Daven200520

If an editor removes a comment from their talk page, whether the comment is legitimate or not, do not add the comment back again. Respect their wishes. It's counter-productive to force the issue.

Note that users who repeatedly restore comments to a user's talk page more than three times in a 24 hour period may be blocked for violating the three-revert rule.

Anthony Allen Shore

I just wanted to let you know I removed your prod from this article because it was not a hoax. In the future it might be worth taking a minute to check Google to determine if something may be a hoax or not. That said, the article definitly requires cleanup and possibly may not meet notability requirements.Rcurtis5 (talk) 23:31, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Noted--Jayson (talk) 23:40, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Investor Education

Just wanted to request you go back and look at the Investor education site that was labelled as written like an advertisement. I've finally had a chance to get back there and add some content/references. I hope this will result in the tag being taken down. If not, let me know and I'll keep working away to try and get it inline with Wikipedia guidelines.

Wavebird

I could be doing this wrong Looks like our talk page its been a while since I have edited wikipedia. Anyways I wanted to refute a few of your changes to the WaveBird Article. I would like to point out that I did site the IGN article to point out that the Logitech Cordless Action controller came out with in months of the Wavebird same year and likely with little influence. The only section I edited other then a few wording changes that I felt are misplaced in the article are related to the WaveBirds influence on the current generation. And even with its sources before mine I doubt any one can find Sony and Microsoft admitting that they loved the wave bird so much they made there wireless controllers after it.

The line about 802.11x might be a little biased I can find a source if you want, but the existence of the Logitech Cordless Action is not and has a reasonable source to site when it came out. This is something more for the talk page of the article and I will keep up with it over the next few weeks to get an opinion before changing it again, but I do feel that your reversals are in error. At least in the influence section. Sorry for not doing all edits at one time, but I like to edit by section so there is less source hints the 4 edits as I was getting the article in order. The final change you made was putting back that the Wavebird is Unique because it was an RF device on 2.4Ghz which is really naive to me. 2.4ghz tech has existed in Keyboard/Phones/Mice/Remotes/ and many other devices long before 2002 the WaveBird was unique because it was first party not because it used radio communication. That edit only cleared things up in the article. I ask you think about your changes for me after what I have said. If you want I can provide more sources related to wireless tech and its age, but I think the already included links to wireless will back up my statments about the 2.4ghz range.

Thank you for your time I really try to keep Wikipedia clean, I just wanted to stay anon this time as it was a small edit. Kept anon because I needed you to recognize the IP

-72.148.115.85 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Daven200520 (talk • contribs) 09:17:11, August 19, 2007 (UTC).

Dean preparations

It's not important what the politicians say, that's not preparations. It's what they do as a government that are preparations. – Chacor 07:32, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

They as a government took the step to block entrants, so that would be considered preparations. However, saying "we are prepared!" isn't really useful information to put in the preparations section, imo. – Chacor 07:39, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Also, can I suggest you please get a spell checker? You're capitalising words unnecessarily. – Chacor 07:39, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 08:50, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Re [1]

Please note that the placement of a block notice does not cause a user to be blocked; blocks must be effectuated by administrators. Non-administrators may request that users engaging in vandalism be blocked at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. John254 18:50, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Generally, users become sysops after making a successful application at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship. While there are no formal criteria for adminship, a successful request for adminship generally requires that the candidate has:

(1) at least several thousand edits

(2) some significant participation in the creation of encyclopedic content, the Wikipedia namespace, and RC Patrol

(3) not engaged in recent, significant policy violations or other disruption

(4) avoided recent participation in significant disputes or other controversy with other good-faith users.

At the moment, I am not a sysop. John254 19:21, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

• Whoa! You should definitely not take John's word for it, Daven, because he's massively overstating what it takes to become a sysop (admin is the common term, actually). Basically all it takes is that you show some dedication to the project, and show that we can trust your judgment. For dedication, pick your own area, it really doesn't matter. For judgment, it may actually help if you were engaged in a dispute, because this tells us how you deal with disputes. One that starts screaming and insulting people in a dispute is not a good admin; one who deals with it level-headedly and resolves it somehow likely is. It really isn't such a big deal. >Radiant< 08:29, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

All My Children

Not 'vandalism' --- I'm making corrections and adding more details. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.209.116.184 (talk) 19:40:39, August 19, 2007 (UTC)

Block messages

Hello! Firstly, thankyou for your hard work reverting vandalism and doing other tasks around Wikipedia, it is greatly appreciated. However, please remember that you cannot block users simply by placing a block notice on their talk pages; only an administrator has the power to block IPs and users. The IP 63.226.201.123 has now been blocked by my request but in future you can report users for vandalising at the administrator intervention against vandalism noticeboard. If the user has a full set of warnings and are actively vandalising then they will normally be blocked and thus, prevented from editing. If you have any questions about this or anything else, please feel free to contact me on my talk page. Happy editing! --Farosdaughter 20:12, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

RE: Word of Wisdom

Copied from User talk:71.35.46.20

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Word of Wisdom. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Daven200520 23:15, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Please look at the dif again -- there was no vandalism or unhelpful edits. I substituted the less elegant <div class="references-small"><references /></div> for {{Reflist|2}} (which had the added benefit of putting the long notes section to 2 columns) and changed the section header from the less standard "Footnotes" to the more standard "Notes". Please actually look at what's being done before you make unsubstantiated accusations. -- 71.35.46.20 23:25, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for helping fight vandalism

Thank you for your assistance in helping fight vandalism on the Seven Wonders of the World article. However you only reverted one of the three edits made by the anonymous user [2]. In the future you may wish to double-check the edit history to make sure you get it all. Thanks again, --Kralizec! (talk) 23:30, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Orange County

My assertions upon making that trivia comment turned out to be incorrect, as made apparent by an early scene in the film. 68.164.58.202 00:47, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Restored vandalism on Alan Oliver

According to the history on Alan Oliver, you restored a chunk of text that an anonymous user had removed[3]. As it turns out, the anon was correct to remove that paragraph. Please be more cautious about what you revert. - jredmond 16:40, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Elite

Your recent contributions to the Wikipedia article Covenant Elite are very much appreciated. However, please take a moment to look over your contributions for spelling, grammatical, capitalization, and punctuation errors before submitting them in final. This will help lessen the amount of copyediting work that fellow Wikipedians need to do, and will help improve the overall appearance of Wikipedia. Finally, don't take this message personally. Thank you!

--Jayson 17:03, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Hello, Please Refrain from making unnecessary and grammar deficient edits as you did on Covenant Elite.

I found the latter part pointless and insulting, I'm not entirely sure what I specifically did to receive such a message?

License tagging for Image:Tsms header.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tsms header.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:10, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Ecstatic Buddhism

The creator's web reference suggests that they may be more of a translator then the original creator. I have no personal interest in this article, and deleted 2 other pages by that editor, but it feels like they are trying to be productive. Should this assumtion not be right, OR is not a speedy deletion criteria. {{prod}} may be effetive is this is a drive by contributor, if not there is always AFD. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:08, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Re:NPW

I've added you, but you should have requested it on User:Martinp23/NPWatcher/Checkpage as someone would've dealt with it from there!

Regards

Reedy Boy 20:18, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Your edits

Attention needs to be made to edit summaries left by other authors. The msg I left here was not a whim, it was based upon scientific rules of naming that can be found here, for you to once again change it to what you thought it should be shows a need for you to understand the edits you do. -- Nashville Monkey 03:09, 12 November 2007 (UTC) Response moved here from my talk page... -- Nashville Monkey 03:27, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Please excuse my mistakes for I was not in sync with the guidelines of Wikipedia. I find it deeply encouraging to get a response for my edits. Again thank you for correcting and notifying me of my disruptive edits. 1A —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daven200520 (talk • contribs) 03:20, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

No problem... -- Nashville Monkey 03:27, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 04:16, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Your RfA

I have added some questions. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 00:18, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

your RfA

I decided to boldly close your RfA early. Please don't take this personally, but it would not have any chance of succeeding at the moment. Please don't let it bring you down, many users who went on to become fantastic admins have a failed RfA on their record. Just keep editing articles, and get some experience in admin-related areas. (Going to update this with some suggestions shortly). Best regards, — Dorftrottel⁠ 00:50, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

You may want to check out the Administrators' reading list (which includes generally useful info for all users, not only admins). One suggestion for a Wikipedia project space area to get involved in is WP:XFD. — Dorftrottel⁠ 01:06, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Arson hunterbrrok.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Arson hunterbrrok.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 01:46, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

your edit to User talk:Carlossuarez46

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 13:26, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

I've restored your article

Let's see if it can improve over time, otherwise it may get nominated for deletion. The link for the perp is pointing to some senator from Georgia not helping matters. Carlossuarez46 18:08, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Your cut/paste is incorrect

Please do a little research - at least read my change comment, since you did not Tedickey 11:10, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

hmm - still didn't read it. I fixed it, a little - now it's up to a D-minus. Regards Tedickey (talk) 01:04, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Tsmsblackheader.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tsmsblackheader.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:04, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Adoption

Sure I'll extend that offer. Would you be interested? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:37, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

We can start now. I'm so excited you decided to take my offer. Let me just briefly introduce myself. I'm 17 years old and live in Las Vegas, Nevada. I've been with Wikipedia for about a year. Mostly what I do is work on wrestling articles or other articles; but mostly wrestling. If its alright with you I'd like to know a little about yourself. Also tell me all you want to learn at my talk page and I will do the best I can. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:24, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

I can help you with that. Also, take note that blocking users is a job for the Administrators. And to expand your limit of edits, you have to have more numbers to your name if you want to become an Administrator. :). --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:59, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

No need to apologize, I am also in school. If you're interested in joining the Wrestling project, sign up here and add this box to your userpage. If you have any questions, just hit me. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:56, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Arson hunterbrrok.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Arson hunterbrrok.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:24, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Your VandalProof Application

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Daven200520. As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank again for your interest in VandalProof. β^_command 02:12, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Re: New Years

As well to you. Welcome back. Need any help? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:36, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Oi

Why have you given me a warning when I haven't posted anything? I think yoiu've got me confused with someone else. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.67.27.240 (talk) 18:35, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Law school rankings

The edits you recently reverted at Law school rankings in the United States did delete a large amount of material, but the edits were thoroughly documented in edit summaries AND they removed poorly sourced POV-laden content. I had removed some of the same content a couple of hours earlier, and it was restored by an IP user who promised to supply sources. Subsequently, some of the content was sourced. The content removed by 72.89.67.193 was unsourced and likely not supportable by reliable sources. --Orlady (talk) 23:04, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Tedickey

The irony of life being that WP:NOTPOLICY is an essay as well, letting everyone know right up front editors are "not obliged to follow it."

Looking back at the comment, I never said "this is policy" or used language like "you must follow this." I simply brought up relevant essays and guidelines, (is that different than what you just did here?) And by the way this was all in response to you threatening to block people for doing things that the guidelines do not forbid them from doing, such as removing comments from their talk page. Again, Wikipedia:User_page#Removal_of_comments.2C_warnings. So if anyone has commented inappropriately, it isn't me for adding an opinion, it would be you for going around and using warning templates on users who you think have broken rules that don't even exist. Brando130 (talk) 11:59, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Warning IP Users

Just a heads up that this was far too harsh for a first warning, first contribution for an IP address. Let me know if you have any questions about warning users —αlεx•mullεr 13:31, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

'..you will be blocked..' blablabla

You better watch your templates. -- 86.57.254.215 (talk) 07:59, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

That wasn't you sorry -- 86.57.254.215 (talk) 08:03, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

(ec) Explanation - Jayson, you've attracted a fan who decided to issue spurious vandalism warnings in your name - Special:Contributions/90.151.83.105 - earning himself a holiday from editing as a result. Let me know if you see this happening again, and I'll extend the holiday. Regards, Bencherlite^Talk 08:04, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Warning of 71.33.124.65

A little much for someone who barely started vandalizing and had no prior warnings, don't you think? DiverseMentality 07:10, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

I beg to differ, I found that his comments were extremely inappropriate and were far deserving of my warning if you disagree please do elaborate. Jayson (talk) 07:14, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Well, personally, I think a final warning for a first-time offender is too much and should receive a prior warning before a final warning (I think of it that if there's a final anything, there had to be something before a final). Some vandals actually stop after the first warning, and I'm assuming this IP is one of those cases. Maybe it's just me though. DiverseMentality 07:26, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Hey, I enjoy feedback from other editors on my edits, I thank you for your time and patience to help better me, and I will be taking in account your suggestions on all of my future edits. Jayson (talk) 07:30, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Okay, cool. Keep up the good work. DiverseMentality 07:35, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

If a new user and IP are making very offensive edits (such as racist or derogatory comments to a WP:BLP), and the user/IP has not received a warning yet, I recommend that you give them a {{uw-vandalism4im}} (only warning) as opposed to a {{uw-vandalism4}} (final warning). The uw-vandalism4im warning gets the message across quickly and seriously. Cunard (talk) 09:12, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Rollback

Hello Daven200520, I have granted your request for rollback. As an experienced vandalism patroller, you know that rollback is only to be used to fight cases of vandalism. Misuse of rollback is grounds for immediate removal. As an aside, I would agree with the comment above me that going straight to a level 4 warning is justified only in the worst cases of vandalism - threats to kill and such. Keep up the good work, and don't hesitate to ask if I can do anything to help! Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 13:27, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Chowk.com

I've declined the {{db-web}} you placed on Chowk.com. The article can't be deleted under A7 since the 2005 AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Www.chowk.com was closed as keep. Since the arguments for keeping this article in that AfD aren't that good, you may want to re-nominate the article for deletion. Regards, Cunard (talk) 08:57, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Siswa Bazar

Hi. I appreciate the work you do reverting real vandalism, but you realise that placing speedy tags on existing articles which have valid basic details and are verifiable constitutes as vandalism itself. I see its not the first time you have done this, but no administrator is going to speedy them. If you come across an article which is verifiable and has basic details in future but you find its notability questionable, try adding a {{notability}} tag instead or asking the editor to improve it first or simply take it to AFD which would have been the correct thing to do. Basically by placing an article up for speedy deletion you are not thinking of the overal encyclopedia and other users who find such articles completely acceptable and without any consensus in doing so is quite selfish. Please acknowledge this and be careful with using huggle and rollback. Keep up the good work reverting all those lemons. Cheers Dr. Blofeld 11:09, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

I understand completely, it was a fault on my part, I will use your wisdom in all my future edits. Jayson (talk) 00:00, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

...for reverting the vandalism on my page. JohnCD (talk) 16:23, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

No problem… Jayson (talk) 00:00, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Acount Creator Request

It's Offical I'm applying for Acount creator privileges. Jayson (talk) 00:12, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Huggle's a genius, isn't it?

WikiThanks

Thank you
for reverting the vandalism on my page.

I really appreciate your time (however short it may be). Thanks again, from a fellow huggler! :D —La Pianista ^(T•C•S) 00:22, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

It's an honor to defend your page!! and Huggle is a genius! Jayson (talk) 00:33, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: Homestar Runner

That wasn't a joke. They're holding a Homestar Runner puppet, and they call it a muppet on their site.--68.36.20.207 (talk) 02:00, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Waters middle school

Hi, the speedy template was removed from this page since schools are not eligible for an A7 deletion - this is made clear on the template. HTH. TerriersFan (talk) 04:20, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Softcore

Hello—the edits I made to this page are not "vandalism." They are designed to tighten and clarify a very vague, poorly written, and ambiguous definition. Could you please actually take some time to appreciate edits before issuing "warnings" for "vandalism"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.46.138.4 (talk) 13:01, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

ACC Tool

Someone, probably you, requested access to the account creation tool. For security purposes could you please confirm that it was you who made the request so we can approve you, thanks. -·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 17:01, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. I have approved your request. You may now access the tool here. Before you do so, please read the tool's guide to familiarize yourself with the process. You may also want to join #wikipedia-en-accounts on irc and/or the mailing list. Keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse may result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for your participating in the account creation process. -·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 22:56, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Funhouse (Pink album)

Dear Jayson, the artist writes her name always as 'P!nk', that's why I have changed the text, but for name convention purposes 'Pink' remains there where necessary. I believe this is constructive, having respect for the spelling of her name. Can you please revert your revert? --Ignacea (talk) 12:30, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Ewoks

Why did you destroy my corrections? I wanted to correct one major grammar mistake, when I realized that all characterizations were full of grammatical mistakes. 134.147.79.25 (talk) 11:14, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Corrected. --Jayson (talk) 12:03, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Re: Adoption

Wow, I haven't talked to you in a while. Um, yeah the adoption is still valid, if you want it to be. :) Yeah, let me know what your question is. Good to hear from ya. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:16, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

RE: Onis Home Refurbishment

Hi there, I appreciate your reasons for removing the page even if the intention was not for it to promote anything other than certain facts of interest. Since you removed the page however other people have been editing information about the company on the IKEA page where the company also features [[4]] and I would like to write an impartial view on the information I hold. I have started writing the page again http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Noblestrawberry/Onis_living. I believe it to be impartial, just the facts, internal and external third party references etc. Would you consider assisting me in editing it or pointing me in the right direction so it complies with Wikipedia's guidelines?. I should add I have put myself up for adoption so as to better my editing. Many thanks. (Noblestrawberry (talk) 02:23, 30 July 2009 (UTC))

Speedy deletion of Sunshine school

I've removed this speedy deletion request as A7 specifically excludes schools specifically it applies to "An article about ... an organization (e.g. band, club, company, etc., except schools)" [my emphasis]. Full speedy deletion criteria are here. This appears to be a high school and high schools are generally notable. However at the moment there is so little information that a redirect seems more appropriate. Dpmuk (talk) 12:59, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Alliance_Map.PNG)

Thanks for uploading File:Alliance_Map.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 20:19, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

POSSE Reading

Please note that you did not complete the nomination for deletion of POSSE Reading by creating Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/POSSE Reading. I have now done so, but I would strongly recommend that you provide your reason for requesting deletion there. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:41, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you.--Phoon (talk) 07:02, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Your comment

here - I removed a see-also to a link placed by a COI-editor pointing to a topic about himself, which duplicated an existing link on the same topic. Exactly what is your reason for the template on my user page? TEDickey (talk) 08:00, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Hello Tedickey! Welcome to Wikipedia! I apologize for overlooking that, however, next time be sure to clarify the exact reasoning behind your removal of content otherwise it can be seen as vandalism. Which is not tolerated. Thanks! --Phoon (talk) 08:10, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

my comment was "remove redundant see-also", which I thought was enough explanation, particularly with the frequency that I do that particular type of maintenance. TEDickey (talk) 08:13, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Well now you know otherwise! Have a good day! and again, welcome to Wikipedia. --Phoon (talk) 08:14, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Re: Reinstate my ACC account.

Hi, I'm not a tool admin in ACC. I checked the logs and it seems that it was Stwalkerster who suspended you for inactivity. Can you please ping him or one of the tool admins? Cheers, Bejinhan talks 09:30, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

I have reinstated access, per your request. Please take a moment to review the guide which has undergone a number of modifications recently. Regards Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 09:35, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Cabelas in alliance.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Cabelas in alliance.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:26, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Alliance Map.PNG

Thanks for uploading File:Alliance Map.PNG. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:47, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sammoon.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sammoon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 2 December 2017 (UTC)