Daisybest

How do i message the people that commented on my article

I have some suggestions on an article "John R. Math" How do i message those that provided suggestions on the page? I have made some changes to the references, i want to message the person that commented on the page to take a look at it, if that settles the issue and I need more suggestions on how to go about this. Daisybest (talk) 19:26, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello Daisybest. The editor that tagged the article with maintenance tags was Reddogsix. I have pinged him into the discussion here but you may also contact him on his user talk page at User talk:Reddogsix. Mkdw^talk 21:57, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

To which I see you've already contacted him there, so it's just a matter of them replying to you. Regards, Mkdw^talk 21:58, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks so much for your feedback. Really appreciated. Daisybest (talk) 22:17, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of SGM Games for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SGM Games is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SGM Games until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. czar 15:29, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of John R. Math for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John R. Math is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John R. Math until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 16:23, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Richard Keith Latman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard Keith Latman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Keith Latman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 16:30, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of NYLS (Electropop Artist)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on NYLS (Electropop Artist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.mtv.com/artists/nyls/biography/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 23:43, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

May 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  SmartSE (talk) 14:45, 8 May 2016 (UTC)