User talk:DocFreeman24/Archives/2020/November

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi DocFreeman24! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 07:47, Wednesday, June 10, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, DocFreeman24! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Writing an article
• Five pillars of Wikipedia
• Community portal
• Task Center
• Help pages
• The Teahouse (newcomer help)
• Main help desk

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 17:29, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for the warm welcome!

DocFreeman24 (talk) 17:33, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Central Business District

Your attention is called to the addition of this display to the article on the Central Business District, Los Angeles (1880s-1890s). Do you have any feelings, for or against? Discussion should take place on that article's Talk page. Thanks. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 05:19, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Labyrinth: The War on Terror, 2001 – ? (October 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Labyrinth: The War on Terror, 2001 – ? and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Labyrinth: The War on Terror, 2001 – ?, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Bilorv (talk) 23:43, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, DocFreeman24! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Bilorv (talk) 23:43, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Labyrinth: The War on Terror, 2001 – ? has been accepted

Labyrinth: The War on Terror, 2001 – ?, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 01:28, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of FC Rapid București strip for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FC Rapid București strip is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FC Rapid București strip until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 11:45, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Beach Buggy Racing.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Beach Buggy Racing.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

• Thanks for flagging. I tagged for speedy delete as I think this image ended up not being the correct one for the article I was working on but I forgot to remove. DocFreeman24 (talk) 00:01, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Blood of Steel.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Blood of Steel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

• Thanks. I can speedy delete as the image did not end up being needed. DocFreeman24 (talk) 23:30, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

~Swarm~ ^{sting} 02:12, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Acceptance of unreferenced pending change

Hello. You accepted a pending change at Libertarian Party (United States) that changed Jorgensen's popular vote total to a number higher than the one in the cited source. The editor that added it has been trying to edit-war it in and they are the reason the page is now PC-protected. Please be careful in verifying the correctness of pending changes before accepting them. Thanks. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 05:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Tartan357:. Initially, let me start off by apologizing that I didn't spot that. I reviewed the edit and it is a relatively small change in vote totals and is in close proximity to a source. So it did not appear to be the sort of edit that is, what I understand to be, the focus of the pending changes review process (i.e., vandalism, BLP issues, copyright violations, patent nonsense, or legal threats/libel) per Wikipedia:Reviewing_pending_changes#Reviewing_process. In any event, I'm sorry to have waded into this edit war and will try to get a better sense for the context of edits going forward so that this sort of thing doesn't happen again. DocFreeman24 (talk) 05:56, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

DocFreeman24, no problem, it's an understandable response. Thanks for your reply. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 07:32, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Personally, I disagreed with the admin's decision to use PC-protection instead of semi-protection to address this issue, for exactly the reasons you brought up. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 07:39, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)