Welcome!

Hello, Daniel-Brown, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:19, 28 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Storkk (talk) 23:43, 8 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Oxalicibacterium flavum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to 16S rRNA and Order
Naxibacter suwonensis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Aerobic
Naxibacter varians (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Specimens
Undibacterium oligocarboniphilum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to 16S rRNA

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 17 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Oxalicibacterium horti (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to 16S rRNA and Order
Massilia haematophila (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Specimen

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 24 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Delftia tsuruhatensis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wastewater treatment plant
Hydrogenophaga caeni (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Anaerobic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:12, 19 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Polaromonas vacuolata, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vesicles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:16, 27 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

A page you started has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Variovorax dokdonensis, Daniel-Brown!

Wikipedia editor Matty.007 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Looks good

To reply, leave a comment on Matty.007's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Variovorax defluvii, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Geumho (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:10, 4 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Burkholderia soli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Korean (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 12 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Cupriavidus basilensis

edit

Hi, I'm Kudpung. Daniel-Brown, thanks for creating Cupriavidus basilensis!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. You may wish to address the issue of naked URLs in the references. See WP:CITE for more information.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:19, 15 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Castellaniella, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anaerobic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 31 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Castellaniella hirudinis) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Castellaniella hirudinis, Daniel-Brown!

Wikipedia editor Matty.007 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Looks good

To reply, leave a comment on Matty.007's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oligella (bacterium), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aerobic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 7 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Azoarcus anaerobius, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anaerobic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 14 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dechloromonas hortensis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anaerobic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 21 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Legionella dresdenensis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aerobic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 27 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Legionella fairfieldensis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fairfield (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 4 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Legionella londiniensis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shizuoka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:01, 1 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to WikiProject

edit
 

If you are interested in medicine-related themes, you may want to visit the Medicine Portal.
If you are interested in improving medicine-related articles, you may want to join WikiProject Medicine (sign up here or say hello here).


Also Wikipedia:WikiProject Microbiology. NB: I am not a member of both projects.

Looking through your contributions, I realize you are active in microbiology/medical articles. With those articles, Template:Cite doi and Template:CitePMIDs will be useful in having a bot expand the DOIs and PMIDs you have cited. Extremepro (talk) 09:28, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

December 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Psathyrella species may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *''[[Psathyrella atomatoides]]'' <small>Peck) A. H. Sm.</small><ref>[http://eol.org/pages/6690106/overview eol]</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:18, 13 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Psychrobacter fulvigenes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aerobic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 7 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Psychrobacter namhaensis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Sea (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Moraxella bovoculi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Calve (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 5 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Original Barnstar
Thanks for your ongoing work on Moraxellaceae! VQuakr (talk) 08:27, 6 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

confusion in bacterial articles

edit

Thanks for your diligent work on bacterial diversity. I'll admit that I'm not deeply familiar with bacterial taxonomy, but some of your recently created bacterial stubs seem possibly incorrect, or at least unclear. In Chelativorans oligotrophicus for example, you describe the bacterium as a species of the genus of Aminobacter, which is confusing (although it may just have been a mistake). Similarly, the article Defluvibacter apparently negates its own existence by stating that "Defluvibacter lusatiensis was transferred to Aquamicrobium lusatiense" (if they are synonyms, there should be only one article). Please make sure that the articles you create are clear and accurate, even if just a stub. Cheers! --Animalparty-- (talk) 03:57, 26 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hoeflea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aerobic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 31 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Bartonella callosciuri) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Bartonella callosciuri, Daniel-Brown!

Wikipedia editor AshLin just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Be sure to add the banner template for WikiProject Microbiology to the talk page of newly created articles. AshLin (talk) 11:35, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on AshLin's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Use this opportunity to make a DYK!

edit

Do You Knows (DYKs) on the Wikipedia Main Page arise from newly created articles or articles newly expanded by 5 times. If you can add 1500 characters of text to the article (excluding wikitext, references, quotes, boxes etc), you can nominate this article for DYK and suggest an interesting fact (referred to as "hook"). DYK needs a little getting used to, but it really repays the hard work in spades. Happy editting! AshLin (talk) 11:25, 25 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Original Barnstar
Here is a barnstar for your work - creating quality bacteria stubs! Well done, keep it up! AshLin (talk) 11:38, 25 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beijerinckia indica, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aerobic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 26 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bosea eneae
added a link pointing to Bosea
Bosea lathyri
added a link pointing to Bosea
Bosea lupini
added a link pointing to Bosea
Bosea massiliensis
added a link pointing to Bosea
Bosea minatitlanensis
added a link pointing to Bosea
Bosea robiniae
added a link pointing to Bosea
Bosea vestrisii
added a link pointing to Bosea

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 4 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Crabtreella) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Crabtreella, Daniel-Brown!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Feel free to expand the stub beyond a bare definition. Otherwise, it is of little use even to microbiologists.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Please add WikiProject banners to talk pages of new articles

edit

Please add this template {{WikiProject Micro|class=Stub|importance=Low}} to Microbiology articles that you have newly created so that they get additional attention from WikiProject Microbiology which has the mandate of looking after all articles on the subject. Do consider enrolling there yourself, happy editting! AshLin (talk) 16:43, 19 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Devosia subaequoris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jeju. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 15 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Editor's Barnstar
With 850 articles and counting, you deserve it. You're an asset to the encyclopedia. Cheers!   ceradon (talkcontribs) 08:09, 11 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

WP:Autopatrolled

edit

I added Autopatrolled to your account. The articles you create are obviously notable and don't need to go through the new page patrol process. cheers --Guerillero | My Talk 04:49, 13 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thank you

edit

...for all the great content you are adding to Wikipedia.

  Bfpage |leave a message  14:17, 23 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your work is appreciated!

edit

My former note of appreciation was insufficient!

  Medical Content Creator Barnstar
Your unstoppable article creations on the Penicillins is very notable. Your hard work has not gone unnoticed. I have to let you know that I've actually learned a lot from your contributions and it has directly applied to my own content creation on pathogenic bacteria. So thank you for making me a better editor.
  Bfpage |leave a message  18:11, 9 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Penicillium tardochrysogenum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Filamentous. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 12 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rhodoplanes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phototrophic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 12 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Meganema perideroedes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Filamentous. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 22 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your new pages

edit

{{cite doi}} and {{cite pmid}} are both deprecated and not bot filled. Please use {{Cite journal | doi=10.xxx/xxxx}} followed by running the citation bot instead. AManWithNoPlan (talk) 19:35, 6 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

you might want to use {{reflist}} instead of references xml.

You might find adding this to your common.js might be useful :

//Add auto formatting yellow button mw.loader.load( '//de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Benutzer:TMg/autoFormatter.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript' );

It gives a yellow button that auto formats ISBN and other things. AManWithNoPlan (talk) 20:23, 6 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Streptomyces flavovirens, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Strain. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 22 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Streptomyces guanduensis, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pine forest and Guandu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 29 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Xanthobacter agilis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pleomorphic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Help to fill the web (and get the orphans adopted)!

edit

Hello there! I noticed you've been playing a major role in microbiology article creation, and so I've got a problem I'm hoping you might be interested in helping with! Tragically, 228 microbiology articles are orphans. Many of them are stubs for bacterial species or genuses which remain orphans because the articles that should link to them haven't yet been created. For instance the genus Acetitomaculum is the first orphan (in alphabetical order). Usually there would be a link on the page for its family Lachnospiraceae and on the page for any species under that genus (in this case, just Acetitomaculum ruminis). Sadly since neither of these pages have been created yet, Acetitomaculum is doomed to remain an orphan. Anyway the reason I bring this up is that I'm hoping you'd be willing and able to turn some of your article-creating prowess towards this problem. With a few swishes of your magic wand, you could help fill the web and get some of these orphans adopted. Let me know what you think and if there's anything I can do to help with your wiki to-do list. Happy editing!! Ajpolino (talk) 06:39, 11 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Tragedy strikes! Someone recently went through some of the microbiology articles hunting for orphans and tagged several more articles. We now stand at 271 orphans :( I'll start working on some of these this week. I'll start at the bottom of the alphabet, so if you've got some time to work on these feel free to start at the top of the list (or wherever you'd like). Together we can get some orphans adopted! Cheers! Ajpolino (talk) 19:56, 15 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Streptomyces rubidus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pine forest. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 6 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Streptomyces silaceus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lexington. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 14 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Streptomyces tateyamensis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tateyama. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 22 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Streptomyces tsukubensis
added a link pointing to Ibaraki
Streptomyces tyrosinilyticus
added a link pointing to Jiaohe

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 29 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Streptomyces zinciresistens, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Filamentous. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 9 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Arthrobacter alkaliphilus
added a link pointing to Niigata
Arthrobacter castelli
added a link pointing to Herberstein
Arthrobacter monumenti
added a link pointing to Carmona

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Methylobacterium organophilum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madison. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 31 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

edit

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chryseobacterium artocarpi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Non. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 12 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Writer's Barnstar
Dear Daniel-Brown, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, especially your recent creation of Chryseobacterium carnis. Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 07:06, 14 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Massilia putida, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wolfram. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 19 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chryseobacterium taihuense, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anaerobic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 26 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

A "H.pylori Bacteria Czar" award for you!

edit
  The Bacteria Czar
Hi Daniel-Brown. From what can see, you are the Czar of updates to Bacteriology articles. Shirt58 (talk) 11:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chryseobacterium yonginense, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mesotrophic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 3 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sphingomonas azotifigens, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mishima. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 11 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

MOS:ORDER

edit

You seem to create a lot of bacteria related articles using the same formula. Creating these is good, but please adjust your formula to comply with MOS:ORDER: Further reading becomes after References section. Thank you. – Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 20:21, 26 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

MOS:FURTHER

edit

Do not duplicate sources you have cited as references to a Further reading section, especially if it's a short article, per MOS:FURTHER. – Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 20:12, 16 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marinobacter litoralis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page East Sea. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 17 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Category:CS1 maint: Extra text

edit

You should not add |edition=2nd ed. in citation templates. The template automatically adds "ed.". Manually adding it triggers Category:CS1 maint: Extra text. – Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 19:54, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nocardiopsis nikkonensis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nikko. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 28 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nocardioides caricicola, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coccoid. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 4 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Desulfomonile
added a link pointing to H2S
Desulfuromonas
added a link pointing to H2S

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 11 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Nocardioides marinus
added a link pointing to East Sea
Nocardioides salarius
added a link pointing to South Sea

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 18 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aquimarina agarilytica, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cina. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 29 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

I have unreviewed a page you curated

edit

Hi, I'm Okamialvis. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Microbacterium halophilum, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Okamialvis (talk) 15:47, 8 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Daniel-Brown. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Active WP:MICRO members

edit

Hi there, I'm putting together a list of active members of WikiProject Microbiology, see User:Icebob99/sandbox. Would you care to add your name? Icebob99 (talk) 03:08, 18 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arcicella rigui, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polymorphic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 10 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Streptomyces tremellae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gutian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 9 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paludibacter propionicigenes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yamagata. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 28 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Niastella

edit

You created Niastella, but the article starts with "Leeuwenhoekiella is a bacterial genus from the family of Cytophagaceae." There seems to be some mistake. --Anvilaquarius (talk) 14:37, 26 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Writer's Barnstar
For many bacteria. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:13, 8 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Profundimonas piezophila) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Profundimonas piezophila, Daniel-Brown!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I redirected this to the genus, per convention (see WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA and WP:MONOTYPICFLORA). I note that the Uniprot entry on Profundimonas indicates unnamed species or strains: you might consider discussing these at Profundimonas as well, rather than creating permanent stubs.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! (talk) 20:03, 12 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Profundimonas piezophila) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Profundimonas piezophila, Daniel-Brown!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I presume you meant facultatively. Any chance you could tweak the lead sentence so that it's clearer to the non-expert that, first of all, it's a bacterium, and then go on to say what type it is?

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 20:04, 12 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Monotypic genera and species

edit

Hello. Please see the naming conventions at WP:MONOTYPICFLORA and WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA. In most cases, monotypic taxa and their sole descendant should be discussed in the same article. By convention, the genus is the target article for monotypic genera. While these guidelines do not directly address bacterial nomenclature, I imagine it would be the same (and for practical reasons, it should be). Thus, Spongiispira norvegica should be a redirect to Spongiispira, which should discuss any salient aspects of the genus as well as the species. We don't want readers to have to navigate multiple pages to glean piecemeal information. Note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a database, and so does not necessarily need to mimic the isolated granularity of a database entry. Cheers, --Animalparty! (talk) 05:26, 13 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Scientific names

edit

Hello,

Please remember to italicize the names of genera and species when creating bacterial stubs. Thanks, Choess (talk) 15:01, 19 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! Appreciate your patient and dedicated work. Choess (talk) 13:48, 22 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Daniel-Brown. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Leptothrix vs Ideonella

edit

I noticed you left a mention for Ideonella on the Leptothrix (bacterium) page. Was this a mistake, or a synonym or what? Help me detangle. Nessie (talk) 02:49, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speciesbox

edit

I really appreciate all the work you're doing, banging away at all the Flavobacterium species. Keep it up!

I do want to tall you that you'll probably want to start using {{speciesbox}} instead of {{taxobox}}. Most taxa pages are switching to the new template system as it's more compact and easier to update when the phylogeny is revised. Imagine changing all the pages in Flavobacterium, as opposed to just updating {{Taxonomy/Flavobacterium}}.

Again, thanks for your hard work! Nessie (talk) 15:43, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Taxobox colours

edit

I also noticed the good work you've been doing on bacteria articles. Just a note to say that |color= is ignored in taxoboxes, so don't bother to include it. To ensure consistency across all organism articles, colour is set automatically. The colours used can be seen at Template:Taxobox colour#Taxobox colour scheme. If in a particularly odd case the automatic selection of colour doesn't work, you use |color_as=, e.g. |color_as=Bacteria. Peter coxhead (talk) 14:10, 25 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:Eukaryotes described in 1836 has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Eukaryotes described in 1836, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Oculi (talk) 17:33, 28 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Penicillium turcosoconidiatum

edit
 

The article Penicillium turcosoconidiatum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Beyond database entries, BEFORE check only finds 2 passing mentions (just the name). Does not appear to meet GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Alpha3031 (tc) 09:12, 14 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:Bacteria described in the 1780s has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Bacteria described in the 1780s, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  20:48, 8 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Daniel-Brown. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Daniel-Brown. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi Daniel. I notice you're creating a lot of articles which reference this journal, but you often cite it as International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology or International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology. It would be nice if you cited it with the proper title casing: International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, as that would save on a lot of subsequent cleanup. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 12:38, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Opitutales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ordo. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

"1-Phenazinecarboxylic acid" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 1-Phenazinecarboxylic acid and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 4#1-Phenazinecarboxylic acid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. DMacks (talk) 19:17, 4 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

New Taxobox Field

edit

@Daniel-Brown: I recently secured a new field for the taxobox: type_strain_ref. Since you've been doing yeoman's work in creating genus and species articles, I thought you would want to know about the new field. To see how to use it, check out the edits I made to a recent article you created: Agrococcus versicolor. And, while I have your attention, I have a few other suggestions:

  1. It's better to use the original paper as the citation for the authority (since they're the ones that coined the name) and LPSN (and/or BacDive) as the citation for the type strain (since it often lists more type strain designations than the original publication did). I made this change on the Agrococcus versicolor page, too.
  2. When citing LPSN, BacDive, UniProt, etc. you should use {{cite web}} not {{cite journal}}. I also left examples of this on the Agrococcus versicolor page. (Side note: UniProt is great for information about protein sequence, structure, and function. However, it's not a very good taxonomic resource. It's also a terrible resource for synonyms. The synonyms it lists are often just misspellings (and uncommon ones at that) or informal names used by the researchers that have never actually been published. As a good rule of thumb, if you can't find the authorship of the name or a peer-reviewed article that uses that name, it's not a real synonym.)
  3. You've been adding a reference to every species listed in the taxobox like this (first example):
First Example
Scientific classification 
Domain: Bacteria
Phylum: Actinomycetota
Class: Actinomycetia
Order: Actinomycetales
Family: Actinomycetaceae
Genus: Gleimia
Nouioui et al. 2018
Species

G. coleocanis[1]
G. europaea[1]
G. hominis[1]

Second Example
Scientific classification 
Domain: Bacteria
Phylum: Actinomycetota
Class: Actinomycetia
Order: Actinomycetales
Family: Actinomycetaceae
Genus: Gleimia
Nouioui et al. 2018
Species[1]

G. coleocanis
G. europaea
G. hominis

Third Example
Scientific classification 
Domain: Bacteria
Phylum: Actinomycetota
Class: Actinomycetia
Order: Actinomycetales
Family: Actinomycetaceae
Genus: Gleimia
Nouioui et al. 2018
Species[1]
| subdivision_ranks = Species
| subdivision = ''[[Gleimia coleocanis|G. coleocanis]]''<ref name=Gleimia>{{cite web |vauthors=Euzéby JP, ((Parte AC.)) |url=https://lpsn.dsmz.de/genus/gleimia |title=Genus: ''Gleimia'' |access-date=June 24, 2022 |publisher=[[List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature]] (LPSN)}}</ref><br>
''[[Gleimia europaea|G. europaea]]''<ref name=Gleimia/><br>
''[[Gleimia hominis|G. hominis]]''<ref name=Gleimia/>
When you're working on a genus that only has a few species, adding the reference to each one is unsightly but is nevertheless a minor issue. But when the genus has hundreds of species, then {{reflist}} produces a reference list with hundreds of letters. It's ugly and counterproductive. Using the reference once produces a much cleaner reference list. You can do this by putting the reference in the subdivision_ranks field (second example):
| subdivision_ranks = Species<ref name=Gleimia>{{cite web |vauthors=Euzéby JP, ((Parte AC.)) |url=https://lpsn.dsmz.de/genus/gleimia |title=Genus: ''Gleimia'' |access-date=June 24, 2022 |publisher=[[List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature]] (LPSN)}}</ref>
| subdivision = ''[[Gleimia coleocanis|G. coleocanis]]''<br>
''[[Gleimia europaea|G. europaea]]''<br>
''[[Gleimia hominis|G. hominis]]''
And consider using bullet points instead of <br> to separate species (third example):
| subdivision_ranks = Species<ref name=Gleimia>{{cite web |vauthors=Euzéby JP, ((Parte AC.)) |url=https://lpsn.dsmz.de/genus/gleimia |title=Genus: ''Gleimia'' |access-date=June 24, 2022 |publisher=[[List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature]] (LPSN)}}</ref>
| subdivision =
* ''[[Gleimia coleocanis|G. coleocanis]]''
* ''[[Gleimia europaea|G. europaea]]''
* ''[[Gleimia hominis|G. hominis]]''

References

  1. ^ a b c d e Euzéby JP, Parte AC. "Genus: Gleimia". List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN). Retrieved June 24, 2022.

Keep up the good work and let me know if you have any questions. Ninjatacoshell (talk) 03:42, 25 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Bacteria described in 1865

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Bacteria described in 1865 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:09, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply