Welcome!

edit

Hi CuriousExplorerJourney! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:49, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Institute of Insurance and Risk Management (July 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:49, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, CuriousExplorerJourney! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:49, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi DoubleGrazing, Thank you for reviewing the article. I will work on refining its content to ensure it does not appear promotional, however, this college's distinguished reputation in India. CuriousExplorerJourney (talk) 12:06, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, CuriousExplorerJourney. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Institute of Insurance and Risk Management, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:50, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi DoubleGrazing, I have reviewed the Wikipedia guidelines regarding conflict of interest and can assert that none apply to me. CuriousExplorerJourney (talk) 12:02, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
So how would you describe your relationship to this company, in your own words? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:05, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your question. Just to clarify, this is not a company but rather a college based in India. I do not have any association or connection with this college. I hope this clarifies any confusion. CuriousExplorerJourney (talk) 12:10, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, I meant to say 'organisation', my bad.
Okay, let me ask it this way: how did you choose this as your first (and so far only) topic to write about? There was presumably a reason? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:13, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Indeed, there was a reason behind my choice to write about this topic initially. I chose this topic because it aligns closely with my professional expertise in Insurance. I look forward to exploring a broader range of topics as well to edit and create. CuriousExplorerJourney (talk) 12:17, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
You uploaded the photograph, and the logo, as your own work? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:22, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Actually, there wasn't an SVG logo available online, so I recreated it using an SVG Editor - Inkscape and then uploaded it. The photograph is a screenshot taken from a video published on IIRM website. CuriousExplorerJourney (talk) 12:28, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
So neither is your own work, then? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:35, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
I created the SVG version of the logo. Also, just to add, Wikipedia does not allow adding copyrighted logo by users with less than certain number of edits, hence, I could not upload it in the copyrighted section. I don't own the photo, its a screenshot from the video. CuriousExplorerJourney (talk) 12:39, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
The reason why copyrighted material cannot be uploaded is that it is in most cases illegal to do so. The workaround is not to pretend that it is your own work instead. If you faithfully recreate someone else's copyrighted design, that is still their copyright. You have now released the institute's proprietary trade mark into the public domain. I expect they wouldn't be very happy if they knew.
The same goes for the photo.
I will request for both to be deleted. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:43, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Alright, but would you let me know, how are the logos of various organizations added to articles, so that, I can follow the proper process for uploading images and logos? CuriousExplorerJourney (talk) 12:45, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
There is a provision called 'fair use', which allows low-resolution logos to be used in published articles on the entity to which the logo relates. This does not apply in the draft space, so logos should only be added after the draft is published in the main article space.
And just so we're clear on this, you may not upload anything as your own work, unless it actually is that. When you upload your own work, you are agreeing to release your proprietary rights in that work into the public domain, and clearly you cannot do that with someone else's property. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:52, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Understood! Thank you for clarifying the provisions regarding fair use and the guidelines for uploading content. CuriousExplorerJourney (talk) 12:59, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Institute of Insurance and Risk Management (July 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AlphaBetaGamma were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 15:56, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello ABG, thanks for reviewing. I have mentioned references from various reliable and credible sources:
  • IRDAI - Regulatory body
  • AICTE - Statutory body
  • Swiss Re Website - Reinsurance company based in Switzerland
  • Risk and Insurance Management Society
  • Business Today - Business magazine
  • Chartered Insurance Institute - Professional body for Insurance
  • The Print - News media
  • Insurance Institute of India - Apex body for Insurance
  • Institute of Actuaries of India - Apex body for Actuaries
Further, please indicate the sections that appear to be promotional, so that, I can make the changes accordingly. CuriousExplorerJourney (talk) 16:23, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
I have made certain changes and I am submitting the article for review. CuriousExplorerJourney (talk) 04:08, 15 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Institute of Insurance and Risk Management (July 15)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:42, 15 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello Double Grazing! Thank you for your feedback. I understand the concerns you've raised about the sources provided. I will carefully review the WP notability guidelines and work on gathering more substantial sources that clearly demonstrate the organization's notability. Your input is valuable, and I appreciate your guidance in ensuring the article meets Wikipedia's standards. Please let me know if there are any specific types of sources or information you believe would be helpful to include. CuriousExplorerJourney (talk) 10:32, 15 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Institute of Insurance and Risk Management (July 15)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 19:11, 15 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
I agree that, there are several press releases, however, there are mentions on websites of organizations that in my opinion are significant and more reliable than press releases. Specifically, some of these organizations have accredited the institute. Additionally, the institute is promoted, owned, and operated by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI), which further underscores its credibility. We can discuss this further in the talk page CuriousExplorerJourney (talk) 12:09, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Institute of Insurance and Risk Management (August 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 08:30, 17 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi Greenman, I have gone through the Wikipedia guidelines on conflict of interest and can assure you that none of these guidelines pertain to my situation in any way. CuriousExplorerJourney (talk) 08:41, 25 August 2024 (UTC)Reply