User talk:Diannaa/Archive 8
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Diannaa. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | → | Archive 15 |
Hi. Is this what completed copy-editing is suppossed to look like? Queenmomcat appears to think so and has cited this as a completed copy-edit in their stats. I came across it looking for examples of copy-editing as a few editors appear to have very loose standards in applying it. Mabuska (talk) 23:23, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- some of our copy editors are obviously going to be more skilled than others. I will go over a few of QueenMomCat's efforts and give them some feedback. --Diannaa (Talk) 23:27, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- My real concern is that this user is in the top five for the Gold Star Award for number of articles, words, and 5+ articles. It'd make me feel cheated to try and do the best i can when some don't appear to try as hard but get the top rewards. Would it be wrong to reinsert a copy-edit tag into an article tagged as complete? Would is also be wrong to copy-edit an article someone has marked as complete and mark it as completed by yourself? Mabuska (talk) 12:22, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- I will ask SMasters for his input on these questions. I have started reviewing the copy edit of Liancourt Rocks dispute and found the work to be adequate but not perfect. Here is a diff of additional things I found to do. I have to go to work now and will check back later to see if SMasters has had time to look at this issue --Diannaa (Talk) 13:46, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- Here is another diff of further edits I did on the Liancourt Rocks article. There is not enough wrong with QueenMomCat's work on the article to warrant me continuing. I will select another to check. --Diannaa (Talk) 19:18, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- I have now checked Sahajananda and Save Indian Family and while they are not perfect they are adequate IMO. Sabiniano Manrique de Lara is not a good example as it is an incredibly poor article. Let's see what SMasters has to add. --Diannaa (Talk) 20:56, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- I must of just clicked on a bad random one lol, as they do have a lot of good work done in many articles. Though what about SMK Batu Maung, or more specifically the list at the end of it? And the inconsistent list styles used for Mandanr? These are minor cases in any event, though still causes me concern when final totals are calculated for completed articles. Mabuska (talk) 23:23, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, it is a stinker, abandon-all-hope-ye-who-enter-here kind of article that I would not even have attempted. I will check out these other two and get back to you in a few mins. --Diannaa (Talk) 23:27, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- These two were both poorly done. At the bottom of the drive page are the consequences: the editor is assessed a penalty of 1200 words plus the word count of the article. There is no mention of them losing the article count so I will leave that be for now, unless SMasters says to remove it. --Diannaa (Talk) 00:06, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay in replying. Firstly, thank you Mabuska for raising this. Obviously, the Guild is very concerned about the quality of our work as it affects our reputation as a reliable WikiProject. This is the main reason why we have a panel of reviewers for our drives. I have checked the articles mentioned here, and I agree with Diannaa. I would be extremely worried if any editors zips through the copy editing and removes the copy edit tag without much concern for quality. However, I can see that the editor concerned did do substantial work on each article, and greatly improved the articles that they worked on in terms of the scope of work related to copy editing. As such, we have to assume good faith in this instance. Copy editing is a craft that requires an extremely sharp eye for detail. Almost all of the Guild's members are not professional copy editors, and they may miss bits and pieces that a professional would spot easily. This does not necessarily make them bad copy editors, they are just not professionals and this may show in their work. Sometimes, even professionals like myself make mistakes (Diannaa can tell you this). If we sit through long editing sessions, we get tired and the quality of our work may suffer as a result. To answer your other question, as stated on the main drives page, we do not encourage anyone to create new work during a drive, i.e. put a copy edit tag on an article and then work on it. So, we prefer if editors do not copy edit the same piece as another editor. There are over 4,000 articles that need work. Time is better spent working on these. If you feel strongly about an article needing further copy editing, you can always work on these after a drive, or if it is particularly bad, you can place a new tag on the article after the drive. Working after another editor will also make it harder for us to check for quality. We will continue to monitor quality across all editors participating in the drive, to ensure fairness and also to make sure that the quality of work is kept at a high level. – SMasters (talk) 01:05, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- No problemos, i can understand and accept all of that. Thanks for the response. As a side-question, when you use the script to count the amount of words in an article, i notice that it doesn't count words that are indented or in a list. I've see some articles where hundreds of words in paragraph form are indented or in a list and the script doesn't highlight or count them thus giving what i'd term a false word count that mightn't relfect the work that went into the article. Mabuska (talk) 12:17, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay in replying. Firstly, thank you Mabuska for raising this. Obviously, the Guild is very concerned about the quality of our work as it affects our reputation as a reliable WikiProject. This is the main reason why we have a panel of reviewers for our drives. I have checked the articles mentioned here, and I agree with Diannaa. I would be extremely worried if any editors zips through the copy editing and removes the copy edit tag without much concern for quality. However, I can see that the editor concerned did do substantial work on each article, and greatly improved the articles that they worked on in terms of the scope of work related to copy editing. As such, we have to assume good faith in this instance. Copy editing is a craft that requires an extremely sharp eye for detail. Almost all of the Guild's members are not professional copy editors, and they may miss bits and pieces that a professional would spot easily. This does not necessarily make them bad copy editors, they are just not professionals and this may show in their work. Sometimes, even professionals like myself make mistakes (Diannaa can tell you this). If we sit through long editing sessions, we get tired and the quality of our work may suffer as a result. To answer your other question, as stated on the main drives page, we do not encourage anyone to create new work during a drive, i.e. put a copy edit tag on an article and then work on it. So, we prefer if editors do not copy edit the same piece as another editor. There are over 4,000 articles that need work. Time is better spent working on these. If you feel strongly about an article needing further copy editing, you can always work on these after a drive, or if it is particularly bad, you can place a new tag on the article after the drive. Working after another editor will also make it harder for us to check for quality. We will continue to monitor quality across all editors participating in the drive, to ensure fairness and also to make sure that the quality of work is kept at a high level. – SMasters (talk) 01:05, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- These two were both poorly done. At the bottom of the drive page are the consequences: the editor is assessed a penalty of 1200 words plus the word count of the article. There is no mention of them losing the article count so I will leave that be for now, unless SMasters says to remove it. --Diannaa (Talk) 00:06, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, it is a stinker, abandon-all-hope-ye-who-enter-here kind of article that I would not even have attempted. I will check out these other two and get back to you in a few mins. --Diannaa (Talk) 23:27, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- I must of just clicked on a bad random one lol, as they do have a lot of good work done in many articles. Though what about SMK Batu Maung, or more specifically the list at the end of it? And the inconsistent list styles used for Mandanr? These are minor cases in any event, though still causes me concern when final totals are calculated for completed articles. Mabuska (talk) 23:23, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- I have now checked Sahajananda and Save Indian Family and while they are not perfect they are adequate IMO. Sabiniano Manrique de Lara is not a good example as it is an incredibly poor article. Let's see what SMasters has to add. --Diannaa (Talk) 20:56, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- Here is another diff of further edits I did on the Liancourt Rocks article. There is not enough wrong with QueenMomCat's work on the article to warrant me continuing. I will select another to check. --Diannaa (Talk) 19:18, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- I will ask SMasters for his input on these questions. I have started reviewing the copy edit of Liancourt Rocks dispute and found the work to be adequate but not perfect. Here is a diff of additional things I found to do. I have to go to work now and will check back later to see if SMasters has had time to look at this issue --Diannaa (Talk) 13:46, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- My real concern is that this user is in the top five for the Gold Star Award for number of articles, words, and 5+ articles. It'd make me feel cheated to try and do the best i can when some don't appear to try as hard but get the top rewards. Would it be wrong to reinsert a copy-edit tag into an article tagged as complete? Would is also be wrong to copy-edit an article someone has marked as complete and mark it as completed by yourself? Mabuska (talk) 12:22, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
This is answered in our FAQ: "Just copy and paste the words (minus the Table of Contents, and any references or notes sections) into any word processor that can do a word count, and take the number from there." Hope this clarifies. – SMasters (talk) 14:54, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- It does indeed! Thanks! Mabuska (talk) 21:32, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Pinto
I'm going drop this here so that you see it while Huggling. Could you explain why you reverted the additions to the Pinto article? I'm not, myself, convinced that they belong, but you didn't give any explanation in your edit summary. Is that source not reliable? The info UNDUE? The reason I ask is that depending on your concern, it may be that the solution is rephrasing and/or trimming rather than removal. Just checking... Qwyrxian (talk) 04:02, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- I think it needs review and discussing before we include any of it in the article. But it will be hard to discuss with the posting editor as he just got blocked for edit warring on another article. I will put something on the talk page and try to get a discussion going. --Diannaa (Talk) 04:04, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'll follow up there. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:18, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Copy-edit
Hi Diannaa! Whenever you are free, can you do a copy-edit of "Exhale (Shoop Shoop)"? It's a GAN, and I can really spot some poor sentences (although I edited the article). Novice7 (talk) 04:08, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- ok. I will look at it tomorrow. --Diannaa (Talk) 04:22, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! Novice7 (talk) 04:25, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
|
The Special Barnstar | |
| For helping me out by copy-editing, whenever an article is in need of one. Thank you Diannaa. Novice7 (talk) 04:14, 18 March 2011 (UTC) |
Thank you. --Diannaa (Talk) 04:16, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Please note that I declined speedy deletion of this user page, because WP:CSD#A7 does not apply to user pages. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:44, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks. I did not notice. Time for bed. --Diannaa (Talk) 04:45, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Gary Sherman
Hello. I see you moved Gary Sherman to Gary Sherman (director) and re-established the former as a disambiguation page. Please note that, while this move was most likely the right action, it has left a number of articles linking to a disambiguation page (not ordinarily the correct state of affairs); these links do not fix themselves.
Tomorrow, I plan to fix the remaining incorrect links. It would be pleasant to know that you had also made a stab at this. --79.68.237.87 (talk) 19:29, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- You are a star! --79.68.237.87 (talk) 20:46, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 21:32, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Automated help
Hi Diana! Looks like you could use some semi-automated help from time to time:
Cheers, --Ohconfucius ¡digame! 09:53, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you! I have installed these and will try them out right away. --Diannaa (Talk) 15:04, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- The script for British variants has not been added to the toolbox. There is a URL decoder I installed that doesn't work either and I don't know why not. --Diannaa (Talk) 15:20, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- The Engvar script doesn't appear in the toolbar with the other script buttons. It lives, slightly awkwardly, in the 'scripts' drop-down in the lower section of the side bar. I will check out the url decoder. I should also mention that I have also written User:Ohconfucius/Sources.js. Unfortunately, it doesn't yet have any documentation. It works on fixing some common formatting problems within refs sections, specifically citation templates. --Ohconfucius ¡digame! 02:18, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, I found the British one. The Scripts drop-down was a peculiar shade of grey so I assumed there was nothing there. Thanks! --Diannaa (Talk) 02:22, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- The script for British variants has not been added to the toolbox. There is a URL decoder I installed that doesn't work either and I don't know why not. --Diannaa (Talk) 15:20, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Please help
| Extended content |
|---|
|
Hello, I'm a Belgian citizen and I found you in the "Artist" discussion page, I would like to ask you some help concerning a wikipedia article about the artist ben heine: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ben_Heine. Please let me know how I can do to improve this article or to have someone do it as I really find it difficult to edit stuff properly on Wikipedia, I can't do it myself unfortunately... (and each time I tried to improve it in a neutral way, someone removed what I added) --Caring-writer (talk) 22:30, 18 March 2011 (UTC) I've been following Ben Heine's work for many years, may I mention that the current article is a text that appeared on Wikipedia in 2006 and that reflects what he did in that time only. He has totally changed and evolved. He has made many more things since then. He is a globally appreciated artist and he needs a better bio. There aren't so many criticisms about him. The article isn't fair, it REALLY NEEDS MANY UPDATES and contains strong mistakes defamation against the artist. Many well known national newspapers and magazines have talked about him and his work recently (see a non exhaustive list here below), none of them is even mentioned in the current article. He has stopped making political art since more than 2 years. Please just consider these publications, most of them are a few days/weeks old only... Daily Mail, The Telegraph, El Pais, Repubblica, De Standaard... These AREN'T blogs!!! These are national papers read by millions of people. Please have a look to the following list of errors in the current article (which I detailed here below, and which I'll mention to several other admins/contributors if needed and if not taken into account).
1) Ben isn't a political artist anymore, it's true he used to make political art accusing Israel of "crimes against humanity", but he stopped making such illustrations in 2009 and wrote an "[[open letter to the Jewish Community]]" in December 2010 apologizing about his past behavior (saying it was the influences of his studies in Journalism. Parts of his final assignment talked about the "limits of freedom of expression in cartoons"). In this letter, he also firmly condemned the infamous Iranian Holocaust cartoon contest and said he was feeling deeply guilty about it. Here is the letter translated in English (Google translator). Ben doesn't deny the Holocaust, he visited Auschwitz Birkenau and feels sincerely sorry about the past suffering of the Jewish community. 2) Ben doesn't contribute to these websites anymore: DonQuichotte, MWC News, Rebelion, Tlaxcala, Irancartoon, Syriacartoon, Arabcartoon, Persiancartoon, Karikaturevi, Azercartoon, Dessin d'humour, National Caricaturist Network (Ben has explicitly asked these sites to remove all his illustrations from their platforms) 3) Ben doesn't collaborate with "La Libre Belgique" Anymore. Only 4 or 5 of his old cartoons have been published in this newspaper (in 2006 and 2007). 4) Pencil Vs Camera is not just a "little detail" in his biography, it is a creative and original series that has generated some huge reactions on the web and in the written press (see a non exhaustive list below). It is such an innovation that several TV channels around the world have also talked about it: Globo - Brazil, TV Brussel - Belgium, and many others). Same for "Digital Circlism"... 5) "Pere Ubu" (one of the main newspapers that clearly accused Heine in Belgium has removed the accusation from their site 6) Most of the links in the "notes" section (expecially the url's linking to images on Ben's blog) do not work... 7) Ben removed from his sites (blog, flickr, Deviantart and official site) all his cartoons accusing Israel or any Israeli person (Avigdor Lieberman...). 8) He didn't participate "recently" to the Kruger Workshop. This event happened in 2006!
List of recent notable publications with Ben Heine works and biography: WEB: - DAILY MAIL (UK - February 2011) - EL PAIS (Spain - February 2011) - THE TELEGRAPH (UK - February 2011) - NEWSLITE (UK : February 2011) - BBC Brazil (Brazil - February 2011) - LA REPUBBLICA (Italy - February 2011) - TV BRUSSEL (Belgium - January 2011) - CNN Turk (Turkey - February 2011) - POP PHOTOGRAPHY: (USA - January 2011) - SHORT NEWS (Germany - February 2011) - ESTADAO (Brazil - January 2011) - HET NIEUWSBLAD (Belgium - February 2011) - DE STANDAARD (Belgium - February 2011) - OBVIOUS MAG (Spain - January 2011) - WEBOVINY (Slovakia - January 2011) - ARTE SPAIN (Spain - January 2011) - Accessible Art Fair (Belgium - 2010) - TrendsNow (France- February 2011) - CHINA DAILY (China - 2010) - DUSHI (China - january 2011) - ABDUZEEDO (Brazil - 2010) - Other publications in 2010 PRINT: - Pop Photography (USA - January 2011) - Het Nieuwsblad - 1 (Belgium - 2011) - Het Nieuwsblad - 2 (Belgium - 2010) - Ca m'intéresse (France - 2010) - Daily Mirror (Great Britain - 2010) - Bookedi (South Korea - 2010) - Digital Artist 1 - 2 - 3 (China - 2010) - Belgian Embassy in London (February 2011) - Photoeidolo (Greece - 2011) - Šeimininkė (Lithuania - 2010) - View Mag (Germany - 2010) - Shambala Sun (Canada - 2010) - Imagine Demain le Monde (Belgium - 2009) - La Libre Belgique 1 2 (Belgium - 2009) - Moonwalk Through Art (The Netherlands - 2009) - Rolling Stone (USA - 2008) - 3e Millénaire (France - 2011) My suggestions for a new neutral article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ben_Heine#Article_about_Ben_Heine_needs_many_updates_and_corrections_.28please_read.29 (it would be good to add some of the above references, feel free to add more)
|
My brain hurts
Hi
I have a problem. I am a little disheartened as I keep getting reverted on articles I have copyedited.
Can you take a quick look at this one for me please, I will understand if you are too busy (but I also think I need a U.S. viewpoint and I believe you are Canadian?)
Basically I think it might be a UK v. US grammar problem, but am so unsure it is beginning to get to me a little - the edit summary of the first edit after my finishing did not help either though and may have upset me more than it should have done [1]. I approached it as a very sensitive article (an A class to FAC) and tried my best to apply everything from my education in the English language, everything I have learnt from editing here and from your little reviews and our discussions - yet still I am getting massive amounts of reverting [2].
This last one is really a setback, I feel as if I wasted a lot of time on a really difficult to follow and read article. Where am I going wrong? A lot of the sentences were really short and had commas in the middle - they seemed to be extremely superfluous, ", and" used in lots of places as well as "On (date), this happened", well you can see on the talk page what I said as my parting comments [[Talk:U.S. Route 131].
If you are too busy perhaps you can pass this on the Steve or another editor you know is from the U.S. - I would like to reply to one statement made and to point them to our discussion on the date comma in particular. It seems as if I am shooting myself in the foot by trying to make editors understand that if something is being done incorrectly by almost everybody it doesn't make it right :¬(
Thanks Chaosdruid (talk) 02:45, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- If they have never been to FA before they may not realise how strict the requirements are. I will have a look and see what's going on. --Diannaa (Talk) 02:48, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- In Canada we don't have any lettered highways. We would say "Highway 2" or "Secondary Highway 623" but we would say "the Trans-Canada Highway" or "the QEW". We might say "south of town" or "south of the town". Both are used, but I think the second one is a little more formal and could be totally appropriate at the FA level. I wrote him a note about the commas. I have to be honest this chap seems a little ungrateful and brusque. I had a bad experience recently too, on Taiwan High Speed Rail. The author admitted that English was not his first language yet he was not especially amenable to advice. And then he tried to tell Jack how to code tables. I just left, and so did Jack. --Diannaa (Talk) 03:17, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Oh actually we do have some lettered highways but the letter goes after the name. When they improved the highway between Calgary and Edmonton, the old highway became Highway 2A. Same thing with Highway 1 and 1A between Calgary and Banff. --Diannaa (Talk) 03:51, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking a look, I feel better, but worse as well lol - I feel awful that you had a bad time :¬(
- Well, at least it wasn't my imagination then, the last one was the Lympne airport, he was ok in the end though. He had reverted long sentences back to 7 & 8 word short ones - even though the FA reviewer had already specifically told him that short sentences were a no-no.
- I made myself feel a little better by copyediting this little gem.
- I did wonder about the out of town, in the UK it means "somewhere outside of the town" and I assumed it mean "leaving the town" due to the context it was being used in (although there were so many of them I tried to vary it a little).
- A friend of mine wanted me to go over with her some years ago, she is Dene (Chipewyan and Dogrib - her words not mine) - from Yellowknife, I always preferred that side of the border, and now my brother is a naturalised U.S. citizen so I only get to visit his side lol.
- Anyway, thanks once again and sorry if it gave you a bad experience. At least now I understand American grammar a little more. Chaosdruid (talk) 04:34, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Oh actually we do have some lettered highways but the letter goes after the name. When they improved the highway between Calgary and Edmonton, the old highway became Highway 2A. Same thing with Highway 1 and 1A between Calgary and Banff. --Diannaa (Talk) 03:51, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- In Canada we don't have any lettered highways. We would say "Highway 2" or "Secondary Highway 623" but we would say "the Trans-Canada Highway" or "the QEW". We might say "south of town" or "south of the town". Both are used, but I think the second one is a little more formal and could be totally appropriate at the FA level. I wrote him a note about the commas. I have to be honest this chap seems a little ungrateful and brusque. I had a bad experience recently too, on Taiwan High Speed Rail. The author admitted that English was not his first language yet he was not especially amenable to advice. And then he tried to tell Jack how to code tables. I just left, and so did Jack. --Diannaa (Talk) 03:17, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
Chesapeake
Hi
Remember USS Chesapeake (1799)? it isn't even in your drop down. You definitely should be counting it, all the work you did on it was in March for sure; and it was a request - plus you checked it and gave me that editing feedback. I made a couple of small edits on Feb 27 but put it on hold while I was discussing the dates commas (again lol) and place formats, then had to spend a couple of days back at work and on the Wiki Guides project pages and an ANI/3RR problem leading me up to the evening of the 2nd March and began the proper edits on March 3, after which you checked it over, corrected a lot and gave me the feedback. Chaosdruid (talk) 06:36, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Just read the train thing (from a link in your drop down which is when I spotted the ↑ topic), nice, editors just love us or (something else which I will not put as it might be too rude) lmao :¬) Chaosdruid (talk) 06:46, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- How about Scout method? I spent half a day on the first half and went back the next morning to find all my work had been undone. I was told to discuss on the talk page before doing such a major edit. Discuss with who? there hadn't been a talk page edit since 2007. It's true, this drive I have not taken credit for all my articles, but I have lots of rollover words and I am not in it for the stinkin' badges. I am sorry you had a couple of bad experiences but its best I suppose to practice some Buddhist non-attachment and walk away from certain editors. --Diannaa (Talk) 15:12, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
U.S. state reptiles (thanks)
Thank you so much for the serious go-over and I hope we can work together in the future. I'm glad I twisted your arm...;)
TCO (talk) 23:52, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
Thank you very much. --Diannaa (Talk) 00:20, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Dianaa. Just a note to let you know I closed this after you speedied the article -- just for housekeeping's sake and to dissuade the sock army: I realize non-admin closure involving SDs is usually not kosher. Cheers. -- Rrburke (talk) 17:10, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- No prob, the thing was actually discussed and closed about a week ago so this is just routine maintenance. Regards, --Diannaa (Talk) 17:11, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
FYI
Hi Diannaa. I am not sure if this area interests you but I have seen recently increased activity of POV, blankings, reverts etc in the article of Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam. One of the accounts involved also edited the article of Sri Lanka Armed Forces and I reverted. As these articles are not within my field of interest, I would like to know if you can keep an eye for future developments and maybe assist in this area. I thought about taking these to RFPP but I don't think there is enough activity yet. Thank you . Dr.K. λogosπraxis 17:58, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, thank you. I will watch-list them for now and will clean them both up when I have time. Thanks for notifying. --Diannaa (Talk) 18:01, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- It was the least I could do. I am also really thankful to you for so readily assisting in this thankless task. :) Take care and thanks again. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 18:06, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
That's funny. I was just thinking about creating that page. Can you please restore that page history as my userspace draft? Marcus Qwertyus 18:35, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, though there's not much there yet. User:Marcus Qwertyus/Fiverr --Diannaa (Talk) 18:45, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
YGM
You've got mail. Many thanks and sorry for the trouble. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 21:31, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
Very indebted. Take care. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 21:43, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
65.8.221.157
Hi Diannaa, I see you just put a ban on User:65.8.221.157. I checked out some of the edits that were reverted by User:Fjp1995 and they don't appear to be vandalism. For example, this one[3] adds to confirmed award nominations that I checked out. and this one [4] adds writers who's names I googled and did indeed contribute to the show. I am not sure what is going on here - I have seem a busy pattern of reversion the past few days on various Phineas and Ferb related articles, with a number of contentious edits. I am not sure that in this case the right editor has been suspended. Will leave it to you to check it out and give your opinion. Cheers! SeaphotoTalk 21:41, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- Are you kidding me? I saw they added the movie won an academy award and I thought it was a certain Disney-esque vandal. I will check further as you suggest, and get back to you asap. --Diannaa (Talk) 21:45, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- I followed the link, and it was an Annie award, which evidently it did win. I will admit to being completely lost in the world of animated entertainment however LOL. What got me drawn into this was seeing a weird pattern while monitor the feed using Huggle. SeaphotoTalk 21:56, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- The table the IP added to Kung Fu Panda shows it was nominated for best animated picture, which is true. I have undone the block on the IP but I have to go out in about 15 minutes and user:Fjp1995 needs watching. Please keep an eye out if you will be out there vandal-fighting for the next while. Note the similar edit summaries here and here. There might be some socking going on as well. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. --Diannaa (Talk) 22:01, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- Will do, I am going to revert those edits in question, and recommend they take the dispute to the talk pages of the articles. Thanks! SeaphotoTalk 22:05, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- The table the IP added to Kung Fu Panda shows it was nominated for best animated picture, which is true. I have undone the block on the IP but I have to go out in about 15 minutes and user:Fjp1995 needs watching. Please keep an eye out if you will be out there vandal-fighting for the next while. Note the similar edit summaries here and here. There might be some socking going on as well. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. --Diannaa (Talk) 22:01, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- I followed the link, and it was an Annie award, which evidently it did win. I will admit to being completely lost in the world of animated entertainment however LOL. What got me drawn into this was seeing a weird pattern while monitor the feed using Huggle. SeaphotoTalk 21:56, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
File:Japanese officials check for radioactive material on residents living near the Fukushima station.jpg
Thank you for your work with File:Japanese officials check for radioactive material on residents living near the Fukushima station.jpg. Jessy T/C 03:50, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- That one was a tough decision and I had been thinking about it for days. Thank you for taking the time to comment. --Diannaa (Talk) 03:52, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- Now it looks like it might get deleted anyways. :/ --Diannaa (Talk) 04:00, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
Script
Hallo Diannaa, I need some help with my wordcount. After installing the automated script, I still cannot find the tool in the Tools menu (far left, I read). Of course, I am not able to prepare a sandwich! Thank you in advance.--Broletto (talk) 08:31, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- I have made a change to your vector.js and hopefully the script will work now. Make sure you are using the Vector skin in your preferences. --Diannaa (Talk) 14:09, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
Thank you
Thanks for your help. Spidey104 16:50, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- You are welcome. --Diannaa (Talk) 23:01, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 March 2011
- WikiProject report: Medicpedia — WikiProject Medicine
- Features and admins: Best of the week
- Arbitration report: One closed case, one suspended case, and two other cases
- Technology report: What is: localisation?; the proposed "personal image filter" explained; and more in brief
Can you provide more information on speedy deletion of Air Ambulance Card, LLC
Hi Diannaa- A few weeks back, you nominated a new article, Air Ambulance Card, LLC for speedy deletion. It was my first article, and I based it almost exclusively on highly credible third party sources including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal and US News and World Report. According to the Wikipedia guidelines for notability, I believe it meets the standard for inclusion. I am happy to revise in order to address any concerns. Can you please userfy and provide specifics on what you see as problem areas? Thanks! Atticusrominger (talk) 14:24, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Hi. The article was deleted under A7: No explanation of the subject's significance (real person, animal, organization, or web content): G12: partial copy vio from http://www.technologyalabama.com/content/alabama%E2%80%99s-air-ambulances and other sites.
- There were several problems with your submission. You cannot post copyright material on Wikipedia even if you are the copyright holder, unless special licensing permissions are in place. That is because Wikipedia aims to be freely distributable and copyable by anyone, and all content must have the appropriate documentation in place before that can happen. Please see this policy Wikipedia:Copyrights which explains how it works.
- The second problem is notability. I am not sure the organisation is notable enough, as Wikipedia defines it, to have an article. We require write-ups in reliable third party sources such as newpapers, magazines, or online publishers to establish notability. New articles about persons or organisations that are not notable are typically speedily deleted.
- The third problem is conflict of interest. Writing an article about your own organisation or that of a client is strongly discouraged, as it is difficult to maintain the required neutral point of view.
- So if you wish to add the copyrighted content to a Wikipedia article, the proper licenses and permissions will have to be in place. Please see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how that would be done. Or, you could write a new article that does not closely paraphrase the material available on line. And you would have to avoid the conflict of interest guideline while doing so. Even then, chances are that the article would be speedily deleted as not notable enough for an article. Sorry the reply could not be more favourable. Regards, --Diannaa (Talk) 14:34, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
User: Markelmitchell
I am inquiring about the User:Markelmitchell, whom you left a comment on his/her talk page regarding the Administrators' noticeboard. The ANI post has been archived and the editor in question has yet to respond to it (or to anything, anyone in general). The user's disruptive editing has continued since your message at the talk page, edits most of which I've once again had to revert. What's the next move about this? Dan56 (talk) 20:13, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Five of the new edits were reverted, and fourteen were not reverted. Some of the new edits were removals of the Small formatting from the articles. The activity is not disruptive enough to warrant a block. I am going to try another message on their talk page. Perhaps they have a narrow monitor and that is why they want everything smaller? Let's try talking to them again. --Diannaa (Talk) 20:27, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, the message is ready for viewing on his Talk. --Diannaa (Talk) 20:38, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Guess who didn't get the message? 51/50 Ratchet, F.A.M.E. I'd revert directly the second one, but I've already reverted twice unconstructive edits on that article, so I'll try "sneaking" a change in. And once again, reverted my revert. Dan56 (talk) 23:33, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- I have laid another level 4 on his page. The mysterious silent stranger. --Diannaa (Talk) 01:06, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
- Appreciate all your help with this matter. Dan56 (talk) 01:13, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
- He may have turned in for the night so we may have to wait for tomorrow to see if we get the desired result or if the guy needs a more serious cup of coffee. À bientôt. --Diannaa (Talk) 01:16, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
- Guess he got that coffee [5]. Dan56 (talk) 01:29, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
- I have reported the user to edit-warring noticeboard for making more than 3 reverts to 51/50 Ratchet, but no one has checked it out yet. It's been a couple of days and I was wondering if it would there wouldn't be anything wrong if you'd looked into it. Dan56 (talk) 21:24, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
- I would rather leave it for the people who normally patrol that board. I have no experience in that area, and may already be too involved. Thanks --Diannaa (Talk) 21:28, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
- I have reported the user to edit-warring noticeboard for making more than 3 reverts to 51/50 Ratchet, but no one has checked it out yet. It's been a couple of days and I was wondering if it would there wouldn't be anything wrong if you'd looked into it. Dan56 (talk) 21:24, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
- Guess he got that coffee [5]. Dan56 (talk) 01:29, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
- He may have turned in for the night so we may have to wait for tomorrow to see if we get the desired result or if the guy needs a more serious cup of coffee. À bientôt. --Diannaa (Talk) 01:16, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
- Appreciate all your help with this matter. Dan56 (talk) 01:13, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
- I have laid another level 4 on his page. The mysterious silent stranger. --Diannaa (Talk) 01:06, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
- Guess who didn't get the message? 51/50 Ratchet, F.A.M.E. I'd revert directly the second one, but I've already reverted twice unconstructive edits on that article, so I'll try "sneaking" a change in. And once again, reverted my revert. Dan56 (talk) 23:33, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, the message is ready for viewing on his Talk. --Diannaa (Talk) 20:38, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Request
Hello. You are a neutral admin which knows the history of my conflicts with Hobartimus, Nmate and co. Can you please express your opinion on this case: [6]? (Iaaasi (talk) 20:40, 22 March 2011 (UTC))
- I certainly don't know all the history but I have been following recent events. I will have a look. Thank you for alerting me. --Diannaa (Talk) 20:43, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot(Iaaasi (talk) 20:44, 22 March 2011 (UTC))
- Can you please at least warn them if a block is not possible? I want them to leave me alone (Iaaasi (talk) 22:25, 22 March 2011 (UTC))
- You all need to stay away from each other, at least for a while. I will post another comment on the big board. I am going out to the gym soon so will be out of touch for a few hours --Diannaa (Talk) 22:33, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Can you please at least warn them if a block is not possible? I want them to leave me alone (Iaaasi (talk) 22:25, 22 March 2011 (UTC))
- Thanks a lot(Iaaasi (talk) 20:44, 22 March 2011 (UTC))
Question
Isn't it a little strange when User:Iaaasi gets a second chance after an indef block, comes back from a week-long block for edit warring, makes 5(!) reverts in 24 hours, and then tries to have others warned/blocked who haven't broken any rule?? Or I'm just too sensitive? Squash Racket (talk) 10:29, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
- After all your disruption, do you have enough nerve to accuse me of multiple reverting? You obviously broke WP:BOLDTITLE and WP:DE (the paragraph Cannot satisfy Wikipedia:Verifiability) by inserting unreferenced information and still make accusations against me? (Iaaasi (talk) 10:38, 23 March 2011 (UTC))
Even if what you try to allege was true, it wouldn't be a blockable offence, use "citation needed" tags next time. Or may I remove any uncited information from any article on WP?
So the question remains: isn't it a little strange when User:Iaaasi gets a second chance after an indef block, comes back from a week-long block for edit warring, makes 5(!) reverts in 24 hours, and then tries to have others warned/blocked who haven't broken any rule?? Squash Racket (talk) 10:45, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
- Squash Racket, your inequitable way of applying the rules is, to use a gentle word, very interesting. When I delete an unreferenced text it is wrong, but you "may" legitimately delete a passage which is even supported by a source. I will let Diannaa to extract the conclusions about this kind of behaviour
- However, I've put a note on the talk page user who had added the text asking him to provide a reliable source(Iaaasi (talk) 12:00, 23 March 2011 (UTC))
- I don't want to waste my time rejecting these lies and deliberately misleading "statements".
- The level of truthfulness and honesty in that comment here shows exactly why User:Iaaasi and his many sockpuppets were indef blocked. In short. Squash Racket (talk) 12:32, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
- Of course, you have not reply and you refer to the same old argument: my sockpuppets. Everything is proven by diffs, Diannaa can conclude by herself if I am lying or not (Iaaasi (talk) 12:41, 23 March 2011 (UTC))
- Squash Racket, everyone did a few reverts yesterday but no one did any blockable offences. If you think otherwise, file a 3RR report. Please STOP talking about Iaaasi's past on a daily basis. He was given a second chance, and your talking about his pre-block activity is not helpful. In fact just the opposite. It is getting to be disruptive. --Diannaa (Talk) 14:05, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
I counted five reverts by him in 24 hours at the article Székely yesterday which is clearly a blockable offence.
What I found extremely strange that afterwards it was him who reported others who haven't broken any rule. And the misleading statements above from a couple of hours ago clearly resemble his earlier behavior for which he was indef blocked.
You seem to confuse me with User:Hobartimus, I haven't talked about his past behavior yet, especially not "on a daily basis". I'm not gonna disturb you anymore with this, in fact it was him who filed a report here, I only answered. Squash Racket (talk) 14:25, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
- Here are four instances where you referred to Iaaasi's past blocks and behavior: In an edit summary: I don't make more reverts because I don't want to break the rule like Iaaasi did a week ago; another edit summary: stop the disruption please after a week-long block for breaking 3RR; on my talk page: Isn't it a little strange when User:Iaaasi gets a second chance after an indef block, comes back from a week-long block for edit warring; on my talk page: The level of truthfulness and honesty in that comment here shows exactly why User:Iaaasi and his many sockpuppets were indef blocked. These are examples of behavior on your part that needs to be stopped. These kinds of daily reminders of his past behavior will not help him learn to be a more productive editor, and that's the desired result, isn't it? Because Iaaasi is a knowledgeable editor that we do not wish to drive away. --Diannaa (Talk) 18:48, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
I won't answer anymore if it disturbs you (please indicate if that's the situation), but I feel I have to say something seeing your response.
The edit summaries were constructed so, because User:Iaaasi and his incarnations had a tendency of making false reports. I like it when administrators see the truth even when he makes a report in the evening or at night (European time) expecting that those who are not always online won't be able to react before a decision is made.
The truthfulness/honesty comment referred to misleading statements he added here on this very talk page. How would you treat this "knowledgeable editor" when he cites a deletion from a year ago with an extensive edit summary as some kind of a sneaky attack? He also cites a request for sources as his own good example, when that request was sent out two minutes before he added his comment here?
I think knowledge without honesty (I'm not talking about the past) isn't of much worth on WP. Squash Racket (talk) 09:43, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- Read more carefully what I've affirmed. I was saying that you considered in the past legitimate to delete a text supported by a weak (by your personal opinion) source, but still a source, while nowadays you accuse me for reverting the addition of a text with no source. So you are interpreting the policies after your own immediate interest (Iaaasi (talk) 10:42, 24 March 2011 (UTC))
- My comment ("I've put a note on the talk page user who had added the text asking him to provide a reliable source") is a proof for the fact that, unlike others, I seek dispute resolution. I don't understand your "2 minutes issue"
- Your insinuation that I file a report at a specific time for some dark reasons is hallucinating
- Diannaa, I respectfully ask you to close this thread (Iaaasi (talk) 10:42, 24 March 2011 (UTC))
- I'm quoting part of my so-called "personal opinion" at the time: "book sponsored by anti-Hungarian Romanian chauvinist Gheorghe Funar", which sounds like a legitimate reason for the removal.
- The problem with Iaaasi was revert warring over the Székely flag to the point of breaking 3RR even though he knew that at least the Székely National Council uses it. If someone objects, a "citation needed" tag is put there and after waiting a couple of days it can be removed.
- That was just a clarification, the rest of my comment stands. Squash Racket (talk) 12:45, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- Your argument is subjective. The fact that the book could have been sponsored by Funar (there are no proofs for that), is not a guarantee for the fact that the text from the book is false. Why did you not apply in that case the rule the rule "keep and add citation needed tag or dubious tag"? (Iaaasi (talk) 13:08, 24 March 2011 (UTC))
Need Some Consensus Input
If you could spare a moment here.Thanks--SH 19:30, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- I will look at it now. --Diannaa (Talk) 19:32, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Dianna, please add you proposals for a lead, I have added one here. Thanks --SH 06:29, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comments. What I need now is to for you to either create your own lead or support one of them, when you have time and we can end this dispute. Thanks--SH 07:33, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Dianna, I think we have consensus, on Kapoor with Profit and me going with your version. Winston will just have to lump it and go with WP:Consensus and stop throwing his proverbial toys out of the pram. Can you include you version as you see fit. Thanks--SH 14:21, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, I have added your lead in the meantime as Profit, me and you at least agree on that. Thanks--SH 23:01, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- Yes. It is not as comprehensive as what Winston was hoping for but it is all factual and backed up by sources so we have a defensible position here. See you later. --Diannaa (Talk) 23:04, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, I have added your lead in the meantime as Profit, me and you at least agree on that. Thanks--SH 23:01, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Dianna, I think we have consensus, on Kapoor with Profit and me going with your version. Winston will just have to lump it and go with WP:Consensus and stop throwing his proverbial toys out of the pram. Can you include you version as you see fit. Thanks--SH 14:21, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- Well we will be going round in circles otherwise. It is done, and if he is not happy, he can speak to you or other Administrators about it. Thanks--SH 23:16, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Sagaing
Permission is below. {{permissionOTRS|ticket=https://secure.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketID=2350537}} ♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:53, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for getting this strightened out. --Diannaa (Talk) 20:16, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
Dear Diannaa,
Could you kindly tell me why haven't you notified me of the ongoing SPI against my account (even though it's customary)? I've learned of it only after it's been concluded and thus didn't have much opportunities in defending myself. I don't think that this is what a due process looks like.
Also I'm not quite sure whether it was on purpose or just plain ignorance, but some of your statements in the SPI request simply don't have anything to do with truth. Take the "Coolkoon has filed a 3RR report against Iaaasi" statement for instance. The truth is that in fact I've never filled a 3RR report. Ever. If you would've cared to check the report itself, then you would've noticed that the report you're talking about has been filed by User:Nmate. Also, the math on your claims about the Slovakia-Hungary relations edit history doesn't add up well either. If you would've done the math, you would've known that (strictly speaking) I've done 2 reverts and stopped because Iaaasi has threatened to report me for edit warring. Technically however I've only done a single revert, because prior to Iaaasi's second "revert" I've added some additional content. In the subsequent edit Iaaasi has however removed all the content I've added before (both of my edits) and that was when he threatened to report me. I've made no more edits after that. Today however I've seen that a new user called Koalicio has obviously "helped" Iaaasi to turn the whole thing into a rather nasty edit war. Later on I've seen that Iaaasi has been reported for 3RR by Nmate.
The point is that during the SPI you didn't seem to show much good faith towards me, actually quite the contrary. Or is it that WP policies are to be applied only to users, but not to admins? Or are they to be applied sporadically? Next time please try to keep at least the facts right. -- CoolKoon (talk) 01:10, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, CoolKoon, you are right. It was User:Nmate who filed the 3RR report. My apologies. Notification of the filing of an SPI report is not required, it is optional, at the filer's discretion. My intention was to do it quietly to avoid further drama and disruption. Regards, --Diannaa (Talk) 01:17, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not entirely sure what considerations led you to the conclusion that I'm a disruptive user, but be it. Nobody likes when lies are spread about him though, especially ones that might directly affect the subject of those lies. CoolKoon (talk) 01:40, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- I am not clear why you are calling me a liar, when I have already apologised for my mistake. --Diannaa (Talk) 01:44, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- Fine, apology accepted. Please, forget about it. CoolKoon (talk) 02:22, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- OK, see you around. --Diannaa (Talk) 02:25, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
re: speedy-deletions under CSD#R2
You recently deleted User:Shadygrove2007/John William Wright, citing CSD#R2 in the edit summary. As a redirect from the Userspace to the Mainspace, it was technically ineligible for criterion R2. That criterion only applies to redirect from the Mainspace. We are trying hard to clean up the cites to the R2 clause so that it's not so widely misunderstood by new users. In this case, there was no harm done because the redirect was speedy-deletable under criterion U1 but if you could help us keep the logs clean in future situations, it would make the education process easier. Thanks for your understanding. Rossami (talk) 01:10, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, I will look out for this in the future. This category is seldom used and I guess I mis-read what it meant. Thanks. --Diannaa (Talk) 01:11, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Kapoor family
Hi, in the Kapoor family page our topic of discussion is "hometown"(heading is "Peshawar or Lyallpur"), I agree with your style but the content was the main issue i.e hometown and as per the sources I have added they describe themself Pathans from Peshawar. Winston786 (talk) 12:46, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Plz check the talk page, Thanks. Winston786 (talk) 13:44, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- I have checked the talk page and written some more comments. I have to do some real-life stuff for a few hours and will check back later and see if any progress is being made on putting together the final version. See you later. --Diannaa (Talk) 13:47, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Watch list
Hi Diannaa,
I wondered if you could help me out. On my watch list there is an entry for 'Talk: Buildings in bushfire prone areas' and 'Buildings in bushfire prone areas', both on 23 March 2011. Both were deleted because of copyright infringement. (I seem to remember asking on the article's talk page what country was the article referring to, which might explain how I got involved in the first place). I thought that was an end to the matter, and that I might as well get rid of any non-needed entries. For some reason, your name is on my watch list in the 'article' column, so when I went to your page to delete it, I found that I couldn't. What do I do now?
Its not that I want to get rid of you, more a case of wanting to tidy up!
Thanks in advance.
RASAM (talk) 15:31, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- I am not sure what is wrong as it is not possible for me to access your watch list. --Diannaa (Talk) 23:03, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- You could try going to https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Special:Watchlist/edit and deleting unneeded items by ticking the appropriate boxes. --Diannaa (Talk) 01:10, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
Correcton
Forgot a section heading the last time, oops!
heads up
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Yokota126 is back to editing articles/OWN without talk page, discussion— Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.184.105.239 (talk • contribs)
- Okay, I will help you watch. --Diannaa (Talk) 01:11, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
Can you help me?
I uploaded this picture and it keeps saying that I need to put in a rationale. Everytime I put one on, it is deleted and replaced with anohter warning. Can you help? thumb|alt=2011 NCAA Boss Button in On Demand|Showing what happens when Boss Button is clicked in 2011 NCAA March Madness On Demand — Preceding unsigned comment added by Corbin630 (talk • contribs) 02:05, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
- You need to add a {{Non-free use rationale}} template. --Diannaa (Talk) 02:09, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
I guess you're looking at User_talk:Anishviswa#Help in formatting. Which is cool.
I was about to do the columns, but as regards the table - it's far too wide to fit on my humble screen - which means, it's too wide for most users. So IDK what the answer is, there. Chzz ► 18:21, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
- Where's Jack!!!!???? We needz our Jack :( I am gonna try changing the font if I can figure out how to code it. --Diannaa (Talk) 18:31, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
- Last I heard, he'd 'scuttled' all his accounts; see m:Steward_requests/Global#Global locks for Jack Merridew's old accounts. Algebraist (talk · contribs) and Timotheus Canens (talk · contribs) are good at this stuff. But I expect, mostly, they'd say same as me - keep it simple; if it doesn't fit, it doesn't fit; do it another way so it does. For 'usability', etc. Chzz ► 18:38, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
- I know he scuttled all his accounts, but he is out there somewhere à la John Galt. We will have to figure out a sneaky way to draw him out, I guess. I have got the table to fit on the screen. Have a look. Trouble is, there will be a lot more data going into the table still; a lot of the fields are empty. --Diannaa (Talk) 18:43, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
- Still way too wide for me; [7] Chzz ► 20:07, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
- I am gonna undo that edit then; it was pointless. The author did not request shrinkage and the data has not all been entered. --Diannaa (Talk) 20:24, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
- Still way too wide for me; [7] Chzz ► 20:07, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
- I know he scuttled all his accounts, but he is out there somewhere à la John Galt. We will have to figure out a sneaky way to draw him out, I guess. I have got the table to fit on the screen. Have a look. Trouble is, there will be a lot more data going into the table still; a lot of the fields are empty. --Diannaa (Talk) 18:43, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
- Last I heard, he'd 'scuttled' all his accounts; see m:Steward_requests/Global#Global locks for Jack Merridew's old accounts. Algebraist (talk · contribs) and Timotheus Canens (talk · contribs) are good at this stuff. But I expect, mostly, they'd say same as me - keep it simple; if it doesn't fit, it doesn't fit; do it another way so it does. For 'usability', etc. Chzz ► 18:38, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
![[7]](http://helpmebot.org.uk/wiki/File:Over9000px.jpg){kind=link}
Chuck Rice page deletion
21:03, 28 March 2011 Diannaa (talk | contribs) deleted "Chuck Rice" (A7: No explanation of the subject's significance (real person, animal, organization, or web content): No sources; no Google hits other than Facebook) I clearly said in that page's talk page THAT IT'S NOT FINISHED! I also said in the talk page that I wanted someone to help! Then you turn around and delete it! In fact, the guy has like 5 blogs, and you only found his facebook page? http://rpgdesign.blogspot.com/ That's one of his blogs, now may I please re-create the article?! Dolphinjamez (talk) 21:15, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
- Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. We have a policy that in order to be eligible for a Wikipedia article, people, organisations, or bands must be notable as Wikipedia defines it. The applicable guideline is Wikipedia:Notability. It looks like Chuck Rice is not notable enough at present to qualify for a Wikipedia article as there are not multiple write-ups in reliable third-party sources such as newspapers, magazines, or trustworthy websites. We cannot source a Wikipedia article to his own blogs. Sorry. -Diannaa (Talk) 21:22, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
Here's an RPGNOW.com link to his company's books, most of which are written by him: http://www.rpgnow.com/index.php?filters=0_0_0_0&manufacturers_id=437 Dolphinjamez (talk) 21:51, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
- A link to a book seller is not the kind of coverage we are looking for. If you had a link to a book review, that would be the kind of thing we need to establish notability. Unsourced articles about living people are quickly deleted under our biographies of living people policy. --Diannaa (Talk) 22:12, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
http://rpgdesign.blogspot.com/2011/02/usher-dossiers-gets-another-5-star.html There, a five-star review on one of his books! Dolphinjamez (talk) 22:37, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
- I am pretty sure this would not be eonough. --Diannaa (Talk) 22:41, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
Didn't you listen?! The page was not complete! I was not done! DO NOT DELETE! CAN I HAVE SOME HELP? The page was not complete. And besides, are you trying to make it impossible for a new member of this site to write about his favorite author? Huh, huh? Dolphinjamez (talk) 22:51, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 March 2011
- News and notes: Berlin conference highlights relation between chapters and Foundation; annual report; brief news
- In the news: Sue Gardner interviewed; Imperial College student society launched; Indian languages; brief news
- WikiProject report: Linking with WikiProject Wikify
- Features and admins: Featured list milestone
- Arbitration report: New case opens; Monty Hall problem case closes – what does the decision tell us?
Jokes
Two jokes-
What's the difference between the England team and a tea bag?
The tea bag stays in the cup longer.
Why did the man throw his watch out of the window?
He wanted to see time fly!
--Ankit Maity | Talk • contribs 15:50, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Eazy-E
Thank you so much for copyediting the Eazy-E article. CrowzRSA 19:55, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
- You're welcome. --Diannaa (Talk) 20:38, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for volunteering your time and efforts into copy-editing the article. However, i would like to hear your opinion in this matter. I had previously changed the population figure from 2 million to 20 lakhs. This is because this is how the population is counted in India. However, some editor has been edit-warring with me using vague reasons such as "For an English encyclopedia with worldwide reach, million is more acceptable than lakh." and "I don't think this is an appropriate page to promote use of lakh and crore." As this is an Indian article, it is more appropriate to use 20 lakh as opposed to 2 million. Do you agree? If so, then please change it in the article, as a revert done by me will result in an edit-war. Regards, Joyson Noel Holla at me! 12:05, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, don't bother! It's solved. Joyson Noel Holla at me! 13:18, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi, could you please use the dashes and British spelling scripts to fix the problems in this article? I haven't made a request for a copy-edit, as it has been copy-edited in the past and i don't have a problem with typos. Thanks! Joyson Noel Holla at me! 13:26, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Wikfiy's April Drive
 | Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's April Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog to 18,000 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions! If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks! Note: The drive started April 1, but you can still join! |
For a tremendous year of effort—barnstar!
|
The Copy Editor's Lifetime Achievement Award | |
| I hereby present you this award because of your astonishing work: you have copy edited more articles (1,044!) and more words (646,254!) than anyone else over the past year of drives. Absolutely amazing! —Torchiest talkedits 02:46, 1 April 2011 (UTC) |
- Thank you very much ! --Diannaa (Talk) 02:51, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
Thanks!
Hi, I recently participated in the copyedit drive - I had not done this before, and I found it diverting and amusing (as well as a useful way to contribute). It appears that you are a major worker in this effort, so... thank you for shepherding this! Herostratus (talk) 03:25, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- I wish to confirm all the above with a lot of appreciation! Thanks from--Broletto (talk) 10:02, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| For being a driving wheel of the March 2011 Copyedit backlog drive. Herostratus (talk) 03:25, 2 April 2011 (UTC) |
- Thank you very much. --Diannaa (Talk) 03:26, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
GOCE drive newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors March 2011 backlog elimination drive report
 Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors March 2011 Backlog elimination drive. Thank you for participating in the March 2011 drive! This newsletter summarizes the March drive and other recent events.
 There were 99 signups for the drive; of these, 70 participated. Interest was high mainly due to a link to our event from the Watchlist page. We had a record-breaking 84 articles listed on the Requests page in March; 11 of these have been promoted to Good article status so far. Several of our recent efforts have received Featured Article status as well, and the GOCE is becoming a solid resource for the Wikipedia community. Many thanks to editors who have been helping out at the Requests page and by copy editing articles from the backlog.
Remarkable progress was made in reducing the backlog this month, as we now have fewer than 500 articles remaining from 2009. We are well under the 4,000-article mark for the total number remaining in the queue. Since our backlog drives began in May 2010 with 8,323 articles, we have cleared more than 53% of the backlog. A complete list of results and barnstars awarded can be found here. Barnstars will be distributed over the next week. If you enjoyed participating in our event, you may also like to join the Wikification drives, which are held on alternate months to our drives. Their April drive has started.
On March 21, SMasters appointed Chaosdruid (talk) and Torchiest (talk) as Guild coordinators to serve in place of The Utahraptor, who recently stepped down. Please feel free to contact any coordinator if you have any questions or need assistance. Your drive coordinators – S Masters (talk), Diannaa (Talk) and Tea with toast (Talk) |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 14:34, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
Barnstars
Sure, I can hand them out right now, if that's okay. —Torchiest talkedits 03:57, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you, that would be great. --Diannaa (Talk) 04:08, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Barnstars
Hi
I am glad to be back :¬) I do miss the goings on here, and our chats lol.
I will get onto the barnstars right now. I may need a little pointer or two though!
For example, Steve has "modern" so I am looking them all up at the moment...Chaosdruid (talk) 12:48, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- You can copy what has been done in the past, and tailor it to suit. I am available right now to help so please post here if you need any assistance. Thank you so much for helping out. --Diannaa (Talk) 13:30, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
I'll take care of K through N. --Tea with toast (talk) 14:44, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you! --Diannaa (Talk) 17:31, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Well I suppose it was inevitable, I come back and there is some problem with my Firefox/Java/Wikiscripts that are causing my browser to crash every time I try and edit anything more than a couple of lines. I have posted on Village pump tech page and will see if it is fixed in a while. It has been getting worse all day - at the moment I have no popups, my watch list is fully expanded and the "New section" is not displaying as a +, strange as it only seems to be on Wiki pages.
- I will try and get the barnstars done later this evening, before 22:00 UTC. Chaosdruid (talk) 18:41, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for the information. --Diannaa (Talk) 18:43, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- I had a bit of time on my hands and was on a roll, so I did the rest. As far as I can see, they have all been given out now except for mine. Cheers. – SMasters (talk) 05:50, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- Can you or Torchiest please give Steve his awards? I have tried but I cannot add anything with pictures or Wikimarkup as it causes my browsers to crash/freeze/disappear/go blank screen. It is a little annoying but apparently there is a problem with the wikiservers and gadgets that is affecting a very small number of editors, luckily I am one of them !! I really wanted to smash my PC up last night but I have calmed down now lol. Chaosdruid (talk) 10:32, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, Steve who? I can't find a Steve. – SMasters (talk) 13:41, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- All done now. Thanks, everyone, for helping. --Diannaa (Talk) 14:41, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for doing that last award for me, didnt quite get fixed in time :¬( Luckily all is fixed now though! Woohoo! Apparently there is a problem with the resource loader version of the Navigation popups in FireFox4 that causes the other scripts to halt. It was fine on Saturday morning so I suppose they are "fiddling" with it again lol.
- I have to get some RL things done now so should be back doing wikiwork in a couple of hours now everything is fixed :¬)
- I have also apologised to the person who I thought was called Steve :¬) Chaosdruid (talk) 19:46, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- All done now. Thanks, everyone, for helping. --Diannaa (Talk) 14:41, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, Steve who? I can't find a Steve. – SMasters (talk) 13:41, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
- Can you or Torchiest please give Steve his awards? I have tried but I cannot add anything with pictures or Wikimarkup as it causes my browsers to crash/freeze/disappear/go blank screen. It is a little annoying but apparently there is a problem with the wikiservers and gadgets that is affecting a very small number of editors, luckily I am one of them !! I really wanted to smash my PC up last night but I have calmed down now lol. Chaosdruid (talk) 10:32, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Haha, no problems. It is actually Scott, and the entire name is a nom de plume. Glad your browser problems have been solved. – SMasters (talk) 21:41, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa, I have received a message abut deeyah jpg File with the title of "File permission problem with File:Deeyah.jpg", this is true that I uploaded the file after I recieved the permission, but I don't know how to paste the information in the relevant are. So I asked an admin. named Decltype to do it for me, Decltype sent the email to the author of the file , got persmission and removed the tag which was attached to the file about deletion. Can you please ask him about this. If you like then I can ask him to reply you. Regards.Jogibaba (talk) 20:15, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- An item called an "OTRS ticket" needs to be attached to the image by getting permission from the person who took the photo and it is attached to the file by an OTRS volunteer. Full intstructions are available at Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. Don't worry if you don't get it done in time; you can re-upload the photo later once you have your permission available. --Diannaa (Talk) 22:33, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- I have sent a PM to Decltype to do that, because I do´t know how to sort "OTRS" ticket . it was Decltype who sent an email to the photographer to get the permission, later he removed the deletion tag attached after getting the permission. Whenever I upload a file, I ask him to do that since I am too naive when it comes to such matter.Jogibaba (talk) 23:23, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- You will have to follow up with him in that case. The instructions how to get the OTRS tick yourself are at Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission if you wish to do it yourself. I am not going to do it. --Diannaa (Talk) 23:25, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- I have sent a PM to Decltype to do that, because I do´t know how to sort "OTRS" ticket . it was Decltype who sent an email to the photographer to get the permission, later he removed the deletion tag attached after getting the permission. Whenever I upload a file, I ask him to do that since I am too naive when it comes to such matter.Jogibaba (talk) 23:23, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
GOCE Barnstars
|
The Most Excellent Order of the Caretaker's Star |
| For exceptional copyediting efforts during the Guild of Copy Editors' March 2011 Backlog Elimination Drive, editing 42 articles with a combined total of 64,135 words (125,761 with rollover and bonuses), I hereby induct Diannaa into the exclusive, brilliant, Most Excellent Order of the Caretaker's Star. -- SMasters (talk) 04:53, 4 April 2011 (UTC) |
|
Leaderboard Award – Word Count – 4th Place | |
| This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Diannaa for copy editing a total of 64,135 words during the Guild of Copy Editors' March 2011 Backlog elimination drive. Thank you so much for your efforts. – SMasters (talk) 04:53, 4 April 2011 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 4 April 2011
- News and notes: 1 April activities; RIAA takedown notice; brief news
- Editor retention: Fighting the decline by restricting article creation?
- WikiProject report: Out of this world — WikiProject Solar System
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC appointments, new case, proposed decision for Coanda case, and motion regarding CU/OS
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Deleted image
You deleted the image my friend took of the school, "Terrace Park High School (1913)". It was taken just yesterday for the purposes of allowing people to see what this historic building looks like before it is partially demolished. So I'm confused why you deleted it. I selected, "for educational purposes only; not for commercial use" because I thought that was the most appropriate choice. I have an e-mail from my friend saying the image(s) are acceptable to use for web-sites talking about the school. How can I correct this problem? -David Tornheim, 4/4/11 9:03 p.m. (sorry I forget how to sign things.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by David Tornheim (talk • contribs) 04:03, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
- Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. In order to keep your image from being deleted, you will have to get the copyright holder to send an e-mail to the volunteer response team. Please see the instructions at Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how this is done. As Wikipedia takes the question of copyright ownership quite seriously, I am sure you can understand why the proper permissions have to be in place before we can accept the image. Images uploaded to Wikipedia have to be freely reproducible so "for educational purposes only; not for commercial use" is not the way to go. It might be simpler if you live near the school to go there and take a picture yourself and then you will own the image and can select a license. The recommended license is {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}}. Plse see the information at Wikipedia:Uploading images. Good luck. Thanks. --Diannaa (Talk) 04:17, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for response. Taking pictures is not an option since I don't live near the school. That's why I had my friend make a special trip to take them. I think he's getting irritable that taking the pictures, uploading them and sending permission to use them, that I'm still asking for more. But I understanding Wikipedia's desire to deal with the copyrights. My impression is that an e-mail must be sent to the address I found in the materials you provided. There are about 10 pictures I would like to use, all taken at the same time. Do I need to send them all in the e-mail, in separate e-mails, or do I need to upload them first. I'm a bit confused, as it's so incredibly complicated to deal with images. I wish there was a simpler step by step process for users like me. I find wikipedia manuals very hard to decipher to do some of the simplest things...
- David Tornheim (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:02, 10 April 2011 (UTC).
- Images is not the only area that is complicated; it's all complicated. Sorry about that. I found a step-by-step guide here, which says you are to upload first and append the {{OTRS pending}} template that shows the e-mail requesting the OTRS ticket has been sent. Note they are recommending you upload the pictures to the Commons, not here. The instructions are the same for either place. I expect you can send one e-mail for a group of images if they all have similar characteristics, since the example they attach (File:Otrs-English.png) shows multiple images on one e-mail. --Diannaa (Talk) 15:01, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, hopefully that does the trick. I'll report back if things go awry.David Tornheim (talk) 21:57, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
- Images is not the only area that is complicated; it's all complicated. Sorry about that. I found a step-by-step guide here, which says you are to upload first and append the {{OTRS pending}} template that shows the e-mail requesting the OTRS ticket has been sent. Note they are recommending you upload the pictures to the Commons, not here. The instructions are the same for either place. I expect you can send one e-mail for a group of images if they all have similar characteristics, since the example they attach (File:Otrs-English.png) shows multiple images on one e-mail. --Diannaa (Talk) 15:01, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Another image question
Hi there, similar issue with my image "File:Right skewed.jpg" in Long Tail. I created this image specifically for the entry (and the associated annotation was my own ) although a version of the image can probably be found in any statistics book and in a more annotated version in thousands of technical books. It is a basic statistical shape, not biased to a particular field. Does the above advice apply to me as well? --RonaldDrewman (talk) 02:23, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
- Your situation is slightly different if you are the person who created the image. What you have to do is tell us what the source of the image was (a statement to the effect that you created the image yourself is considered adequate) and you must select a license template. For such a simple diagram you might with to place the image in the public domain. If that is what you want to do, the correct license is {{pd-self}}. Images with no sources and no license template are speedily deleted. Sorry the wiki is so dang complicated. --Diannaa (Talk) 02:31, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
76.117.247.55
Good morning! I keep 76.117.247.55 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) on my watchlist, since some editors treat him as just another IP. I was surprised to see that he earned a block from you, so went to have a look. If the block was triggered only by his edits at Wikipedia talk:Long-term abuse, may I ask you to have another look at them? This editor has been contributing since 2005, so his opinions of long-term abusers are probably worth listening to.
Forgive me if there are other factors that I've missed. -- John of Reading (talk) 07:01, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
- I too have this user watchlisted. Like John of Reading said above this IP editor has been around for several years. He didn't appear to be violating any policies at long term abuse. Is there other information behind the block? Alpha Quadrant talk 13:47, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
- There had been several attacks over the course of the evening that triggered filter #58 and filter #294 (ones that were definitely not false positives) and I thought it was him again. I have looked at it again and though this IP did also trigger filter #58 I am pretty sure it was not our LTA abuser but comments by the IP editor like you say. I will unblock him now. Thanks for checking this out. --Diannaa (Talk) 13:51, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
New GOCE template
Hi, I've just created the new template GOCEtb to let users know that their request on the GOCE page has been actioned. It takes only two parameters viz:
article=article name
user=user name
and comes out like this:
| | Hello, Diannaa. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Wikipedia at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! |
Please let me know if it can be improved/modified. Best, ► Philg88 ◄ 
talk 14:43, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
- I like it! I think it should be a little smaller though, by changing the size of the image. What do you think? --Diannaa (Talk) 18:04, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
- Indeed, looks much better, thanks. I will now create a quick /doc for it.
- While I'm here let me take the chance to mention the Pillow Pets copyedit request. I have some issues with this article based on WP:NOTABILITY and WP:SPAM and I'm thinking of tagging it as such, hence a copyedit is out of the question. What is the procedure for polite rebuffing the request? (Sorry, noob GOCE question I know). Best, ► Philg88 ◄
talk 21:02, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
- While I'm here let me take the chance to mention the Pillow Pets copyedit request. I have some issues with this article based on WP:NOTABILITY and WP:SPAM and I'm thinking of tagging it as such, hence a copyedit is out of the question. What is the procedure for polite rebuffing the request? (Sorry, noob GOCE question I know). Best, ► Philg88 ◄
- I looked at the article too and it just needs too much work for any of us to tackle at this time. I think the best thing the author could do at this point is go through the issues raised at the Peer Review first, and then re-submit for copy edit at a later date. I will post something on their Talk page. Thanks Phil, I never thought of declining the request but that is probably the way to go until the more structural issues are addressed. And thank you very much for making the nifty new template. This will help promote our work and help grow our wikiproject. --Diannaa (Talk) 22:45, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
Requesting a copy-edit?
Hi Diannaa! If you're free, can you do a copy-edit of Mandy Moore discography's lead? I would like to nominate it for an FL. Thanks in advance. Novice7 (talk) 17:27, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, done. :) --Diannaa (Talk) 00:45, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you so much!! Novice7 (talk) 03:51, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Egypt
Nice copyedits! Ocaasi c 00:55, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! I will do a little each day so everyone watching has a chance to react and revert if need be. Thanks for the feedback. --Diannaa (Talk) 00:57, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
myoder
Ok so why did my article i posted get deleted? i understand what i did wrong by altering the Blackbird song but my article was legit! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Myoder002 (talk • contribs) 02:42, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
- Legit in what sense of the word. This is a usage of the word "legit" that is unknown to me. --Diannaa (Talk) 02:48, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Replacing a photo
Can you please replace the photo of the File:Henry R. Tilton.jpg. The photo is over 100 years old. I though I picked the correct license. If I have not, please advice.
Thanks Seansasser (talk) 04:26, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
- You did use an appropriate license but you also need to tell us what the source of the photo was so the copyright status can be verified. If you got it from the Internet, please provide a link. --Diannaa (Talk) 13:55, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
As per you request here is the link
http://www.hazegray.org/features/1898gale/
Seansasser (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:10, 8 April 2011 (UTC).
- Ok, I have restored the image. Notice also the information template that I have added to the file that organises the information. --Diannaa (Talk) 06:18, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
A Block Evade
Hi fellow editor. Is this editor a block evade? He seems familiar. He seems to be similar to a series of similar named users. Thanks --SH 07:08, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
- Hi, Sikh History. Sorry I forgot about your message. If you would like to provide more information I would be glad to help investigate. Please send me an e-mail if you do not wish to publicly reveal details. --Diannaa (Talk) 06:42, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- I though he was this fellow? Thanks--SH 06:48, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- It seems to me his edits are more sophisticated than that other user. But the fact that he is creating templates and uploading pictures lead me to believe he is not a new user. We will have to watch. I will watch-list some of the pages he has been working on and the pictures too. --Diannaa (Talk) 16:01, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- 89.241.186.121 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) is editing the same articles as the user you named. --Diannaa (Talk) 22:47, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- It seems to me his edits are more sophisticated than that other user. But the fact that he is creating templates and uploading pictures lead me to believe he is not a new user. We will have to watch. I will watch-list some of the pages he has been working on and the pictures too. --Diannaa (Talk) 16:01, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- I though he was this fellow? Thanks--SH 06:48, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- That is interesting. Thanks --SH 06:48, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
OgreBot
I believe I have called your attention to this before (I may be wrong), but I just thought a friendly reminder would suffice: Category talk:Wikipedia files on Wikimedia Commons#Bot to delink images illustrates how, by installing User:MGA73/nowcommonsreview.js, you can indicate to my bot to delink any images, which I will delete immediately afterwards. I run it as often as I can, usually daily. I have found it helpful beyond measure in delinking images that are on commons. I mention it as you have done recent work on Category:Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons, and it appears it could have come in useful for you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:17, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- No, I did not know. In the past I have gone to manually remove links to deleted files and if I am not quick about it they would already be removed by a bot, so I did not know tagging was needed. I will check this out tomorrow and get it set up. Thanks! --Diannaa (Talk) 06:07, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Well Ogrebot doesn't just delink the file, it relinks it to the equivalent on commons, so the content of the page isn't changed from a visual perspective. Thanks. 
Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:28, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, I saw that once I had a quick look at the material. I will check it out more thoroughly tomorrow. Thank you. --Diannaa (Talk) 06:34, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Cookie
Seaphoto has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
Thanks for sorting out that mess with Canterbury High School (Ottawa)! SeaphotoTalk 01:34, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for the yummy cookie! And thank you for being patient with me while I made up my mind. Another school article for my ever-growing watch list! *sigh* --Diannaa (Talk) 01:39, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- LOL you can have a rich Wikipedia career just watching "notable alumni" sections. Happy editing! SeaphotoTalk 01:41, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- My thanks as well, to both of you. High school articles are easy pickings for this sort of vandalism. Initially I wanted to support Seaphoto's extended efforts to protect the article, and now appreciate the time Diannaa took to review the history. Now back to anonymity.... 99.168.85.28 (talk) 01:52, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for stopping by. See you on the Interwebz. --Diannaa (Talk) 01:53, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
Mel Gussow
Your help appreciated here, again. Thank you, JNW (talk) 14:57, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- No problem. --Diannaa (Talk) 14:59, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'm going to bow out for a bit so as not to confuse matters with my own corrections, giving you a clearer shot at things. If it helps, the three (well, now four) areas of contention seem to be, 1) conversion to Christianity; 2) middle name Hayes or Howard; 3) father "Don" or "Donald" - all unsourced completely, all contested (two of them truly trivial); and 4) the Eliz. Taylor thing which as you know I'd be just as happy to see included. Thanks for keeping an eye on it all. JohnInDC (talk) 15:16, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- I want to leave in the Liz thing as it at least has sources. Every unsourced thing will have to go. That's the best way to draw the line and offering a small concession might help. --Diannaa (Talk) 15:21, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'm going to bow out for a bit so as not to confuse matters with my own corrections, giving you a clearer shot at things. If it helps, the three (well, now four) areas of contention seem to be, 1) conversion to Christianity; 2) middle name Hayes or Howard; 3) father "Don" or "Donald" - all unsourced completely, all contested (two of them truly trivial); and 4) the Eliz. Taylor thing which as you know I'd be just as happy to see included. Thanks for keeping an eye on it all. JohnInDC (talk) 15:16, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- You're good. Have Jimbo raise your salary. JNW (talk) 15:25, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- Double it! Triple it! Hahahaa --Diannaa (Talk) 15:28, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- I agree with this approach. Thanks. Good luck and keep up the good work. (A nicely phrased and sourced edit was included in that diff I showed on the other editor's Talk page.) JohnInDC (talk) 15:26, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- Double it! Triple it! Hahahaa --Diannaa (Talk) 15:28, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- You're good. Have Jimbo raise your salary. JNW (talk) 15:25, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
Adolf
Hitler's name is spelt like that. Check it out.Kelisi (talk) 17:12, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- Yikes! Sorry about that. --Diannaa (Talk) 17:16, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
ISBN
Good point. --TIAYN (talk) 16:13, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
- Another good point. --TIAYN (talk) 16:35, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Sockfarmer harvesting again
Hi Diannaa, thanks for your note about the banned sockfarmer, and for helping to maintain and promote the related userbox :) It may be worth mentioning I found a very odd coincidence here but on further thought I think it really is just a coincidence. Secondly, the CCI case at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Babasalichai is now open, and covers nearly all of the confirmed sockpuppets but not the IP addresses. Much of the various accounts' contributions will since have been reverted anyway, but this may still be helpful in removing some of the damage done by the socks in various places. In instances where copyvios are found, these will be removed or re-written even if the edits were made before any of the accounts were first blocked. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 04:23, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
- I will help out with this clean-up if I have time. Thank you. --Diannaa (Talk) 00:34, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
Another potential sock
It looks like your editing at the moment, so maybe this will catch your eye. Por favor, a look at Talk:Yoshiyahu Yosef Pinto and User:Kevincory1981 in the last section. I see a few of the key clues (also, xyr contribution history out another). WP:DUCK? Qwyrxian (talk) 00:20, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- I was on AWB, which puts out an alert. I will check it out right now. Thank you--Diannaa (Talk) 00:23, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- I agree it is him and am going to block. Thank you. --Diannaa (Talk) 00:28, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
Inbox
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.