Your submission at Articles for creation: WDG 4G (November 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:16, 19 November 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Diligentemu, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:16, 19 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Image without license

edit

Unspecified source/license for File:WAG 12 locomotive.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:WAG 12 locomotive.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 06:00, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Scale model of WAG 12 locomotive.jpg

edit
 

A tag has been placed on File:Scale model of WAG 12 locomotive.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Adamgerber80 (talk) 07:07, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:WAG 12 locomotive.jpg listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WAG 12 locomotive.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Adamgerber80 (talk) 07:12, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Locomotive WAG 12.jpg listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Locomotive WAG 12.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Adamgerber80 (talk) 12:55, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Warning

edit

Please do not add copyrighted images to wikipedia, if you continue to do so you will be blocked from editing here, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 15:25, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

MilborneOne I have changed licenses of those images and has been accepted by administrator

Block Notice

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MilborneOne (talk) 22:40, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Locomotive WAG 12.jpg

edit
 

A tag has been placed on File:Locomotive WAG 12.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Theroadislong (talk) 22:41, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Diligentemu (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #20315 was submitted on Jan 13, 2018 08:18:47. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 08:18, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Request for unblocking

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Diligentemu (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I now understand wikipedia copyright policies and pledge to obey to it when I'm unblocked. I did not have detailed information regarding non free licensing, copyright violation and "sock-pupetting". I thought uploading screenshots of videos with myself being copyright holder is allowed, so I uploaded screenshots many times without bothering to read guidelines. Regarding the insinuating message on user Adamgerber80's talk page, well I did that out of anger and frustration. He been following me and reverting my edits since long time, even though most of them were correct informations . I have contributed to wikipedia positively on pages like Project 17A-class frigate , Visakhapatnam-class destroyer, Kolkata class destroyer. I also did not know that using two accounts is not allowed on wikipedia. I did not use that account for vandalism or abusing , as was stated in my blocking reason. So my blocking is unjustified and should be reconsidered for unblocking.

I have nothing against anyone. I would like to contribute more to wikipedia by doing edits and creating new pages. I have recently submitted a draft for creating page on WDG-4G class locomotive of Indian Railways Diligentemu (talk) 13:25, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Declined due to continued sockpuppetry as User:AnubhavA99. Huon (talk) 21:18, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Comment: I have some concerns about the editors behavior and their disregard towards Wikipedia Policies. Some concerning issues were the extensive use of WP:SPS or lack of any sources while editing. The user left this message on my talk page [1] which shows little regard towards Wikipedia policies. Similarly, their claim that they will continue to make edits as a "challenge" just to make a WP:POINT here [2]. I believe the creation of the Sockpuppet Spectacular99 was a result of actively trying to bypass Wikipedia rules with full cognizance of their actions. The sock continued to edit the same set of pages which the user edited and at times immediately after the user and in tandem to possible depict that two or more users were editing the same article. The Sock also contested image deletion requests for Diligentemu to depict that some other user was arguing. The sock immediately uploaded the same image on Wikimedia Commons after it was deleted for Copy-right violations which was then immediately added by Diligentemu to Indian locomotive class WAG-12. Even this image was deleted they added it on Wikipedia first falsely claiming it to be free work (fully understanding that it was not since it had already been deleted twice on Wikimedia Commons) and on it's subsequent deletion uploaded it again under dodgy NFCC rules where it was deleted again. The latest message on my talk page User_talk:Adamgerber80#Love_me_so_much? insinuates block-evading behavior and a continuation to violate Wikipedia Copy-right policies as a "challenge" and the user continued with their edits even after I had politely warned them that this could lead to sanctions and blocks. The user when to extent of removing the message MilborneOne had placed on their Talk page here [3] possibly to avoid issues during the unblock. Lastly, I have strong reasons to believe that the user when their account was unblocked and even after it being blocked continued with editing Wikipedia without signing in. Examples(2405:205:6492:c632:799a:ebe5:69ca:1e25 (talk · contribs), 2405:204:c088:8bd3::1a3b:e8a1 (talk · contribs), 2405:204:6308:486e:255e:eae2:17a1:6970 (talk · contribs), 2405:204:c005:289a:4970:4172:b8d4:28a3 (talk · contribs)). Of course, these haven't been taken to SPI but all the user's edits are mobile edits, same as the IPs and all of them on the pages of their interest and very similar to their earlier edits. Adamgerber80 (talk) 13:59, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: WDG 4G (January 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
EROS message 15:26, 14 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:DFCCIL logo.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:DFCCIL logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 3 August 2020 (UTC)Reply