Your submission at Articles for creation: Village Health Works (July 6)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 15:48, 13 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, DoGoodResearch! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curbon7 (talk) 12:55, 6 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Village Health Works has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Village Health Works. Thanks! bonadea contributions talk 15:44, 13 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Village Health Works has been accepted

edit
 
Village Health Works, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 20:12, 13 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

July 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm I dream of horses. An edit you recently made to Abortion in Burundi seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 19:19, 30 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jeff Pearce (historian)

edit
 

The article Jeff Pearce (historian) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This person is not notable under the notability guideline for authors or the general notability guideline. I could not find significant coverage of this subject or his books in independent, reliable sources. The sources cited are YouTube videos (including the subject's own, e.g., [1]), the subject's blogs, and a book listing on Amazon.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:19, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply