Crusadinggoonie
Hi, The article FDR: American Badass! has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ArbCom 2020 Elections voter messageeditArbCom 2021 Elections voter messageeditArbCom 2022 Elections voter messageeditHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add December 2022editPlease do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:28, 22 December 2022 (UTC) You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Golem. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:39, 23 December 2022 (UTC) You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Golem. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} . NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:47, 26 December 2022 (UTC)Since a temporary block did nothing to dissuade you, you're now indefinitely partially blocked. You can still edit the article's talk page to discuss the content dispute. To directly edit this page, though, you need to make an unblock request here on your talk page after reading through Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:35, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Crusadinggoonie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: This other user is continually deleting my contributions for what he refers to as unreliable citations. Meanwhile, almost every other entry in that section is uncited and he doesn't touch those entries. He did not follow Wikipedia guidelines which states that user contributions should not be unduly deleted, but rather seek a consensus first, or even put a tag on the citation. It also states that the contributor should be afforded time to add or correct citations prior to deletions. In the interim, an third unrelated user has corrected the situation by providing citations on the entries I added, thus avoiding any further contention over this dispute.
Decline reason: You seem to be trying to justify your edit warring, not tell us why it was wrong. Also see WP:NOTTHEM. 331dot (talk) 09:19, 28 December 2022 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. ArbCom 2023 Elections voter messageeditHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |