Craig.borchardt

Welcome!

Hello, Craig.borchardt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:09, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism warnings

Hi Craig; regarding using WP:AIV; generally, you should only put "active" vandals on that page (i.e., someone who's recently vandalized after being given some sort of a final warning. When admins look at that list, they usually check to see if the user has vandalized recently after being given a test4 (or in some cases at least a bv ("blatant vandalism")). The IP user you recently reported hasn't been active since this morning. If they continue later today or tomorrow you could add them back to AIV. Also, be sure to leave new messages at the bottom of the page, not the top. Thanks! OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:09, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Satisficing

Maybe you should work on how it rolls out. It doesn't quite fit in as smoothly as it can. Yanksox 12:16, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

The main thing is a lack of clarity. Remember, the reader doesn't know everything, some context could help.

Grammar

Don't even worry about it. I'll erase my sarcastic (I apologize) comments from here. Happy editing and stay alert. Schwartz und Weiss 10:40, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

re: Bishop

Thanks. I could remove some extra characters that appear at the start of his article and his inbox appears to be chopped off. If you can repair, that would be appreciated. Morenooso 01:48, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Nicely done! Morenooso 01:23, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:StTeresa.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:StTheresa.jpg. The copy called Image:StTheresa.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 02:44, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

St. John's Seminary

It's just my opinion. but wouldn't it be better to combine the St. John Seminary disambiguation page with the St. John's Seminary disambiguation page? The first can redirect to the second. That way the list only needs to be maintained in one place. The St. John Vianney College Seminary reference is the only one that would be somewhat out of place, but it is only a partial match anyway. -- Tcncv (talk) 03:04, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Craig.borchardt! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 329 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Francis Quinn - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:42, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Józef Kowalski (priest)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:47, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Sourcing issues with your articles

Please review the discussion at Template:Did you know nominations/Józef Kowalski (priest) about how can you write better articles in the future. Thanks for your contributions so far, --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:28, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Beatification

Some more fixes are needed. Every one of the articles about the WWII Martyrs needs the following:

1. A statement that they are beatified, in the lead of a longer article or the first three of a stub.
2. The word "beatified" needs to be used, not "blessed" Any person can be blessed by any religious, (or by any other believing person, for that matter). "Beatified" has a specific meaning.
3. The word "beatified" needs linking to Beatification.
4. Full name of religious orders. Using initials to designate an organisation is pointless. SVD (or whatever it is) could be a venereal disease, as far as the general reader is concerned.

Amandajm (talk) 04:28, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

I want to take issue with you for the fourth point. The initials for a religious order are not pointless; they used with the person's name. For example, the Jesuits use "S.J" immediately after their names, such as "Gerard Manley Hopkins, S.J." (in fact, that's how the initials are used in that article). This is how I would expect the person's name to appear in an encyclopedia article. Many people understand the initials of several of the more common religious orders. These initials when used with the person's name should be a link to an article about the order, if there is an article on Wikipedia. Then further in the biography about the person, a full name of the religious order can be used.

I think it's a pretty rare day that someone reads an article that begins "John Doe, SVD (1900-1942) and says: "oh, this is a venereal disease." It just seems inappropriate as feedback. I understand that you feel that some people are just not familiar with with these initials, and I agree that can be an issue. This type of construction is actually somewhat common. For example either "Judith Olivia "Judi" Dench, CH DBE FRSA" is either highly respected and decorated, or maybe she needs to see a doctor...now! ;-). I suspect that perhaps this comment was based on a different article or an instance that you saw somewhere else.

Also, while I agree that an article about someone who is beatified should used the term "beatified", that person actually does carry the title "blessed". You can see that right now in the article about "Blessed Teresa of Calcutta" (reference to the term "beatified" is in the third paragraph).

Thanks again for your work on Wikipedia. Best to you in your work.

Craig, this is what I am referring to: "Blessed Ludwik Mzyk (April 22, 1905 – February 20, 1940) was a SVD Martyr.[1]"

If the initials are after the person's name then anyone, whether they recognise the initials or not, should know that they represent a title, or honour. However, the use of initials for an organisation in the context of a sentence such as this one is meaningless to anyone who does not know what the initials represent. If I said that he worked for the CSIRO or NSWGR, would you have any idea what his occupation might be?

I also must remind you that, unlike most talk pages, on wikipedia, you add your post to the bottom of the page, not the top, and you sign by using four little squiggles (top left of keyboard). It immediately inserts your name and the date

Amandajm (talk) 01:52, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Malcolm Patrick Galt

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Malcolm Patrick Galt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Lor^Chat 23:45, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Craig.borchardt. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Craig.borchardt. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Craig.borchardt. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Alfred Hitchcock’s listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Alfred Hitchcock’s. Since you had some involvement with the Alfred Hitchcock’s redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 20:54, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

"Alfred Hitchcock’s" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Alfred Hitchcock’s. Since you had some involvement with the Alfred Hitchcock’s redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. ComplexRational (talk) 17:43, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)