DerrickH71
Welcome!
edit
|
November 2017
editWelcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Donald Watkins has been reverted.
Your edit here to Donald Watkins was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWl-gRULLJY) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:49, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:DerrickH71/Masada.com
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on User:DerrickH71/Masada.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.masada.com/about-us.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. (t) Josve05a (c) 21:29, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Nabirm Global, LLC
edit If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Nabirm Global, LLC, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
- It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://www.nabirm.com/profile/overview/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 22:18, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
January 2018
edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a place for blogging or promotion. So please do not try to use Wikipedia to promote yourself or your family, band, product, or company. The subjects of our articles have to meet certain notability requirements and be written from a neutral point of view. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time, even if it's on your user page. We're sorry if this message has discouraged you from editing here, but the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SamHolt6 (talk • contribs)
COI
editYou have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:DerrickH71. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=DerrickH71|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.
Also read the following regarding writing an article
- you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
- you must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
- there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
- you must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. Nor is attcahing a copy of an unverifiable letter.
Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above
Nomination of Donald Watkins for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Donald Watkins is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Watkins until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. ← 17:57, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Reply
editHi, thanks for message. Please add your messages to the bottom of the talk page, or they may be overlooked; I've moved the message for you. Further to my comments above;
- I commented at the AfD page]. I won't repeat that here, except to say that that you seem less than transparent about any links with Watkins, even if you are not being paid, which I am prepared to accept
- If you post an article it will be assessed as it stands. If you don't want that to happen, you should write it as a draft.
- Please read Wikipedia:Assume good faith, Wikipedia:Civility and WP:No personal attacks. To defend your article through insulting others isn't going to help your credibility, and such attacks shame you rather than those you seek to insult.
- If you really thing I am deleting your articles because I'm a racist, I am required to inform you that the correct venue for you to pursue that is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:43, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Reply
editThank you for your input, Jimfbleak. My response was in no way meant to imply that you were involved in the deletion of Mr. Watkins's page. It was also not meant to imply that you are a racist. My responses are in no way meant to criticize you personally. I understand that editing is a very complex process that I am only beginning to understand. I admire those editors such as yourself who are highly-skilled and knowledgeable about this whole process. Thanks.````
- Thank for the apology. I'm prepared to accept that you didn't intend to imply that I was a racist, but you do need to be careful about suggesting that an article was deleted because of the race/religion/gender of its subject, that's bound to raise hackles. The article about Watkins was nothing like as bad as those about his companies, and I'm content to let the AfD run its course and leave it to the community to decide whether it should stay.
- I'm not sure what you meant here: My response was in no way meant to imply that you were involved in the deletion of Mr. Watkins's page. The one incontrovertible fact is that I did delete it, and no other editors were involved until the AfD on your rewrite. What you are querying is whether I should have deleted it, not the fact of my having done so
- A few unrelated points.
- Add links to other articles. I've added a few, but it needs more
- Try to avoid posting essentially the same message in different places, it makes it more difficult to follow the thread
- Note that I won't necessarily see messages like the above unless you post them on my talk page. You can alternatively leave a message on this page, and I will know you have done so if you start it with my user name, User:Jimfbleak and sign it with four tildes ~~~~ when you post it. That will send me an alert.
- Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:06, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- On your own talk page, you can do what you like, but you should not remove text you have posted from an active thread anywhere else once you have had a response. If you want the text to be ignored, just strike through. On my talk page, I've reverted and struck through for now, I'll remove the thread once it seems to be finished. At the AfD, NatGertler attempted to do the same but made an error, so I completed the process. I've also struck through my comments except for the rationale for my "delete" !vote. I've also restored the deleted version following a request from another editor so that the full history is available Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:48, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- JimfbleakThank you for your input. I am just going to back out of this whole process of trying to edit the Watkins page or any other page, for that matter. I will leave the job to the pros who understand all of the protocol and policies. My suggestion (for what it is worth) is that this man's biography be included in Wikipedia as there is much history and a number of legal cases that all can be verified. Thank you again for taking the time to offer advice and guidance. DerrickH71 (talk) 16:37, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- I'm sure that he is notable, and that the AfD will probably keep the article, it's basically a matter of making it conform more to our policies Jimfbleak - talk to me? 19:30, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
April 2018
editPlease don't remove well-sourced content, especially not from a controversial article such as Stephen Miller (political advisor), which falls under several discretionary sanctions regimes, see below. And even more especially, please don't change things in that article (particularly the lead section, which has been discussed ad infinitum) without first looking at the talkpage, where there is an ongoing RfC about calling Stephen Miller "far-right" in the lead sentence. The RfC currently stands at 13 people in favor of using "far-right" and 7 against. Please feel free to weigh in at the RfC, if you wish. And while you're checking out the talkpage, please also notice the page restrictions listed at its top. Bishonen | talk 20:15, 31 March 2018 (UTC).
Notice of two kinds of discretionary sanctions
edit
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. Bishonen | talk 20:15, 31 March 2018 (UTC). Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. Bishonen | talk 20:15, 31 March 2018 (UTC).