Wikipedia

Xymmax

Joined 18 April 2007


I first registered this account - my first - April 20, 2007. Since then, I've gotten involved pretty deeply in AfD work. I see it as a chance to triage articles that are flawed, but may yet have potential. If you need access to a Wikipedia article that has been deleted, ask me. If it's not a copyright violation, libel, or personal information, and has not been deleted as a suspected biographies of living persons violation, I will userfy the article for you.

Note that using the text to recreate any deleted article may automatically qualify them for speedy deletion, and copies of previously deleted content that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion because Wikipedia is not a free web host. We have a list of alternative sites which may be used to host your content.

I maintain a sock account AVPW primarily for use on public networks. In the event of a compromised account, I specifically request any administrator to honor a request from AVPW to block this account, and absolve you in advance of any repercussions.

To do list:


    Add'l links


    CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.


    Update this page
    Immediate requests Entries
    Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
    Wikipedians looking for help 0
    Requests for unblock 73
    Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 2
    Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 16
    Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 1
    Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 167
    Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
    Candidates for speedy deletion 19
    Open sockpuppet investigations 314
    Click here to locate other admin backlogs

    AB = Administrative Backlogs

    edit

    Administrative backlog

    edit
    Copy to Wikimedia Commons with hidden file revisions
    Requests for unblock
    SPI cases awaiting administration
    Wikipedia pages tagged for copyright problems
    Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism
    Wikipedia:Closure requests
    Wikipedia:Copyright problems
    Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies
    Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion
    Wikipedia:Requested moves
    Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled
    Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/AutoWikiBrowser
    Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer
    Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Page mover
    Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer
    Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback
    Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations
    MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist
    Wikipedia:Templates for discussion
    Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention/Bot
    Wikipedia:WikiProject History Merge
    Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies/Requests

    WP:AIV

    edit

    AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism

    Administrator intervention against vandalism

    Reports

    edit

    Bot-reported

    edit

    User-reported

    edit


    CSD / PRODs

    edit

    CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions

    Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
    User requested 1
    Empty articles 1
    Nonsense pages 0
    Spam pages 3
    Importance or significance not asserted 1
    Other candidates 14

    The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
    ( source / chronological order / expired )

    Deletion backlog

    {{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat

    BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently
    Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
    Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
    Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
    Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
    Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
    Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
    Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
    Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

    Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently

    Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently

    Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 1 item

    Requested RD1 redactions – 32 items

    Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently

    WP:UAA / WP:RFPP

    edit

    UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection

    Usernames for administrator attention

    Bot-reported

    edit

    User-reported

    edit
    Requests for page protection


    Current requests for increase in protection level

    edit
    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
    Shortcuts

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    2024–25 Saudi Women's Premier League

    edit

    Reason: Non-confirmed users keep adding non-referenced information to the article, most of which turns out to be wrong Lunar Spectrum96 (talk) 20:30, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 04:17, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

    Casablanca derby

    edit

    Reason: there is a problem with this page Casablanca derby . There is an account Ou111. that deletes the table every time. Can you find a solution to block the account or lock the page permanently. Ji Soôo97 (talk) 22:30, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

    Already protected by administrator Star Mississippi . CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 04:23, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
    Already protected by administrator Star Mississippi. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:57, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

    Crystal Pepsi

    edit

    Reason: Constant vandalism all year. Just glance at the history, of about 10 garbage or vandalism IP edits almost each month. When you protect it, I'll restabilize it. Thanks. — Smuckola(talk) 05:03, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There hasn't been an edit to the article in about a month, and the last IP edit seemed like a good faith attempt to change "1000 million" in the prose to 1 billion. Aoidh (talk) 05:34, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

    Deni Avdija

    edit

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Pending trade, not confirmed. SmittenGalaxy | talk! 05:37, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

    1971 East Central State Academicals: Manuwa/Adebajo Cup

    edit

    Reason: Spammer changing page title and reverting to unknown page Msogbueze (talk) 06:04, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

    Declined Page is at Draft:1971 East Central State Academicals season. Work on it there. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:17, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
    Recently, another user has created a new page titled "1971 East Central State Academicals Season". This unnecessary page creation and redirection disrupted the accuracy and integrity of the information presented on the original article, "1971 East Central State Academicals: First Champions of the Manuwa/Adebajo Cup". I kindly appeal for an administrative intervention to remedy this issue. Thank you, Msogbueze (talk) 07:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

    Dodger Stadium

    edit

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – multiple IPs, SPA. gobonobo + c 06:41, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

    Valkyrie Anatomia

    edit

    Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Ae245 (talk) 06:51, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

    • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:51, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

    R22 (New York City Subway car)

    edit

    Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Ae245 (talk) 07:09, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

    R21 (New York City Subway car)

    edit

    Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Ae245 (talk) 07:10, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

    R15 (New York City Subway car)

    edit

    Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Ae245 (talk) 07:10, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

    R17 (New York City Subway car)

    edit

    Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Ae245 (talk) 07:10, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

    R14 (New York City Subway car)

    edit

    Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Ae245 (talk) 07:11, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

    R12 (New York City Subway car)

    edit

    Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Ae245 (talk) 07:11, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

    R6 (New York City Subway car)

    edit

    Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Ae245 (talk) 07:11, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

    R4 (New York City Subway car)

    edit

    Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Ae245 (talk) 07:12, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    edit
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
    Shortcuts

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
    Shortcuts

    Christine Chubbuck

    edit

    Reason: Been protected 6+ years, lower activity, should we give unprotection a shot? Razorback250 (talk) 01:24, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    edit
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
    Shortcut

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
    Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests


    Handled requests

    edit
    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
    Protected edit requests

    1 protected edit request
    v·h
    Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
    Module:Message box/fmbox.css (request) 2024-06-25 04:53 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log) From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
    Updated as needed. Last updated: 05:49, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
    17 template-protected edit requests
    v·h
    Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
    Template:Infobox Chinese (request) 2024-06-07 08:07 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
    Module:Gallery/styles.css (request) 2024-06-10 16:38 Template-protected (log) Protected by Izno on 2021-05-06: "Highly visible template: match parent"
    Module:Road data (request) 2024-06-11 17:04 Template-protected (log) Modified by Lectonar on 2023-05-30: "High-risk template or module"
    Module:Lang/data (request) 2024-06-11 18:55 Template-protected (log) Protected by Trappist the monk on 2017-12-13: "High-risk Lua module"
    Template:Canadian party colour (request) 2024-06-19 02:50 Template-protected (log) Modified by MSGJ on 2018-03-24: "reinstate template protection"
    Template:Infobox officeholder (request) 2024-06-20 06:11 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
    Template:Rail-interchange (request) 2024-06-20 07:17 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
    Module:Ahnentafel (request) 2024-06-24 19:59 Template-protected (log) Protected by Primefac on 2018-04-27: "High-risk Lua module"
    Template:Designation (request) 2024-06-25 03:47 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
    Template:Infobox Christian leader (request) 2024-06-28 12:36 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
    Template:Inflation/year (request) 2024-06-30 03:13 Template-protected (log) From Template:Inflation-year: Protected by Zzuuzz on 2016-10-21: "High risk template 11k+ transclusions"
    Template:Inflation/fn (request) 2024-06-30 03:19 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2020-08-29: "High-risk template"
    Template:Infobox language (request) 2024-06-30 06:30 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2021-08-16: "Highly visible template: transclusion count now over 9,000; most recent editors are still able to edit"
    Template:Translated page (request) 2024-07-01 21:01 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mr. Stradivarius on 2015-05-18: "Highly visible template: allow template editors"
    Module:Political party (request) 2024-07-03 21:29 Template-protected (log) Protected by MusikBot II on 2021-11-18: "High-risk template or module: 13487 transclusions (more info)"
    Template:Air force (request) 2024-07-04 04:21 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
    Template:Infobox software (request) 2024-07-04 04:23 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
    Updated as needed. Last updated: 04:29, 4 July 2024 (UTC)


    WP:RFA

    edit

    RFA= Requests for adminship

    WP:RFP

    edit

    RFP= Requests for permissions

    Requests for autopatrolled

    Autopatrolled

    edit
    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:Xegma

    edit

    Hello there, I have created 30 articles as of now and i am requesting for Autopatrolled right. Xegma(talk) 07:34, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

    User:C1K98V

    edit

    Hello, I have created 100+ articles, primarily focused on television series. And I plan to keep doing the same. Thanks for your consideration C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

    Link to previous request. (I have no opinion at this time.) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:36, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
    Extraordinary Writ, I appreciate it. Thanks for looking into my request. — C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 05:50, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
    Joe Roe, you declined this previously. Do you want to have another look? Schwede66 06:42, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
    I'm sorry I don't have time to look at this properly right now. I'm happy for another admin to process it as they see fit. – Joe (talk) 09:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
    Joe Roe, I appreciate it. Thanks for looking into my request. — C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:47, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

    User:Dclemens1971

    edit

    As a new page reviewer for the past couple months, I've seen the value of keeping high-quality page creations out of the review backlog. Since 2022, I've created 154 articles (one of which was PROD'ed, uncontested, early on, but I learned from it and that's the only one ever proposed for deletion in any venue). I think my track record of page creation is strong and I'd like to receive autopatrolled rights to reduce the NPP backlog for my future article creations. I'm also autopatrolled for redirects if that's helpful context. Dclemens1971 (talk) 04:43, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

    There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.


    Confirmed

    edit
    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    Requests for page mover

    Page mover

    edit
    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


    User:PadFoot2008

    edit

    Hello, I'd like to request page mover rights as I often come across articles that do not follow the Wikipedia:Article titles policy and though usually move those articles myself, they sometimes can't be moved due to technical reasons. I have participated in numerous WP:RMs and opened many significant ones, as well as performed many moves myself over the past. Thank you. PadFoot2008 04:07, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

    I am slightly concerned about the number of recent reverted moves. Primefac (talk) 14:45, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
    Hello @Primefac, concerning those two reverted moves, they were indeed mistakes on my part. In hindsight, I should have done a deeper study of the main article Gahadavala dynasty. I had decided to move some Indian monarch articles to be in par with the standard convention of "(name) of (kingdom)" (such as George II of Great Britain), and when I discovered the two articles (Madanapala (Gahadavala dynasty) and Govindachandra (Gahadavala dynasty)), I proceeded to have a quick look at the main article, where I saw the phrase "Gahadavalas of Kannauj", and after performing a quick search through the usages of "Govindachandra of Kannauj" in RS, I arrived at the conclusion that it would be a good move location. After the move was reverted, I dug deeper and read the main article more carefully and found out that the Gahadavalas do not actually appear to have ruled over the city of Kannauj but rather over Varanasi. I have since been more careful in performing such moves, and five monarch related article moves performed since seem good for now. PadFoot (talk) 11:43, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

    User:SparrowQ

    edit

    Reason for requesting page mover rights that "I am requesting page mover rights to efficiently handle page renaming jobs. This will help simplify the maintenance process and improve the content." SparrowQ (talk) 20:09, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

     Automated comment This user has 1120 total edits. — MusikBot talk 20:10, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
     Not done: you do not meet the minimum requirements and do not appear to have a need for this right. You can move most pages on your own, and if you run into any problems, you can get help at WP:RM/TR. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:59, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

    User:KingSkyLord

    edit

    I have been editing for over 7 years and I plan on using this permission in order to help with discussions on WP:RM and deal with cross-redirects for articles that should have more disambiguated titles. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 12:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

    Requests for mass message sender

    Mass message sender

    edit
    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
    Requests for pending changes reviewer


    Pending changes reviewer

    edit
    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:48JCL

    edit

    I'm a productive user that has warned people in the past for distruptive editing, COI, vandalism and more. I usually try to complete things I start and it is very painful for me to look at Special:PendingChanges having tons of articles. I would definitely try to reduce the backlog. 48JCL 23:45, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

    User:HypeBoy

    edit

    I have been helping in improving Wikipedia for three years now, and I am familiar with the wikipedia policy on vandalism (I routinely fight vandalism by patrolling edit filter log) as well as the main points of NPOV, Verifiability, WP:NOR, and WP:NOT. I'm hoping I can contribute more to Wikipedia by having PCR right. Thank you. — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 00:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

     Not done, I looked through the history of your talk page to see how you interact with other editors and quickly found this edit (pure vandalism, and dismissed with "Get off my talk page."). Plus, lots of other warnings (and a block) for personal attacks; copyvio, edit warring, and more, and you chose to respond insultingly to most of them. Advanced permissions require the ability to distinguish vandalism (and obviously refrain from it yourself) and to engage in good faith with messages from other editors. DanCherek (talk) 17:22, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
    @DanCherek: I respect your decision, but except for my regrettable vandalism, those other edit summaries were from 2022 (the year where I got my only block), and it's mid 2024 now. I have since assumed good faith, stayed away from violating the rules, and made substantial edits. Is this terminal and it's a fool's errand to re-request in the future? — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 07:27, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
    No, not a fool's errand, and I understand that a lot of those warnings were in the past, but edit summaries like this and this – from this past month – aren't ones to be proud of in terms of AGF'ing. Not trying to bring you down, but to set up the rest of this answer and hopefully help a future request: my advice is that when reviewing a permissions request, one of the things I (and probably many other admins) consider is how you would likely respond to a question about your use of the permission. So I suggest first building a track record of interacting with others in a collegial way, on your talk page and elsewhere. If a new editor's good-faith pending change gets reverted by you, for whatever reason, and they ask you about it on your talk page, I would like to have an indication that you would discuss it with them and not just blank the message. I appreciate the recent note on your talk page history, I think it's a good start. DanCherek (talk) 12:22, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
    @DanCherek: I understand. Thank you for taking the time to reassess my editing history. Cheers. — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 01:40, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

    User:Skitash

    edit

    I have a very strong understanding of Wikipedia guidelines, and I revert disruptive editors and report them to WP:AIV on a daily basis. I would greatly appreciate access to this permission so that I can review edits to articles. Skitash (talk) 20:42, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

     Done DanCherek (talk) 17:02, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

    User:KingSkyLord

    edit

    I have been editing in this site for over 7 years and I will be using this permission primarily for dealing with positive requests and vandalism in football articles (e.g. Toni Kroos) KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 18:59, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

     Done. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:14, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

    User:TarnishedPath

    edit

    I've been editing WP for 17 odd years and I'm able to identify what is and what isn't vandalism. Also familiar with Wikipedia's basic content policies and the basic legal policy on copyrights. Requesting the right as I have at least two articles on my watchlist (Australian Greens and Linux) for which there are regularly pending changes. I would use the permission to process requests in those article (plus any others that are on my watchlist that I don't see often) and occasionally peaking to see if there is a backlog. TarnishedPathtalk 11:01, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

     Done Elli (talk | contribs) 20:18, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

    User:2RDD

    edit

    I am requesting Pending Changes Reviewer permissions to support the review and validation of pending changes on Wikipedia. With 1,057 edits and experience in trust articles and music, I am confident in my ability to accurately review and approve pending changes. I understand the importance of maintaining the integrity and accuracy of Wikipedia's content and am committed to upholding the highest standards of quality and neutrality. Thank you for considering my request. 2RDD (talk) 15:39, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

     Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 15:40, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

    User:Martinc021

    edit

    I have been patrolling Special:RecentChanges for a while. I see a lot of pending changes that needs to be reviewed. I request this permission to improve myself and help the community. Martintalk(sign) 01:41, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

     Automated comment This user has 56 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 01:50, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
    Requests for rollback


    Rollback

    edit
    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:RJShashwat

    edit

    Recently, I have reverted several edits on pages within the Wikipedia:WikiProject Jainism and some in the Wikipedia:WikiProject Hinduism. In my view, there are very few active users with rollback rights working on these WikiProjects. I would want to volunteer to be one because of the sheer abuse of pages in these WikiProjects. Several users push their POV on pages in these WikiProjects since they are related to religion. People are adamant on their POV being correct. Mutual rivalry is common on pages in these two projects. I have boldly reverted edits that were clearly vandalism and those that pushed a POV and deleted the other, more-sourced POV on pages like Manatunga, Sivabhuti, Jain temples, Pavagadh, Hathigumpha inscription and some other smaller pages as well. I believe rollback rights would just make this job easier for me because on some pages, I have had to manually remove the content that vandalized the page. Rollback rights would just help me do it faster. RJShashwat (talk) 02:20, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

     Not done You don't need rollback to undo inappropriate edits. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 00:39, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

    User:2RDD

    edit

    I hereby tender my application for the distinguished role of Rollbacker, having accomplished a notable volume of contributions exceeding 500 edits and consistently demonstrated a steadfast commitment to maintaining the highest standards of content quality through the diligent reversion of vandalized pages. I am confident that my expertise and unwavering dedication render me an exemplary candidate for this position, and I eagerly anticipate the opportunity to further serve the community in this capacity. 2RDD (talk) 10:50, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

    In your own words, would you please explain what vandalism is? Using that explanation, please evaluate whether the following edits are vandalism, and provide an explanation as to why or why not:
    — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 15:49, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

    User:Esowteric

    edit

    Hi, I've been at en wiki since May 2006 with 30,000 edits, around 59 pages created, and around 500 articles on my watchlist. I have used undo until now and most often leave notices on user talk pages, but I could do with rollback where there have been multiple edits by the same user, so that I can more easily and quickly provide an edit summary. Thanks. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 18:31, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

     Done DanCherek (talk) 18:39, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
    Thank you so much. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 18:42, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

    User:Ben Azura

    edit

    I requested Rollback several months ago and my request was was turned down because I didn't have enough anti-vandalism in my recent editing history. I haven't been very consistently active for personal and family reasons so I don't remember the exact course of events after that. After I was turned down I tried filtering the recent changes feed based on suggestions I saw here. This is the latest example of why that hasn't been working for me:

    [2]

    The vandalism was done in multiple edits and part of it survived my revert [3].

    I had figured out a way to warn users after my previous request was turned down but after a few months away I don't remember how I was doing it. I wasn't able to find a way to easily warn the user whose username is not clickable the way it usually is when edits are reverted.

    I am not planning to use rollback for anything other than reverting vandalism. Is this process really necessary to get the Rollback privilege? Ben Azura (talk) 13:22, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

    User:GoldRomean

    edit

    I believe that I meet the requirements for the rollback user right; I've read WP:RBK and WP:REVERT, have enough edits, try my best to consistently warn users, and I've been reviewing recent changes fairly consistently since around May. I think I have a good grasp of Wikipedia's main policies. I'm also currently enrolled in the CVU Academy. I use Twinkle and Ultraviolet but I would love to be able have full access to Huggle and have another tool to be able to stop vandals so I am requesting rollback rights. Thanks :D. GoldRomean (talk) 19:15, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

    Footer

    edit

    Policies and links

      Today's afd

      Citation_templates

      Edit counter and analysis

      This user is a member of the

      Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgments About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionists

      AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD
      AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD

      Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet

      It is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia.

      This motto reflects the desire of these Wikipedians to be reluctant, but not entirely unwilling, to remove articles from Wikipedia.

      Unified login: Xymmax is the unique login of this user for all public Wikimedia projects.
      Committed identity: 5e0a9af339f30221a08fa86264cf1a81e3637ef17bd7ba87260c63b0fea3cdb0b55f545f061dd97184aa4061626c8c41b7237f4b18ccfdd096bff83e92ce9fc5 is a SHA-512 commitment to this user's real-life identity.

      I copied this source code from someone's user page I liked. I did not save the name. Thank you, whomever you are.

      Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Xymmax&oldid=1203238975"