Welcome Dagana4!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 48,330,622 registered editors!
Hello Dagana4. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm DBigXray, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:
    Introduction to Wikipedia
    The five pillars of Wikipedia
    Editing tutorial
    How to edit a page
    Simplified Manual of Style
    The basics of Wikicode
    How to develop an article
    How to create an article
    Help pages
    What Wikipedia is not
Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
    Do be bold
    Do assume good faith
    Do be civil
    Do keep cool!
    Do maintain a neutral point of view
    Don't spam
    Don't infringe copyright
    Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest
    Don't commit vandalism
    Don't get blocked
If you need further help, you can:
    Ask a question
or you can:
    Get help at the Teahouse
or even:
    Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
    Fight vandalism
    Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome
    Help contribute to articles
    Perform maintenance tasks
           
    Become a member of a project that interests you
    Help design new templates
    Subscribe and contribute to The Signpost

To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your userpage.

Please remember to:

  • Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the   button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
  • Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!

Sincerely, DBigXray 09:10, 26 February 2019 (UTC)   (Leave me a message)Reply

DBigXray 09:10, 26 February 2019 (UTC)Reply


 

Hi Dagana4! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

10:30, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

edit
  Thank you for removing vandalism from wikipedia articles. cheers. DBigXray 09:11, 26 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so much!

March 2019

edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button   located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. DBigXray 07:50, 10 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hey what's this? Is someone else is using your account? Dagana4 (talk) 13:11, 10 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
this is a reminder, since you recently forgot to sign--DBigXray 08:46, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Recent edit to Payal Rohatgi

edit

  Hello. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person (Payal Rohatgi), but that you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! PATH SLOPU 09:36, 24 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Yes you made a mistake. I had got that from an entertainment news source. It is completely quoted and sourced as well. The anon used removed it because he did not like it.

ARBIPA sanctions alert

edit

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Kautilya3 (talk) 12:24, 11 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Azam Khan (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rama Devi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:09, 26 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

August 2019

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Indo-Pakistani War of 1947–1948, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 14:16, 25 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Sasanian Empire

edit

Do keep in mind that the article is heavily outdated, and most of the information was added looong ago. It needs a heavy rewrite, one which I will do one day. --HistoryofIran (talk) 19:21, 7 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

ARBIPA sanctions reminder

edit

Hello Dagana4, you still have the ARBIPA sanctions alert a few sections above. It is inexplicable why you are edit warring over a poor quality sources like Nathu Ram Godse at Hindustani language. You know that you are required to follow WP:BRD on controversial topics? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:59, 18 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Talk page discussion Islam and Violence

edit

Hello I saw you contributing at talk page about Islam and Violence/ especially pacifism in Islam/. That pages, Islam and violence, Pacifism in Islam etc should be monitored always, there is often changes of content and vandalism, personal pov views etc. I would like to keep discussion alive at that topics also at talk pages, with inviting different users to contribute to consensus for quality content etc. At talk page discussion is dead almost in that articles, so in that name I write to you to use knowledge about improving content, keep quality content and with that whole Wikipedia. Thank you for your time. 178.221.118.83 (talk) 03:30, 25 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Shukraneeti

edit

Hello, Dagana4,

Thank you for creating Shukraneeti.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add WP:INLINECITED refs.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 06:10, 26 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Muskaan Kataria

edit
 

The article Muskaan Kataria has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable and not recognized for just taking part as a contestant in a reality TV show.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abishe (talk) 07:11, 26 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reliable sources

edit

Hi there, re: this edit, Jackace.in is not a sufficient reference. We don't care what random blogs and websites have opted to publish. Who knows where they get their information? Other websites? From marketing companies? Fabricated from thin air? We only care what reliable mainstream sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy have to say about anything, especially in the world of Indian film finances, which are notoriously unreliable and dependent entirely on proprietary estimates. Please see our reliable sourcing guidelines, and for a general list of suitable and unsuitable resources for Indian entertainment articles, please see WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:57, 6 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I was trying for a source for the film budget and box office verdict. Can you help me? I found only one source. Dagana4 (talk) 07:47, 14 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
Dagana4, when you ask for help from another editor and they don't respond, sometimes it's just that they didn't see it. Many folks have thousands of pages on their watchlist. You could ask them at their talk page, or ping them here or to the article talk (instructions at WP:PING), if you still have the same question. Re: the sources you're looking for -- my understanding is that entertainment news in Indian media is nearly all unreliable. I've been told even entertainment news in Times of India is liable to be paid advertising rather than actual fact. There's information on reliable sources in the film industry at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Film/Resources but there doesn't seem to be anything specific to Indian film. --valereee (talk) 14:23, 2 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

question

edit

I'm sorry, a 'misleading date'? What does that edit summary mean? --valereee (talk) 05:01, 2 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Kunal Kamra

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kunal Kamra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at [[{{{value1}}}]]. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 13:29, 31 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Dagana4,
I thought I'd let you know that the previous version of this article that was deleted was "userfied" and moved to User:Winged Blades of Godric/Kunal Kamra. You might ask Winged Blades of Godric if you can work on this old draft and improve it to meet Wikipedia's notability standards. Liz Read! Talk! 17:50, 31 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Snehana

edit
 

The article Snehana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references are available. No secondary sources available to establish the notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The9Man | (talk) 06:20, 6 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

April 2020

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Shrikhand, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 17:50, 20 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Tapa-i-Kafariha moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Tapa-i-Kafariha, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 20:22, 24 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Controversial topic area alert

edit

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. — Newslinger talk 04:08, 18 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Orh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Untouchable.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 18 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Tapa-i-Kafariha

edit

  Hello, Dagana4. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tapa-i-Kafariha, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:03, 21 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Reference errors

edit

Your recent edits to Chandra dynasty#Education have introduced two reference errors. You invoke named references "samakal2" and "TDS1", but never define those reference names. Please take this opportunity to fully define these references in the article. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:49, 13 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

South-West Dedicated Freight Corridor moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, South-West Dedicated Freight Corridor, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kichu🐘 Need any help? 10:00, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from this webpage, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 11:45, 16 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:South-West Dedicated Freight Corridor

edit

  Hello, Dagana4. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:South-West Dedicated Freight Corridor, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Melaselvanur-Kilaselvanur Bird Sanctuary moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Melaselvanur-Kilaselvanur Bird Sanctuary, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Clog Wolf Howl 14:28, 7 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Tapa-i-Kafariha

edit
 

Hello, Dagana4. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tapa-i-Kafariha".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:28, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Melaselvanur-Kilaselvanur Bird Sanctuary

edit

  Hello, Dagana4. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Melaselvanur-Kilaselvanur Bird Sanctuary, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:09, 24 March 2022 (UTC)Reply