Your submission at Articles for creation: Christopher J. Gramiccioni (March 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 13:42, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Cswendeman! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 13:42, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Declare any connection

edit
 

Hello Cswendeman. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Draft:Christopher J. Gramiccioni, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Cswendeman. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Cswendeman|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:45, 20 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

I can assure that I am not being compensated in any way, shape or form for writing this. I am doing this on my own time. I have no vested interest in this other than for informational purposes only and because I firmly believe that this would be a valued informational page for Wikipedia.

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Cswendeman. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:Christopher J. Gramiccioni, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. A cursory Google search shows that you have a clear conflict of interest, please declare this on your User page. Theroadislong (talk) 14:31, 22 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Christopher J. Gramiccioni

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Christopher J. Gramiccioni, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Worldbruce (talk) 16:24, 22 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Christopher J. Gramiccioni

edit

Hello Cswendeman, welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed that you moved Draft:Christopher J. Gramiccioni to Talk:Christopher J. Gramiccioni. Articles don't belong in the Talk namespace, so I moved it back to draft. You can submit the draft for review by clicking the blue "Submit your draft for review" button at the top of the draft page. An experienced editor will then review the draft and move it to the main article space if it is suitable. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page or at the Teahouse. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:30, 5 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christopher J. Gramiccioni (December 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Chris Troutman (talk) 01:28, 11 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Christopher J. Gramiccioni concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Christopher J. Gramiccioni, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 27 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christopher J. Gramiccioni (September 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SL93 (talk) 00:34, 19 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Christopher J. Gramiccioni

edit

  Hello, Cswendeman. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Christopher J. Gramiccioni, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 01:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Christopher J. Gramiccioni

edit
 

Hello, Cswendeman. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Christopher J. Gramiccioni".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:09, 19 March 2021 (UTC)Reply