RE:Hola de nuevo

edit

Boas DJose, eu concéntrome na Galipedia, normalmente non fago achegas nas outras wikis porque xa teño alí máis traballo do que podo facer O:) Saúdos, --Elisardojm (talk) 16:33, 25 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Fontarón moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Fontarón, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:52, 22 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fontarón (July 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DannyS712 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DannyS712 (talk) 03:19, 23 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, DJose Méndez! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DannyS712 (talk) 03:19, 23 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fontarón (August 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Eagleash (talk) 04:59, 23 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

August 2019

edit

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Eagleash (talk) 15:06, 23 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Flyer22 Reborn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Fontarón— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 23:24, 29 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to LeBron James, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. VictorTorres2002 (talk) 00:10, 30 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hola Jose

edit

Hola Jose, me llamo Remy, soy investigador de seguridad informatica. He notado que algo raro pasó cuando usted cambió una pagina recientemente. Tiene que ver con los resultados de Google. Podría contactarme con usted para hacerle unas preguntas? Si gusta, me puede mandar un correo a: [redactado por autor] Remordie (talk) 16:17, 9 September 2019 (UTC). Gracias!Reply

Ya té lo envíe. DJose Méndez (talk) 15:53, 9 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi

edit

Hi Jose! you seem nice! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.35.114.34 (talk) 05:00, 1 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Enriqueta Otero Blanco moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Enriqueta Otero Blanco, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MarginalCost (talk) 11:48, 15 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Enriqueta Otero Blanco (November 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ThePlatypusofDoom was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 06:23, 17 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Enriqueta Otero Blanco (November 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 16:39, 30 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Enriqueta Otero Blanco concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Enriqueta Otero Blanco, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 1 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Enriqueta Otero Blanco

edit
 

Hello, DJose Méndez. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Enriqueta Otero Blanco".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:57, 3 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Manuel Martínez Núñez

edit
 

The article Manuel Martínez Núñez has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:35, 4 June 2022 (UTC)Reply