Dazperkz

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Guru Josh, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Guru Josh was changed by Dazperkz (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.928078 on 2011-07-26T00:44:02+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:44, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to The Guru Josh Project. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. | Uncle Milty | talk | 11:50, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

You're being discussed at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard

Just an FYI, you're being listed as one of the disputants at Dispute resolution noticeboard. The thread is Guru Josh. Have a nice day. Hasteur (talk) 14:16, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

As for the Guru Josh Project still gigging worldwide, this is 100% fact, Darren Bailie of Guru Josh Project played in Brazil on the 30th July 2010 and the week previous in Austria. He also has many gigs booked for the future as does Anders Nyman. http://www.balloonrecords.com/ please select pictures on this site then scroll down to the 22/23 July 2011 to confirm that the Guru Josh project are still gigging and will continue to gig as they are also on the sites roster for future bookings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.100.112.107 (talk) 20:57, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Ok, we get you are sorry about this, however you don't need to spread this around multiple different pages. Hasteur (talk) 21:28, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Ok ok... i'm now getting the hang of it, well i think. --Dazperkz (talk) 21:48, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Bold, Revert, Discuss

As you appear to be new here please be aware that there is a policy called "Bold, Revert, Discuss". The purpose of this is to prevent edit warring and to help explain why things are the way they are. Do not re-institute the assertion that Guru Josh Project is touring on the page without first discussing it on the article's talk page. Hasteur (talk) 20:39, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:42, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Guru Project

The article Guru Project has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence that it meets the notability criteria for bands

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:53, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Guru Project for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Guru Project is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guru Project until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:37, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Darren Bailie

Darren Bailie (23 July 1974), commonly known as Guru Josh Project, was a Northern Irish Dj and Music producer, active in the electro house scene, best known for his debut single Guru Josh Project - Infinity 2008, originally released in 1989 by Guru Josh, Infinity Records. The song was re-released in 2008 by Darren Bailie who then created the Guru Josh Project. In 2009 Darren Bailie followed up his success with his hit Protect Your Mind (Braveheart Theme)

References

Speedy deletion nomination of Darren Bailie

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Darren Bailie, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
• It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://darrenbailie.com/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

  If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 00:45, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Why have did you nominate this page for speedy deletion? if there we some mistakes etc surly its makes sense to just edit the page?

August 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 05:03, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Why did you delete this page? everything in the article was fact and correct, if there were any mistakes surly it makes sense to just edit the page not delete it????

We cannot "correct" copyright violations. The page was a direct copy of [1], which is clearly marked as "all rights reserved". Additionally, the material was heavily promotional. One might of course expect that in material on the individual's own website, but we don't allow articles to promote anyone or anything, instead requiring strict neutrality. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 15:45, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Ok, hopefully the new version is ok so far, can you advise how to re-use the picture i uploaded, where do i find the text to use?

Draft:Darren Bailie

I have moved your article here because it does not currently meet the criteria for inclusion. Deb (talk) 19:57, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

I am still working on it now and its gone already????

It's not "gone" - it's in draft space, which is where you should work on articles that are not finished. Deb (talk) 08:25, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Darren Bailie

Hello, Dazperkz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Darren Bailie".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:33, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Darren Bailie (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Boothsift was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Darren Bailie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Darren Bailie, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The One and Only Boothsift 00:02, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Dazperkz! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! The One and Only Boothsift 00:02, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 10:48, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello Dazperkz. Please note that redirects from mainspace to draft space should be avoided, as well as links from mainspace to draft space in articles. Please wait until the draft submission is accepted. Thank you and happy editing, —PaleoNeonate – 08:05, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Dazperkz. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. —PaleoNeonate – 08:11, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Dazperkz! You created a thread called Darren Bailie at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Darren Bailie concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Darren Bailie, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Darren Bailie

Hello, Dazperkz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Darren Bailie".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 20:01, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Dazperkz,

If you want to continue to work on your draft article, just go to WP:REFUND and request that it be restored. It was only deleted years ago because no one was working on it. After six months of inactivity, it is considered abandoned.

If you have questions, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:52, 5 August 2022 (UTC)