Your submission at Articles for creation: ADN Investment Group (August 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Jamiebuba were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jamiebuba (talk) 11:25, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Dinarom! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 11:25, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bartensleben Castle (September 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 15:10, 5 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Dinarom. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 14:50, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bartensleben Castle (September 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Akevsharma (talk) 01:06, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Schkopau castle (September 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hoary (talk) 01:53, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

September 2022

edit
 

Hello Dinarom. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Dinarom. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Dinarom|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Your contributions to the encyclopedia seem to all be about ADN Investment Group, and the various properties they own. Please let us know what your connection is to this investment group and/or their properties or investments? Netherzone (talk) 15:47, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Netherzone. Yes, I have a connection with ADN Investment Group. However, I also would like to expand Wikipedia with articles about historical places. Yes, I agree that ADN owns those places, but it never reduces the importance of the information about objects for Wikipedia. All articles are about epoch-making places and their history.
I'm gathering information myself, as well as making translations and adding pictures. All information is real and proved, also that ADN owns the Objects. I am adding previous owners as well as the present and the information is completely true.
I really trust in what ADN do for that places, renovating and giving second life to them. That probably means my indirect connection to the organisation.
Can I continue my work and publish information about objects? Does it mean that I can't provide information about the real owner? And if I would like to, should I mark it like  ?
I appreciate your help! Dinarom (talk) 07:48, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi Dinarom, you can continue to submit drafts for new articles. See WP:paid and WP:COI for more information. For existing articles, you can make edit requests (read the linked instructions). Your paid declaration needs to be placed on you User page rather than here. If you have questions or need help, you can ask at the Teahouse. S0091 (talk) 17:03, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uhyst castle (September 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hoary (talk) 11:42, 17 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your feedback and example! I was struggling to find how to properly show the inline links to de:Wikipedia, thanks for showing me how! Will correct all the links and submit again. Dinarom (talk) 06:38, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Flechtingen water castle has been accepted

edit
 
Flechtingen water castle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

JeBonSer (talk | sign) 01:10, 30 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uhyst castle has been accepted

edit
 
Uhyst castle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 17:06, 25 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bartensleben Castle (December 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sionk was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Sionk (talk) 18:58, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Schkopau castle (December 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sionk was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Sionk (talk) 19:02, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Illesheim castle (January 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 18:40, 5 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hohenmölsen clinic (January 6)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:33, 6 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:ADN Investment Group

edit

  Hello, Dinarom. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:ADN Investment Group, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Sports Complex 333 has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sports Complex 333. Thanks! CNMall41 (talk) 08:37, 7 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Bartensleben Castle

edit

  Hello, Dinarom. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bartensleben Castle, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Illesheim castle

edit

  Hello, Dinarom. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Illesheim castle, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:05, 7 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Bartensleben Castle

edit
 

Hello, Dinarom. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bartensleben Castle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:12, 12 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Schkopau castle

edit
 

Hello, Dinarom. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Schkopau castle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 03:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Illesheim castle

edit
 

Hello, Dinarom. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Illesheim castle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:52, 5 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Hohenmölsen clinic

edit

  Hello, Dinarom. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hohenmölsen clinic, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 3 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sports Complex 333 (August 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul Vaurie was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Paul Vaurie (talk) 21:17, 11 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Hohenmölsen clinic

edit
 

Hello, Dinarom. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hohenmölsen clinic".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:27, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply