User talk:DMacks/Archive 32

Latest comment: 7 years ago by PapiDimmi in topic Boner
Archive 25Archive 30Archive 31Archive 32Archive 33Archive 34Archive 35

23:23, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aspartic acid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Incontinence. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

15:25, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Can you re-up this discussion?

I missed the Template talk:Infobox drug#3D models discussion when it was first initiated in mid-2014. (See tetracycline Talk.) I would gladly engage that if it were restarted, unless it reached a conclusion that you found satisfactory, without my presence . Le Prof 73.210.155.96 (talk) 15:41, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi DMacks,

I am not sure where's the copyright violation to my draft,

since mostly of the content are rewritten by myself and referred from our company's press releases and our partner's websites.

And I thought the censor is after the submission, how wikipedia can just remove the draft without any warning, and let me have no power to further edit the article.

Please point out the violation, and allow me to access the draft for further modification.

Ariel Yin (talk) 03:04, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

There are specific sentences and paragraphs that are verbatim. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials to learn how to proceed, being aware that the text becomes open-licensed by your mere action of posting it here (i.e., your company is no longer in control). But before you do *anything* else, read WP:COI to make sure you are in compliance (hint: you are not) and whether you should be working on an article about your own company (hint: possibly not). DMacks (talk) 20:37, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Najaf ali bhayo

Hello. I noticed your comment on the SPI about someone trying to change your WP password. It's Najaf up to his old tricks again, he tried to change my password too about a year ago... - Tom | Thomas.W talk 21:01, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Yup. It was just one more piece of evidence that my rangeblock was on target:) DMacks (talk) 21:42, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

H2Lv

You're welcome! Somehow I find that every time I go to those articles the superheavy ones seem to be back. Of course, those are the least of the articles' problems, but at least removing those makes it a little less obvious that they are from what I tend to jokingly call "periodic table fans". The phenotype: memorised the names of all 118 elements, knows precious little about their actual chemistries besides little fragmented tidbits, but repeatedly organises things into neat but ill-fitting little boxes according to his or her knowledge without first reading up on the topic from more reputable and detailed sources. ^_-☆ Double sharp (talk) 07:30, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Thiophene

Leave a note here about your concerns about thiophene, and I will try to resolve issues. Your continued efforts on these fundamental compounds are much appreciated. --Smokefoot (talk) 15:30, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Oxalate degrading enzyme

Thanks for your work at this article; with no background in the subject, I found the article just almost incomprehensible. I can't even figure out what chunk makes Enzymes are macromolecules with biocatalytic activity, and most enzymes are proteins redundant, so it's good that someone more knowledgeable came along :-) Do we have an article that covers the "degradation" concept that's relevant here? You added a link to degradation, but it's a disambiguation page. And also, I've added Category:Oxalates and Category:Enzymes to the article, since it's related to and one of these concepts, respectively. Is oxalates appropriate, or is that only for types of oxalate compounds? And surely this can go in some of the enzymes subcategories (I'm guessing in one of the subcategories of Category:Enzymes by function, for example), but I don't understand which ones. Nyttend (talk) 16:59, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

22:03, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi DMacks. If you get a chance, I wonder if you'd take a look at this edit request. The OP came back and modified the request after I declined it, but I'm finding that an adequate assessment of it is a bit beyond my ken. RivertorchFIREWATER 04:06, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

14:46, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Czechia "Vandalisim"

How was it vandalism I just updated the name Ninvento (talk) 16:08, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Please see the FAQ link I included in the message. DMacks (talk) 18:29, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Javascript test pages

Hi Dmacks

Thanks for starting the discussion at WP:VPT#Categories_for_.js_pages about the categorisation of code. I learnt a lot from it.

However, the discussion has now run its course, so I was wondering if you would now like to disable (or delete) the two test pages you produced — User:DMacks/template-test1 and User:DMacks/test.js — so that they no longer populate non-existent categories?

It would be helpful to have them no longer appear in Special:WantedCategories. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:02, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Done. Thanks for gnoming the categories! DMacks (talk) 20:08, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Great! Thanks --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:39, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

This Month in Education: [March 2017]

 
This Month in Education

Volume 6 | Issue 2 |March 2017

This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. Be sure to check out the full version, and past editions. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team!

In This Issue


Featured Topic Newsletter update

Overview on Wikipedia Education Program 2016 in Taiwan


From the Community

High School and Collegiate Students Enhance Waray Wikipedia during Edit-a-thons

Approaching History students as pilot of Education program in Iran

An experience with middle school students in Ankara

Wikishtetl: Commemorating Jewish communities that perished in the Holocaust


From the Education Team

UCSF Students Visit WMF Office as they start their Wikipedia editing journey

Meet the team


In the News

Från dammiga arkiv till artiklar på nätet


If this message is not on your home wiki's talk page, update your subscription.

The new issue of the newsletter is out! Thanks to everyone who submitted stories and helped with the publication. We hope you enjoy this issue of the Education Newsletter.-- Sailesh Patnaik using Saileshpat (talk) 19:07, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

17:53, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Enzyme, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cofactor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

18:35, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Freedom Machine

Not a test page. Spam. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:01, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Indeed. Thanks for canning it. DMacks (talk) 05:28, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Henderson Bridge (Rhode Island), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page India Point. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 12 April 2017 (UTC)


Hi DMacks,

I had added some of those external links related to New Power Party, which they are mostly related to New Power Party with those external links on various reforms that are going on at Taiwan. I hope that you would at least read them on those various issues at Taiwan instead just using bots to delete them. Wikipedia is after all an encyclopedia for mass awareness to keep people informed on things around world.


Deletionism and inclusionism in Wikipedia - Wiki....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deletionism_and_inclusionism_in_Wikipedia


File:Size of English Wikipedia broken down.png....

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Size_of_English_Wikipedia_broken_down.png


I love science, too, but politics in Taiwan isn't exactly like academic papers, which are very rigor and even dry reading. Those external links are almost all related to Taiwan or exactly to topics of that page. My goals are to focus on struggle of Taiwan and why these political parties even existed in first place not to write strict academic papers to impress your peer scientists like most academic papers in very complex terminologies. I will just said that it is important for Taiwan to have those links regarding to reforms and human rights at Taiwan. China suppressed freedom of speech and so on. Better privacy laws are really needed in Taiwan to protect on those that are demanding for changes in Taiwan. I hope you will have understanding on that. Thanx! =) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.114.119.130 (talk) 04:37, 14 April 2017 (UTC)


Privacy International - Wiki....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privacy_International

Julian Assange - Wiki....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_Assange

Not much love lost between Wikipedia and WikiLeaks - The Guardian....

https://www.theguardian.com/business/andrew-clark-on-america/2010/aug/30/wikipedia-wikileaks


Maybe Jimmy Wales needs to pay royalty to Julian Assange for using word such as wiki.... just joking! USA certainly got housing bubbles, student loan crisis, income inequality, and much more to that devastated middle income class. Anyhow.... noticed that Taiwan is rather red and rank very low on privacy laws.... sadly. I mean you can change world and save life on here not siding with any Pro-China and Anti-Democratic agenda for sure. Imagine that!  ;-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.114.119.130 (talk) 05:29, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

19:32, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Vandalism

@DMacks: @DMacks2: Somebody instead of clean up the article deleted 95% portion of your last edited article[37], photos, references, signature, Infobox information, awards and distinctions, books, reliable sources, quotes, occupation, example of poetry, khowar translation, links, reliable references and external links and many others has been deleted, please check this edit and revert the article to its original position and fix the protection template to save the article from vandalisum--175.107.55.33 (talk) 05:34, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Looks fine to me. Sock blocked. DMacks (talk) 06:44, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
@DMacks: @DMacks2: sir due to oversight or human error you blocked the IP 175.107.55.33 please unblock the IP as someone deleted 95% portion of your last edited article[38] please revert the change to your last edit. Thanks --175.107.53.145 (talk) 03:55, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
No. DMacks (talk) 04:06, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

16:40, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

This Month in Education: [April 2017]

 
This Month in Education

Volume 6 | Issue 3 | April 2017

This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. Be sure to check out the full version, and past editions. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team!

In This Issue


Featured Topic

How responsible should teachers be for student contributions?


From the Community

Cairo and Al-Azhar Universities students wrap up their ninth term and start their tenth term on WEP

Glimpse of small language Wikipedia incubation partnership in Taiwan

Key to recruiting seniors as Wikipedians is long-term work

Education at WMCON17

OER17

Western Armenian WikiCamper promotes Wikiprojects in his school

Building a global network for Education


From the Education Team Mobile Learning Week 2017
If this message is not on your home wiki's talk page, update your subscription.

The new issue of the newsletter is out! Thanks to everyone who submitted stories and helped with the publication. We hope you enjoy this issue of the Education Newsletter.-- Sailesh Patnaik using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:18, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

19:50, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Technical support scam article

Hi DMacks, I don't know why you removed my edit here - I added something important that wasn't covered in the article, but should've been. Please have a look at the source, my addition is demonstrated there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrDennis (talkcontribs) 13:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

The idea that SEO can elevate bad sites, either malware, ad sites, or all sorts of incorrect information, is already well-covered. I don't see what is substantially new or deserving of additional prominence, and I don't see a high-quality well-known reference site to support it (WP:RS and WP:UNDUE guidelines). I do see a new editor who seems to be fond of adding refs to the same site on many pages (refspam is a serious problem on Wikipedia). DMacks (talk) 14:23, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
The unique aspect of black-hat SEO combined with the fake tech support issue is something that search engines still didn't find a way to tackle properly. This is an industry that makes millions every month from unsuspecting users, and the idea of a reverse phone number search hasn't crossed anyone's mind yet. Looking over official sites, nobody mentions the SEO aspect, as though the ban on fake tech support ads by Google & Bing solved the problem. But it hasn't! The article demonstrates the research which was made and an issue that continues to plague search results and users.
The other edits I made that reference our site are also highly relevant and while I see your point about "a new editor who seems to be fond of adding refs to the same site on many pages", I'd like to point out that the specific pages I add are not only beneficial and highly relevant, but also unique, without a better substitute from a more authoritative site. (see this tool for example, which was also removed from the antivirus comparison page) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrDennis (talkcontribs) 14:44, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
"without a better substitute from a more authoritative site." is one of the problems. If this were a major or notable situation, it would be covered by them. Especially someone like google getting tricked by a scam involving masquerading as google? Compare to the recent gmail phishing, which was widely covered. I suspect wikipedia just isn't ready to jump into the realm of cutting-edge information, instead taking a more conservative approach to reporting. DMacks (talk) 13:00, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
I appreciate your taking the time to discuss this, and if you think that the black-hat SEO networks are an insignificant issue, I can't convince you otherwise. However, if you truly believe that the importance of a research is determined solely by the popularity or fame of the researcher, I beg to differ. I guess we'll have to agree to disagree on this.
Do you mind if I raise the issue of the other submission which was removed? The tool that provides an aggregation of lab tests is a perfect resource for comparing antivirus test scores because (1) it combines scores from multiple AMTSO certified labs, (2) it allows users to view tests over time instead of a single test (the labs don't have such an option), and (3) each original test is accessible from the data points on the graph. All the data is based in fact and no other tool does that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrDennis (talkcontribs) 14:06, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

02:25, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Unblock request on hold

There is an unblock request at User talk:1.136.96.43, in connection with a year-long range block that you placed on the range 1.136.96.0/24 in September 2016 for block evasion. I am much inclined to unblock, but I am consulting you, in case you know of relevant facts that I can't see. Looking at your editing history around the time when you placed the block I see no edits that appear to be related to the block, and which might throw light on the reason for the block, nor is it obvious from the IP editing what block was being evaded, which makes it difficult for me to fully assess the situation. However, the following are my observations based on what I can see.

There have been 1493 edits from 241 IP addresses in the range. Looking at the editing history, I see a wide range of different edits, with no obvious connections to one another, so that there is no reason at all to suppose that all, or even a large minority, of the edits are from one person. That being so, I see no reason at all to suppose that the editor who is requesting the unblock is the one who caused you to block the range. Indeed, in view of the evidence that many editors have used the range, I find it difficult to see how a long-term block on the whole range could have seemed justified in the first place. Also, any disruptive editing from the range which took place back in September was certainly not so extensive that unblocking now would pose a major risk. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:42, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

I'm guessing this was Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dylan Florida/Archive? I can see some of the previous range blocks were triggered by him and he uses Telstra. The history here in early 2016/2015 shows previous uses of this range. Not clear what triggered the most recent range block. Kuru (talk) 14:45, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Yup, Dylan Florida as usual. DMacks (talk) 17:57, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
@JamesBWatson:, see also User talk:1.136.96.88, where you and I have already discussed this same rangeblock and another admin declined the unblock. DMacks (talk) 18:00, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Here is the block log for the /24 range. In my opinion, it is not unreasonable to keep a /24 blocked for as much as a year if we have evidence that the problem is likely to continue. Since the block is anon-only we are just forcing the user to create an account, if they need to work from this range. EdJohnston (talk) 18:17, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
@EdJohnston and Kuru: & of course DMacks. Thanks for the clarifications. This is a good example of why it is virtually always best to check with the blocking administrator "in case you know of relevant facts that I can't see", because that is exactly what turns out to be the case. (And I didn't remember my own raising of a similar question for the same range block in September last year.) This is one of the rare occasions when I think that the considerable collateral damage caused by such a long-term block on a range with many editors is probably the lesser evil. I shall decline the unblock request. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:13, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
@JamesBWatson: And thanks for asking! I certainly didn't mean my comment to be snide in any way, though I can now see it being read that way, but merely to keep discussions linked and available due to the...nature of the subject. DMacks (talk) 20:47, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Hagiographies

Any suggestions on what to do when I run across a hagiography such as Bernard Cheong? Other than fix it myself?   Need a template:hagiography cleanup tag? Thanks Jim1138 (talk) 09:27, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

27.252.121.212

27.252.121.212 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Quite opinionated. wp:KDL irrelevant, wp:disambiguation irrelevant... Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:01, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

And disruptive. If I weren't involved prior to seeing how widespread the pattern was, I would have blocked him myself ASAP. DMacks (talk) 20:59, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Request for undeletion the article Koushani Mukherjee

I am requesting you for undeletion the article Koushani Mukherjee. She is a bengali film actress who already made her debut in four films. I want to provide reliable sources on the article.

Tushar Singha (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:30, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Because this was deleted as a result of a discussed consensus (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koushani Mukherjee), I cannot undelete it unilaterally. You were advised at WP:Deletion review who to contact instead, because I am not "the administrator who closed the discussion". DMacks (talk) 04:38, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

21:48, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Boner

You did not have to protect Boner, as I had quit editing the page after this revision by Bkonrad (talk · contribs).
PapíDimmi (talk | contribs) 17:54, 16 May 2017 (UTC)