User talk:Dodger67/Archive 21
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Dodger67. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 15 | ← | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | → | Archive 25 |
Thank you!
Thank you for approving my draft. 38.142.24.194 (talk) 18:12, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Interestingly enough, I already have an account that could have created this page on my own. However, I was editing from a network whose security I wasn't sure about, so I didn't log in. I didn't mind using AFC because I have never created an article (even a disambiguation page), so I wanted it to be reviewed. 38.142.24.194 (talk) 18:15, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.
Religion/Russia
Hey there, i wanted to ask you to look again at my request for a change in the article about religion in Russia i made like 3 months ago. I actually think we agree substantively on the subject and could improve the wording of the article. Thank you in advance. Icarusatthesun (talk) 16:42, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
- Icarusatthesun could you point me to a diff or discussion? Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 20:03, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
- Roger (Dodger67) Excuse me. Just wanted to check again if you think its worth to revive my edit request again. Sadly I am not that savy and active in Wikipedia. Icarusatthesun (talk) 01:09, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Icarusatthesun Sorry to be so slow. I think you could simply go ahead and remove the implied connection between Judaism and Bolshevism. The old discussion is enough reason to do so. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:01, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.13 18 September 2018
Hello Dodger67, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.
- Project news
- The New Page Feed now has a new "Articles for Creation" option which will show drafts instead of articles in the feed, this shouldn't impact NPP activities and is part of the WMF's AfC Improvement Project.
- As part of this project, the feed will have some larger updates to functionality next month. Specifically, ORES predictions will be built in, which will automatically flag articles for potential issues such as vandalism or spam. Copyright violation detection will also be added to the new page feed. See the projects's talk page for more info.
- There are a number of coordination tasks for New Page Patrol that could use some help from experienced reviewers. See Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Coordination#Coordinator tasks for more info to see if you can help out.
- Other
- A new summary page of reliable sources has been created; Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources/Perennial sources, which summarizes existing RfCs or RSN discussions about regularly used sources.
- Moving to Draft and Page Mover
- Some unsuitable new articles can be best reviewed by moving them to the draft space, but reviewers need to do this carefully and sparingly. It is most useful for topics that look like they might have promise, but where the article as written would be unlikely to survive AfD. If the article can be easily fixed, or if the only issue is a lack of sourcing that is easily accessible, tagging or adding sources yourself is preferable. If sources do not appear to be available and the topic does not appear to be notable, tagging for deletion is preferable (PROD/AfD/CSD as appropriate). See additional guidance at WP:DRAFTIFY.
- If the user moves the draft back to mainspace, or recreates it in mainspace, please do not re-draftify the article (although swapping it to maintain the page history may be advisable in the case of copy-paste moves). AfC is optional except for editors with a clear conflict of interest.
- Articles that have been created in contravention of our paid-editing-requirements or written from a blatant NPOV perspective, or by authors with a clear COI might also be draftified at discretion.
- The best tool for draftification is User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js(info). Kindly adapt the text in the dialogue-pop-up as necessary (the default can also be changed like this). Note that if you do not have the Page Mover userright, the redirect from main will be automatically tagged as CSD R2, but in some cases it might be better to make this a redirect to a different page instead.
- The Page Mover userright can be useful for New Page Reviewers; occasionally page swapping is needed during NPR activities, and it helps avoid excessive R2 nominations which must be processed by admins. Note that the Page Mover userright has higher requirements than the NPR userright, and is generally given to users active at Requested Moves. Only reviewers who are very experienced and are also very active reviewers are likely to be granted it solely for NPP activities.
List of other useful scripts for New Page Reviewing
|
|---|
|
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
KankP (talk) 06:56, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Dodger67 - I am a new Wikipedia editor and have made a contribution recently (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dr._Omkar_Rai). I think this contribution is notable enough as this is widely covered and not just passing mentions.
Please have a look and suggest me if you see any improvement to help me make my contribution worthy for wikipedia.
Looking forward to learn and contribute. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KankP (talk • contribs) 06:49, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Question about edits
Hi Dodger67! Thanks for your notes! Just wanted to ask how I could make this entry better for the wikipedia community. All statements were referenced with 3rd party sources, is there any suggestions you have for my entry for Hugo Uys? Let me know. Thanks! Nnduwadi (talk) 01:20, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Dear Dodger, I have checked the references and added some new ones. This list is of course not ment as independent phenomenon but an addition to the List of airliner shootdown incidents as is explained in the introduction. What do you say about the revised draft?. Otto (talk) 22:01, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Otto ter Haar If it's meant to be part of the other article then add it there. I don't see any justification for it to exist as a separate article as it's not a notable topic in its own right. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:01, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Roger, Attacks on civil aviation are notable because if it happens it gets Significant coverage in the media for obvious reasons. Millions of people use civil aviation and rely on its safety. I have referenced to the coverage in the media in the references I provided.
- My first choice was too to add it to the List of airliner shootdown incidents. In fact most incidents were listed there in a separate paragraph (see history). Other users in majority decided to delete Near misses because it doesn't fit the name of the article (see talk page). Otto (talk) 21:03, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- Otto ter Haar the problem is that "near misses" is itself not a subject that can sustain a seperate article. Individual incidents do get coverage that give them notability but the subject "near misses" as such do not. There simply are no sources that discuss such misses as a topic in itself. Imho at best the various articles about such individual incidents might be grouped in a category. I think you might do well to discuss the issue at WP:WikiProject Aviation for further opinions whether such an article could exist. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:29, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- The obvious solution should be to rename the article List of airliner shootdown incidents into List of attacks with gunfire or missiles on civil aviation. For unknown reasons some vocal editors refuse to discuss that and removed all near misses from the list. In these circumstances I see a separate article to supplement the incomplete original one as the right solution. I can add a template which suggests to merge both articles to the suplementary one. Otto (talk) 12:09, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
A barnstar for you
|
Teahouse Barnstar |
| This is for your valuable contributions related to teahouse. PATH SLOPU (Talk) 13:48, 22 September 2018 (UTC) |
Have your say!
Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
October 2018 at Women in Red
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:46, 28 September 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
South African Special Forces
The R1 is a licenced copy of the FN FAL.
A "lightweight" variant of the FN FAL with a folding butt is a R2, and a model designed for police use not capable of automatic fire is the R3.
TrojanHawk99 (talk) 22:16, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
- And your point is? Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 15:12, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Recent edit
About this edit, you cite [[WP:POINT ]] but didn't state in which way is related with my edits. The article has a section on Marxist feminist critical theory and I thought that the subject is not a mainstream view. Maybe I'm wrong so an elaboration on this would be helpful to future edits. Rupert Loup (talk) 12:10, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to the Months of African Cinema!
.svg)
Greetings!
The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which has been dedicated to improving contents that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.
This is a global online edit-a-thon, which is happening in at least 5 language editions of Wikipedia, including the English Wikipedia! Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section, if you haven't done so already.
On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing Users who are able to achieve the following:
- Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
- Country Winners
- Diversity winner
- High quality contributors
- Gender-gap fillers
- Page improvers
- Wikidata Translators
For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:50, 03 October 2018 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – October 2018
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2018).
Administrator changes
Justlettersandnumbers • L235
Bgwhite • HorsePunchKid • J Greb • KillerChihuahua • Rami R • Winhunter
Interface administrator changes
- Cyberpower678 • Deryck Chan • Oshwah • Pharos • Ragesoss • Ritchie333
Oversight changes
- Guerillero • NativeForeigner • Snowolf • Xeno
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, the process for appointing interface administrators has been established. Currently only existing admins can request these rights, while a new RfC has begun on whether it should be available to non-admins.
- There is an open request for comment on Meta regarding the creation a new user group for global edit filter management.
Technical news
- Partial blocks should be available for testing in October on the Test Wikipedia and the Beta-Cluster. This new feature allows admins to block users from editing specific pages and in the near-future, namespaces and uploading files. You can expect more updates and an invitation to help with testing once it is available.
- The Foundations' Anti-Harassment Tools team is currently looking for input on how to measure the effectiveness of blocks. This is in particular related to how they will measure the success of the aforementioned partial blocks.
- Because of a data centre test, you will be able to read but not edit the Wikimedia projects for up to an hour on 10 October. This will start at 14:00 (UTC). You might lose edits if you try to save during this time.
Arbitration
- The Arbitration Committee has, by motion, amended the procedure on functionary inactivity.
- The community consultation for 2018 CheckUser and Oversight appointments has concluded. Appointments will be made by October 11.
- Following a request for comment, the size of the Arbitration Committee will be decreased to 13 arbitrators, starting in 2019. Additionally, the minimum support percentage required to be appointed to a two-year term on ArbCom has been increased to 60%. ArbCom candidates who receive between 50% and 60% support will be appointed to one-year terms instead.
- Nominations for the 2018 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission are being accepted until 12 October. These are the editors who help run the ArbCom election smoothly. If you are interested in volunteering for this role, please consider nominating yourself.
Trivia
Sorry if I've already mentioned this at some time in the past. I have a short memory. :) The sportswriter Tom Meany once wrote a book called The Artful Dodgers.[2] Not necessarily suggesting you should buy it. Just FYI. :) ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 00:32, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
Get ready for November with Women in Red!
|
Continuing: | ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Thanks
Dear Dodger
Thanks so much for your welcome message.
I had no idea we were not allowed to link books associated with people in the pubic eye, and will avoid doing so in future.
I often follow up book references from wikipedia, so I can see others like literary references, too.
Kind regards
Mauve Peace — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mauve Peace (talk • contribs) 18:38, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
- Hi again Mauve Peace the point is not to link to a book seller in a reference. You cite the book itself by providing bibliographic details in the reference; author, editor, title, year, publisher, page(s), and for books published since the 1970s please include the ISBN if it's available. The Referencing for beginners guide has further good advice. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:34, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello Dodger67, I was hoping you could take a look again at the draft that I submitted for re-review after making a few changes to it. Thank you in advance. Triplep3 (talk) 12:15, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Triplep3 I've asked for subject specialist help from WP:WikiProject Software. -- Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:24, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Great, thanks for the update! -- Triplep3 (talk) 08:51, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.14 21 October 2018
|
Hello Dodger67, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
- Backlog
As of 21 October 2018[update], there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.
- Community Wishlist Proposal
- There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding the drafting of a Community Wishlist Proposal for the purpose of requesting bug fixes and missing/useful features to be added to the New Page Feed and Curation Toolbar.
- Please join the conversation as we only have until 29 October to draft this proposal!
- Project updates
- ORES predictions are now built-in to the feed. These automatically predict the class of an article as well as whether it may be spam, vandalism, or an attack page, and can be filtered by these criteria now allowing reviewers to better target articles that they prefer to review.
- There are now tools being tested to automatically detect copyright violations in the feed. This detector may not be accurate all the time, though, so it shouldn't be relied on 100% and will only start working on new revisions to pages, not older pages in the backlog.
- New scripts
- User:Enterprisey/cv-revdel.js(info) — A new script created for quickly placing {{copyvio-revdel}} on a page.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 20:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Health and Appearance of Michael Jackson
I left a comment on the Talk Page regarding your edit. I have nothing to add, but maybe you want to read it. Quaffel (talk) 15:23, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 18:10, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 20:59, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 21:32, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 22:23, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 23:28, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 00:01, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello there, I noticed that my artist page was deleted due to Unambiguous advertising or promotion I would like to know if it can be fixed or the issue could be resolved if not what's the appropriate way for an artist to get a wikipedia page and I'm willing to step down and let go of all the promotion content. Thank You! waiting for the response
11/1/2018 — Preceding unsigned comment added by The VoV (talk • contribs) 10:11, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Convert's Cognitive Development Framework for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Convert's Cognitive Development Framework is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Convert's Cognitive Development Framework until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed, Rosguill talk 06:02, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2018
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2018).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment determined that non-administrators will not be able to request interface admin access.
- A request for comment is in progress to determine whether the Mediation Committee should be closed and marked as historical.
- A village pump discussion has been ongoing about whether the proposed deletion policy (PROD) should be clarified or amended.
- A request for comment is in progress to determine whether pending changes protection should be applied automatically to today's featured article (TFA) in order to mitigate a recent trend of severe image vandalism.
Technical news
- Partial blocks is now available for testing on the Test Wikipedia. The new functionality allows you to block users from editing specific pages. Bugs may exist and can be reported on the local talk page or on Meta. A discussion regarding deployment to English Wikipedia will be started by community liaisons sometime in the near future.
- A user script is now available to quickly review unblock requests.
- The 2019 Community Wishlist Survey is now accepting new proposals until November 11, 2018. The results of this survey will determine what software the Wikimedia Foundation's Community Tech team will work on next year. Voting on the proposals will take place from November 16 to November 30, 2018. Specifically, there is a proposal category for admins and stewards that may be of interest.
Arbitration
- Eligible editors will be invited to nominate themselves as candidates in the 2018 Arbitration Committee Elections starting on November 4 until November 13. Voting will begin on November 19 and last until December 2.
- The Arbitration Committee's email address has changed to arbcom-en
wikimedia.org. Other email lists, such as functionaries-en and clerks-l, remain unchanged.
William R. Smith, MD
Hi Dodger,
Thanks for editing my William R. Smith, MD submission. It is my first time writing a Wiki page. Do I need to follow up with you? Is it OK that there are multiple William R. Smiths? I used MD to distinguish this page. When can I expect to hear back on whether or not it was approved?
Regards, Julie Kling (talk) 17:14, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.15 16 November 2018
Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months. |
Hello Dodger67,
- Community Wishlist Survey – NPP needs you – Vote NOW
- Community Wishlist Voting takes place 16 to 30 November for the Page Curation and New Pages Feed improvements, and other software requests. The NPP community is hoping for a good turnout in support of the requests to Santa for the tools we need. This is very important as we have been asking the Foundation for these upgrades for 4 years.
- If this proposal does not make it into the top ten, it is likely that the tools will be given no support at all for the foreseeable future. So please put in a vote today.
- We are counting on significant support not only from our own ranks, but from everyone who is concerned with maintaining a Wikipedia that is free of vandalism, promotion, flagrant financial exploitation and other pollution.
- With all 650 reviewers voting for these urgently needed improvements, our requests would be unlikely to fail. See also The Signpost Special report: 'NPP: This could be heaven or this could be hell for new users – and for the reviewers', and if you are not sure what the wish list is all about, take a sneak peek at an article in this month's upcoming issue of The Signpost which unfortunately due to staff holidays and an impending US holiday will probably not be published until after voting has closed.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)18:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Msl
Please update the scorecards properly and completely. If you don't want to you don't have to edit at all. It's disappointing considering you are an administrator. Human (talk) 13:08, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- A Simple Human, I'm doing it at the pace I can manage, most of those edits are done on a phone, so it takes a little while. See WP:NOTNEWS and WP:DEADLINE. My being an admin is of no relevance at all, simple editing is not an administrative action. Please assume good faith and maintain a civil tone when communicating with fellow editors, we are all volunteers doing what we can to improve Wikipedia. Remember it's a hobby, not a job. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:22, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
I edit entirely using my phone and I know it's a hobby but still editing properly is a good thing to do. And as far as I remember I did assume good faith and maintained a civil tone. Human (talk) 13:31, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Dodger67. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Dodger67. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello Dodger67. I noticed your name in the history of this page. This is now well-formatted and it seems like a normal article. I'm wondering if it has missed any of the required phases of AFC review? Can you say whether it still needs to be submitted somewhere else, or should it be considered for main space? Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 03:06, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- Hi EdJohnston, it is correctly submitted and waiting for a review. The backlog has apparently come down quite a bit in recent weeks, so the wait will hopefully be quite short. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 05:51, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
MSL points table
Make the point table as a separate section. This has been implied to all other cricket leagues around the world. Human (talk) 18:51, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
- A Simple Human Good idea, do you think it should go before or after the match summaries? Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:17, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
I need your help
Hi! can you please check out this Florian Munteanu case. I've seen plenty of pages here on Wikipedia with actors who played a single role in a movie. I don't understand why some people complain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4F8:1C17:404A:0:0:0:1 (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
December 2018 at Women in Red
|
Continuing: | ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
Nominations now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards
Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – December 2018
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2018).
Administrator changes
Al Ameer son • Randykitty • Spartaz- Boson • Daniel J. Leivick • Efe • Esanchez7587 • Fred Bauder • Garzo • Martijn Hoekstra • Orangemike
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, the Mediation Committee is now closed and will no longer be accepting case requests.
- A request for comment is in progress to determine whether members of the Bot Approvals Group should satisfy activity requirements in order to remain in that role.
- A request for comment is in progress regarding whether to change the administrator inactivity policy, such that administrators "who have made no logged administrative actions for at least 12 months may be desysopped". Currently, the policy states that administrators "who have made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least 12 months may be desysopped".
- A proposal has been made to temporarily restrict editing of the Main Page to interface administrators in order to mitigate the impact of compromised accounts.
Technical news
- Administrators and bureaucrats can no longer unblock themselves unless they placed the block initially. This change has been implemented globally. See also this ongoing village pump discussion (permalink).
- To complement the aforementioned change, blocked administrators will soon have the ability to block the administrator that placed their block to mitigate the possibility of a compromised administrator account blocking all other active administrators.
- Since deployment of Partial blocks on Test Wikipedia, several bugs were identified. Most of them are now fixed. Administrators are encouraged to test the new deployment and report new bugs on Phabricator or leave feedback on the Project's talk page. You can request administrator access on the Test Wiki here.
Arbitration
- Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee Elections is open to eligible editors until Monday 23:59, 3 December 2018. Please review the candidates and, if you wish to do so, submit your choices on the voting page.
Miscellaneous
- In late November, an attacker compromised multiple accounts, including at least four administrator accounts, and used them to vandalize Wikipedia. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately. Sharing the same password across multiple websites makes your account vulnerable, especially if your password was used on a website that suffered a data breach. As these incidents have shown, these concerns are not pure fantasies.
- Wikipedia policy requires administrators to have strong passwords. To further reinforce security, administrators should also consider enabling two-factor authentication. A committed identity can be used to verify that you are the true account owner in the event that your account is compromised and/or you are unable to log in.
Obituaries
- Shock Brigade Harvester Boris (Raymond Arritt) passed away on 14 November 2018. Boris joined Wikipedia as Raymond arritt on 8 May 2006 and was an administrator from 30 July 2007 to 2 June 2008.
Hi, your name's cropped up time to time on the page or talk page of black mamba. I've been trying to spruce it up for FA-hood and have found cleanup quite a bit more onerous t han starting from scratch. All input on how it reads, more context,less context etc. see Wikipedia:Peer review/Black mamba/archive2 - appreciated. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:54, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.16 15 December 2018
Hello Dodger67,
- Reviewer of the Year
This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to Onel5969. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554 reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285 edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.
- Thanks are also extended for their work to JTtheOG (15,059 reviews), Boleyn (12,760 reviews), Cwmhiraeth (9,001 reviews), Semmendinger (8,440 reviews), PRehse (8,092 reviews), Arthistorian1977 (5,306 reviews), Abishe (4,153 reviews), Barkeep49 (4,016 reviews), and Elmidae (3,615 reviews).
Cwmhiraeth, Semmendinger, Barkeep49, and Elmidae have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only seven months, while Boleyn, with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.
See also the list of top 100 reviewers.
- Less good news, and an appeal for some help
The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640 holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.
- Really good news - NPR wins the Community Wishlist Survey 2019
At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3 December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.
- Training video
Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minute video was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Voting now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards
Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:17, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 13
This month: A general update.
The current status of the project is as follows:
- Progress of the project has been generally delayed since September due to development issues (more bitrot than expected, some of the code just being genuinely confusing, etc) and personal injury (I suffered a concussion in October and was out of commission for almost two months as a result).
- I currently expect to be putting out a proper call for CollaborationKit pilots in January/February, with estimated deployment in February/March if things don't go horribly wrong (they will, though, don't worry). As a part of that, I will properly update the page and send out announcement and reach out to all projects already signed up as pilots for WikiProject X in general, at which point those (still) interested can volunteer specifically to test the CollaborationKit extension.
- Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Pilots was originally created for the first WikiProject X prototype, and given this is where the project has since gone, it's only logical to continue to use it. While I haven't yet updated the page to properly reflect this:
- If you want to add your project to this page now, feel free. Just bear in mind that more information what to actually expect will be added later/included in the announcement, because by then I will have a much better idea myself.
- Until then, you can find me in my corner working on making the CollaborationKit code do what we want and not just what we told it, per the workboard.
Until next time,
January 2019 at Women in Red
|
 January events:
|
More than ambiguous
One word with different meanings is a homonym (or equivocal).
Ambiguity that depends on the meanings of individual words or expressions (e. g., "time flies like an arrow") is semantic ambiguity. "Flies" can mean either the noun or the verb, and "like" is either the verb or the adjective, the expression having four possible meanings.
Syntactic ambiguity, sometimes called amphiboly, depends on the structure of the sentence or expression, the individual words being unambiguous. In "Jack hits James and Jill hit him", "him" depends not on the meaning of "him" but on who is being referred to; it has ambiguity of reference. Similarly, in "little girls' camp", either the girls or the camp may be little.
"Pretty cold weather" is mixed, "pretty" is semantically ambiguous and can mean either the adjective or the adverb, which results in a syntactic ambiguity between qualifying "cold" or "weather".
Pragmatic ambiguity depends on the intended effects of a sentence, e. g. "You're a fine fellow!" can be meant either sincerely or sarcastically, implying the opposite of the said. Rhetorical devices (apophasis, antiphrasis) make use of this. --212.186.133.83 (talk) 06:31, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Yoco
Hello, i created an article about Yoco, a Cape Town based company . I think it meets criteria of notabilty to be in Wikipedia, but it was unfortunately put as article for deletion. Can you please give your opinion as an experienced contributor in South-Africa related articles? Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yoco Technologies Thank you in advance. MathieuPaul1977 (talk) 08:54, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2018).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- There are a number of new or changed speedy deletion criteria, each previously part of WP:CSD#G6:
- G14 (new): Disambiguation pages that disambiguate only zero or one existing pages are now covered under the new G14 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-disambig}}; the text is unchanged and candidates may be found in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as unnecessary disambiguation pages.
- R4 (new): Redirects in the file namespace (and no file links) that have the same name as a file or redirect at Commons are now covered under the new R4 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-redircom}}; the text is unchanged.
- G13 (expanded): Userspace drafts containing only the default Article Wizard text are now covered under G13 along with other drafts (discussion). Such blank drafts are now eligible after six months rather than one year, and taggers continue to use {{db-blankdraft}}.
- The Wikimedia Foundation now requires all interface administrators to enable two-factor authentication.
- Members of the Bot Approvals Group (BAG) are now subject to an activity requirement. After two years without any bot-related activity (e.g. operating a bot, posting on a bot-related talk page), BAG members will be retired from BAG following a one-week notice.
Technical news
- Starting on December 13, the Wikimedia Foundation security team implemented new password policy and requirements. Privileged accounts (administrators, bureaucrats, checkusers, oversighters, interface administrators, bots, edit filter managers/helpers, template editors, et al.) must have a password at least 10 characters in length. All accounts must have a password:
- At least 8 characters in length
- Not in the 100,000 most popular passwords (defined by the Password Blacklist library)
- Different from their username
- User accounts not meeting these requirements will be prompted to update their password accordingly. More information is available on MediaWiki.org.
- Blocked administrators may now block the administrator that blocked them. This was done to mitigate the possibility that a compromised administrator account would block all other active administrators, complementing the removal of the ability to unblock oneself outside of self-imposed blocks. A request for comment is currently in progress to determine whether the blocking policy should be updated regarding this change.
- {{Copyvio-revdel}} now has a link to open the history with the RevDel checkboxes already filled in.
Arbitration
- Following the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: AGK, Courcelles, GorillaWarfare, Joe Roe, Mkdw, SilkTork.
Miscellaneous
- Accounts continue to be compromised on a regular basis. Evidence shows this is entirely due to the accounts having the same password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately.
- Around 22% of admins have enabled two-factor authentication, up from 20% in June 2018. If you haven't already enabled it, please consider doing so. Regardless of whether you use 2FA, please practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.
Remove KHOE languages Edits
Hello. Why are you removing my edits to the page. These are verifiable content. Toroxa (talk) 20:49, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
February 2019 at Women in Red
|
 February events:
|
Indeed the RSA Conference Award and the RSA Conference are separate and should stay separate
The award committee for the RSA Conference Award for Excellence in Mathematics is an experts cryptographers committee associated with the CT-RSA (Cryptographers' track). The award, by now, is over 20 years old and is perhaps the top award in Cryptography research. Many of the award winners moved on to get higher awards (Turing Award, ACM Award in Computing, and so on). It should not be merged with the conference since in case the conference changes (it is a commercial industry entity) and may want to discontinue the award, then the CT-RSA conference series most likely will continue and the IACR most likely will take over the award (IACR may also be interested to co-sponsor the award as well).
Thanks!Marcelju— (talk) 18:13, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Marcelju, both articles are rather brief with little depth and detail. Perhaps you could assist to expand them, I presume you might have access to further sources. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 22:26, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
The goal is to extend the entry. If you follow the entries of winners who got the award you can see that they are supper important cryptographers and there is a lot of content about them. Conflating the entire COMMERCIAL RSA Conference with the SCIENTIFIC AWARD is not the best way to highlight the content in this entry. There are not too many awards dedicated to scientific cryptography (IACR fellows is another entry of this nature), while the area itself is of an increasingly important nature (like TLS on the Internet and in smart phones, there are billion and even trillion transactions per day involving cryptography, some of the winners have contributed to). Also the award nature may change over the years not in sync with the conference itself, so it should not be just part of the conference itself (The IACR crypto organization may co-sponsor it in the future, etc.) In any event, more material is available regarding the award since this is just the initial entry (I wanted it to be accepted first before extension). Thanks! Marcelju (talk) 13:11, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Two years! |
|---|
Traka Page
Hi
Apologies I am updating a page (Traka) for the first time on Wikipedia and noted your suggestion to delete the updates due to non compliance with G11?
Forgive my ignorance but please could you clarify what this means so I can look to correct?
Thanks
Lydia — Preceding unsigned comment added by LydiaFionaLewis (talk • contribs) 21:00, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Hi LydiaFionaLewis, you've slightly misunderstood. I have nominated the article "as a whole″ to possibly be deleted or dealt with in any other apropriate manner. The reason I nominated it is that it currently has no sources at all (it never had any acceptable ones) and reads like a company brochure (see WP:PROMO). The discussion will occur at WP:Articles for deletion/Traka and will continue for at least one full week (unless the outcome becomes really obviously clear earlier). You are absolutely welcome to participate in the discussion. Your arguments in the debate must be grounded in Wikipedia's policies and rules, external condiderations are disregarded. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 21:21, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2019).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment is currently open to reevaluate the activity requirements for administrators.
- Administrators who are blocked have the technical ability to block the administrator who blocked their own account. A recent request for comment has amended the blocking policy to clarify that this ability should only be used in exceptional circumstances, such as account compromises, where there is a clear and immediate need.
- A request for comment closed with a consensus in favor of deprecating The Sun as a permissible reference, and creating an edit filter to warn users who attempt to cite it.
Technical news
- A discussion regarding an overhaul of the format and appearance of Wikipedia:Requests for page protection is in progress (permalink). The proposed changes will make it easier to create requests for those who are not using Twinkle. The workflow for administrators at this venue will largely be unchanged. Additionally, there are plans to archive requests similar to how it is done at WP:PERM, where historical records are kept so that prior requests can more easily be searched for.
Miscellaneous
- Voting in the 2019 Steward elections will begin on 08 February 2019, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 28 February 2019, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- A new IRC bot is available that allows you to subscribe to notifications when specific filters are tripped. This requires that your IRC handle be identified.
March 2019 at Women in Red
|
   Please join us for these virtual events:
| ||
|
|
Your draft article, Draft:Saudi women in the arts
Hello, Dodger67. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Saudi women in the arts".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 11:42, 26 February 2019 (UTC)