Wikipedia

User talk:Daniel/Archive/81

< User talk:Daniel‎ | Archive
Latest comment: 14 years ago by NuclearWarfare in topic request for Sonja Elen Kisa page
Learn more about this page
The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on User talk:Daniel. No further edits should be made to this page. For a list of archives for this user, see User talk:Daniel/Archive.
Archive This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any comments to the current talk page.
← Archive 80 · Archive 81 · Archive 82 →

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

New messages notice at top of talk page

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hello. I would just like to inform you that the "new messages" section near the top of your talk page is slightly confusing initially to an experienced user, and significantly confusing to a new user, as it looks like an actual message. I would like to suggest that you place that notice at the very top of your talk page inside a message box, such as an {{mbox}}. -- IRP ☎ 00:21, 2 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

I hate those boxes things, and the first section of my talk page (as is evident by the responses to it) is an inside joke. Thank you for your concern with how I manage my talkpage, but I fear your concern is misplaced, because by virtue of it being my talk page, I'll manage it how I want (including inside jokes being propagated on it). Regards, Daniel (talk) 00:24, 2 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
It was only a suggestion for improvement. Thank you. -- IRP ☎ 00:28, 2 March 2010 (UTC)Reply


The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Images in Nobel Prize

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello,

I'm thinking about nominating the Nobel Prize article for the second time to FA. Last time images were a main problem but most of it has been fixed now. However, me and licensing etc don't go well together. I saw you were an OTRS administrator so I figured you might perhaps be good with licensing and images? If you can help me the problems are located on Talk:Nobel Prize. It is mainly the image File:NobelPrize.JPG that has a problem. It needs a second license (see talk page) which I don't know how to fix.

Are you able to help me? --Esuzu (talk • contribs) 15:56, 14 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Daniel and copyright don't mix. This point of copyright law can be seen as contentious, in the differing copyrights between 2D and 3D objects. However, based on consensus at Wikimedia Commons, the 3D object (in this case, File:NobelPrize.JPG) is the one in public domain. File:Logo of the Nobel prize.jpg seems to be still under fair use, based on the tags on it. Therefore, use File:NobelPrize.JPG to illustrate the article. —Dark 11:05, 15 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
United States
China
Coba
Taking Children Seriously
Bosonic string theory
Trecena
Joseph Stalin
Shoku Nihongi
Lunation
Cat
France
Italy
Israel
Skyways (TV series)
Japan
Canada
Type I string theory
The Job (TV series)
Iraq
Cleanup
Doug Stanhope
Green Day
Britney Spears
Merge
Kimmy Gibbler
Nazism
Slavery
Add Sources
Joey Gladstone
Racism
Andy Warhol
Wikify
Dungeons & Dragons Miniatures Game
Government
1990s
Expand
Dog
Hagakure
Counter-Strike

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:16, 15 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please have a butcher's...

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Greetings Daniel - I see that a couple of years ago you protected Birdworld. It's too complicated for me to try to edit there, but maybe you can have a look at what's going on. Cheers! --Technopat (talk) 21:31, 10 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Seems like a straightforward reversion of copyvio. —Dark 01:56, 11 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Australia FAR

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

You should come and pipe up, Dark has given me your opinions re Cahill and ponting YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 07:24, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

You really should start being an Australian and helping us save the country! :) —Dark 10:50, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
CCM looks like start class YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 06:51, 20 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Everything Daniel does looks like start class. That's why he's in SA. —Dark 08:06, 20 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #29

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The 29th issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. JCbot (talk) 14:18, 13 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Possible move of the William Beebe rape section to new bio article

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, I've posted an RfC about a controversial topic. I believe that you've participated in discussions about this before. Please participate dispassionately. NYCRuss ☎ 11:50, 14 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox A-League season

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:Infobox A-League season has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:02, 20 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 April 2010

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Nomination for deletion of Template:FootballIDRIVEpast

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:FootballIDRIVEpast has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:36, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Wikipedia Signpost: 3 May 2010

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Wikipedia Signpost: 10 May 2010

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

OTRS tags

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, Daniel. :) I noticed User:Ironholds had used {{PermissionOTRS}} for an article at Talk:Gaussig House and just popped by to explain to him why this is not ideal. He says that you had told him the template to use, so I figured I'd pop by here as well. :) Besides not specifying the source (which can be a problem if somebody imports text from other sources and people presume that the material is also clear), it doesn't allow for specification of license, so when you get a single license source like that one we don't let our reusers know per WP:REUSE that GFDL is disallowed. While I find {{ConfirmationOTRS}} a bit frustrating (why does that one require an "otrs" parameter instead of an "id"?), it's really best for articles. {{PermissionOTRS}} is (at least according to its usage notes) meant for files.

Of course, you may know all this and it may have just been a miscommunication, but I thought I'd let you know. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:08, 12 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

I was reading off the guide on OTRSwiki...is that out of date? Daniel (talk) 01:50, 13 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
I guess so. But maybe that's why I used to use {{PermissionOTRS}} for text. We probably should update it. But this is probably my last post before a two week vacation. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 02:21, 13 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Wikipedia Signpost: 17 May 2010

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Wikipedia Signpost: 24 May 2010

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

request for Sonja Elen Kisa page

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago9 comments3 people in discussion

Sonja Elen Kisa is currently a redirect and on the protection log you asked to be contacted for any changes. Could you unprotect or edit the page on my behalf, please? 


{{Infobox Person
|name          = Sonja Elen Kisa
|birth_date    = 1 November 1978
|birth_place   = Ontario, Canada
|known_for     = creation of [[Toki Pona]]
|website       = http://www.kisa.ca/
}}
'''Sonja Elen Kisa''' ([[1978]]) is a [[linguist]] and professional [[translator]] ([[English]], [[French]] and [[Esperanto]]). 

She became known through her creation of [[Toki Pona]], an [[experimental languages|experimental language]], designed for the purpose of testing the [[Sapir-Whorf hypothesis]].  Toki Pona is inspired by [[taoism]] and intended to shape the thought processes of its users in Zen-like fashion.

== External link ==
* [http://www.kisa.ca/ Sonja's Linguistic Surrealscape] (in ''English'' and ''Esperanto'')

[[Category:Engineered languages]]
[[Category:Esperanto]]
[[Category:Taoism]]

[[cs:Sonja Elen Kisa]]
[[eo:Sonja Elen Kisa]]
[[hsb:Sonja Elen Kisa]]
[[hu:Sonja Elen Kisa]]
[[id:Sonja Elen Kisa]]
[[lt:Sonja Elen Kisa]]
[[nl:Sonja Elen Kisa]]
[[nn:Sonja Elen Kisa]]
[[no:Sonja Elen Kisa]]
[[pl:Sonja Elen Kisa]]
[[pt:Sonja Elen Kisa]]
[[ru:Киса, Соня Элен]]

Hpvpp (talk) 01:44, 28 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

It was decided by consensus, taking into account sensitive real world issues communicated with the subject via OTRS, that the article would remain a redirect to TP. I suggest incorporating a smaller version of the text there. Regards, Daniel (talk) 08:02, 9 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
I am thoroughly baffled. The Sonja Elen Kisa page exists in all the (12) namespaces listed above. What can be so sensitive as to preclude an English page?
Hpvpp (talk) 06:16, 13 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
The English Wikipedia lacked the technical ability to prevent the repeated inclusion of remarks about her sexuality (among other unencyclopedic and poorly-referenced material), to which she was the target of a protracted campaign to defame her character originating with real-word acquaintances, and the consensus was to merge and protect to resolve the issue (given she was of borderline notability and there was an obvious target for a merge). Daniel (talk) 11:10, 13 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
I am dismayed that this technical ability is available elsewhere and not on the English site, but I presume someone is working on it and that Sonja will get her page then. Anyway, you can close this discussion. Thanks for the update.
Hpvpp (talk) 00:44, 14 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
It isn't available on the other wikis; more, it's a case that the people continuing this character-assassination on her can't speak the other languages. Hopefully with flagged revs coming in soon, this will be remedied. Thanks for your understanding. Daniel (talk) 02:47, 14 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
Hi Daniel, just came across this after following a couple of talk page links. Now that we have pending changes or whatever we are calling it, do you think it would be OK to set Level 2 or higher flagged revisions protection and restore this article? I don't really have an interest either way, I'm just idly wondering. NW (Talk) 09:58, 17 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
Yeah probably, level 2 is exactly what it needed. To be honest I don't understand the bureaucratic nuances of the current PCP test, so if you would be so kind as to set the PCP up and fill in the paperwork, that'd be great. Daniel (talk) 15:06, 17 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
I'm not sure if we are allowed to use Pending Protection until next week for some reason, actually. I'll turn it on anyway so I don't forget, but I think we should probably wait a week before restoring the article. NW (Talk) 07:08, 18 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Wikipedia Signpost: 31 May 2010

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

McKenzie AfD

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Not that I think that anything different should be done, but please be aware that Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Basketnews/Archive linked to evidence in the AfD you have oversighted. While it now seems to be clear that McKenzie was not involved, it also seems to be clear that some media promotion group was, and I am pretty sure that they have more socks and may possibly be promoting other sports figures/agents on Wikipedia. Someone may want to go through the deleted article and see if they can identify these additional socks and perhaps gather from that what other articles may be involved. Yworo (talk) 18:36, 8 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Anyone else is free to do so. Hunting down socks in a case I'm not involved in isn't something I want to be using my limited wiki-time doing, sorry. Regards, Daniel (talk) 03:13, 9 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 June 2010

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

OTRS and the pending changes trial

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Daniel - you or another OTRS admin might want to comment here, where I raise the question of whether or not to include semi-protected articles with OTRS tickets on them in the trial process. Thanks. Risker (talk) 08:28, 17 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

I sent a link to our admins mailing list - I confess the trial has generally left me confused, so hopefully someone who has been following it more closely than I will be able to pitch in. Cheers for the heads-up, Daniel (talk) 15:11, 17 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Daniel/Archive/81&oldid=1088260282"