May 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Toxic workplace— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 14:26, 27 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Deniz. To clarify on the message left above: while we appreciate your translation, it should go on the Turkish Wikipedia, located at https://tr.wikipedia.org. Your contribution should be welcome there. James Hare (NIOSH) (talk) 12:30, 31 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Huseynağa Rzayev

edit
 

The article Huseynağa Rzayev has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:58, 1 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Huseynağa Rzayev for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Huseynağa Rzayev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Huseynağa Rzayev until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vanjagenije (talk) 13:03, 6 February 2017 (UTC)Reply