting to delete my work.

Thank you!!

Actually, my bot deletes nothing. It is, in fact, unable to do so. A passing admin deleted it.

Please read the guide to donating your own copyrighted material to Wikipedia. Note that, in addition to copyright requirements, the article must still comply with notability guidelines, advertising prohibition and avoid conflicts of interest. — Coren ^(talk) 18:30, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

WP:RM of sorts

Well actually the template you have just converted ({{move}}) has now half a message missing and extra coding outside the template. Simply south 18:58, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

In fact plus other similar ones. Please could you preview and correct instead of briskly moving from one to the next. Simply south 19:00, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Truthfully i haven't seen it on the other ones other than those you mentioned. Also thanks for fixing them. Finally, can you tell me why all temps generally are being converted, it seems? Simply south 19:42, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

OK. Simply south 20:43, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: ambox formatting

See Wikipedia:Talk page templates for the standard format for talk-only templates. For now, the goal of Wikipedia:Template standardisation is more or less limited to article pages, though there's talk of expanding it to project pages and the like. In particular, the image request templates are talk-only and should follow the talk template format. OTOH, I have a feeling the talk templates will soon look more like the new article templates. szyslak 19:28, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

I do agree that Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup looked much better before my reverts. OHOH, when tags like {{reqphoto}} are used on talk pages, wouldn't the ambox formatting clash with all the other talk templates? In addition, the talk-only templates often have very specific formatting that allows for conversion to a sidebar mini-template, as with the various WikiProject tags that appear as sidebars in talk pages with a lot of templates. So before we change the talk templates, I'd suggest bringing up a discussion on Wikipedia talk:Talk page templates. szyslak 19:37, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Appreciate it! I wish the other person had identified himself or herself on their user page. --Tenebrae 20:10, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: {{rewrite-section}}?

You caught me in the middle of updating the documentation! :) {{cleanup-rewrite}} already supports specifying if it is being used for a section, it just didn't say so in the 'Usage' section (it also supports adding a reason, also not documented) which I was in the middle of updating. Both {{rewrite-section}} and {{sectionrewrite}} are both only for sections, and it seems silly to have 3 templates when 1 will do. If you want, you could make the section templates transclude {{cleanup-rewrite|2=section}} or move the functionality to {{rewrite}} which is currently a redirect (it has a past incarnation of the template though in the history, making moving more difficult). mattbr 21:32, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

your copybot - improve!

source was wikipedia! TChad 18:01, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

I agree... good idea for the bot but it associated my mini stub with a site I had never seen. Suggest you only do this with articles that are of a good size. ? Victuallers 19:14, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Nathaniel Coulson

Hi

I maintain both lostwithiel.org.uk and lostwithiel.eu and would like to get the content onto the wiki. So whilst the articles are exactly the same it is because I have used the content. I hope this is ok. Cregy 19:42, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Copyright warning

Hi,

I have this evening added a new article about Tenant Management Organisations ( there was no information prior to me doing that ) I included some adapted text that I have used previously for an information pamphlet that is published on the Housing Justice website. Housing Justice have added the pamphlet to their website with my consent but the copyright is not theirs. The text included in the Wikipedia article is written by me although it includes text previously used by me in other documents. There are therefore no copyright issues.

Southport Trevor

The meesage said ;-

"This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Tenant Management Organisations, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.housingjustice.org.uk/hjregenerate/gn/nftmo.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 20:09, 16 September 2007 (UTC)"

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Southporttrevor"

Kirby (surname)

CorenSearchBot tagged this article which I have just created; however, the article content was a straighforward split from Kirby, while the website identified by the bot was merely a Wikipedia mirror site. The tag has been removed. PC78 00:04, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

The contents of this article (title: The Sunshine Charity) has been put on Wikipedia by the authors of the website www.sunshinecharity.org. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tdesaram (talk • contribs) 09:46, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

QStik Records

The article on QStik Records is a copy of the article I drafted in my sandbox - haven't worked out how to delte the article from my sandbox - so there isn't any copyright violation involved here ... Dan arndt 09:05, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

The easiest way to do so is simply to replace its contents with a {{db-author}} tag, which asks for deletion from an admin. But that was a bug in CSBot, which shouldn't trigger on user space articles anyways. Will fix. — Coren ^(talk) 12:40, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Quess you haven't made the adjustment to the bot 'cause it came up with the same notation about the article - have done what you said however about the sandbox article - 'preciate the advice. Dan arndt 01:13, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Odd. I thought I did, but it apparently doesn't work as expected. Your sandbox is in userspace, right? (E.g: User:Dan arndt/somepage). — Coren ^(talk) 01:23, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

the new Surry Hills Netball Club entry

Hi

You said I couldn't have the text as it was because it is a copy from www.shnc.org.au but I actually own the www.shnc.org.au site and run it for www.shnc.org.au ... I just wanted to create a basic page and then let the members develop it with additional content.

John Grivas —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johngrivas (talk • contribs) 14:37, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Ronald Reagan's Alzheimer's letter

Hi there. I got a message from a bot on my talk page concerning my recently written article, Ronald Reagan's Alzheimer's letter, saying prettymuch that it is mostly plagiarized. The reason for that is that so many websites contain the text of the letter written by Reagan, and I included the text of the letter in the article. Please check it out and get back to me about possible solutions. Thanks! Best, Happyme22 23:31, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

about Israel news agency bot placement

on the website it said if wish to copy it the source was available, since it said that i recopied it. i assume this is ok because of what the site said i could do so i am removing the sticker on the page. any reason not to please contact me. Mrmattkatt 02:26, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

John David R. Atchison

While the content of Mr. Atchison's page appears on many pages, it is because it is basic biographical information, which may seem to be "lifted" from many pages, but is not. Please consider removing the copyright violation tag from the page.--AveryG 02:50, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

I am not sure I understand the distinction between the page I started (which was subsequently deleted apparently) and the current version.--AveryG 16:19, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Patrick Halpenny Biog

There is no copyright issue as I wrote both the Wiki biography and his corporate biography.

Yakuza68 12:07, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Clark copyright problem

Hi Coren.

I recently added an article on Trevor Clark, with a substancial part of the text being a copy of his introduction on his own webpage (basically cutting out any sentences that could be understood as publicity).

It IS a copy-paste...but entirely intentional. I have the express permission of the author. How do I go about normalizing the situation?

Thanks and regards,

Christian Clark —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kuraku (talk • contribs) 13:55, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

U-Ram Choe

Hi!

The text in question (located at http://www.makezine.com/blog/archive/2007/01/uram_choe_mecha.html?CMP=OTC-0D6B48984890) is copy/pasted from a press release that I hold the copyright to.

Bitformsgallery 18:38, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Copyright warning

I got the message below about the content on the Delta Gamma Iota page. I am the creator of the http://www.deltagammaiota.org website and am the President of the Alumni board. I also wrote every word on the website. Please allow this content to be published on our wiki.

Thanks,

Jeff Gray

[edit] Delta Gamma Iota This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Delta Gamma Iota, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.deltagammaiota.org/about.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 01:30, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Gray186 01:38, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gray186"

Y Sent to WP:CP by Butseriouslyfolks (talk · contribs). — madman bum and angel 16:21, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

ISIPCA

Hi,

Well, I'm not sure how this work. I did copy past for ISIPCA, however this was I'm the author from the website link mentionned. Further more it talks about the history of the school and what it do. So it's little bit strange to redo the same text in a different way.

Anyway, I have redone like requested.

Rgds, S. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sensonet (talk • contribs) 14:16, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Y No further action required. — madman bum and angel 16:20, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Western States Football League

I have created an article with the correct capitalization and redirected Western states football league to it. I am wikifying and improving the article, which I found on the wikify list. Thanks for your bot's message. Casey Abell 14:38, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Y No further action required. — madman bum and angel 16:20, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Categories

Hey Coren! You might want to consider putting a colon in front of reported Wikipedia violations. See: [6]. No problem. Cheers!

— madman bum and angel 15:28, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

I hope you don't mind me marking some of these threads with {{aye}} so you don't feel too overwhelmed when you go to look at your user talk page. I know I would.  ;) — madman bum and angel 16:20, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

RE:Grpahics Lab

Could you have a look at my attempt at the copy & paste icon ? Cheers > Rugby471 ^talk ⚔ 16:16, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

No copyright violation at San Pedro Valley County Park

I think the bot is in error about copyright violation at San Pedro Valley County Park. Thanks. SaltyBoatr 21:23, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

CorenSearchBot info: academickids.com

CorenSearchBot is very cool. Would've loved to have that around when I was doing a lot of work on dog-breed articles and having to do searches like that all by my manual lonesome.

FYI, it flagged Bogatyr (disambiguation) as a duplicate of a page in another wikimedia wiki, [7]. I did put info on Talk:Bogatyr (disambiguation) explaining that the text was on Wikipedia first. I don't know whether academickids.com is a mirror (or otherwise "legit" copier) of wikipedia material, but if so, you might add it to your list to filter out, so that people like me can avoid an unexpected 20 minutes or so of research and justification. Elf | Talk 23:26, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Harris Newmark was a pioneer businessman and historian. His book "My Sixty Years in Southern California 1853-1913," was an important book about Southern California. Kaspare Cohn founded Union Bank and Cedars/Sinai Hospital.

I am the author of http://homepage.mac.com/lindalevi/PersonalAW/HarrisNewmark1.html where the article Harris Newmark appears. So could you please alow the content to be published on Wikipedia.

Thank you, Linda Levi September 22, 2007 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lindalevi (talk • contribs) 09:49, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: Chief of Army Staff, Bangladesh

Sorry to butt in, but couldn't help. I don't think the material that makes Chief of Army Staff of the Bangladesh Army has any place on Category:Chiefs of Army Staff, Bangladesh. Category pages are not meant to be used as article spaces even it means only a list. The lists in category should always be created by inserting the category link into the relevant pages. It can't and shouldn't be done manually, as is the case here. Therefore I'm now removing the improper material from the category page. Let the article remain as is. Thanks. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 18:15, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: deleted Glen Worf

NEW researched entry for Glen Worf, 22 September 2007. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lastcent (talk • contribs) 21:04, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

The Official Album: 45 Years of Magic

This is a album, of course the text is going to be similar to what is on another website. --blm07 00:31, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Paul Dombrecht

Reworked the text substantially. brian stormen 00:42, 13 September 2007 (UTC) Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Belvdme" brian stormen 08:09, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Possible Handshakes and Heartbreaks Copywrite Infrigment

The contents of the article Handshakes and Heartbreaks is generic CD content Information, solely the track names and lengths. It is certainly not copywrited. Offkorn 08:12, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

No Copyright Violation from Laraven

Hello, My name is Mark Janicello. I am user LaRaven. The materials that I have added to Wikipedia come from my own website www.markjanicello.net. I am the author of the website, and the text, and thus the copyright owner of the Wikipedia text.Laraven 19:19, 23 September 2007 (UTC)Laraven

Conway Polynomials page

There should be a wikipedia page on Conway polynomials, which are commonly used to construct finite fields on a computer. The only source in English is Frank Luebeck's page. I asked him if I could use his page as a basis. He agreed. I can rearrange the statements but they are mathematical defintions and cannot change significantly. DavidJoyner 23:54, 23 September 2007 (UTC) David Joyner, 9-23-2007

Oregon Forest Resources Institute

Hey, just dropping you a line to let you know that 1) your bot works, and 2) I've cleaned up the excess web page quoting. :) --GoodDamon 04:46, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Got by your bot...

Hi! Nice work on the copyvio bot. The article it clobbered me on is one I wrote myself at two other GFDL-compatible wikis. --PMDrive1061 06:16, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Some thoughts about the bot...

...in my opinion it would be better if the bot neither tagged the article nor notified the article creator. We can do that. First, it would do fewer edits (1 instead of 3) per article, so could instead add more articles to WP:SCV; second, it would peeve experienced editors less. I think that is important. --Iamunknown 08:54, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Well, I don't agree. For one, almost half the tags lead into the article being edited by the original contributor into compliance, which is a good thing (and, indeed, better than us having to fix it: the author has presumably learned not to do that again in those cases).

Besides, CSBot isn't lagging behind, so giving it less work doesn't mean more tagged articles. :-) — Coren ^(talk) 12:38, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

St Louis Gender Foundation.

No copyright violation, this is our mission statement and appears all over the web. We own this text. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stlgftg (talk • contribs) 10:18, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Brevard County Environment

I've tried to clean up this article from when you last tagged it. Could you glance at it and see if it might now meet any of your requirements. Thanks. Student7 18:03, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Samuel Lysons

Your bot caught me in mid edit - the article is now much more advanced, drawing on several sources. Hopefully, it is now satisfactory. Paul W 19:34, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Old Northside Website

I have included text from the old northside website, with permission from the neighborhood, who owns that information. I'm a resident. I can alter/rewrite the text if necessary, but we have permission to use information.Electrasteph 21:38, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Compo

I have created disambig pages for Compo and Compo (company) and renamed dislocated articles to Compo (slang word) and Compo (Serbian company). Steelbeard1 01:43, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Matthew Ross entry

Hello,

I noticed the automated copyright notice for the Matthew Ross entry because it is identical to the bio description on www.lolafilm.net . Please release the notice, as the author of the entry and the author of the Web site are the same person. If you have any questions, feel free to message me. Thank you.

Lolafilm 06:21, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Applied Watch Technologies Page

Hello I got warning that my page would be deleted because it is using information from the site, This is my company site and would like to utilize the data my team created for the site on Wikipedia.

If you could please contact me as soon as possible to try and remedy this issue.

Thank you

Dremeda 18:24, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Scarborough Pirates

I created this page and your bot identified it as a possible copyvio. The bot is correct that I did use the named article as a major source in my initial edit, however I had always planned to incorporate other material and alter the wording.

I don't think the version as it stands now violates the copyright held by Totalrl.com. I will leave the tag on for now buit I will remove it in a couple of days if nobody makes an objection.GordyB 16:12, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Removed - nobody interested in making an objection.GordyB 21:31, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

CorenSearchBot & .gov Excludes

A .gov site made it through the bot's exclude filter[8]. It may just be a one-off issue, but thought I'd let you know in case it's a bug. Thanks. -- JLaTondre 14:31, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

thethoughtfulchristian.com

I just tried to create a profile for my company, TheThoughtfulChristian.com. I was denied because the bot program you have found duplicate content on our website. I have permission to use that content as the manager of this product. What do I need to do in order to prove this? Andrew —Preceding unsigned comment added by Awbuckley (talk • contribs) 18:03, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

WPAG-TV deletion

WPAG-TV article text was taken from an another article on the Wikipedia which is under a GNL and is its permissible. The CorenSearchBot is flaging the article on a Wikipedia mirror. If the Wikipedia is not under a GNL license then there would be no mirror. (If i copy this else to User talk:Coren will it flag me again? Spshu 21:35, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

MastCell reversed deletion. Yah! Spshu 21:41, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Tagging for copyvios for free material

Hi. Your bot recently put CSB tags on three articles I've created. It should be noted that the source, the Lenin archives at www.marxists.org is public domain. --Soman 21:55, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

I am only using material released via Wikia GFDL, and should not have been tagged by CSB. --Aldis90 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aldis90 (talk • contribs) 22:20, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

MfD about the Wikipedia:WikiProject_ROMacedonia

Hi, I noticed you voted for the project deletion. I'm sorry I noticed this thing a little bit late, please review my comments on the MfD page here and also here, I think we are going to make a big mistake if we delete a whole project because of the To do page dispute. I'm open for discussion. MatriX 22:49, 26 September 2007 (UTC)