Darigon Jr.
Welcome!
editHello Darigon Jr., welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Electriccatfish2 (talk) 23:40, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
"Comparison of standard Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian" page move
editHello! I noticed you copied the content of Comparison of standard Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian article and pasted it to Comparison of standard Bosnian, Croatian, Montenegrin, and Serbian. This is not a right way of moving a page. Also note, that this move is potentially controversial, so you should use Requested moves process instead. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 19:26, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
- Hallo Dmitrij D. Czarkoff, thanks for your help on the page "Comparison of standard Bosnian, Croatian, Montenegrin, and Serbian". I think that Serbo-Croatian is a pluricentric language with four standard variants (see all my contributions). Therefore I added the Montenegrin variant into page title. Obviously, I didn’t move the page in a technically correct way... Thanks again! --Darigon Jr. (talk) 20:25, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
- Please notice, that I actually reversed page move. You really should use Requested moves process if you want it moved. Also note, generally the discussions are expected to be kept together; as this discussion has started here, please, reply me here. You may also put {{talkback}} (follow the link to see usage details) template on my talk page to make me aware of your response. Please, don't take these comments as accusations or other way to offend you: I just want to help you learn the rules you should know to achieve the result you want. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 21:04, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 4
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Standard language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spanish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Hats off...
editI'm really impressed by your temperament: I was perhaps a bit harsh re Kordić article (as I was back in 2012), and you didn't jump at my throat, which is what many editors would do. On the contrary: you took the most constructive approach. Anyway, I really wish more editors were like that... GregorB (talk) 16:23, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Snježana Kordić RfC
editNot sure if you've noticed - I've started an RfC to get a wider input, so you might want to comment in the article's talk. GregorB (talk) 12:07, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hi GregorB, thanks for letting me know. I welcome your idea to start a RfC. Best,--Darigon Jr. (talk) 16:29, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Thank you
editThank you for all your hard work and I regret having caused you to do additional work. Yours, Quis separabit? 20:35, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
A page you started (Who is Who in Croatian Science) has been reviewed!
editThanks for creating Who is Who in Croatian Science, Darigon Jr.!
Wikipedia editor Vinodtiwari2608 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Please add more references
To reply, leave a comment on Vinodtiwari2608's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Disambiguation link notification for April 6
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Croatian Scientific Bibliography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Croatian Scientific Bibliography
editIf this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Croatian Scientific Bibliography requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://bib.irb.hr/?lang=EN. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa (talk) 02:15, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Status and Advice
edit- As reviewing administrator, I deleted the article. On the now deleted talk p. you said :that this didn't apply because the short text had 5 references. That's not the point. The point is that nothing in Wikipedia may ever be copied from an outside site or previously published material, without full copyright permission according to WP:DCM. This is quite apart from the problem that it is necessary to show notability by references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements--and much more basic. Please see WP:COPYVIO for an explananation. This is one area where we never compromise. Please review all your previous work, and rewrite anything that was copied. Do not just write a praphrase of it, but rewrite from scratch. Close paraphrases are equally copyright violations. DGG ( talk ) 18:40, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Who is Who in Croatian Science
editIf this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Who is Who in Croatian Science requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://tkojetko.irb.hr/en/oprojektu.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa (talk) 02:17, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- Has been deleted. Either way, the above applies, so there is nothing one can do about it except write the article again, this time without close paraphrasing. GregorB (talk) 11:36, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, Darigon Jr.. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, Darigon Jr.. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Darigon Jr.. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Darigon Jr.. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
editDisambiguation link notification for December 23
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
- Bar chart (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to 3D
- Frequency (statistics) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to 3D
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:22, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
editArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Please see Talk for Mutual intelligibility
editCluelessly formatted attempt on my part to supply an easy click: [[1]] Barefoot through the chollas (talk) 17:30, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)